More

Lipitor Tied To Diabetes Risk, More Evidence Shows

Lipitor Diabetes

First Posted: 03/29/11 02:53 PM ET Updated: 05/29/11 06:12 AM ET

People on a high-dose regimen of the cholesterol drug Lipitor may have a slightly increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes -- particularly if they have several of the classic diabetes risk factors, a study published Monday finds.

A number of studies have linked Lipitor (known generically as atorvastatin) and other cholesterol-lowering statin drugs to a small increase in users' risk of diabetes.

This latest study, based on data from three large clinical trials, strengthens evidence of a connection.

But it also suggests that the risk may largely exist among people who also have the well-known risk factors for type 2 diabetes -- including excess weight, high blood sugar, elevated triglycerides (a type of blood fat) and high blood pressure.

Those four factors appear "very good at distinguishing people at high or low risk for developing new-onset diabetes with atorvastatin," lead researcher Dr. David D. Waters, of the University of California at San Francisco, told Reuters Health in an email.

So managing those risk factors -- by shedding excess pounds, for example -- would be important for curbing any extra diabetes risk, Waters said.

He also stressed that the diabetes risk tied to statins is small.

"An important point," Waters said, "is that the risk of developing new-onset diabetes and its complications (is) greatly outweighed by the benefit of statins in reducing cardiac death, heart attack and stroke."

The findings, published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, are based on data from three clinical trials comparing high-dose atorvastatin (80 milligrams) with either a lower dose statin or placebo pills in people with cardiovascular disease.

In the trial with the placebo group, the study found, atorvastatin users had a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes over 5 years. Just under 9 percent did, versus 6 percent of the placebo group.

That trial included 3,800 adults who were diabetes-free at the outset; all had a history of stroke or "mini" strokes known as transient ischemic attacks.

When Waters and his colleagues accounted for a number of other factors -- like age, weight and smoking habits -- atorvastatin use was linked to a 37 percent increase in the odds of developing diabetes, versus the placebo.

But a closer look showed that the extra risk appeared limited to patients with at least two of the "big-four" risk factors for diabetes.

Of patients with all four risk factors, nearly half of atorvastatin users -- 26 of 56 -- developed diabetes, versus just over 20 percent of the placebo group (11 of 52 participants).

Waters' team found no strong connection between high-dose atorvastatin and diabetes risk in the other two trials.

In one, researchers compared 80 mg of atorvastatin against 20 mg of simvastatin (Zocor) in nearly 7,500 heart attack sufferers who were free of diabetes. Over 5 years, 6.4 percent of atorvastatin users developed diabetes, as did 5.6 percent of simvastatin users.

The third trial compared high-dose atorvastatin against a 10 mg dose of the drug in people with stable heart disease. Of the 7,600 who were free of diabetes to start, 9 percent in the high-dose group and 8 percent in the low-dose group developed diabetes over 5 years.

Statins are not the only drugs that have been linked to diabetes risk. Certain high blood pressure treatments (beta-blockers and thiazide diuretics), niacin (sometimes used to lower cholesterol and triglycerides) and glucocorticoids are among the others.

In most of those cases, the reason for the risk appears to be the drugs' effect on the body's ability to control blood sugar.

In contrast, it's not yet clear why statins would contribute to diabetes, Waters said.

He and his colleagues suggest that doctors might want to carefully monitor atorvastatin users for diabetes. But, they write, the benefits of the drug "clearly outweigh" the risks for people with heart disease or a history of stroke.

People without heart disease or prior stroke may be able to first try diet changes and exercise alone for lowering their cholesterol.

Waters and other researchers on the study have financial ties to Lipitor-maker Pfizer Inc. as well as other drug companies. Three co-researchers are Pfizer employees.

SOURCE: bit.ly/d1cHYE Journal of the American College of Cardiology, online March 28, 2011.

