iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Education Budget Cuts: Schools Face Fiscal Cliff As Stimulus Money Runs Out

By SEAN CAVANAGH and HEATHER HOLLINGSWORTH   04/06/11 05:51 AM ET  AP

-- As lawmakers around the country debate their states' budgets, they're staring over the edge of a massive fiscal cliff – the point where about $100 billion in federal stimulus money for education will run out.

The end of that money will compound states' severe budget woes and likely lead to thousands of layoffs and the elimination of popular school programs around the country.

The bulk of the money, part of $814 billion provided under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act passed in 2009, went to save the jobs of teachers and other school employees, as state and local revenue dried up during the prolonged economic downturn. Lawmakers in many states drew criticism for making deep cuts in state education spending and replacing the money with stimulus dollars, thus avoiding cuts elsewhere in their budgets.

States are required to have spent most of their education stimulus money by September, and most will burn through it by the end of the current academic year, budget officials say.

And while state economies are showing signs of life, tax revenue is not increasing fast enough to make up the loss.

"It's not like that money was the icing on the cake," said Michael Griffith, a senior policy analyst at the Education Commission of the States, in Denver. "It was the cake."

Officials in some states saw the cliff coming from the start and encouraged districts to use stimulus money in ways that would not produce ongoing costs they could not cover when the emergency aid ran out, such as temporary tutors or improvements to buildings to make them more accessible for students with disabilities.

"There was a lot of caution about people employing folks, because when that money is gone, it's gone," said Ray Lankford, Missouri's Deputy Commissioner of Education. "A lot of them did program improvements and short-term employment to address specific issues."

While Congress tried to cushion the blow for states through its approval last year of a $10 billion Education Jobs Fund, state officials say that money is not enough to replace the lost stimulus dollars.

The situation is compounded by a reluctance to raise taxes in many states.

In Florida, freshman Republican Gov. Rick Scott's budget for fiscal 2011-12 would cut state K-12 spending from $17.3 billion to $16.5 billion, a decrease of about 5 percent. The end of $872 million in stimulus money would boost that cut to roughly 10 percent compared with the current year.

The combined weight of those state and federal cuts would force Florida's Volusia County school district to cut an estimated 900 employees, said Margaret A. Smith, the system's superintendent. The 62,000-student district has cut 1,500 positions and $75 million from its budget in the past two years.

Further cuts will hit programs in art, music, and physical education, as well as extracurricular and sports programs, she said.

In Ohio, Gov. John Kasich has proposed increasing state aid for schools by 1 percent to 2 percent for each of the next two years. The evaporation of federal stimulus money will mean a net decrease of 5 percent to 6 percent below current levels, said David Varda, the executive director of the Ohio Association of School Business Officials.

Of about $100 billion in total education-focused stimulus aid, about $79 billion was devoted to K-12 programs. The biggest chunk went to help states restore school programs cut because of the recession. Smaller portions went to special education programs and federal Title I programs for poor children.

The stimulus money also paid for competitive programs aimed at fueling innovative reforms, most notably the $4.35 billion Race to the Top program.

But the vast majority of the money was designed to save jobs. The U.S. Department of Education has estimated that the stimulus funds saved some 368,000 school-related jobs during the 2009-10 school year.

Education is "a worker-intensive business," Griffith said. "If you're cutting positions, you're cutting programs."

In Tennessee, districts used the federal money in part to add employees, particularly instructional and curricular coaches, said Amanda Anderson, a spokeswoman for the state Department of Education.

Massachusetts strongly encouraged districts to use at least 50 percent of their Title I money on "strategic investments" that would leave long-term benefits for students, said J.C. Considine, a spokesman for the state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.

Wyoming, a state insulated from much of the recent economic pain by its strong energy industry, is actually planning to return $10 million of the $82 million in stabilization money, said Jeanne Norman of the state's Office of State Lands and Investments.

