NYR More

Indian State Bans Joseph Lelyveld's New Gandhi Book

New Gandhi Book

By ERIKA KINETZ   03/30/11 10:51 AM ET   AP

MUMBAI, India -- A state in western India banned Pulitzer-Prize winner Joseph Lelyveld's new book about Mahatma Gandhi on Wednesday after reviews saying it hints that the father of India's independence had a homosexual relationship. The author says his work is being misinterpreted.

More bans have been proposed in India, where homosexuality was illegal until 2009 and still carries social stigma.

Gujarat's state assembly voted unanimously Wednesday to immediately ban "Great Soul: Mahatma Gandhi and His Struggle With India."

The furor was sparked by local media reports, based on early reviews out of the U.S. and U.K., some of which emphasized passages in the book suggesting Gandhi had an intimate relationship with a German man named Hermann Kallenbach.

"Great Soul" has not yet been released in India, so few here have actually read Lelyveld's writings.

"The book does not say that Gandhi was bisexual or homosexual," Lelyveld wrote in an email. "It says that he was celibate and deeply attached to Kallenbach. This is not news."

He noted that his book – which is said is about Gandhi's struggle for social justice and the evolution of his social values – is available both in the U.S. and as an e-book download.

"It should not be hard for anyone to determine what it actually says," Lelyveld wrote. " 1/4 It's a pious hope, but I'd say someone might take the trouble to look at it before it's banned."

Several reviews of "Great Soul" detailed its sections on Gandhi's relationship with Kallenbach.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Andrew Roberts said that the only portrait on the mantelpiece opposite Gandhi's bed was of Kallenbach.

"How completely you have taken possession of my body," reads one widely quoted letter from Gandhi to Kallenbach. "This is slavery with a vengeance."

Britain's Daily Mail ran an article under the blaring headline: "Gandhi 'left his wife to live with a male lover' new book claims."

The Mumbai Mirror on Tuesday ran a front page story under the headline "Book claims German man was Gandhi's secret love," which quoted the same passages as Roberts.

Sudhir Kakar, a psychoanalyst who has written about Gandhi's sexuality and reviewed some of his correspondence with Kallenbach, said he does not believe the two men were lovers.

"It is quite a wrong interpretation," he said.

Gandhi's great goals were nonviolence, celibacy and truth, he said.

"The Hindu idea is that sexuality has this elemental energy which gets dissipated," Kakar said. "If it can be sublimated and contained it can give you spiritual power. Gandhi felt his political power really came from his celibacy, from his spiritual power."

He said Gandhi often filled his letters, including those to female associates, with strong love language, but that did not lead to physical intimacy.

"Nothing happened," he said. "He is telling his feelings, but they are platonic. They are not put into action. That would have been terrible for him."

Politicians in the state of Maharashtra, home to India's financial capital Mumbai, have also called for a ban on the book and, along with Gujarat's chief minister Narendra Modi, have asked the central government to bar publication nationwide.

Modi said Lelyveld should apologize publicly for "hurting the sentiments of millions of people."

"It has become a fashion to tarnish the image of great Indian leaders for self publicity and sale of books," said Sanjay Dutt, spokesman for the ruling Congress Party in Maharashtra. "The government should invoke a law to severely punish anyone who tarnishes the image of the father of the nation."

Ranjit Hoskote, a writer and general secretary of PEN India, which fights for free expression, condemned the ban and said local media had misconstrued both Lelyveld's intentions and the nature of Gandhi's relationship with Kallenbach.

"You can't cite a worse example of third hand reportage and comment," he said. "How can you ban a book you haven't read?"

He said Gandhi's correspondence with Kallenbach has been available in library archives for decades. "There's no secret. There is no scandal," he said.

