More

D.C. School Vouchers: U.S. House Votes To Reinstate Program, Bill Heads To Senate

Dc School Choice

BEN NUCKOLS   03/30/11 06:43 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The U.S. House of Representatives voted Wednesday to reinstate school vouchers for District of Columbia students, reviving the only program that uses federal tax dollars to subsidize private-school tuition.

The bill introduced by Republican House Speaker John Boehner would provide up to $12,000 a year for needy students to attend private schools of their choice.

It was approved 225-195, largely along party lines. Democrats opposed it as an inappropriate use of federal funds and an unwelcome intrusion into local affairs.

Boehner, who attended Roman Catholic schools, had tears in his eyes while describing how the program levels the playing field for families who otherwise would be forced to send their children to failing schools.

"There's no controversial idea here," Boehner said. "It's the American way."

The voucher program was created in 2004 with the support of the district's Democratic leadership to provide $7,500 a year to about 1,700 students. Congress agreed to begin phasing it out in 2009.

The new bill would increase the annual subsidy to $8,000 for elementary and middle school tuition and $12,000 for high school. It would cost $300 million over five years, with $100 million going to the voucher program and the rest to D.C.'s public and charter schools.

The bill now heads to the Senate, where prospects are uncertain. Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., is a sponsor, and will all but certainly succeed in advancing it out of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, which he chairs. But to pass the full Senate it will need support from Democrats, a handful of whom have favored D.C. school vouchers in the past.

The Obama administration opposes the bill but has not threatened to veto it, suggesting a willingness to compromise.

In its statement of opposition, the administration cited an independent study conducted for the Department of Education, which found no conclusive evidence that vouchers enhanced student achievement.

But the study fueled both sides of the debate. It concluded that students in the program had a significantly higher chance of graduating from high school, along with showing modest gains in reading. Its lead author, Patrick J. Wolf, told a Senate committee last month that the program was good for students.

The return of the D.C. vouchers comes amid a GOP push for expanded vouchers in several states. Indiana's Republican leadership wants to create the nation's broadest voucher program, offering help with private school tuition to even middle-class families.

Most voucher programs are limited to low-income students, those with disabilities or those who attend failing schools. About 1 percent of the nation's 50 million K-12 students participate in voucher programs offered either by states, municipalities or through public-private partnerships.

Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, who represents D.C. in Congress but does not vote on the House floor, led spirited opposition. She introduced an amendment that would direct all the funds to D.C.'s public and charter schools. Nearly half of D.C. public school students attend charter schools.

"Home rule means nothing if the District of Columbia can still be a dumping ground for every pet idea and pet project of the majority," Norton said.

She accused voucher proponents of bullying D.C. because they lacked the "nerve" to introduce a national voucher bill. Voters have consistently rejected vouchers in referendums.

In a statement, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State accused House Republicans of hypocrisy for approving vouchers while proposing billions of dollars in domestic spending cuts. Several Democrats pointed out a GOP pledge to accompany every new spending measure with a corresponding cut, which they said the voucher bill violates.

D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray opposes the bill, but some D.C. officials support it, including Council Chairman Kwame Brown, who said low-income parents benefit from additional school choices.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said there was no reason to block a program that parents overwhelmingly favor. He noted that the cost of educating D.C. students was among the highest in the nation and that by many measures, D.C. schools remain among the nation's worst.

"They have a right to fail, and they are failing," Issa said. "But Congress has a right to at least intervene."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

WASHINGTON — The U.S. House of Representatives voted Wednesday to reinstate school vouchers for District of Columbia students, reviving the only program that uses federal tax dollars to subsidiz...
WASHINGTON — The U.S. House of Representatives voted Wednesday to reinstate school vouchers for District of Columbia students, reviving the only program that uses federal tax dollars to subsidiz...
Filed by Erica Liepmann  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:59 AM on 04/01/2011
Why is it the Liberal always want to keep the poor people down? Why is it they don't want the poorer kids to have a better education? Public school is not the be all, end all. Public education is failing in these large inner city school systems, and has been failing since 1979, when President Jimmy carter created the separate Department of Education. It used to be under the Health and Human Services umbrella.

As a parent and Grandparent I will fight tooth and nail to be able to ensure my Children/Grandchildren get the best possible education out there.

