More

David Sokol: I Didn't Want Warren Buffett's Job (VIDEO)

Sokol Cnbc

First Posted: 03/31/11 01:02 PM ET Updated: 05/31/11 06:12 AM ET

By Ben Berkowitz and Jonathan Stempel - Former Berkshire Hathaway executive David Sokol on Thursday said he has invested in companies he then recommended for acquisition in the past, a day after Berkshire disclosed Sokol pushed Lubrizol Corp to Warren Buffett after investing in it.

But Sokol said on CNBC if he had it all to do again, he would have invested in Lubrizol for himself and not passed the recommendation on to Buffett. He said he did not expect Buffett to want to buy the company and was surprised at how quickly the "Oracle of Omaha" moved to make a deal.

Sokol was seen by many investors as the most likely successor to Berkshire Hathaway's iconic CEO, though he made clear in the interview he did not aspire to the job and wanted to build his own "mini-Berkshire" instead.

Buffett released a letter on Wednesday disclosing that Sokol bought a substantial stake in Lubrizol before urging Buffett to acquire the company, which Buffett did for $9 billion this month. Sokol appeared to have made a profit of at least $2.98 million on his investment.

In a half-hour interview, Sokol insisted he never had any inside information on Lubrizol and that he bought the shares solely as a good investment for his family.

"I'd like to invest my own money, control a significant piece of it, and control my own schedule," Sokol said, later adding "I didn't know anything others don't know."

Sokol also said he has on past occasions invested in companies that he suggested Buffett buy, noting one example of a bank that Buffett did not ultimately acquire.

He also said other Berkshire executives have in the past held stock in companies they then identified for investment or acquisition, citing the example of Berkshire Vice Chairman Charlie Munger owning a stake in Chinese car maker BYD before suggesting it for an investment.

Nonetheless, the chairman of Berkshire units MidAmerican Energy and NetJets told CNBC's anchors he understood how the sequence of events looked, even if he did nothing wrong.

"I can understand the appearance of an issue ... That's why we made it public," he said.

Sokol resigned March 28. He said Buffett did not try to talk him out of resigning. Buffett's letter included an excerpt of Sokol's letter, but the full Sokol letter was not made public.

Berkshire's Class B shares, which are more heavily traded than its Class A stock, opened 1.6 percent lower at $84.06.

Watch the full CNBC video here:

(Reporting by Ben Berkowitz and Jonathan Stempel; Editing by Derek Caney, Lisa Von Ahn, Dave Zimmerman)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
By Ben Berkowitz and Jonathan Stempel - Former Berkshire Hathaway executive David Sokol on Thursday said he has invested in companies he then recommended for acquisition in the past, a day after Ber...
By Ben Berkowitz and Jonathan Stempel - Former Berkshire Hathaway executive David Sokol on Thursday said he has invested in companies he then recommended for acquisition in the past, a day after Ber...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 63
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KyDude
My herd marched over the cliff.
01:17 PM on 04/02/2011
What a helluva deal this guy had: Invest a couple mil of your own in a stock, then have Warren follow you in with a couple billion, the stock surely spikes, and he bails. WHAM..CHACHING.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheHat921
09:57 AM on 04/01/2011
Sokol: "I didn't want Warren's job".....just wanted to improperly use my knowledge to skim off a couple fo extra bucks for my family!

After all, Warren may be able to live on 1970's money, but not the Sokols, and everything is so expensive today a few extra millions easily earned at no risk comes in mighty handy.
09:53 AM on 04/01/2011
Nothing like a couple of greedy old tax-dodging fools sticking a knife in each other.
10:30 AM on 04/01/2011
What eveidence do you have that Buffet is a tax dodger? Please port your sources.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stox1994
08:33 AM on 04/01/2011
They always say, I didn't know and I did no wrong. Madoff said they pushed money on me. All kinds of explanations come from the financial sector as they get caught with their pants down.
08:47 PM on 04/02/2011
He did nothing wrong.
photo
THE GREAT PURIFIER
If you are going through hell, keep going.
02:06 AM on 04/01/2011
But - hey - Bloomberg.com, that beacon of investment information impartiality (we all trust Bloomberg, don't we?) says that Sokol "exercised poor judgment" but didn't break any laws.

So there. Bloomberg has spoken. Haug! The Court is adjourned. Case closed.
12:35 AM on 04/01/2011
There are a couple of potential problems I see for this kind of activity. It depends on what his responsibilities were with Berkshire Hathaway.