___

Associated Press writers R.K. Misra in Ahmedabad and Aijaz Ansari in Mumbai contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BOOKS

MUMBAI, India -- A state in western India banned Pulitzer-Prize winner Joseph Lelyveld's new book about Mahatma Gandhi on Wednesday after reviews saying it hints that the father of India's independenc...
MUMBAI, India -- A state in western India banned Pulitzer-Prize winner Joseph Lelyveld's new book about Mahatma Gandhi on Wednesday after reviews saying it hints that the father of India's independenc...
Filed by Zoë Triska  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:32 AM on 05/04/2011
The New Yorker: Shouts & Murmurs. An imagined conversation between Gandhi and a gay guy:
So I ask him if he's come out to his parents,and he says, "Oh, no, they're all old-school Hindu and they wouldn't understand." So I say, "But wouldn't it be cool if you could do a campaign with a poster of your parents hugging you, and the poster could say, ' Staying in the Closet is a Hin-Don't'?" ...Of course, he eventually dumped me for this German-Jewish bodybuilder, and I warned him, I said, "Hello, been there, and I know that at first it sounds hot, but pretty soon it's all 'Nein, I can't stay out late, be cause I have to get up early for the gym' and 'Nein, we can't do your rally for South Africa, because we've go got my cousin's Seder, remember?'...
01:20 PM on 04/02/2011
Religious types do this with movies when they get the chance, too -- Life of Brian and The Last Testament of Christ being notorious examples.

I agree that the Indians pushing for a ban don't realize the value of the publicity they are thereby granting the author and the work. But that's partly because they don't realize homosexuality should not be something "damning." (In other societies, such rumors or "revelations" would be far less remarkable and so stir fewer sales.) And that's because they believe their society doesn't have a relaxed attitude toward sexual orientation, either. The politicians may may be perfectly correct in that.

If so, their attempt to ban is right on the right on the money -- for their society. Should the "accusations" prove true, or true enough to carry water, Gandhi would lose more credibility than he could possibly gain, and among a far broader swath of people than would ever read the book.

The problem is that by their actions, those wishing to enforce a ban grant the rumors status they would not ordinarily have and the book sales that it might not have had either. Their panic effectively proves the "accusations" true, a status they wouldn't have previously had. That doesn't control "damage," it simply trades one kind of "damage" for another.

Then there's that whole "freedom of the press" thing. But if it existed there, a banning would not be even now under discussion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Howard53545
05:26 AM on 04/01/2011
So they banned the book cause the authors says Gandhi was a girly man. Who cares, he dead, let em read the book.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skatoolaki
Passionate, fiery walking contradiction.
10:54 PM on 03/31/2011
On an entirely different note, Gandhiji's deep affection for this man has nothing to do with lust or love of the kind being protested here. When expressed in writing this way, his words are no different than the love poems of the 13th-century Persian poet Rumi or the King Solomon's "Song of Songs" in the Bible.

Love, expressed in this way, is positively pure and whether it is speaking of divine love (love of the Creator) or another human love (love of another person) is quite indistinguishable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skatoolaki
Passionate, fiery walking contradiction.
10:50 PM on 03/31/2011
First of all, even if the book was filled with salacious lies claiming an indecent relationship between Gandhiji and this man, banning it would be foolishly pointless. They say that even bad press is good press and, indeed, it's often much better. Banning a book does little besides stoke the curiosity of a public that may have, otherwise, had no interest in the subject and wouldn't have purchased it otherwise.