I say congratulations to these parents who want only what is best for their child.

This is not class or cultural warfare, it is just common sense, for those wanting a better education and life for their child.
09:49 AM on 04/01/2011
I know I'll get lambasted, because so many people think school choice is a right-wing thing. The DC schools are the ONE area where congress can act because DC is not a state, it federal land. In that specific case, the federal gov acts in the absence of state gov. DC is notorious for its failing schools. Let the kids get a good education. Fix the public school in parallel. The idea of forcing kids to stay in failing schools while they are "fixed" dooms those kids. School choice is not a right-wing ploy to get you to pay for private school. It's truly democracy - send your kid wherever you want them to go. If the R's want to advance this LET THEM. We all benefit.
01:22 AM on 04/01/2011
A private school bailout bill. Great way to undercut the already failing public education.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:05 AM on 04/01/2011
It point isn't to save public schools. The point is to give the most number of students access to better schools. Currently, private schools offer a better education than public schools in DC.
12:15 PM on 04/01/2011
The problem is that most of those students don't want to have to do the work it takes to be successful so "access to better schools" isn't going to amount to much.
03:35 PM on 04/01/2011
Then why cant we use the money to improve public schools? Are private schools like public schools? Not at all. Public schools educate every student sent there-including the most needy, the most difficult, and the most disabled. Could these students go to a private school on their own? Would they last there? Would they succeed there? Private school vouchers are NOT a cure for public school woes, but a distraction from the real problem at best. At worst, they are part of the problems afflicting public schools. Lets improve public education in big cities such as DC by getting to the root of the problem-poverty, lack of resources, and a student's life outside of school, while at the same time holding bad teachers accountable when and if they exist.
11:42 PM on 03/31/2011
$12000 won't pay to educate a kid at most private schools in DC that run about $20000. Course this little voucher plan is just another variation of Obama's plan to give over our schools to corporate interests. His charter and privatization plans directly give money to undemocratic charters often run by corporations. So I guess he probably won't care too much about this except he might veto it to look good while doing the same thing or worse with his education deform plans.
09:14 PM on 03/31/2011
Of course-pay the money to private institutions but not on the failing schools. We blame schools for failing, yet do not put the time and effort into improvement. This is an attack by private institutions, through our representatives, on our public schools. What will happen next? Whatever it is, it will not be pretty?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:06 AM on 04/01/2011
If the public schools are failing, they deserve to be attacked.
02:13 PM on 04/01/2011
The public schools aren't failing---students are.
03:29 PM on 04/01/2011
Your statement shows no understanding of the issue. I feel as if there is a problem in this country, we attack and scapegoat the so-called causes of the problem, without listening to the real reasons WHY there are issues. The real issue here is WHY are public schools failing? Why does our system take MONEY and RESOURCES away from a school that is struggling or starting to fail? Doesnt that set one up for failure? Why are the most troubled kids from closed schools reshuffled to other schools that ARE succeeding without proper facilities or resources for those schools, thus turning good schools into struggling or failing schools? Why dont we examine the REAL reasons for school failures? I think we all know it is not the fault of the teacher, not so much the administrator, but rather the WHOLE SYSTEM that is fault, particularly factors outside of schools that cannot be controlled by the schools alone. Our system is setting up schools and students for failure. Instead of blaming the ones with the least amount of power or decision making in the schools, the teachers, we should we fixing the whole system. Public schools are a reflection of social, cultural, and economic issues, not the cure for these same issues. Attacking schools that fail will not cure their faults, much the same as yelling loudly at a child who doesnt understand a subject will make them automatically understand it.
07:29 PM on 03/31/2011
DC is one of the more expensive places to live, hence the high education costs.

I shouldn’t be surprised that people, who don't think that DC residents should be able to be fully represented in government, also believe that it is okay that congress should make decisions for DC residents unilaterally.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JM Brodie
Baltimore-based Denverite
04:51 PM on 03/31/2011
Meanwhile Congress moves to cut any other federal funding to public schools around the country -- including Washington.
03:36 PM on 03/31/2011
More corproate welfare. this time for the education industry at the expense of the public educational system.. Except it also includes financing Christian schools, which is illegal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
the pilgrim has landed
03:33 PM on 03/31/2011
Jobs? The deficit? No--it's culture wars time in GOPland