Hundreds Rally For Higher Wages On Anniversary Of King's Death

Fair Wages For New Yorkers Act

First Posted: 04/05/11 01:20 PM ET Updated: 08/04/11 10:47 PM ET

NEW YORK -- Hundreds of New Yorkers rallied on the 43rd anniversary of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s assassination Monday night, calling for the passage of legislation aimed at raising wages for most workers at developments receiving public subsidies.

A group of more than 250 interfaith leaders, politicians, labor organizers and community members filled the Bethel Baptist Church in Brooklyn, while another 400 met at the Bronx Pentecostal Deliverance Center, to advocate for the Fair Wages for New Yorkers Act. The bill would mandate a $10 hourly wage -- or $11.50 without benefits -- at large, publicly-funded developments. Pay increases for workers at those sites would be tied to inflation to ensure their "living wage" status.

Although there are no citywide statistics on the average wage of employees at subsidized developments, a recent report [.pdf] on three city-supported developments found the five most common non-managerial jobs all paid starting wages of less than $10 per hour. The job sites included a Fresh Direct Warehouse, which has received $2.2 million in city subsidies since 1999, and Yankee Stadium, which has been given "nearly $50 million in City tax breaks, more than $1.2 billion in tax‐exempt financing [...] and over $326 million in estimated city capital improvements," according to the report, jointly produced by Good Jobs New York, the Fiscal Policy Institute and the National Employment Law Project.

"When we provide subsidies to developers and companies in the name of job creation, what type of jobs are we creating?" City Council Member Brad Lander said in a phone interview. The Fair Wages for New Yorkers Act is "a no-brainer," he added: "It is about basic human dignity. It is economically smart. We have a scarce pot of those subsidies [and] it seems patently obvious to me that the best use of scarce dollars for job creation is to create jobs you can sustain your family on."

Michael Valdez, a Fordham University student who used to work as a cashier at Yankee Stadium, said in an interview shortly before his speech at Monday's rally in Brooklyn that his time at Yankee Stadium "was awful" -- at $8.50 an hour and without benefits. And since shifts were frequently overbooked, he said, "You would have to come in and wait two or three hours before you could even clock in [and] if they got enough workers, they would send everybody else home."

"Here in New York, living is so expensive. With these jobs that offer [so little], you definitely cannot support a family." Valdez added. "Even as a college student, it is difficult."

Living Wage NYC, the umbrella coalition that has been organizing the push for the wage bill for the past year, has been led by the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union. In a speech at Monday night's rally in Brooklyn, RWDSU President Stuart Appelbaum evoked King's legacy, recounting how King traveled to Memphis in 1968 to join sanitation workers "in a march for living wage jobs" to "preach the message that no job holder should live in poverty" on the day before he was assassinated.

"More than 40 years later, the need for living wage jobs is more urgent than ever," Appelbaum said. "These companies take, but all they give back is dead-end, low-wage jobs. As a city, we can and must do better. It is our moral imperative."

The two rallies come as the City Council gears up for its first hearing on the living wage legislation sometime in late April.

Currently, a majority of Council members support the bill, but it is unclear whether Council Speaker Christine Quinn, who largely controls the body, will support its passage. Quinn has been courting business interests in advance of an expected 2013 mayoral run.

At the Brooklyn rally, Rev. Robert Waterman of the Antioch Baptist Church offered a veiled swipe at Quinn. "City Council, you need to listen up. City Council Members, let's stop dealing with personal ambitions preventing you from standing up because you are looking for your next step up," Waterman said.

Earlier Monday, Martin Luther King III, the eldest son of the civil rights leader, offered his support for the living wage bill. According to the New York Observer, King's endorsement came after a heavy push by RWDSU for his support.

"People see something very wrong happening," King said in a statement. "Corporations getting richer from tax subsidies offered in the name of economic development yet making people poorer with low-wage jobs."

Some critics, including a coalition of local chambers of commerce, have said the bill would seriously harm businesses.

