iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Planned Parenthood, Abortion & Federal Budget Fight

Planned Parenthood Federal Budget

DONNA CASSATA   04/ 8/11 11:20 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Republicans portray Planned Parenthood as primarily focused on performing abortions and – intentionally or not – using American taxpayer dollars to do it.

Not so, say Democrats who counter that the group's 800-plus health centers nationwide provide an array of services, from screenings for cancer to testing for sexually transmitted diseases. Abortion is just one of many procedures, and the law bars Planned Parenthood from using tax money for it.

In the budget maelstrom that threatened to partially shut the federal government Friday stood Planned Parenthood Federation of America, a 90-year-old organization now part of a decades-long congressional battle over abortion.

Republicans want any legislation keeping the government operating to bar federal dollars for Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest provider of abortions. They want to distribute the money to the states.

"The country is broke and the vast majority of Americans don't want tax dollars to take the life of unborn children," Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio., chairman of Republican Study Committee, told reporters in a conference call.

Democrats say they see a radical agenda against women's health, especially poor and low-income women, and won't allow it, even if that means shutting down the government.

"It is appalling that Republicans would hold our economic recovery hostage for a ransom of denying millions of women Pap tests, breast exams, and birth control," said Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y. "It shows their top priority is not keeping our economic recovery on track – it is reviving divisive social issues."

Republican leaders say that's just not so. The question of a shutdown, they said Friday, is about a need for greater cuts in federal spending, not social issues including abortion.

Abortion nearly scuttled President Barack Obama's health care overhaul in the final hours of debate last March. A year later, the stakes are still high, the political rhetoric fierce and the claims in need of clarification.

Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., wrote last month that the legislative fight is "Big Abortion vs. American taxpayers."

Giving its version, Planned Parenthood said it performed about 330,000 abortions last year, 3 percent of its total health care services. The organization also said its doctors and nurses annually conduct 1 million screenings for cervical cancer, 830,000 breast exams and some 4 million tests and treatments for sexually transmitted diseases.

"It's an outrage to shut down the government over an extreme proposal that would deny millions of women Pap tests, breast cancer screenings and birth control," Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, said in a statement. "Attacking Planned Parenthood's preventive health care hurts women, does not cut the deficit or fix the economy, and must be stopped."

Nine of the Senate's Democratic women stood together at a midday Capitol Hill news conference vowing to stop the House GOP effort.

"This is an opportunity for the right wing in the House to really sock it to women," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.

Said Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash.: "These women are a mighty line of defense against cutting Planned Parenthood."

The organization said it receives $363 million in federal funds, getting its money from both the Title X program and Medicaid. Title X provides grants for family planning and related health services under a law signed by Republican President Richard M. Nixon in December 1970.

Of the Title X money, Planned Parenthood gets about $70 million, some 25 percent of the $317 million in Title X spending. The organization's annual budget is $1.1 billion and includes individual donations.

Federal law bars Planned Parenthood from using tax dollars for abortion. In 1976, three years after the landmark Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, Congress passed the Hyde Amendment which bars the use of taxpayer funds for abortion except in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother.

It annually is attached to the congressional spending bills.

But Republicans argue that often all the money ends up in the same account for the organizations.

"Come on," Jordan said, "Money is fungible. ... It's just common sense. We think that taxpayers understand this, particularly at a point in history when the country is broke."

No matter what the outcome, the fight over federal money for Planned Parenthood will continue. Once Congress resolves the budget for the current fiscal year, it must decide on spending for the next budget.