A few Wyoming districts have used stimulus money to pay for teaching jobs, but more of them have spent it on computer software, student programs, and building maintenance.

Idaho's stimulus funding saved jobs and restored work days that school employees were going to take off through furloughs, said Melissa McGrath, a spokeswoman for the state Education Department. But districts also bought classroom materials, computer software and remediation services for students, which will help in the post-stimulus era, she said.

Nearly every state will use the $10 billion Education Jobs Fund approved last year to make up for the loss of stimulus money. One exception is South Carolina, which did not receive its $140 million share because of large cuts the state made to higher education, which violated the law's requirement to maintain spending in that area.

Texas has seen a much larger chunk of jobs aid, $830 million, blocked because state officials have not been able to promise they would meet congressional rules for maintaining future K-12 spending. The 2010 stimulus requires assurances that the state won't cut its own education spending in response to the federal money, and Texas has taken that requirement to federal court.

The state faces an estimated $27 billion, two-year budget shortfall that could cost as many as 65,000 school employees their jobs, the Texas Association of School Administrators estimates.

States that have received education jobs money appear to be on very different schedules for spending it – which by law they can do this academic year or next.

Missouri has not yet spent any of its $190 million share but is counting on it to make up for shrunken state revenues and the stimulus gap, as is New Jersey, which saved its share to cover the coming academic year.

In Idaho, 50 of the 115 school districts have drawn down a combined $5 million of the state's $51.6 million allotment. State officials have proposed K-12 budget cuts for next year, so the remaining money is expected to help make up some of the loss. Massachusetts' school districts so far have spent about half the state's $204 million jobs money.

Iowa will receive $97 million through the federal Education Jobs Fund. But that's small compared to the stimulus money that saved an estimated 3,500 jobs, said Jeff Berger, the chief financial officer and government-relations coordinator for the state Education Department.

___

Cavanagh reported from Washington, and Hollingsworth reported from Kansas City, Mo. Also contributing to this report were Associated Press writers Geoff Mulvihill in Trenton, N.J.; Jessie L. Bonner in Boise, Idaho; Bob Moen in Cheyenne, Wyo.; Steve LeBlanc in Boston; and Seanna Adcox in Columbia, S.C.; and Education Week Assistant Editor Michele McNeil.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

Filed by Erica Liepmann  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 113
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
04:32 PM on 04/08/2011
If you hear someone speak out against an elected official who plans to "cut money for education" or something like that, ask this person how the budgeted money currently is being used. If a large share of it is indiscriminately being paid to teachers, regardless of how much they taught students, then you have reason to demand more education for your education dollars.

http://schoolsteach.blogspot.com/2011/04/cutting-money-for-education-part-1-in.html

Where there is no connection between education results and the dollars allocated for education, there is nothing to prevent tenured teachers from collecting your education dollars into their retirement for doing little more than babysitting.

By the way, I have been an educator for over a decade.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:44 AM on 04/07/2011
Why isn't anyone acknowledging the costs of special education? P.L. 94-142 (now IDEA) mandated that ALL students, regardless of disability or of cost would be educated in public schools. This is a civil right, but it's a very expensive one. I don't understand why people complain that education costs more now when I can't think of any public service that costs less than it used to. Of course education is more expensive now. We have to pay for therapists and special education teachers and sometimes have separate rooms. Some students need their own aide. We have one student in our school who needs his own nurse. How much do you think that costs? We also have rooms where children prone to violence have one teacher and several aides for less than a dozen students. That is also expensive, and those expenses are needed all over the nation. And how about unfunded mandates? That means schools have to provide services and, if it isn't in one budget, it has to be taken from another one. Charter schools and private schools don't have to provide those services, but public schools do. I'd like to see anyone provide those services at what education used to cost years ago. You'd be sued by parents and in court so fast! And you would lose.
01:17 AM on 04/07/2011
Homeschool.
10:46 PM on 04/06/2011
I have to stop asking "What could possibly happen next?"