Secondly, the idea of banning something you have never read is patently absurd. I remember once reading a quote from an irate mother who was gunning for her child's school library to ban the Harry Potter books. When asked how she could consider banning a book she'd never read, which she had openly admitted was the case, she stated something along the lines of, "I don't need to read it to know that it's evil just like I don't need to watch a pornographic film to know it's dirty." Flawless logic, that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ajita Kamal
I'm a fluzlbuwlzum saint.
07:41 PM on 03/31/2011
Now the Indian government is considering making insulting Gandhi a crime. India is fast approaching the levels of intolerance of free-speech usually seen only in dictatorships.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChrisRoberts
Chris Roberts, God of Short Stories.
11:59 AM on 03/31/2011
Not much of an article.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:00 AM on 03/31/2011
the book doesn't say that he had a homosexual relationship. that is an interpretation some reviewers had of certain passages. our hyper masculine society has a hard time interpreting when males of other cultures express platonic love for each other. In american terms, he had a Bro-mance.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ajita Kamal
I'm a fluzlbuwlzum saint.
05:02 PM on 03/30/2011
This shows the bigotry of the Gujarati state govt and the people of India in general. Why should it matter to anyone that Gandhi might have been bisexual? There is a legitimate concern that the book raises- the prospect that Gandhi might have ha inappropriate relationships with underage girls including his niece. But instead of talking about that, everyone is up in arms about his alleged homosexual affair.
05:40 PM on 03/30/2011
Keep in mind that the state of Gujarat also bans alcohol as well...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
melchar
Stop the Genocide in Libya, Now!
10:35 PM on 03/30/2011
What legitimate concern? This is nothing more but cheap western Freudian pschology being applied inappropriately to a Hindu culture. You westerners always have to ruin everything with your irony, sarcasm and scepticism. Its like an illness. I think its good that Indians want nothing to do with it. Keep your sicknesses to yourself.
07:34 AM on 03/31/2011
Westerners weren't sleeping naked between women. Gandhi was an aberration and needs to be exposed for what he truly was.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ajita Kamal
I'm a fluzlbuwlzum saint.
07:29 PM on 03/31/2011
What nonsense. Firstly, I'm not a 'Westerner', and you do not have sole right to all things Indian. Secondly, instead of addressing the facts you attack me personally. This is typical of those who do not have any legitimate answers. Address the claims. It is your reluctance to even consider inappropriate the fact that an old man was sleeping with an underage girl that is the sickness.
03:26 PM on 03/30/2011
This is one Gandi book I won't be reading. I think Lelyveld knew the controversy he was alluding to tp bring a little spice to his book. Why bring up something like this at this time. Let us have our hero and allow Gandi to rest in peace. I hope the book flops because it deserves to in MMHO.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
brahdog
hello walls
09:05 PM on 03/30/2011
i know, heroes can't possibly homosexual or even a little homoerotic. nevar.
10:31 PM on 03/30/2011
I don't see why not. After all Alexander the great was but that was always known. This new rumor has no basis in my opinion. Heavens, I love my girlfriends but we're not lesbians and if one or two were that's ok but I just don't believe this nonsense about Gandhi and shame on the author. But that's just MVHO. It's like saying Lincoln was a homosexual after all these years. Like who's going to believe an author who brings it up at this date. In my opinion this author is just trying to add a little spice to sell his book. No offense to homosexuals or lesbians or anyone for that matter. I'm as liberal as they come but let us not create rumors after all these years and many books later on this man just to sell a book.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:02 AM on 03/31/2011
seriously, it is just one reviewers misinterpretation of certain passages in the book. Americans especially have a hard time understanding when men of other cultures express platonic love for one another. he had a "bro-mance".
12:01 PM on 03/31/2011
BJ, I think Americans have problems with Americans express platonic love for one another and yet I don't see why when women do all the time. I love and adore a few close women friends but that is common with the many women I know.

Thanks for bringing up this point. It is valid.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:56 PM on 03/30/2011
How insulting to the Gujarati, thinking that they are incapable themselves of deciding what the author means.
03:06 PM on 03/30/2011
Tell that to Boston. And Kansas.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:19 PM on 03/30/2011
What books did the State legislatures of Massachusetts and Kansas ban?
05:38 PM on 03/30/2011
Side note: It would be Gujratis rather than Gujarati (Gujarati is one person, Gujaratis is multiple people).
02:43 PM on 03/30/2011
I'm not surprised Gujarat banned the book. Gandhi was Gujarati himself, and he remains the state's most famous person.
07:36 AM on 03/31/2011
Sad. THAT is Gujarat's most famous person? A coward who indulged in political blackmail to achieve his ends, threatening legitimate governments while choosing to remain outside them?
02:48 AM on 04/01/2011
Whatever are you blathering on about?