If he was supposed to be scouting investment opportunities for Berkshire, and in the course of investigating those opportunities discovered Lubrizol, and then made his personal investment before passing on advice to Buffett, that would sort of be frontrunning, getting in ahead of his "client," Buffett, in order to profit on Buffett's trading.

If he advised Buffett to invest in Lubrizol and did not disclose his position, that would be wrong.

If, on the other hand, his discovery of Lubrizol was made outside of his official duties and he alerted Buffett to his position when advising him to buy, no problem.
photo
BlackBuddha
I didn't mean to, I meant to
11:29 AM on 04/01/2011
That is the crux of it. (He should make his time sheet public).
03:08 PM on 04/01/2011
He worked 24 hours a day for Berkshire. The question is what his duties were, not when he was performing them. I am sure there are several people at Berkshire who scout investment opportunities. I am not sure if Sokol was one of them, or if he was further up the line in management and/or evaluation of ideas discovered by others and sent up the line.
11:07 PM on 03/31/2011
lets take a poll . if you were in a restaurant and over heard two guys next to you and one said to the other " we're announcing a takeover offer of co abc in 2 days, would you go and buy some shares in co abc . i would and i bet 999 out of a 1000 posters on this site would
07:19 AM on 04/01/2011
He had knowledge of a deal that would significantly move the stock price. It is insider information and it is illegal to act on. If anybody does not like that then they should change the law. It wouldn't be too hard, couple of a million is all it would cost.
JohnnieBravo
MN Dem in Bachman district. Lives by "exact words"
06:39 PM on 03/31/2011
Buffet sets an example for the crooks at Goldman and JP Morgan. their CEO's are criminals, first class for sure, but nothing more than dolled up criminals.
06:14 PM on 03/31/2011
This is Insider Trading. Martha Stuart went to jail for much less. He can say all he wants but that does not mitigate the fact that he is a crook.
photo
1logicalthinker
with occasional humorous overtones :)
10:54 PM on 03/31/2011
This is NOT insider trading! He did not know if Berkshire Hathaway was going to buy the company when he bought the stock. You can say all you want, but that does not make him a crook.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
12:57 AM on 04/01/2011
Yes, but if the public says he is a crook, then it is not just me saying it,...Run him down, claw it back, then off to jail
olddognewtrick
Half full or half empty...It's the same
01:45 AM on 04/01/2011
Worse! He recommended it!
05:34 PM on 03/31/2011
Watch the Documentary "Inside Job" and then ask yourself why three years after our worst financial meltdown "not a single financial executive has gone to jail."

http://www.sonyclassics.com/insidejob/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Republicanistan
Ignorance is Strength in Baggerstan
04:06 PM on 03/31/2011
"In a half-hour interview, Sokol insisted he never had any inside information on Lubrizol and that he bought the shares solely as a good investment for his family."

Yea, you met with the CEO privately and all that info was public (not) and bought the shares Low...and then after Berkshire moved to buy the company, you sold the shares High and made money on the inside information...

Your family must be so proud.
photo
free speech isnt free
A bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy
04:31 PM on 03/31/2011
Like the avatar the name and your comments. Spot on!
shonuff1914
Don't judge me I'm just doin my thang
04:55 PM on 03/31/2011
cost a buck o five????
shonuff1914
Don't judge me I'm just doin my thang
09:22 AM on 04/01/2011
Ha indeed there is! F&F
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:50 PM on 03/31/2011
Are Sokol's eyes still brown after this interview or does he need a refill.
03:49 PM on 03/31/2011
If this really isn't illegal for this guy for some loophole reason, this country truly is doomed.
photo
THE GREAT PURIFIER
If you are going through hell, keep going.
02:09 AM on 04/01/2011
Yes.

We are doomed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Republicanistan
Ignorance is Strength in Baggerstan
03:39 PM on 03/31/2011
How sweet. He made $3 Million on insider information "for his family"...what, did baby need new shoes?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ConsensusReality
RootenTootenZooten
03:39 PM on 03/31/2011
I hope he's in a prison cell for his next interview.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Derivative Project
03:33 PM on 03/31/2011
Why the Sokol 'affair" is the game changer in Dodd Frank derivatives regulation:

http://blog.thederivativeproject.com/