*sigh*
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bushman68
Not George
10:32 PM on 04/06/2011
Perfect example of a major drawback of the stimulus plan. it's like welfare on crack. A huge handout makes many states become reliant on the fed...even more than before. If we try to go back to previous spending levels, all we here is "oh,the children, what about the children? Jobs! We need more gov't jobs! And don't forget the old people. They'll be eating cat food before you know it.". We have to stop spending money we don't have.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eugene Berkovich
Unapologetic Socialist
11:34 PM on 04/06/2011
NO money to pay teachers - thousands or millions of new unemployed. Fewer teachers means larger classes, level of instruction goes down, student participation goes down, time a teacher has to spend with a student goes down. Education will suffer.

We need more government investment in schools, instead of government investment in the pockets of the rich.
05:39 PM on 04/07/2011
We have or rather the 1% of the ultrarich in this country have plenty of $$$. We have to make sure the rich get richer and the schools for 99% else get cut cut cut because we need to drive down the 99%. After all, U.S. citizens don't need jobs, don't need an education. We don't need any more handouts for that states. It's better to cut those jobs, have 60 students in a class like Nigeria or Afghanistan.
rdk70816
Yellowhammer
09:54 PM on 04/06/2011
Save your child's education. Abolish the US Department of Education and allow states and localities to do the job. Test scores for students will escalate vigorously.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eugene Berkovich
Unapologetic Socialist
11:31 PM on 04/06/2011
Garbage. We need a unified curriculum, enforced from a central body, which would ensure that no locality, no state produces kids who were not given the chance to compete because some local fools took over a school district and forced some creationist or other agenda into the mix. Together we're strong. When we have local people running education we throw the kids under the bus
06:37 AM on 04/07/2011
I hate NCLB, but can you imagine the difference in quality education, between the states, if we did that?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vandercule
09:44 PM on 04/06/2011
The students will be better off. In Wisconsin, despite $2 Billion in extra funding over the last 10 years, only 29% of 8th Graders are deemed "Proficient" in reading. What's really sad is that it is a well known fact that students always try to emulate their teachers.....!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:50 PM on 04/06/2011
No, they emulate their parents. Those parents are spread so thin trying to support their families that children are being neglected, and left to the world of media. By the time they get to school they are often not ready to learn. The right's economic policies are ultimately driving the inequity that causes such neglect and educational problems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flyr1710
09:36 PM on 04/06/2011
simple..the less educated people are, the higher likelihood the people in power can stay in power by spewing lies to brainwash the electorate....think about it
07:24 PM on 04/06/2011
Guess the era of 180 day contracts for teachers is over.
Time to end teacher tenure - and enlarge school disctrict sizes in order to get rid of useless 'administrators' who pull in higher salaries than teachers - but don't teach.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vandercule
09:48 PM on 04/06/2011
I would settle for 180 days but: Take off 3 Bereavement Days; up to 7 "Undocumented" sick days; 3-4 days of "Get the classroom ready for the Fall term and close the classroom for the Summer recess"; 2 Teacher/Parent Conference days; 2 Supt. Conference days; Snow days; and we're back to about 165. I know. I was a local School Board President.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheMilesHome
In the Conservatory, with a Pipe Wrench.
07:01 PM on 04/06/2011
Look, you either believe in the American dream or you don't.

Anybody who thinks public schools should go the way of the Edsel, are un-American, at best. Charter schools are limited. Private schools are more costly. And unless the voucher system pays 100% for a child to go "anywhere he wants", reform the system, like the global economy is TRYING to teach us.
12:03 AM on 06/05/2011
It actually costs LESS per child to run a private school than public due to the extra things (free breakfast, free lunch, etc. ) and due to the benefits and salary of teachers.
Private schools are generally exempt from most educational regulations, but tend to follow the spirit of regulations concerning the content of courses in an attempt to provide a level of education equal to or better than that available in public schools
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:58 PM on 04/06/2011
It's happening, the transfiorming of America into a third world banana republic.