"We have a long history of pro-life protection being part of an appropriation debate," Jordan said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Republicans portray Planned Parenthood as primarily focused on performing abortions and – intentionally or not – using American taxpayer dollars to do it. Not so, say D...
WASHINGTON — Republicans portray Planned Parenthood as primarily focused on performing abortions and – intentionally or not – using American taxpayer dollars to do it. Not so, say D...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,604
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
11:26 AM on 04/15/2011
Wow, a lot of vilifying of conservatives going on. We are not so mean and hateful as you might think if you will take the time to learn a little about us. For example, my wife volunteers at a clinic for women what does free wellness visits, gives out free maternity clothing, gives out free baby food, diapers, and baby clothes to mother's in need, does free parenting classes, and helps refer women to adoption agencies. These adoption agencies do "open adoptions" which mean that the birth mother gets to still be involved in the baby's life if she so chooses. The adoption agency and women's clinic that we are personally adopting from, does all their services on a completely volunteer basis and NO ONE not eve the director makes a dime off of their services.

So please don't paint such a broad brush. Get to know some of us and you will see something different than what the media is saying. We love women, we love children, and we love those in need.

http://www.crisispregnancyoutreach.org/index.shtml

one side note, we are for women's rights, including the rights of all the little women who are aborted (you did know didn't you that by the time an abortion occurs the gender can be determined genetically. So roughly half of abortions (more than 1 million/yr) out there are ending the rights of a little woman)
11:34 AM on 04/13/2011
i love the arguments about the value of life (that is still a potential) and declaring iutb worthless, while simultaneously declaring that the life of the woman is worth less (even though it is already in progress)

honest question for those who feel this way, why is the unborn child more important than the life of the woman?
photo
AgingDiva
nerdy librarian
12:36 PM on 04/11/2011
Ya know....... I didn't want any of my tax dollars spent to kill women and children in Iraq and Afghanistan.

And in a similar vein.... I don't like my tax dollars given to religious organizations for religious education or social services.

Just sayin.......
10:55 AM on 04/13/2011
love this comment
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Godfearing
Is it Birther NRA or NRA Birther?
12:24 PM on 04/11/2011
All women's reproductive decisions should be between her and her God! Everyone else should but out, Pat Robertson!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anonymous17
Thank You Fox News For Keeping us Infromed - T.P.
08:37 PM on 04/11/2011
No snark detected there, the battery on the snark detector is_dead or it would be sounding alarms all over the place.
07:49 AM on 04/11/2011
Who are we to argue with God's plan? If a woman makes a choice to have an abortion, than it is fate. Pro-life therefore is anti-Almighty.
I love it when you can use the same non-factual rhetoric of the gop to discount their entire argument.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ivytwine97
Mornings...not my favorite time of day..
08:21 AM on 04/11/2011
this is great
11:04 AM on 04/11/2011
Ahhh, determinist logic (absence of free will, fundamental belief of Christianity).

So by the same logic, If I were to slap you..........?

On second thought, yeah, you make a great point.
06:56 AM on 04/11/2011
I never had an abortion but I was grateful for Planned Parenthood when I needed to get on contraception for the first time. I was over 18 and could have gotten the pill from any doctor, but since I didn't have insurance I couldn't afford a regular doctor. Thank you Planned Parenthood, you helped me when I needed you, you probably saved me from needing an abortion.
10:21 PM on 04/10/2011
i support planned parenthood .
09:07 PM on 04/10/2011
Anybody seen the Wizard? I hear he's looking for a brain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mattea Berry
Card carrying member of the professional left
11:46 PM on 04/10/2011
Sporky, there is something wrong with you. Why are you stalking my posts just to make fun of my appearence? I have done nothing to you. Leave me alone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anonymous17
Thank You Fox News For Keeping us Infromed - T.P.
12:32 AM on 04/11/2011
Is that your pic in the avatar window?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marionette
10:26 AM on 04/11/2011
when i click on sporky's profile, seems that it has been removed..

