iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Hexavalent Chromium: Tap Water Industry Knew About Brockovich Chemical For Years, Reports EWG

Hexavalent Chromium

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 04/04/11 02:44 PM ET Updated: 06/04/11 06:12 AM ET

The tap water industry has known since 2004 about worrisome levels of a suspected carcinogen in America's drinking water, claims Environmental Working Group (EWG).

EWG reported a few months ago that laboratory tests found high levels of suspected carcinogen chromium-6 in the drinking water of 31 U.S. cities. Norman, Oklahoma; Honolulu, Hawaii; Riverside, California; and Madison, Wisconsin reported the highest levels of contamination. EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson responded quickly to the report, launching a risk assessment of the chemical found in drinking water.

The chemical, also known as “hexavalent chromium,” became well known after renowned legal assistant Erin Brockovich won a settlement against Pacific Gas & Electric Co. The company allegedly dumped the chemical into the local water of Hinkley, CA. After the EWG report on the cities with high levels of chromium-6, Brockovich told The New York Times, "It may be more widespread than I had even thought and I had thought it was pretty widespread."

While EWG’s report came out just a few months ago, it turns out that the tap water industry may have found clear evidence of chromium-6 pollution in untreated water back in 2004 (although pollution levels in untreated and treated water cannot be directly compared). EWG claims that the industry’s survey, conducted by the Awwa Research Foundation, studied data on 189 utilities in 41 states, and concluded that chromium-6 was common in American groundwater.

According to EWG:

The industry research group provides its report Occurrence Survey of Boron and Hexavalent Chromium to water utilities and their consultants, who pay four or five-figure subscription fees and a document fee of about $300. (The report can now be bought online for $200 or more.)

The 2004 industry study was obtained by EWG. Jane Houlihan, EWG senior vice president for research, states, “The tap water industry’s 2004 study is unmistakable proof that it has known about extensive chromium-6 contamination for at least seven years.” Yet, EWG reports that tap water industry representatives did not mention their study during the February 2nd Senate environment committee hearing on chromium-6 pollution. According to EWG, it does not appear that the customers of the utilities with tainted water were notified of the chemical’s presence.

Erin Brokovich is sadly unsurprised by the utilities’ silence. She tells EWG, “Instead of treating their customers like adults and sharing the test results with them, they shelved the findings, letting folks continue to drink water for years that could contain chromium-6.”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

 
 
  • Comments
  • 270
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Slureyetis Capone
10:07 AM on 04/06/2011
Pop u L@ti on Con Troll.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fredpa
I will try again tomorrow.
10:22 PM on 04/05/2011
If this story has you worried, the solution is simple. Pull all EWG funding. It'll go away, and we'll all be fine. La la la la la
04:03 PM on 04/05/2011
Is this filtered by residential water filter?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:31 PM on 04/05/2011
Depends on your residential water filter. Reverse osmosis (RO) filters should reduce it significantly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:22 PM on 04/05/2011
Please don't call it chromium-6. It's chromium(VI). Roman numerals, not Arabic numbers. This is an important distinction to chemists.

Arabic numerals are used to refer to the atomic mass of an element, which reflects an atom's radioactivity -- this is what people talk about when they refer to the iodine-131 for Fukushima. In contrast, normal non-radioactive iodine is iodine-127. Roman numerals refer to the oxidation state. Iron(III), for example, is rust.

The chromium this article refers to is chromium(VI). Chromium-6, if it were to exist, would violate dozens of natural laws. If you're going to publish science articles, please get the science right.
04:02 PM on 04/05/2011
Thank you. I learned something.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:36 PM on 04/05/2011
Glad I could help.

One disclaimer: I just checked the EPA website, and they refer to it as chromium-6. So I take back the mean things I said about HuffPo's science articles, since the EPA is busy mucking up the terminology at the source.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
efmo
Oh no, my micro-bio is empty!
04:35 PM on 04/05/2011
Thanks for the info. Good to know!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Callah
You can't fix stupid, not even with duct tape.
02:57 PM on 04/05/2011
Now add Iodine -131, Tellurium 132, Cesium 137, and Plutonium fallout to the water as well...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:20 PM on 04/05/2011
Who the hell needs Nuke plants when you can accomplish the same thing buy dumping carcinogens in the drinking water?

