More

School Vouchers Under The Microscope: Do They Really Improve Student Achievement?

Education Reform

First Posted: 04/04/11 02:16 AM ET Updated: 06/01/11 06:12 AM ET

The Milwaukee School Choice Program, which was not only the first but also the largest school voucher program in the country, has fallen under fire after voucher students failed to surpass their public school counterparts in state tests.

As reported in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the program provides disadvantaged students a lottery-earned voucher, totaling up to $6,607, to escape failing public schools and attend higher performing private schools. The state spends over $128 million on vouchers, which proponents argue is cost-effective compared to expenditures on students who attend public schools.

The program was largely regarded as an experiment when it started as a solution to failing public school systems in the 1990s. Now critics are citing it is a failed one.

According to the Sentinel, after voucher schools were required to participate in standardized testing, the results did not show growth, as advocates had hoped. Rather, students participating in the voucher program were outperformed, in regard to proficiency in reading and math, by those who remained in Milwaukee Public Schools.

"There was no meaningful differences over three years in student achievement growth in either math or reaching between a matched set of voucher and MPS students."

According to The Wisconsin State Journal, testing scores indicated that program participants were 34.4 percent proficient in math and 55.2 percent in reading, which was lower than public school students who scored 47.9 percent and 59 percent respectively.

Both sets of students achieved far below students statewide, who collectively scored 77.2 percent proficiency in math and 83 percent in reading.

Despite these findings, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has moved forward with a budget proposal that would expand the Milwaukee School Choice program, eliminating income constraints and including more schools. The program currently includes 111 private schools and provides over 20,000 low-income students with vouchers to attend them the Sentinel reports.

The Wisconsin State Journal reports that the proposal has sparked controversy among democratic leaders, amid the current state findings that the program has failed to produce academic achievement.

"The fact that we've spent well over $1 billion on a failed experiment leads me to believe we have no business spending $22 million to expand it with these kinds of results," Rep. Sondy Pope-Roberts, the top Democrat on the Assembly Education Committee said. "It's irresponsible use of taxpayer dollars and a disservice to Milwaukee students."

Proponents of the program argue these test scores offer only a "snapshot" and are not substantive enough to accurately evaluate it. They insist that competition is key to fixing the problems with the education system at a lower cost, and cite statistics from other studies to advocate the program's expansion.

The Sentinel reports, however, that though overall costs may be lower, Milwaukee residents will pay the price without the promise of increased proficiency.

Robert Costrell, an Arkansas professor who analyzed the study, estimated that $37 million is saved each year through the voucher program. Unfortunately, the impact is not allocated evenly.

"$30 million a year saved in state income and sales taxes, and $52 million a year saved in local property taxes everywhere in the state except Milwaukee. But Milwaukee property taxpayers are paying an extra $45 million a year."

These findings come amidst a contentious federal debate over the potential of private-school voucher programs sparked by Speaker Boehners proposed SOAR act -- legislation that has already passed in the house, which would reinstate the D.C. voucher program, expired in 2009 because it also failed to show academic growth.

The D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program, signed into legislation by President Bush in 2005, included instituted mandates for yearly monitoring by the Department of Education, and provided scholarships of $7,500 to needy students to attend local private schools.

The Department of Education, which evaluated the program yearly, reported that it did not have as much of an impact as advocates had hoped.

"The evaluation found that the OSP improved reading, but not math, achievement overall and for 5 of 10 subgroups of students examined."

The study also showed that students applying to the program from schools in need of improvement (SINI), which were labeled as highest priority by Congress, had no achievement impacts.

Critics are also concerned about the constitutionality of such programs, as 80 percent of private schools in the program are religious.

The ACLU has issued a letter petitioning policy-makers to dismiss the bill on these grounds.

"Schools that participate in the voucher program are exempt from complying with laws like the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Since the principal recipients of these federal voucher funds are private religious schools, Americans' tax dollars are going toward schools that bring specific religious content into their curricula."

President Obama has also stated his disapproval of the program.

"Private school vouchers are not an effective way to improve student achievement. The Administration opposes targeting resources to help a small number of individuals attend private schools rather than creating access to great public schools for every child."

As policymakers in Washington, and around the country, debate the best solution for failing American Schools, Milwaukee continues to face tough decisions.

The Sentinel reports that Milwaukee public schools are currently facing $74 million budget shortage.

Other cities around the country are looking to Milwaukee as an indication of how voucher systems perform, and advocates continue to see the silver lining in the somber statistics.

Rep. Robin Vos, who is behind a push to create voucher programs in other cities explained his position to the Wisconsin State Journal:

"Obviously opponents see the glass half-empty," Rep. Vos said. "I see the glass half-full. Children in the school choice program do the same as the children in public school but at half the cost."
FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

The Milwaukee School Choice Program, which was not only the first but also the largest school voucher program in the country, has fallen under fire after voucher students failed to surpass their publi...
The Milwaukee School Choice Program, which was not only the first but also the largest school voucher program in the country, has fallen under fire after voucher students failed to surpass their publi...
Filed by Victoria Fine  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 372
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
01:22 AM on 04/05/2011
Neither do charter schools.