starting over on another nick? uncool and shameful man..
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MJHammonds
I'm a fan of culturally witty posts
08:48 AM on 04/16/2011
No, it means he went to far, and HP removed his profile.
08:57 PM on 04/10/2011
Let's compromise. We will start funding Fox News to the tune of, say, 50 mil. a year so long as they guarantee none of the funding will support ideologically driven programming (opinion).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anonymous17
Thank You Fox News For Keeping us Infromed - T.P.
09:09 PM on 04/10/2011
Lol, Fox wouldn't exist if it wasn't for their ideologically driven opinionated programming. Thus I support this initiative 100%!
09:13 PM on 04/10/2011
Well Fox has Shep Smith (Liberal), Chris Wallace (true independant) Geraldo (left of Marx) so the funding can support this type of programming.
09:10 PM on 04/10/2011
Let's do it. Great idea. Fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johuyik
Pro-2cnd and anti-NRA.
08:54 PM on 04/10/2011
Actually everyone is pro-choice. I can prove it, but Huffpost keeps deleting my post.
09:09 PM on 04/10/2011
Abstinence is a choice.......I am always amused when unwilling (or unprepared) fathers are told, "you made your bed, lie in it" or "it takes two to tango", or "maybe you should have thought about that before........" Liberals love to scream "equality" except for the victim classes.......minorities, the poor, women........
09:11 PM on 04/10/2011
Paradoxy, The new Liberal Orthodoxy!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anonymous17
Thank You Fox News For Keeping us Infromed - T.P.
09:18 PM on 04/10/2011
Abstinence is not always a choice, that is part of the problem with this issue.
08:14 PM on 04/10/2011
Idiot GOP. Federal law prohibits federal dollars from being used for abortions. Any abortions PP performs is funded via other sources of revenue.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly Jade
10:34 AM on 04/11/2011
now their new thing is "but we don't KNOW that. I bet SOME DOES go to abortions. They're lying on their taxes!"
07:46 PM on 04/10/2011
If you wish to limit public grants to non-profits based solely on the political views of their leadership, you may as well get fitted for a brown shirt. That should never be a criteria for determining who gets federal grant money.
photo
StevenKeirstead
Photographer and Biologist who happens to be gay.
06:39 PM on 04/11/2011
Right on!
07:06 PM on 04/10/2011
hey, pro-lifers, i have a question. well, i have a question for those of you that don't support birth control, anyway, since i know that isn't all of you.

for those of you that don't support birth control, what do you suggest for a girl that naturally has a severe hormone imbalance or a condition like PMDD if she can't morally take the pill? because both my sister and my girlfriend have been on birth control since puberty and well before either of them was sexually active, so i'm just wondering if birth control is ever acceptable in your eyes or if they just have to "live with it".
09:09 PM on 04/10/2011
I'd suggest she date you. That will teach her to say "no."
09:16 PM on 04/10/2011
That's funny right there, I don't care who you are that's funny right there!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cwebster
predominantly exasperated
09:19 PM on 04/10/2011
His sister????
photo
camanokat
Outta this world
05:39 AM on 04/11/2011
Wouldn't surprise me if the troglodytes try to outlaw birth control, but I think in the situation you describe, there would be a work-around using the meds for PMMD. Then, just like well-connected women could get a D&C for "menstrual irregularities" back in the 60's, while poor women gave babies up for adoption, only well-off women could be treated.

F&F by the way.
07:02 PM on 04/10/2011
mcdeve 2 hours ago (5:09 PM)
30 Fans
Become a fan
You really think abortion has lifted up poor women? Can anything say so clearly-"y­ou are worthless" than trashing the unborn of your womb?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah, forcing poor women who are financially struggling as it is to have a baby they can't afford that will make their lives even more difficult and reduce them to the sum of their womb. i think that'd make it pretty clear what you think of them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anonymous17
Thank You Fox News For Keeping us Infromed - T.P.
08:54 PM on 04/10/2011
Allow me to be #2
12:44 AM on 04/11/2011
Ditto. Good post.
photo
smurrayesq
My Micro-bio isn't empty, it is secret
06:50 PM on 04/10/2011
Doesn't the same money is fungible argument apply to foreign funding of our elections through the Chamber of Commerce? Didn't the Chamber of Commerce say that the money that they received from foreign donors was somehow segregated and not used for elections? Republicans believed that, but they don't believe that Planned Parenthood does the same thing. How convenient.