But Maisha Morales, who owned a small religious supply store in Albee Square Mall in Brooklyn before it was redeveloped by the Bloomberg administration, contested that idea. "As a former small business owner who was able to pay living wages, I believe there is no reason why corporations and big box retail stores can't do the same." Morales said at Monday's Brooklyn rally. "Especially when they are usually the ones being given these tax incentives in these new developments."

Correction: an earlier version of this article incorrectly stated the findings of a report conducted by Fiscal Policy Institute, National Employment Law Project, and Good Jobs New York. The report found that the five most common non-managerial jobs at three developments receiving city subsidies paid starting wages of less than $10 per hour, and not that these jobs all paid wages below $10 per hour.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST NEW YORK

NEW YORK -- Hundreds of New Yorkers rallied on the 43rd anniversary of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s assassination Monday night, calling for the passage of legislation aimed at raising wages for most work...
NEW YORK -- Hundreds of New Yorkers rallied on the 43rd anniversary of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s assassination Monday night, calling for the passage of legislation aimed at raising wages for most work...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 105
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:04 PM on 04/08/2011
I think they should march every day and ask for higher wages.Or even 2-3 times/day.it can't be done too much
07:11 PM on 04/08/2011
If they march 2 or 3 times a day every day what would they be receiving higher wages for doing?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
loosebowel
The Truth and Nothing but the Truth
07:20 AM on 04/07/2011
A living wage in this economy of unemployment. Who's idea was this?
07:29 PM on 04/05/2011
a better solution would be to close them down and save the taxpayers $$
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dirtydog1776
rub my soft, furry, objectivist tummy
06:04 PM on 04/05/2011
New York is so expensive to live in because of all the rules, mandates, regulations and laws. A regular liberal paradise on earth. They even have "Salt Police." It all costs money and is so inefficient, which is typical of liberal schemes to save you from yourself. Passing a living wage sounds good, but merely chases businesses away, makes New York even more expensive and does nothing to address the problem that many people have no marketable skills or skills that people are not willing to pay for government mandated prices. You wouldn't like it if the government forced you to shop where they dictated? Think about it and yes, I be one mean, little puppy, but rub my soft belly and feel better.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deans2cents
I speak my mind...
05:11 PM on 04/05/2011
Higher wages? How about i just get ajob that pays first!
04:27 PM on 04/05/2011
Yes, by all means, pay more for unskilled labor. It worked for the auto manufacturers...

Oh wait...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
04:44 PM on 04/05/2011
Yes,you wai-. pay it was not the reason why America auto manufactures went down.
Check again,quality price and competition!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
04:45 PM on 04/05/2011
*wait
04:14 PM on 04/05/2011
"Here in New York, living is so expensive. With these jobs that offer [so little], you definitely cannot support a family." Valdez added. "Even as a college student, it is difficult."

I'll give him some free and good advise. How about move elsewhere! I know I can't live in NYC b/c I don't make enough. But I have brains to realize, I can make it quite comfortably elsewhere. I am still close enough to travel to NYC when I want but I pay a third of what it would cost in the city. I also found I would get paid the same.
04:51 PM on 04/05/2011
That is MUCH easier said than done...especially when you have a family...it costs money to move...and you have to find a job, a place to live, a respectable place for your kids to go to school, a university/college that will transfer your credit hours, etc.
09:06 AM on 04/06/2011
Ben there, Done that.
03:48 PM on 04/05/2011
Demanding higher wages for entry level jobs means fewer workers and more expensive goods that people wont buy. Like say a ten dollar hot dog at the stadium. Doesn't sell. Grow a brain people.
04:06 PM on 04/05/2011
That doesn't make any sense. So giving higher wages to entry level workers equates to $10 hotdogs, but increasing executive salary by leaps and bounds doesn't? Typically when one does a budget, salaries are all lumped together. So $1.50/hr. more for entry level workers wouldn't have any different effect on the price of a hotdog at a stadium than anyone ELSE who also got a salary increase.