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

People on a high-dose regimen of the cholesterol drug Lipitor may have a slightly increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes -- particularly if they have several of the classic diabetes risk facto...
People on a high-dose regimen of the cholesterol drug Lipitor may have a slightly increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes -- particularly if they have several of the classic diabetes risk facto...
Filed by Nicholas Miriello  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 113
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dustin Rudolph
Clinical Pharmacist & Certified Nutritionist
07:09 PM on 03/31/2011
As a pharmacist I see no effective way to truly tackle type 2 diabetes that includes oral meds or insulin. Also if someone is on Lipitor for high cholesterol then it has the same cause as type 2 diabetes - the foods we eat and a sedentary lifestyle. There's a lot that can be done about diabetes and high cholesterol - http://fb.me/Dgy5fNCc
09:39 AM on 03/31/2011
Most often the things we never see are in front of us all the time. We all have a part of ourselves that is always there within us and always escaping our attention. This part of who we are, always hidden in plain sight, is the ability to foresee future changes in our mind-bodies as unintended consequences of our behaviors. Therefore, once you read “Health Secrets from the Seventh Heaven” you will realize that the solutions to your existing or potential health problems are so close to you that all you need to do is to become aware of them. More at http://moshesharon.wordpress.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimmy 61762
01:44 PM on 03/30/2011
I had a reaction to lipitor after taking it for a few years.My blood test showed no abnormalities and I just happened to run out of it and the problem went away.I told my doc and he switched me to simvastatin.He told me that many of his lipitor patients had problems.My reaction was that I had sore joints and flu like symptoms.Never had the problem since.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimmy 61762
01:39 PM on 03/30/2011
I
11:31 AM on 03/30/2011
Good for some things bad for others. Http://www.diabeticcareguide.info I'm not proud to say I haven't been to a Doctor in a while, but I'm not on a TON of meds that will mess me up either!
10:53 AM on 03/30/2011
Maybe it's because people taking Lipitor are typically advised by their physicians to embrace the low fat (and thus high carb) diet that is the ticket to adult onset diabetes.

Just a thought...
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
06:24 AM on 03/30/2011
How to control for the `I'm on statins so I can keep eating the coronary-on-a-plate diet' factor?
photo
crydespite
oh go on then
06:11 AM on 03/30/2011
Headline above the article: Lipitor tied to diabetes risk

Reality within the article: "the risk of developing new-onset diabetes and its complications (is) greatly outweighed by the benefit of statins in reducing cardiac death, heart attack and stroke."
09:53 AM on 03/30/2011
Little more from the article: 'But, they write, the benefits of the drug "clearly outweigh" the risks for people with heart disease or a history of stroke........Waters and other researchers on the study have financial ties to Lipitor-maker Pfizer Inc. as well as other drug companies."

Two recent and perhaps less conflicted studies "Do statins have a role in primary prevention? An update.
Therapeutics Letter Issue 77 / Mar - Apr 2010" '......Statins do not have a proven net health benefit in primary prevention populations ...."

The prestigious Cochrane review came to a similar conclusion....."Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease"

Taylor F, Ward K, Moore THM, Burke M, Davey Smith G, Casas J-P, Ebrahim S

"Only limited evidence showed that primary prevention with statins may be cost effective and improve patient quality of life. Caution should be taken in prescribing statins for primary prevention among people at low cardiovascular risk......"
photo
crydespite
oh go on then
05:22 AM on 03/31/2011
that's a fair cop. my quibble was with the comparison between the headline and the article, not the accuracy of, well, either of them!
photo
froidytoidy
Underwhelmed Independent
11:42 PM on 03/29/2011
"MONDAY, March 28 -- More than half of the nearly 500 writers and reviewers of recent cardiology clinical practice guidelines reported a conflict of interest due to ties with drug makers and other companies, a new study finds...

http://www.drugs.com/news/conflicts-interest-cloud-heart-guidelines-study-30399.html

How are we, as consumers, supposed to believe anything as it relates to medication and the heart?
02:07 AM on 03/30/2011
That's easy- if you don't believe anything you hear about heart meds from the pharmaceutical industry, simply don't use their products. Don't use Lipitor, don't use Zocor- just stay away from statins altogether. No one will make you take these products. If you think you're better off without them, just don't use them.

As horrible as type II diabetes sounds to me, I'd much rather have it than a stroke. I'd certainly take statins if I had to, but I'll try to avoid having high serum cholesterol AND diabetes as best as I can for now. I don't suffer from "big pharma" paranoia though, and should the time come when I need heart meds or meds to control adult onset diabetes, I'll be greatful to the drug companies for all the work they do to help control and alleviate the health problems associated with those conditions.
photo
Husaria
Question all authority
07:43 AM on 03/30/2011
If you have type II diabetes you are at greater risk for stroke and heart disease. You cannot pick and choose what a disease or condition does to your body.

No one can be slightly pregnant and no one can have a ' touch ' of diabetes. You either have it or you do not. How you manage it will determine how well you live. Manage it poorly and you will suffer greatly.
photo
Husaria
Question all authority
07:44 AM on 03/30/2011
The USA. The only country that allows drug averts on TV.

