More

Extended Unemployment Insurance Stopping Short In Several States

Unemployed

First Posted: 04/06/11 05:20 PM ET Updated: 06/06/11 06:12 AM ET

Extended unemployment insurance benefits for the long-term jobless are set to expire this month in North Carolina, Wisconsin, Indiana, and Tennessee, according to the U.S. Department of Labor.

Unless state lawmakers take action, laid off workers in those states will no longer receive benefits under the federal Extended Benefits program as of April 16.

Indiana legislators are working on last-minute legislation to maintain the state's eligibility for EB, which provides up to 20 weeks of federally-funded benefits for long-term jobless who exhaust 26 weeks of state benefits and up to 53 weeks of federal Emergency Unemployment Compensation. The unemployment rate in Indiana is 8.8 percent.

"Since the federal government is picking that expense up it's kind of foolish not to help the unemployed people out in Indiana a little bit," said State Rep. Dan Leonard (R), who said he sponsored legislation that unanimously passed a committee vote Wednesday and should reach the governor's desk next week. Leonard said the state's Department of Workforce Development brought the issue to his attention last week.

"We think it's important to push it through in a quick fashion and get it done," Leonard said.

A spokeswoman for Gov. Mitch Daniels (R) declined to comment on whether the governor supports the legislation.

The legislation is necessary because the long-term jobless are eligible for 20 weeks of EB if the job market in their state meets two conditions. First, the state's unemployment rate during the most recent three months must be above 8 percent. Second, the rate must be at least 10 percent higher than it was during the corresponding three month period in either of the two previous years. (If the unemployment rate is above 6.5 percent, then the state is eligible for 13 weeks of EB instead of 20.)

Even though unemployment remains high in most states, rates haven't risen in such a way over the past two years that states can continue to meet the second condition for EB eligibility. That's why Congress, when it reauthorized the federal benefits programs in December, included a provision allowing states to modify their laws so the EB "look back" encompasses the previous three years instead of just two.

"In general, unemployment rates three years ago were low enough to meet the look-back requirements for the EB 'on' indicators," advised a December Labor Department memo to state workforce agencies. The Labor Department publishes a monthly "trigger notice report."

Some advocates for continuing the benefits worry the problem of outdated EB "look back requirements" and "on indicators" is so abstruse that state lawmakers are either unaware or ignorant of the problem.

"Too many misguided and/or uninformed state legislators are either choosing to deny their state's unemployed workers UI benefits they so desperately need, or are simply neglecting to deal with the issue that will come into play after they adjourn," Judy Conti, a lobbyist for the National Employment Law Project, wrote in an email. "There is an easy legislative fix for all of this, the money has been appropriated, and it is of the utmost importance to very vulnerable citizens in their states."

Lawmakers and governors' offices in Wisconsin, Tennessee, and North Carolina either had no comment or did not respond to requests for comment from HuffPost.

California, Colorado, and Michigan have changed their laws to maintain eligibility for the benefits, according to the Labor Department. (Though Michigan curtailed future state benefits at the same time it changed its EB trigger.)

In Missouri, a Republican state senator who filibustered a bill that would maintain the state's eligibility for EB relented on Tuesday, deciding to focus his anti-spending efforts on federal stimulus measures instead of federal unemployment benefits.

The National Employment Law Project expects Alaska, Alabama, Kentucky, and Virginia to trigger off EB benefits after the Labor Department releases state unemployment rates later this month.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Extended unemployment insurance benefits for the long-term jobless are set to expire this month in North Carolina, Wisconsin, Indiana, and Tennessee, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. Unl...
Extended unemployment insurance benefits for the long-term jobless are set to expire this month in North Carolina, Wisconsin, Indiana, and Tennessee, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. Unl...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 498
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
av1drdr
07:37 PM on 04/29/2011
Many factories in Republican controlled Georgia close the doors for the week of July 4th. This makes the workers eligible for a weeks worth of unemployment compensation. This allows paid vacations without costing the companies a dime. They actually sign the workers up for the unemployment inside the business. Does anyone know if this practice is done in other states and how it can be better exposed?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
12:11 PM on 04/18/2011
Thom Hartmann and Nicole Sandler are reporting that the crowd booed Sarah Palin at her Wisconsin rally this past weekend. Who in the corporate media has reported this?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
12:01 PM on 04/18/2011
There are some agressive trolls on this thread. They really want to smear the unemployed just like they are doing to teachers, police and firefighters. It is all about their wealthy masters paying less taxes.
01:52 PM on 04/16/2011
Unemployment went up this week and the republicans are in the house-thought they were going to create jobs.
photo
99er2049er
Voted by mail for 2012 election - All Democrats
03:37 PM on 04/16/2011
Why do Republican tax cuts always expire in ten years or less?
They want to make them thirty but keep running out of fingers.