But I'm sure all of the parents believe their kid is getting a better education than in public school.

And maybe they are.

But a standardized test will never prove it.
Mountain Momma
Seemed like a good idea at the time
10:27 PM on 04/04/2011
"Proponents of the program argue these test scores offer only a "snapshot" and are not substantive enough to accurately evaluate it."

.... but test scores ARE substantive enough to accurately evaluate public schools and teachers.
Got it. Makes perfect sense, if you live in GOPLand.
01:59 PM on 04/05/2011
haha that just about sums it up about the GOPers....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jaredbrain
07:25 PM on 04/04/2011
Ten bucks says the budget includes more vouchers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OnlyaKing
06:27 PM on 04/04/2011
When are people going to understand that it doesn't matter how much money or what school they allow kids to go too. All learning starts at home with the family. The child that doesn't have a stable home with parents that read and work with their kids in the five years before school starts. Poor scores and students come largely from these less stable environments.
How to get these parents or parent to put in the time with their own kids is beyond me. The home life or lack there of is soley and completely the parents. We do not have the right to tell them how to live their life or raise their kids. But it is our right to quit thowing more and more money chasing an impossible goal that was lost long before kindergarten started.
photo
Jahli
Sanity has a well known liberal bias
05:01 PM on 04/04/2011
Vouchers will continue to provide us with generations of students that believe that the earth is 6,000 years old... We may as well let our children pay hooky.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Starwalker3
04:46 PM on 04/04/2011
"Proponents of the program argue these test scores offer only a "snapshot" and are not substantive enough to accurately evaluate it. They insist that competition is key to fixing the problems with the education system at a lower cost, and cite statistics from other studies to advocate the program's expansion."

HA - but these same people turn around and support merit pay on the basis of one stinking test score.

Education isn't about competition - that means winners and losers - public education needs to be about everyone winning. I think we've proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that Friedman and the Chicago School of Economics is a house of cards designed to only support the 1% wealthiest.
04:15 PM on 04/04/2011
Imagine you could pick the school and teacher for your kid. Each teacher would have a bio, resume, and references available. You could find the teacher whose style you think would best fit with your child. You would choose the teacher and a second and third alternate.
Now the teachers would be compensated based on how many times they were chosen. If you are a popular teacher, you would get a bonus. If you were a teacher that doesn't get many requests, you get put on notice. Every year, a new teacher is added to each grade, and one gets fired. This is based on student requests.

Cleans the dead wood, and teacher is not just based on standardized tests, but rather real life perceptions. If you are a good teacher you will benefit and so will the kids. If you are not an effective teacher, you won't be teaching for long.
photo
Jahli
Sanity has a well known liberal bias
05:03 PM on 04/04/2011
There is a major "flaw" in your plan....What part of "good" teacher is determined by popularity... being liked in the working world is not what get's one a raise or promotion or business results.
05:10 PM on 04/04/2011
It has nothing to do with being liked. Joe citizen is going to request the best teacher for his kid. The one where the kid will get the most out of the class.
That's what is meant by popular.
Does this make teachers competitive? I hope so! Who does it benefit? The kids and society.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:12 PM on 04/04/2011
"If you are a popular teacher, you would get a bonus"

I like that idea! We can call it “Ask the Experts” or “Tips for Teachers”

Assign each teacher a large jar and line up the jars on a table near the exit of the school.
At the end of each week give each kid five $1 bills.
Ask the kids to decide which teachers really care about the students and give them a tip.
When the last student leaves the school, the teachers can grab their tax free Bonus!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SofaKing22
If God is for us, who can be against us?
03:50 PM on 04/04/2011
I can understand giving vouchers to parents for an over-achieving child that needs better educational resources not available to them through the public schools. It shouldn't be a way for parents that already send their children to private schools to get vouchers. I know the arguement is always well, we pay taxes also and don't even send our childrent to public schools. Why should we have to pay for other children to go to school? Would that be the same as not wanting to pay taxes towards city transit because I own a car and don't use the bus? There are other costs associated with these programs as well, since students also need to be transported to the private schools in many instances. Then there's always the rumors of vouchers as a way of getting good athletes from public schools to private schools. So maybe instead of a lottery for vouchers there needs to be better criteria based on the need of the student for advancing their education. Of course we could just simply put all that money into improving our existing schools.
photo
CabCurious
green green green
03:58 PM on 04/04/2011
You're talking about a scholarship program, which is not a voucher program.

There are plenty of large scale scholarship programs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
JasonJM
Life isnt fair, get used to it.
03:44 PM on 04/04/2011
It's not if it works...it's who is running it.
Urban Prep Academy Gets 100% Black Male College Attendance... Again
"Urban Prep certainly scores one point for charter schools"

http://www.bvblackspin.com/2010/03/09/urban-prep-academy-for-young-men/
photo
CabCurious
green green green
03:45 PM on 04/04/2011
There are many, many charter public schools doing great work. But this is 100% irrelevant to the voucher debate because they are not private schools.