What does that say about big pharma?
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
09:45 PM on 03/29/2011
One day people will realize that statin drugs do more harm then good.........but not until untold $billions have been made.
05:56 PM on 03/29/2011
Lowering your cholesterol will not add one day to your life. Some books on the subject are The Cholesterol Hoax by Sherry Rogers , The Great Cholesterol Con by Malcolm Kendrick, Statin Drugs by Duane Graveline.
photo
Husaria
Question all authority
07:45 AM on 03/30/2011
check out

www.westonaprice.org

They have been saying this for years
09:57 AM on 03/30/2011
That has been recently confirmed by several studies and reviews. Unfortunately most MDs. appear to get there training on this matter from television.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
05:09 PM on 03/29/2011
Biggest cash cow for Big Pharma these cholesterol pills.  Why then do they never eliminate the problem but once you take them forever.  Heard in the future HMOs won't fund the pills, guess they know why.  The problem is a bad diet, and groceries with the hydrogenated vegetable oil in it that sticks to the artery walls and does not dissolve.  Those fancy coffees in convenience stores, coffee creamers, etc.  are not mentioned.  If a doctor asks me about cholesterol level I find me a smarter one. 
03:32 AM on 03/30/2011
I think you answered your own question- people have to keep taking them if they refuse to change their diet. They can't eliminate the problem if people keep eating poorly. I don't believe that hydrogenated vegetable oil is high in cholesterol, though. However, it will -as you mentioned- clog your arteries and lead to heart problems.

There is a drug on the market that blocks the absorbtion of dietary fats into your bloodstream; I believe Roche released it several years back (maybe longer) you may remember the commercials that warned:

"Because XENICAL works by blocking the absorption of dietary fat, it is likely that you will experience some changes in bowel habits. These changes may include gas with oily discharge, an increased number of bowel movements, an urgent need to have them, and an inability to control them."

I don't believe it was ever a blockbuster drug, but boy did those side effects generate a lot of jokes. It still makes me chuckle today.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yoyo1900
04:50 PM on 03/29/2011
I have been taking Liptor for years now and have found that my blood sugar is rising slowly. Prior to this it has been normal. Is Liptor responsible for this?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
LisaViger
Vegan, Socialist, Atheist, Peace Monger
05:17 PM on 03/29/2011
Maybe, maybe not, yoyo. But if you look at the actual studies, there is very little evidence that Lipitor prevents heart disease or death from heart disease. So, if the drug does little or nothing beneficial, and may cause diabetes, that begs the question of why do people use it?
09:58 AM on 03/30/2011
Perhaps the power of advertising.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimmy 61762
01:49 PM on 03/30/2011
You could see a rise in blood sugar because you become less active as you get older.An increase of 20 points is not a big thing because a stick of gum or eating a carb could cause it.Its when you see a large increase that it rings a bell.
photo
gwinegarden
She's an Arctic Wolf
04:42 PM on 03/29/2011
Many people, with type 2 diabetes, like me, seem to be on a statin. My doctor told me that the "normal" numbers for diabetics need to be lower than for non-diabetics.
photo
SCboy
Dogs are people too.
04:15 PM on 03/29/2011
Do cholesterol drugs actually lower cholesterol or do they just somehow manipulate cholesterol numbers? The huge, quick drop in cholesterol numbers that I have heard of from some people just don't make sense. I mean, is it possible that a lifetime of cholesterol could be cut in half (or more) in 30 days?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
LisaViger
Vegan, Socialist, Atheist, Peace Monger
04:24 PM on 03/29/2011
It doesn't really matter, because statins do very little, if anything, to actually prevent heart attacks or stroke.

The only thing known to reverse and prevent heart disease is a whole foods vegan diet.
photo
SCboy
Dogs are people too.
04:33 PM on 03/29/2011
Well, I guess that's my point. Drug companies make hundreds of millions of dollars selling drugs that they say "lower cholesterol", and it makes people feel better to hear that their cholesterol numbers are lowered. But, there seems to be no research that shows a link between taking the drugs and reduced risk of heart attack, at least that I am aware of. Doesn't pass the smell test, imo.
05:04 PM on 03/29/2011
Prove it. There's plenty of evidence to the contrary that a strict vegan diet is very stressful on the human body because we have not evolved as herbivores. Also, many ailments, including heart disease are frequently a matter of genes.
04:14 AM on 03/30/2011
Yes, cholesterol drugs actually lower serum cholesterol. It doesn't matter if the person taking it has been eating a high cholesterol diet their entire life- it will still lower the LDL cholesterol levels in the blood. Of course, atherosclerosis caused by years of high levels of "bad cholesterol" is not undone by having low serum cholesterol, but it helps slow the progression of the disease.

Remember your blood gets filtered