iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Yale Students File Title IX Suit Against The University

Yale Title Ix Lawsuit

First Posted: 03/31/11 06:20 PM ET Updated: 05/31/11 06:12 AM ET

The Yale Herald:

The Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced today it will open an investigation to review Yale's policies for dealing with sexual harassment and sexual assault. The investigation comes in response to a Title IX complaint filed against the University on Tues. Mar. 15.

Read the whole story: The Yale Herald

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

The Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced today it will open an investigation to review Yale's policies for dealing with sexual harassment and sexual assault. The investiga...
The Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced today it will open an investigation to review Yale's policies for dealing with sexual harassment and sexual assault. The investiga...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:51 AM on 04/05/2011
This forum is FAIL. Removing comments that are valid. No wonder no body comes to this site.
12:46 AM on 04/01/2011
They should make a firm when they graduate dedicating lawsuits towards universities. I have some ideas.
09:53 PM on 03/31/2011
Obviously, this type of conduct is condoned since it is done so openly. Yale should be leading by example since the school is upheld as a bastion of the best of the best. Maybe that is the problem...these young men feel so entitled that when they enter the "real" world, they feel empowered to take what they want without worry of consequences. Could this explain Wall Street?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:52 PM on 03/31/2011
It looks like an assylum.
photo
Boobuzuela
Satire identical to actual Republican positions
09:17 PM on 03/31/2011
What building is that?

I've never visited Yale.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
insidious
Socialist Progressive Liberal Independent Feminist
09:38 PM on 03/31/2011
Judging from your avatar, you'd probably fit right in...
09:45 PM on 03/31/2011
Don't know, but it's certainly not the most flattering view of any university, let allow the hallowed halls of Yale.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
08:18 PM on 03/31/2011
Discrimination can creep into scientific misconduct and fraud and must be curtailed.

http://www.bccmeteorites.com/misconduct-planetary.html
07:07 PM on 03/31/2011
As a Yale alum, this makes me very sad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Parade Keegan
I Can Hear You
07:02 PM on 03/31/2011
Experience has taught me, campuses can not police themselves. Criminal behavior should be reported to authorities who do not have a vested interest in the reputation of a specific entity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
lj9283
Why is "Carried Interest" not taxed as Income?
06:44 PM on 03/31/2011
What Yale building is in that picture?
07:07 PM on 03/31/2011
This is one of the math buildings as you begin ascending Science Hill. I think it's across the street from Silliman.
09:39 PM on 03/31/2011
i think it's sterling chem lab, right?
05:10 PM on 04/08/2011
The photo is Osborne Memorial Laboratory at the corner of Science Hill. The top of Kline Biology Tower can be seen behind it. Not adjacent to Silliman College, by the way, but across from the college hockey arena, Ingalls Rink. Using that photo may be the strangest representation of Yale I've ever seen. Usually the gothic Harkness Tower or the main entry gate to the Old Campus called Phelps Gate is shown.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cgeorgan
Proud American-Canadian Libertarian
06:41 PM on 03/31/2011
Free speech vs. Title IX:  I know which one is more important.
07:09 PM on 03/31/2011
From what I read in the article, the crux of the suit deals with allegations of sexual assault and rape, which have nothing to do with free speech. Also, chants directed at female students that may insinuate a desire to commit rape, are not necessarily protected by the First Amendment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cgeorgan
Proud American-Canadian Libertarian
09:23 AM on 04/01/2011
From what I read in the article, the crux of the suit deals with allegation­s of sexual assault and rape,

No, the lawsuit has to do with individuals commenting on allegations of sexual assault and rape.   Read the article starting from the 7th paragraph from the bottom.
07:58 PM on 03/31/2011
I am not sure how "quid pro Quo" with professors demanding sexual favors for grades falls under the first amendment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cgeorgan
Proud American-Canadian Libertarian
09:21 AM on 04/01/2011
I see you're arguing the 1977 case, when we're here in 2011 arguing the current case.  Join us here, today.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SitandStay
Lorenzo&BushH8ter
06:17 PM on 03/31/2011
.......PASS ....THE ......EQUAL....RIGHTS.......AMENDMENT.................
It has been 88 years since Alice Paul wrote the original ERA.
It has been 39 years since the ERA was submitted to be ratified by the states.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
7 states made no attempt to ratify the ERA: Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, Utah, Arizona and North Carolina. Other states ratified it and then rescinded.
Now, in the 21st century we are filing new jobs at a rate of 90 percent with men, leaving the women Heads of Household a ridiculous 10 percent of the bounty.
We pound our chest and declare what a leader and protector the United States is of women's rights in other countries. We shame the ill treatment of women by other countries. We bring women to the forefront of our evening news that have been raped in other countries, yet we hardly speak of women abused in our country.
Wal-Mart is in court due to antiquated and illegal treatment of women, yet our aged Supreme Court justices may let them slip through the gauntlet on superfluous grounds, ignoring the fact that there are thousands of plaintiffs in this class action suit. A class action suit that is representing so many for the very reason that class action suits were allowed, so as to not tie the courts up with individual suits.
Women are being persecuted for having private medical procedures, physician/patient privilege protected, but now it becomes a "party line" communication with non-medical corporations.