And schools of choice can remove students in ways that the local neighborhood public school cannot.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
JasonJM
Life isnt fair, get used to it.
03:49 PM on 04/04/2011
Another reason to have more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFT
High-Stakes Tests? Opt out.
06:48 PM on 04/04/2011
http://charterschoolscandals.blogspot.com/2010/07/urban-prep-academy-charter-high-school.html

Like HCZ, KIPP and the rest, their claims are lies.
photo
mikey09
Living off the grid.
03:43 PM on 04/04/2011
Government tests should not be the factor in determining a schools success. Judge a school by how many of their graduates need to take remedial classes in college.
 
We have schools that look good on paper because they are testing to the test, yet when kids get to college they are taking remedial classes that the government or parents are paying for and no college credit is being earned. It doesn't help to graduate kids from HS if they haven't learned anything
photo
Jahli
Sanity has a well known liberal bias
05:05 PM on 04/04/2011
If you wait until students hit college to measure success you have at least one if not two "lost" generations... ARG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
photo
mikey09
Living off the grid.
05:27 PM on 04/04/2011
True...but we already have those lost generations, its been going on for some time now. On Paper (test scores) schools appear to be "good" "passing" "sucessful"....yet those kids graduating from those schools are taking remedial classes in college.
 
Some schools are graduating kids that can not even read....my point really is that the current way of judging a schools success is not accurate.
03:42 PM on 04/04/2011
I love this quote: "Obviously opponents see the glass half-empty," Rep. Vos said. "I see the glass half-full. Children in the school choice program do the same as the children in public school but at half the cost."

So we can produce under-achievers at half the cost!
photo
Jahli
Sanity has a well known liberal bias
05:05 PM on 04/04/2011
Exactly... The great conservative's plan
photo
LightShadow62
The answers are not found in the extremes
03:37 PM on 04/04/2011
All you have to do is look at the political party that has been pushing vouchers to know that it does nothing for the quality of education. In fact it goes a long way towards destroying any chance of poor and working class children getting a decent education by taking even more resources away from public schools.
photo
Jahli
Sanity has a well known liberal bias
05:07 PM on 04/04/2011
Yep... Keep 'em stupid, you can continue to fool them into voting for conservatives by simply stating "low taxes"..... BWHAHAHAHAHHAHA.
photo
Mr Bobo
Warriors, come out and PLAY-AY!!
03:34 PM on 04/04/2011
Despite this study, I still believe in the voucher program. I think a more accurate assessment would be to compare apples to apples. In this study, they are comparing the performance of "disadvantaged students" in the voucher program with the general population of public school students.

Compare the performance of "disadvantaged students" in the voucher program with children identified as "disadvantaged" in the public school system and then get back to us with the statistics. I think the results would demonstrate improvement AND at a cheaper cost to the state than the public school system.
photo
CabCurious
green green green
03:42 PM on 04/04/2011
You can NEVER do a valid apples-to-apples comparison with a failing school and a private school for the simply reason that the private school can pick students and remove students.

Vouchers are dead. They never promised real accountability.
photo
Mr Bobo
Warriors, come out and PLAY-AY!!
04:26 PM on 04/04/2011
I'm saying track the "disadvantaged students" in the voucher program who won the lottery and compare them with children identified as "disadvantaged" from the public schools they came from. Compare 100 kids to 100 kids in THIS SPECIFIC PROGRAM. Match them based on socio-economic status and their grade point averages before they left their failing public school.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
captained50
03:34 PM on 04/04/2011
Here is the problem. Everyone seems to be an expert in Education. Vouchers are a way to get the Government (which everyone hates) to pay Private Corporations for Education. This is an untapped resource. We see the destruction of public schools at the favor of Corporate America's greed.
Floriduh schools, $5600 per student Times over 2.5 million students....Tell me that's not big business?
Government funded corporate welfare indeed. Laugh at Florida for having a crook at the helm, (he's taking this to the bank). We scored 5th in the Nation...and overall did better then most private or charter schools. This shows how committed the teachers are, that were dealt a dirty hand.
photo
CabCurious
green green green
03:39 PM on 04/04/2011
First of all, charters are not private and those saying so show real ignorance.

Secondly, the way people make money in public education is from textbooks, facilities management, and various services to school systems. Not actual management of schools.

There have been no genuinely profitable private management companies. It's not the kind of sector where corporations can sweep in and many good $$$. Even the biggest attempts at it have openly admitted being financial losses until they have large enough scale to become profitable (i.e. many many hundreds of schools and complete ownership of the facilities).

The religious schools that initially supported vouchers ended up deciding that they didn't want all the public accountability and scrutiny.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:02 PM on 04/04/2011
"Secondly, the way people make money in public education is from textbooks, facilities management­, and various services to school systems."

You forgot Union Initiation Fees and weekly Union Dues? How much?
05:08 PM on 04/04/2011
But neither are charters public. Public means for everyone. Charters can cherry pick students and decide to remove some. I dont know what to classify them as.
photo
mikey09
Living off the grid.
03:33 PM on 04/04/2011
Can't speak for all private schools but the one my grandkids attend do NOT have that week or two of test prep the local public school has.....teaching to the test is NOT going to prove a child is getting an education.