More

Microsoft Throws Weight Behind Google Antitrust Probe

Microsoft Google Antitrust Probe

GABRIELE STEINHAUSER and MICHAEL LIEDTKE   03/31/11 05:34 PM ET   AP

BRUSSELS — Microsoft Corp. escalated its attack on Google Inc. by complaining to European regulators Thursday that its fiercest rival is an Internet bully that abuses its dominance of online search and advertising.

The allegations against Google crystallize the piecemeal gripes that Microsoft has been making about Google's business practices for the past few years. It's also an ironic twist for Microsoft, whose control over how software operates on most personal computers has made it a frequent target of the types of complaints it's now making against Google.

This marks the first time that Microsoft has lodged a formal antitrust complaint with a government agency against one of its own rivals.

In doing so, Microsoft hopes to encourage the European Commission to dig deeper into an investigation opened four months ago into Google's business practices.

The European inquiry was spurred by complaints made by several smaller websites. They contended Google was unfairly burying them in search results and highlighting the company's own services instead.

The sites behind the initial complaints included Ciao, an online-shopping site owned by Microsoft, and Foundem, a price-comparison site that belongs to a technology trade association backed by Microsoft.

Given that, Google said Microsoft's latest complaint was unsurprising.

"We continue to discuss the case with the European Commission, and we're happy to explain to anyone how our business works," Google spokesman Al Verney said.

Although the specifics of Thursday's European complaint were confidential, Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith outlined the basics in a blog posting.

Microsoft has made most of these accusations before in public statements or forums.

It contends Google is making it difficult for mobile phones that rely on its Windows software to access Google's YouTube video site. Google is promoting its own phones software, Android, and has been accommodating with Apple Inc.'s iPhone, according to Microsoft. Google CEO Eric Schmidt was on Apple's board when the iPhone was introduced in 2007.

Microsoft also accused Google of making it difficult for advertisers to transfer their data used to manage online marketing campaigns to rival search engines. And Microsoft said Google has programmed its search formulas in ways that drive up prices that its rivals have to spend to buy ads shown alongside Google's search results.

The complaint also paints Google as a hypocrite. Microsoft says Google has made it increasingly difficult for Microsoft's Bing and other search engines to index the videos on YouTube, an apparent contradiction to Google's crusade to make content openly accessible.

Google has been particularly critical of Facebook's refusal to open up data within its social network. Microsoft owns a 1.6 percent stake in Facebook, and Bing has been granted better access to Facebook profiles.

"Unfortunately, Google has engaged in a broadening pattern of walling off access to content and data that competitors need to provide search results to consumers and to attract advertisers," Smith wrote in his blog post.

Microsoft has a business incentive to undermine Google, which processes about two out of three every search requests in the U.S. and an even higher ratio in other parts of the world, including many countries in Europe.

After investing billions in its search technology during the past few years, Microsoft is desperate to close the market gap. Toward the end, Microsoft teamed up with Yahoo Inc. last year and, together, they now have nearly 30 percent of the U.S. market.

To protect its search engine, Google previously has complained about the way Microsoft had set up its market-leading Web browser, Internet Explorer, to make it less likely that people would install software known as toolbars from competitors.

"Antitrust has become a competitive weapon used by both companies," said Boston University law professor Keith Hylton, who specializes in antitrust issues. "This is troubling because you never know quite what to make of the complaints."

Previous complaints against Microsoft had thrust that company into a court battle with the U.S. Justice Department in the late 1990s. European regulators have imposed heavy fines for anticompetitive practices involving its Windows operating system and Internet Explorer.

Google has been fined in France and admonished in Canada for inadequate privacy controls but so far hasn't been penalized in an antitrust investigation. If European regulators conclude Google engaged in anticompetitive behavior, it could fine the company up to 10 percent of annual revenue, which is expected to surpass $35 billion this year.

Microsoft's move could exacerbate the legal and public-relations troubles already facing Google, which is based in Mountain View, Calif.

The filing comes a week after a federal judge rejected a proposed legal settlement that would have given Google the digital rights to millions of out-of-print books. The judge concluded the agreement would have walled off its Internet search rivals from valuable content.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Justice is reviewing whether Google's proposed $700 million acquisition of airfare tracker ITA Software would give it an unfair advantage in online travel.

Microsoft, which is based in Redmond, Wash., came out against both deals as part of broader coalitions.

The state of Texas is also looking into Google's business practices.

Microsoft's decision to get involved in Europe's Google probe is a natural step, said Federico Etro, an economics professor at the University of Venice who has studied the case.

But he doesn't see this as merely another round in the jousting between two companies that don't like each other. He said online search is very complex market, with multiple consumer and economic issues to sort out.

Shares of Microsoft fell 22 cents, or 0.9 percent, to close Thursday at $25.39, while Google shares rose $4.92, or 0.8 percent, to $586.76.

___

Michael Liedtke reported from San Francisco.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
12:58 PM on 04/01/2011
i dont trust Google.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:32 AM on 04/01/2011
In a marketing coup, Microsoft will release a new export search engine called Bing Bang ++. It will be released under the direct supervision of Steve Ballmer, so you know it will be really good this time. .font {sarcasm}
10:28 AM on 04/01/2011
So many people dumping on Microsoft and supporting Google...