These headlines remind me of what I witnessed in Venezuela after the IMF/World Parasites demanded they cut support for schools in order bail out the banksters.

Back then, America laughed at Latin America and Africa and called them "backwards", now those same banksters demand the U.S. to cut school funding to bail out impossible derivatives.

Who's laughing now?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Boomer946
Time to expose the man behind the curtain
06:52 PM on 04/06/2011
Look at the bright side. The Repug'icans are trying to kill child labor laws across the country while simultaneously pushing to cut education funding which will result in fewer teachers and also eliminating the minimum wage, especially for minors. So, why not just leap to the ultimate conclusion of this tragedy by passing all this legislation, let the kids skip out on school altogether cause they won't have a chance to learn anything. Let them all get jobs making fifty cents an hour to help our corporations better compete with China. This is what the Repugs and the corporations want anyway!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vandercule
09:52 PM on 04/06/2011
Wow! And our teachers are doing such a good job that only 40% of HS Seniors could identify the decade in which WW II started. And that was a "trick" question in that there are two correct answers; 1930s for Europe; 1940s for USA.

And, in International Competitions involving US HS Seniors vs peers in developed countries, we came in 24 out of 25 in Math. We did beat out Mexico. But I suspect the exam was given in English.

GOOGLE: A lying Democrats worst nightmare!
06:40 AM on 04/07/2011
But I bet those kids can bubble in a test perfectly. We spend all our time prepping for the FCAT. Kids that are behind are put on computers with the "required" test prep programs to increase their test scores. KIDS HATE SCHOOL NOW and I don't blame them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Boomer946
Time to expose the man behind the curtain
12:32 PM on 04/07/2011
So from reading my post you decided the teachers are the perfect target for blame? If it were that simple we could solve it in a day. There is no doubt our education system is doing a poor job in a lot of areas. Even so, we still produce a lot of students who are able to compete with the world. In fact consider how the U.S. got in the global leadership position we have bragged about for over a half century: it was education at all levels. I've known people who did lousy in grade school and high school, but who had an epiphany afterwards and obtained advanced degrees and became solid to exceptional contributors to our country in various fields. Being a Baby Boomer several of my associates got those epiphanies in Viet Nam realizing that life was precious and shouldn't be wasted. Others labored in deadend jobs for several years before realizing they wanted more and needed a degree to move ahead. Some met people who inspired them to pursue excellence in all things and changed their course.

So, yes, we have problems in our educational system, but the outcomes are not all negative, and we shouldn't conclude, as many conservatives seem to be doing, that we need to eliminate public education altogether because the results are not 100 percent positive from the very outset. As poor as it seems to be public education is still the single greatest factor responsible for the exceptionalism of America.
06:50 PM on 04/06/2011
Next time the states should wise up and refuse the federal stimulus money and avoid the situation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Veganie
Live food, live bodies
06:27 PM on 04/06/2011
There are dictators who plunder their countries and corporate leaders who plunder the people. The income gap is shameful, the wealthiest duty should be to make a safe product, treat employees fairly, provide decent benefits and pay.
07:25 PM on 04/06/2011
So we should borrow from China to pay our teachers more?

With decrease in tax revenues - time to cut back on govt employees.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Veganie
Live food, live bodies
07:43 PM on 04/06/2011
Increase taxes on the super-rich. A few years ago a poll showed 19% believed they were in the top percent!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vandercule
09:55 PM on 04/06/2011
JFK, the best Democrat President in ages, cut all taxes to the bone. During his term in office, the Treasury didn't know what to do with all the money that came in.. Till that Texan came in and spent it all on "The Great Society."

Problem is that JFK, today, couldn't win the Democrat primary for Dog Catcher in Podunk.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Russ Kirk
Don't confuse excess with success.
06:17 PM on 04/06/2011
Borrow more money now to pay for their education, then they can afford to pay the loan back later, with interest of courses.Thank you China.