More

U.S. Troops In Afghanistan Suffer More Catastrophic Injuries

Afghanistan Amputation

First Posted: 04/07/11 06:23 PM ET Updated: 06/07/11 06:12 AM ET

By Tony Perry, Los Angeles Times

Reporting from Landstuhl, Germany, and Helmand-- Grim combat statistics that one military doctor called "unbelievable" show U.S. troops in Afghanistan suffered an unprecedented number of catastrophic injuries last year, including a tripling of amputations of more than one limb.

A study by doctors at the Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany, where most wounded troops are sent before returning to the U.S., confirmed their fears: The battlefield has become increasingly brutal.

In 2009, 75 service members brought to Landstuhl had limbs amputated. Of those, 21 had lost more than one limb.

But in 2010, 171, 11% of all the casualties brought to Landstuhl, had undergone amputations, a much higher proportion than in past wars. Of the 171, 65 had lost more than one limb.

Injuries to the genital area were also on the increase. In 2009, 52 casualties were brought to Landstuhl with battlefield injuries to their genitals or urinary tract. In 2010, that number was 142.

Dr. John Holcomb, a retired Army colonel with extensive combat-medicine experience, said he and other doctors involved in the study were shocked by the findings, which he labeled as "unbelievable."

"Everybody was taken aback by the frequency of these injuries: the double amputations, the injuries to the penis and testicles," said Holcomb, now a medical professor at the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston. "Nothing like this has been seen before."

Military brass say the increase in catastrophic injuries can be attributed to the Taliban's use of improvised explosive devices, the roadside bombs that account for the majority of U.S. and NATO deaths and injuries. Last year was also the deadliest year for U.S. troops in Afghanistan, with 499 killed, according to the Defense Department.

Troops are increasingly vulnerable to injuries from such makeshift bombs as they mount foot patrols in an effort to win support from Afghan villagers, a key strategy in the counterinsurgency campaign.

An armored Humvee provides a measure of protection from a blast. A so-called mine-resistant vehicle provides more. But when a soldier or Marine steps on a roadside bomb, there is considerably less protection from flying shrapnel or super-heated air. Also, rocks, dirt and other debris embedded in a blast wound can cause immediate and devastating infections.

The hospital at Landstuhl is the busiest it has been since the battle in the Iraqi city of Fallouja in late 2004, officials said. Both the number and severity of wounds have increased, said Air Force Lt. Col. Raymond Fang, a surgeon and trauma medical director at Landstuhl.

The average patient stays about three days at Landstuhl before being airlifted to the U.S. for further care. "All we're doing is clearing up the destruction done by the injury," Fang said.

In Afghanistan, some officers believe the insurgents have increased both the explosive power of their improvised bombs and their ability to place them for maximum carnage.

Some of the explosives are placed on fences and other aboveground locations so that the blast strikes directly at the legs of passing Marines, soldiers or medical corpsmen who accompany combat troops.

"It's a weapon of terror designed to inflict the most grievous wounds," said Marine Maj. Gen. Richard Mills, formerly the top Marine in Afghanistan.

The increase in catastrophic wounds has taken an emotional toll on the medical personnel at Landstuhl, said Navy Cmdr. Joseph Sheldon, one of nine chaplains at the U.S. military hospital.

Sheldon and the other chaplains are also present when patients awake to learn of the extent of their battlefield injuries. He remembers sitting with a wounded Marine on Christmas Eve.

"There was a lot of silence and a lot of tears, for both of us," Sheldon said. "Everybody wants their life to be the way it was, but it's not. Coming to grips with that is hard."

After the Landstuhl study was first reported in the Washington Post, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) asked Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, for an explanation of the increase in amputations and what the military was doing to protect front-line personnel.

The Camp Pendleton-based 3rd Battalion, 5th Regiment, has been particularly hard hit, with 24 Marines killed and more than 175 wounded while deployed in the Sangin district of Helmand province.

More than a dozen Marines from the battalion have lost two or more limbs. One of them is 1st Lt. James Byler, 25, of Long Island, New York, who was leading a patrol in early October when an explosion severed his legs and snapped off the ends of several fingers.

Byler's patrol was walking slowly, carefully, in what is called "ranger style," with each man following in the footsteps of the man in front of him.

"Everyone had gone over that spot," said Byler, now recuperating in the U.S. "I was just the one who stepped on it when it exploded.