Capitalism is the extraordinary belief that the nastiest of men, for the nastiest of reasons, will somehow work for the benefit of us all.
- John Maynard Keynes
01:13 PM on 04/05/2011
When will we ever learn? Even Adam Smith thought that healthy capitalism would be regulated, first by a social compact between labor and wealth and then by "vested self interests" that would keep forces in check. We haven't protected our water and air as we should. We ascribe decency and good motives to companies who are all too often only in it for the profit. We buy into the demonization of "regulators" and "watchdogs" and let silly commentators belittle their importance. Here's your evidence of just how well that particular brand of acquiesence works out. Or as Bill Engvall might say "Here's your sign".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FilthyHarry
Expletive Deleted
08:07 AM on 04/05/2011
This can't be true! Wouldn't 'self-interest' and/or the 'invisible hand' of the free market have kept companies from potentially making their customer base sick?
photo
sven1olaf
Liberty and Justice for all!
10:42 AM on 04/05/2011
in a market not protected by privatized interests... perhaps
04:03 PM on 04/05/2011
Utopia.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSWatchdog
citizen
03:27 AM on 04/05/2011
They've also known that fluoride was an industrial waste forced on cities by the Federal Government via the States. It's a poison that has never been proven to fight tooth decay but does a lot of other bad things to our bodies. Now that the Shadows want us working longer , instead of dying after retirement so we don't collect Social Security they finally had the FDA state that it should be cut back by 60%.
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
07:52 AM on 04/05/2011
This sounds very familiar.......
General Jack D. Ripper: Nineteen hundred and forty-six. 1946, Mandrake. How does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hard-core Commie works.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robnelsong
Dire Wolfman
01:25 PM on 04/05/2011
Dr. Strangelove should be required viewing for all conspiracy theorists.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Callah
You can't fix stupid, not even with duct tape.
03:04 PM on 04/05/2011
The problem is, the crazy in the movie was right....well about the Fluoride, not about the commies...the terrible thing here is that we are paying through the nose to get poisoned by our own people. They knew alright, just like they knew when they dumped Iodine 131 into milk and fed it to the citizens of Washington State, Idaho, Oregon, North Dakota, South Dakota and Oklahoma in 1953/54/55. See Operation Green Run at Los Alamos Public Records or Wikipedia for a direct link.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FilthyHarry
Expletive Deleted
08:06 AM on 04/05/2011
Well i certainly don't know anything about it but I do know you can visually see the difference in people's teeth if you go someplace with no fluoride in the water.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George McAulay
Delighted to meet you
01:45 AM on 04/05/2011
Be thankful that Union Carbide didn't kill thousands of you like they did in Bhopal, India. They got away scot free on that as they have here in Australia having destroyed Sydney Harbour's water with leached agent orange and DDT by burying the crap in landfill years ago. It will be generations before the local seafood can be eaten safely or the ground water can be drunk.
01:15 PM on 04/05/2011
And is anyone going to jail for it....I think I know the answer to that one.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gr8abz
01:32 AM on 04/05/2011
Tea Baggers love water that's treated with chromium. It's a symbol to them of keeping regulations at bay and preserving their liberties.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
efmo
Oh no, my micro-bio is empty!
04:42 PM on 04/05/2011
That's when I lost all respect for John Stossel (didn't know he was a libertarian at the time) but he was on 20/20 several years ago doing a story on the Erin Brokovich/Hinckley story & was basically pooh-poohing it. He said the company never admitted wrongdoing in the settlement, etc. They were never found guilty of polluting the water (or however he put it) which was meant to imply it was just the poor company getting taken advantage of, etc. There was no firm proof hex VI was really a problem to people either. At the end of the segment, Barbara Walters asked him if he would drink the water & he blinked & then said "that wasn't the point". Well, if you believe it was overzealous prosecution of an innocent power company, then you should be able to say adamantly "yes, I would drink the water" without a second's hesitation!
01:25 AM on 04/05/2011
The sheer shame of learning of the stupidity of corporate America *alone* is killing me faster than the actual effects of it...
01:17 PM on 04/05/2011
Except, it isn't stupidity on the part of corporate America. It's all part of their cost benefit analysis and we're just so much collateral damage in their quest for ever greater profits.
photo
AwakeNow
just flew into town
10:59 PM on 04/04/2011
At this time in our history of america, I suppose that if the water doesn't get you ... then the air will.

Peace
01:17 PM on 04/05/2011
And Lord help us when they figure out how to charge us for sunshine. We'll have solar powered everything (and probably mandated too)
10:16 PM on 04/04/2011
The truth is coming out in the water....hopefully soon the truth about flouride toxicity will come into the light. No more industrial waste products in our water poisoning us!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
We built America without BO
10:01 PM on 04/04/2011
Radon is more of a problem. Ditto arsenic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:21 AM on 04/05/2011
But if there is arsenic in your water you probably know it. And a sand and iron filter can clean it out of the water. Hexavalent chromium is a carcinogen. If you know it's there you can choose not to drink the water. Or demand it be treated. Sad that these water companies thought it cheaper and easier not to inform their customers that the water was contaminated.