Why do Republicans get defined as the right?
Because nobody else has a single right with them in charge.
02:22 PM on 04/12/2011
TN Unemployment Rate is 9.6%. The TN Department of Labor and Workforce Development sent out letters dated 4/01, but most residents did not receive them until 4/07 informing them their benefits would be ending on 4/16. After being told they would be receiving 53 weeks of Federal Emergency Unemployment Compensation. How does a state with this high of an unemployment rate discontinue EB to anyone who has not been able to find employment, regardless of what Tier they are on?
photo
99er2049er
Voted by mail for 2012 election - All Democrats
03:38 PM on 04/16/2011
We can again thank the republicans for harming the poorest of poor, while they take that money and give it to the richest of rich. What a system.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
10:54 AM on 04/18/2011
The race to the bottom continues.
09:06 PM on 04/11/2011
AOL AND THE POST ONLY LETS YOU COMMENT ON WHAT THEY LIKE IF THEY DON'T LIKE IT THEY TAKE IT OFF
09:03 PM on 04/11/2011
REPUBLICANS CUT THE MONEY THAT YOU MAKE AND LEAVE THE PEOPLE ALONE.CUT WHAT YOU SEND OVERSEAS NOT THE PROGRAMS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED.WHATS WRONG WITH YOU ARE YOU ALL NUTS OR JUST WANT TO BE VOTED OUT.
08:57 PM on 04/11/2011
CUT OUR BENAFITS BUT KEEP SENDING ALL THAT MONEY OVERSEAS
photo
99er2049er
Voted by mail for 2012 election - All Democrats
02:03 PM on 04/07/2011
Lets all put it on the line here. If you want to cut unemployment benefits, lets cut a small percentage and do the exact same with the wealthy.

e.g.

Cut unemployment benefits by 15%
Stop the recent tax cut plan for the rich and make them pay higher taxes (say 3%)

That way everyone suffers equally. Lets see how well the GOP takes this idea.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
09:57 PM on 04/18/2011
The problem is that 3% wouldn't hurt a rich person much at all. They would grumble, but they wouldn't really hurt; they would not suffer.

But cutting unemployment benefits by 15%, an average of $45/week or $180 bucks a month is a lot of money for someone who is unemployed. That's a utility bill, food, gas for the car to get to job interviews.
photo
99er2049er
Voted by mail for 2012 election - All Democrats
10:31 PM on 04/18/2011
But the rich only remember making that amount when they were teenagers living under their parents roofs. They literally can't relate to being poor and unemployed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Croley
One Nation, Indivisible, for Liberty and Justice f
09:42 AM on 04/07/2011
America has gone from a Manufacturing society to a Service society. Is it a wonder that we are having a hard time finding jobs when they have been shipped away for pennies on the dollar?
photo
99er2049er
Voted by mail for 2012 election - All Democrats
01:45 PM on 04/07/2011
It's the double punch to the unemployed. First, their jobs are taken away from them and outsourced, and second the government doesn't want to help them with unemployment insurance extensions until they can find a job. At a minimum, continue the unemployment extensions (this at least keeps the unemployed and their families living at or below poverty level (survival) until they can find jobs).

I have been through several recessions before and lost jobs before, but this recession is by far the most difficult to find a job in.
photo
dayzee10
Get busy living or get busy dying! Damn right
08:11 AM on 04/07/2011
Want to aggravate a not in the top 2% retealibanbaggerican? Tell them Ryan's budget plan went through and their social security check is cut 40% and they have to buy their own medical plan starting July 1. Then sit back and watch the feathers fly.
07:01 AM on 04/07/2011
Oh, we don't have to worry about extending benefits in WI because our Governor raped public workers and the jobs are just going to start pouring in.
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
04:46 AM on 04/07/2011
Maybe when your unemployment runs out, a Tea Bagger will let you move into their basement for a small modest fee..........
photo
99er2049er
Voted by mail for 2012 election - All Democrats
01:48 PM on 04/07/2011
haahah or it will be like that movie, Night of the Living Dead, where all the poor and unemployed just turn into zombies and break our way into the rich peoples basements!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:25 AM on 04/07/2011
Mo can kiss it good bye if it hasn't done so already. We have a problem nobody wants to fix, address, or even go near. They instead want to keep stealing from programs, unemployment, jobs, healthcare, living wages, pushing forclosures, and more people out in the street. My question is this, where the hell is the money going they keep stealing? Its time the public is told where thier money went. It is time for no nonsense audits, total transparency, and firing of those responsible. I feel for those in other states, Mo is just as bad, with more jobs leaving. The lies in the media of new jobs opening is a lie and a farce. Its time people we fight back and fight smart and hard. Elect your write in candidate, they will represent you.
photo
99er2049er
Voted by mail for 2012 election - All Democrats
01:49 PM on 04/07/2011
Ask the rich where the next round of money will come from after they use up this latest batch from the poor. OK, we steal from the veterans, the poor, the unemployed, the unions, now the elderly. Who is next??? How about the corporations and the wealthy, who have more money than they know what to do with, thanks to stealing from the poor.
12:59 AM on 04/07/2011
Where are the jobs Boehner?
photo
99er2049er
Voted by mail for 2012 election - All Democrats
01:11 AM on 04/07/2011
I am asking the same question. Ok, again GOP you get your tax breaks, where are the jobs?
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
04:43 AM on 04/07/2011
Didn't you hear?...... McDonalds is hiring 50,000 new employees............

What the GOP didn't say was those newly created jobs would be at a wage where you could survive. What they don't say is sometimes more telling than what they do say.