"It wasn't a big one, but it was enough to blow my legs off."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

By Tony Perry, Los Angeles Times Reporting from Landstuhl, Germany, and Helmand-- Grim combat statistics that one military doctor called "unbelievable" show U.S. troops in Afghanistan suffered an u...
By Tony Perry, Los Angeles Times Reporting from Landstuhl, Germany, and Helmand-- Grim combat statistics that one military doctor called "unbelievable" show U.S. troops in Afghanistan suffered an u...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 117
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeyJaii
Socialism.
09:09 PM on 04/09/2011
Because of war, it ruins all the lives of our soldiers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmosKnows
02:53 AM on 04/09/2011
The Beatles- While My Guitar Gently Weeps

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-xRRZUeC9A
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neighborhoodmole
no one really knows who anyone is here
07:55 PM on 04/08/2011
One of the reasons may be improved immediate care which results in a higher survival rate for these injuries which would have been fatal in the past. As the military gets better at high tech ways to stop bleeding and quickly evacuate the wounded, they will get survivors with increasingly horrific injuries. I just finished reading the book "My Nuclear Family" where the author describes seeing someone brought into the military ER in Iraq with just one arm left, but still alive.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicanada
Blogger, radio co-host, writer, editor, voice-over
01:35 PM on 04/08/2011
The cost of one of those prosthetics would put a student through college.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sam green 31605
fireobama2012 dotcom
08:09 PM on 04/08/2011
so how about just give them a tree limb and a whittling knife..here ya go and thanks for your sacrafice
photo
FaceTheTruth00
I'm a girl.
08:49 PM on 04/08/2011
Yeah well, in my opinion a soldier wounded in battle has done something with his life for the protection of us ALL; whereas a college student's education benefits himself, and perhaps his future employer.
photo
robadeaux
Your labels have expired....
05:03 AM on 04/11/2011
Those soldiers are not protect either you or anyone else in the US.
Keep believing in those myths... you can sleep better, and the posters point, I think, was it would be better to send them to college than a war for the profit of the MIC.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicanada
Blogger, radio co-host, writer, editor, voice-over
01:34 PM on 04/08/2011
this may seem harsh, but if we're over there to provide jobs and economic opportunity why can't these prosthetics be made locally?
01:09 PM on 04/08/2011
What they're not reporting (accurately enough) is this. The configuration of the explosives used have changed. The insurgents have figured out how to put a bomb together that can be detonated 3 or 400 meters away from our troops. The 'bomb' shoots a superheated jet of liquid copper at the target.

It can pierce metal, even the armor on up-armored humvees and strykers. And, because of the distance away from the troops, it's far, far more difficult to detect than (for example) some pile of explosives hidden under a rock by the roadside.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sam green 31605
fireobama2012 dotcom
07:24 PM on 04/08/2011
your spot on..you forgot that this tech is from Iran agents supporting insurgents
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chino66
03:13 AM on 04/11/2011
Because these type of IEDs have generally not been used in Afghanistan (EFPs). The majority of the IEDs are made from home made explosives.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Herz
12:56 PM on 04/08/2011
Seems to me that both Russians and Chinese might be supplying the Taliban with anti-personnel mines. I know that SVD rifles have been showing up in Afghanistan from that source.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sophiemaki
12:46 PM on 04/08/2011
this is not fair.
we need to exit .
petraeus is a war monger .......
why are we still there again? AQ has fled..
How are we spending 350 million dollars per day there? can someone answer that question?
Is it to keep us safe?
shameful.
01:05 PM on 04/08/2011
Petraeus may be a war monger. Or not.

Here is the reality.

The President of the United States has given him objectives. An unavoidable part of those objectives is killing people and breaking things. He has zero ability to *not* carry out the mission given him by the President of the United States in the manner his knowledge, training, and experience tell him is most likely to result in victory, subject to the limitations of time and resources given him by the President.

He faced this situation under Bush, and now under Obama. If he is not doing what Obama wants, Obama has the ability, and responsibility, to replace him.