Ironic that you're telling people to "grow a brain".
04:36 AM on 04/06/2011
Diffidently, I explain,whoever is paying the well rewarded executive feels their efforts will result in more money coming to the employer than the expense of the hire.Obviously,that's not the case with the living wage recipients.Many business owners dislike hiring folks who will cost them more than they generate
It's a simple conceept.I wonder you don't understand it.
photo
behindEnemyLines
Put down the talking point pamphlet.
03:43 PM on 04/05/2011
So $10 an hour is the mythical "living wage" number?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whomod
Saved By Grace
04:29 PM on 04/05/2011
Yep.

$10 dollars an hour wouldn't even cover rent, much less bills, gas and groceries.

I don't understand why we Democrats are so averse to 'family values" considering it's the tool the gOp use to steal swing voters and independents from us.

For instance, conservative 'family values" dictates that it is preferable to have 1 wage earner earn enough to support his own family without forcing the wife to also have to work rather than properly watch and raise the children. That plays right into the evangelical belief about how 'womens lib' destroyed the family. Of course this beliefs doesn't take into account the economic necessity of two wage earners in the family. Which is what really is destroying families. And that's the Democrats opening. If they ever choose to wake up and take it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grovestand12
E Pluribus Unum...O, 2012!
03:32 PM on 04/05/2011
of course there was little to no msm coverage of this because the were no baggers there. had there been at least three baggers on board, trust and believe, the msm would have been all over this story.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:31 PM on 04/05/2011
Maybe people should lower their cost of living.
03:44 PM on 04/05/2011
lol ok....not that I'm advocating a forced living wage 9theres a lot of fall out from doing such). But the holes in your simplistic argument are big enough to drive a tank through.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tangelan
"We don't believe you!" Alright, alright.
04:22 PM on 04/05/2011
In profit over people economy we've been lowering our standard of living for years.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JSanders2000
03:29 PM on 04/05/2011
"You would have to come in and wait two or three hours before you could even clock in [and] if they got enough workers, they would send everybody else home." If the wage is raised, wouldn't there be more workers waiting? Where is the logic? Stupid.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:28 PM on 04/05/2011
Key word is "hundreds" Apparently 100 people showed up in Trenton, even less in other cities, in what was supposed to be a massive day of solidarity. Seems like more people like the idea of helping the middle-class rather than st0ping all over them like the union heads want to.

Epic Fail!



http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2011/04/05/by-the-dozens-unions-stage-not-so-massive-we-are-one-rallies/
03:45 PM on 04/05/2011
Cheering on the death of America.

Way to go. Unless you are rich you are next.
03:17 PM on 04/05/2011
Rock on! A living wage. Not "slave" wage. We can do better!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quindy
quindy
03:02 PM on 04/05/2011
Non-Doorman Doorman

Most Expensive Least Expensive Most Expensive Least Expensive

Studios TriBeCa, $3847 Harlem, $1593 TriBeCa, $3212 Harlem, $1641
One-bedrooms TriBeCa, $4183 Harlem, $1595 SoHo, $4416 Harlem, $2295
Two-bedrooms TriBeCa, $6283 Harlem, $2146 SoHo, $8173 Harlem, $2621

$10/hour time 10 hours per day times 30 days per month makes $3000. That is to assume a person does not take any day off. How is that a living wage with average rental prices shown above?
realitybaby
Livin in realitybaby!
03:38 PM on 04/05/2011
ahh havent u figured out yet that NYC is NOT for poor people?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quindy
quindy
04:41 PM on 04/05/2011
Look, I live in New York City, I was just posting it for those who think that $10 bucks will do it.
04:07 PM on 04/05/2011
Why am I not paying those prices? B/c I don't live there. How about move to a place one can afford. I would love to live at those places, but I realize it is not a right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quindy
quindy
04:43 PM on 04/05/2011
Yeah, let's close all the schools, restaurants, subways, museums, theaters, books stores and so on because the people who work there cannot afford to live there. What kind of thinking is it?