If Germany accused China of ethnic cleansing and having a plot for concurring the globe, would all of you say "Pot Meet Kettle"?

Regarding MS's complaint... It's possible that history is repeating itself, but fanboys are too consumed with brand loyalty (or hatred) to even consider the possibility that the allegations might be true...

The same thing is true in American politics. People are drawn into an having emotional response regarding political issues. When this happens, they dig in their heels and stop listening and thinking objectively.

Microsoft is no sainte, but I find it shocking that people give their blind trust to Google (and Facebook) given its access to individual private information.
photo
Morgantheaxe
Right is wrong, and left is correct!
01:51 AM on 04/01/2011
Is it me or do Tech companys seem to spend waaaaaayyyyyyy to much time sueing each other?
photo
Morgantheaxe
Right is wrong, and left is correct!
01:48 AM on 04/01/2011
Pot Meet Kettle.


Oh hey, on their Taxes Google claims that they are an Irish Company, because we all know the economic disaster in that country that was brought on by cutting it's corporate tax rate to almost nothing, so google calls Ireland home. Anyone know where Microsoft calls home?
photo
publiknme
.....don't get me started!
01:10 AM on 04/01/2011
......so Microsoft is admitting that BING is a failure ?
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
05:42 AM on 04/01/2011
Not they. They tried Bing to find out if it was a failure, but the results weren't any use.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:34 AM on 04/01/2011
Well, err, Microsoft may have used Bing to gauge the results of their search engine and ...cough...cough, came up empty.
11:52 PM on 03/31/2011
No sympathy for Microsh!t. They had 2 decades of being an abusive monopoly creating substandard products and now all they can do is whine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beasteben
evil carbs
05:43 PM on 03/31/2011
someone sounds jealous!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Shaw
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
04:51 PM on 03/31/2011
KALI-MA! KAAALLLIIII-MAAA!

Looks like a swarm of bees are about to come shooting out of his mouth.
09:14 PM on 03/31/2011
LOL'ed at this. Home-nome-sho-vai... Home-nome-sho-vai... Home-nome-sho-vai... Home-nome-sho-vai...
photo
Morgantheaxe
Right is wrong, and left is correct!
01:49 AM on 04/01/2011
LOL tooooo funny. I scrolled back up and looked at the picture that is sooooo perfect!!!
photo
EcnelisDoogod
B the change you want 2C
04:23 PM on 03/31/2011
How many corporations and governments have lost their ability to compete (despite their huge head start) because they couldn't or wouldn't adapt to new circumstances. Monopolies use their influence to thwart competition. Successful companies strive to be better. Google continues to reward its customers rather than limit them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
09:59 PM on 03/31/2011
Microsoft never really got into the whole innovation thing. They just copied others.
11:50 PM on 03/31/2011
You hit the nail on the head! Microsoft can't buy their way out of this. And they can't innovate either.
photo
EcnelisDoogod
B the change you want 2C
02:26 AM on 04/01/2011
But they did bring us a unified platform ultimately. IBM wanted to maintain hardware control of the emerging PC market. MS rebelled choosing Windows instead of OS2. Seems to me that their competitive edge took a hit a after the Justice dept. joined the picture.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
llibsetag
03:45 PM on 03/31/2011
Pot...Kettle...Black
MSMonopoly hates competition because then they have to produce something better which they are incabable of.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
03:11 PM on 03/31/2011
Google to appeal for prompt enforcement of a no-pot-calling zone over redmond.
02:56 PM on 03/31/2011
that's rich. when you can't compete you sue.
02:33 PM on 03/31/2011
Lots of people hating MS here. As a consumer of the new Windows Phone, MS's claims resonate true. Read this:

http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_on_the_issues/archive/2011/03/30/adding-our-voice-to-concerns-about-search-in-europe.aspx

From MS:

"Unfortunately, Google has refused to allow Microsoft’s new Windows Phones to access this YouTube metadata in the same way that Android phones and iPhones do. As a result, Microsoft’s YouTube “app” on Windows Phones is basically just a browser displaying YouTube’s mobile Web site, without the rich functionality offered on competing phones. Microsoft is ready to release a high quality YouTube app for Windows Phone. We just need permission to access YouTube in the way that other phones already do, permission Google has refused to provide."

...

"There of course will be some who will point out the irony in today’s filing. Having spent more than a decade wearing the shoe on the other foot with the European Commission, the filing of a formal antitrust complaint is not something we take lightly. This is the first time Microsoft Corporation has ever taken this step. More so than most, we recognize the importance of ensuring that competition laws remain balanced and that technology innovation moves forward."
02:55 PM on 03/31/2011
Google is a business NOT A CHARITY they don't have to share everything. Microsoft has its own video properties use those.
04:38 PM on 03/31/2011
Why are you so anti-consumer? As a consumer, I want choice in my phone platform, and I want choice in my video services, or "properties" as you refer to them. Google is limiting choice and consumer freedom. And you're defending this????