Petraeus is not in charge: he is the tool of Obama. If you don't like what Petraeus does, talk to the hand that holds him.
photo
robadeaux
Your labels have expired....
05:05 AM on 04/11/2011
They are all the "tools" of the MIC... multinational war monger corporations...
the hand that holds us all...
12:20 PM on 04/08/2011
We need to leave Afghanistan there is nothing in that country that is worth 499 US lives.
01:05 PM on 04/08/2011
Right.
photo
checkmoot
We have met the enemy and he is us.
05:37 PM on 04/08/2011
Our military spending is up to about nine hundred billion a year. Some people are making enormous profits from our wars and the politicians are not going to interfere with that. Did the Iraq and Afghan wars make us any safer ? Of course not, that was never the point and is our new war in Libya going to make us safer ? Just gonna make some folks richer.
12:16 PM on 04/08/2011
I am an amputee and think we all need to get out of Afghanistan now. This is not a war, undeclared, it is a police action. Get all of our young men and women out now. Let's send over all the congress and senate without pay, like our solders, starting tomorrow. These rich politicians should go fight, since they are willing to stop there pay. Most of the military families live under the poverty level!
Then when these top Americans come home, they are forgotten. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer, our solders get screwed. We should change the congressmen and senators to match the solders pay. They don't give up there limbs and life. Sorry we all know about the senator in AZ. That is sad.
Just mad about the fact we are still there.
12:43 PM on 04/08/2011
We got paid last time. Funny, most of the people I am in with are middle class white boys...

I agree with you about the pay, but I wouldn't want some congressman getting in the way of my work.
12:11 PM on 04/08/2011
So when to mining operations begin?
photo
Str84Ward
life is all about the things you never figure out
11:47 AM on 04/08/2011
We have so much turmoil on our own soil. To keep waging war when a majority believes that death is glorified is, insane. There can't be a "true" war with an opposition that welcomes death ! Are we so egotistical to believe we must be the monitors for how countries are governed across the globe ?! How about building stregnth within our own borders for human rights, quality of life and a plan for a genuinely improved US ! WHY has our country become so very jaded and self absorbed that we do not stand up and refuse this senseless mass of global death & destruction ?! Were the protests against Vietnam more so due to the draft; such as our country had (a draft) for the gulf oil spill and employment cuts ? My son was fined thousands of dollars for having his battalion signia and RIP names of three young men who were KIA in an operation he was fully engaged in, tattooed on his upper arm. In staying closely in touch, it is clear that our soldiers more so fight for each other, not for a belief of protecting their country. They don't want to be there, they aren't remotely clear as to WHY they are there. (Many soldiers today were in jr. high when 9/11 sparked the wars.)
Many "re-up" for deployment to get back alongside their comrades. The "tattoo fine", my son says they can kiss his pilot wings.
02:50 PM on 04/08/2011
Well said. we have to wait now until Obama gets reelected to get out of there. Its absurd. And if some republican gets elected, then we will have to wait until that republican gets reelected to get out of the afghanistan abysm of horror. Its a shame.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:45 AM on 04/08/2011
Good, Huffington Post. I am glad you placed this article on the front page.
02:51 PM on 04/08/2011
I usually criticize the Huffington Post for being cheap, but I agree with you. These are news that must be known by the public. This horror has no reason to be.
TheAntiOkie
Saying you're Christian doesn't prove anything
10:28 AM on 04/08/2011
And the republicans want to cut off support for them after they come home.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sam green 31605
fireobama2012 dotcom
07:30 PM on 04/08/2011
you are kidding me...both D and R's have have been good to returning vets...there can and should be more done but this is one issue no party is playing politics with (for the most part)
TheAntiOkie
Saying you're Christian doesn't prove anything
08:41 PM on 04/08/2011
Start paying attention:

In Feb, one of the states started it:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/02/14/steve-avery-indiana-republicans-vote-to-cut-veterans-benefits/

Texas got into the act - no shock there:
The Texas Legislature is considering a 20 percent cut in the near $14 million in state funds which the TVC receives to provide veterans services across the state. This cut is, on average, disproportionate to the reductions other state agencies face. If approved, this will drastically reduce the TVC’s ability to provide services.

Bachmann was forced to back off her demand that Vet bennies be cut:

Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-Minn.) proposed this week $400 billion in “real and necessary” budget cuts in federal spending to avoid raising the budget ceiling from $14.3 trillion. The cuts include capping increases in Department of Veterans Affairs’ health care spending and reducing Social Security Disability Income (SSDI) payments for veterans, all to save a total of $4.5 billion.http://washingtonindependent.com/105208/bachmann-budget-cuts-propose-reducing-veterans-benefits

And this one is the cruelest cut of all:

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/mar/25/budget-ax-looms-over-vets-housing-program/



HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Louis A Delgado
01:17 AM on 04/09/2011
Sorrry not true. I worked 30 year for the VA (govt) 15 of those years as a field rep. I've seen veterans from WWII to now. I seen them as well as widows of veterans in the hospital, Nursing homes, in their homes and living in the streets. Trust me it just gets worse. The republicans have this attidude (and I have heard them) that any veteran wounded or not should be gald to have just to have served without any major compensation.