More

Soap Operas: Can They Survive?


First Posted: 04/08/11 01:11 PM ET Updated: 06/08/11 06:12 AM ET

"All My Children" is hanging on for dear life.

After moving the entire production from New York to Los Angeles to save money, publicly cutting the paycheck of its most well-known star, and eliminating long-time cast members, the show still remains on the chopping block. What's a classic show to do?

Bobbie Eakes, a cast member on the show, has been feverishly tweeting polls and petitions directed at ABC executives. "AMC is not being cancelled! But now is a great time to let the network know you'd like to keep it that way," she tweeted, adding a smiley emoticon for good measure.

If ABC followed through with its cancellation, "All My Children" would join a long line of recent soap opera casualties. "Guiding Light," which premiered on CBS in 1952 after fifteen years on the radio, was cancelled in 2009, and "As the World Turns" followed in September 2010, airing the last episode of its 54-year run. More tellingly: not a single daytime soap has been created in the last twelve years and only six are currently running. In comparison, 19 soaps graced the airwaves in 1970.

"Networks are looking to get out of the soap opera business," said Abigail De Kosnik, co-editor of The Survival of the Soap Opera , putting things bluntly. "Tristan Rogers of 'General Hospital' said that soaps will be gone from the airwaves in five years or fewer."

So what happened? How did the format that Time magazine once called "television's richest market" find itself on the verge of extinction?

Experts have come up with plenty of explanations, and the first is simply sociological. "The old model of soap opera was built around an ideal viewer who no longer exists: the bored housewife," said De Kosnik. "But since the 1950s, women have entered the workplace in droves. There are stay-at-home moms, but they are wealthier, and they regard their ability to dedicate themselves to their family's domestic concerns to be a privilege, even a marker of status."

Essentially, the idea of "escaping" to a sudser on a daily basis doesn't hold the dramatic appeal for women that it once did, and those still in need of their escapism are getting their guilty pleasures elsewhere. For every daytime soap's botched exorcism, sizzling resurrection, or Luke and Laura-attempting-to-save-the-world-from-carbonic-snow, we now have enough reality-based interventions, live-rat-hoarders, and episodes of "Jersey Shore" saved on our DVR to last a lifetime.

Those shows are cheaper to make. Daytime reality shows, game shows, and talk shows all generate far greater returns than soap operas do -- and they are much easier to syndicate. It seems impossible to watch a soap opera in reruns, perhaps aired out of order. How do you keep track of who is divorcing and having sex with and killing whom? This might explain why SOAPNet, the cable network for soaps-in-syndication, recently announced it would become "Disney Jr." in 2012, specializing in early education and pre-school programming and proving, once and for all, that Mickey Mouse is far more powerful than Tabitha the 300-year-old witch.

Furthermore, daytime soaps no longer attract the coveted 18-34 demographic in large numbers, making them far less appealing to advertisers. Whereas "General Hospital's" Luke and Laura storyline once lured college students, teens, and even pre-teens to the genre, nowadays you'd be hard-pressed to find a woman under 25 who admits to following a daytime soap with any of the same steadfast devotion as older generations did. Young viewers are more likely to tune in to any number of weekly primetime series like "Gossip Girl" or "Vampire Diaries."

So the question remains: do soaps throw in the towel, or do they try to revamp? Can a medium that started in the 1930s during the Great Depression find a new audience today in the Great Recession? The median age of the average daytime soap viewer currently stands around the mid-50s. Sam Ford, a writer and co-founder of the Convergence Culture Consortium at MIT, argues that networks should use this knowledge of their demographic appeal to their advantage.

"If soaps are to stay alive, it will require a complete shift in the mindsets of the institutions involved," Ford says. "Most regular shows age with their demographic and then go off the air, but soap operas aim to stay on the air for many years. So rather than taking a primetime mentality of reaching the youngest, hippest audiences, soap operas should focus on hanging on to their multi-generational appeal."

Ford advocates targeting daytime soaps specifically to boomers. They're the ones who watched Luke and Laura in droves during the 1970s, and they're also joining social media outlets faster than any other age group. "Daytime soaps are built around sharing stories. If the boomers are on Facebook playing Farmville, why can't they be keeping up with soap operas?"

Perhaps daytime soaps could also take a hint from the unwavering success of the Spanish language telenovelas. The four major Spanish-language broadcasters took in over $3 billion in ad revenue just last year. The Telemundo network has garnered attention recently for "La Reina del Sur" (Queen of the South), a show about the rise of a female drug-trafficker, which in its second week trumped all the English-language networks among viewers ages 18-34 within the 10pm hour. Univision's telenovela programming, meanwhile, is still its most successful venture by far.

"In the early stages, we were trying to be what everybody else was," Don Browne, President of Telemundo Communications, told the Hollywood Reporter: "But we realized there's an appetite for contemporary, smart content that speaks in a real way to Hispanics in this country."

And apparently the networks are listening. ABC is developing a telenovela of their own-- a US version of the Argentinian telenovela "Los Roldán" with producer Salma Hayek. (But who knows if they'll have the cajones to make it as gritty and unwavering as its Spanish-speaking counterpart?)

In the past, the daytime soaps that tried to shake up their age-old formats have failed. "Passions," the NBC soap that ran from 1999 to 2007, tried the supernatural thing, and "Port Charles" had a sexy vampire or two. "Guiding Light's" executive producer, Ellen Wheeler, attempted to turn that program into a dramatized reality show, complete with shaky handheld cameras, more realistic, city-centric sets, and lower budget. The result? Fans rebelled and the show was soon cancelled.

Indeed, the daytime soap opera may not last much longer, but the networks have to decide how much preserving the format actually matters to them. Otherwise they can start from scratch, learn from the telenovelas and reach out to other demographics and ethnicities. The networks could also take a look at Showtime's period serials like "The Tudors" and "The Borgias" for inspiration. As their success proves, there's still an appetite for unique serial programming.

Perhaps the key is more obvious: We clone James Franco six times and add one of them to each remaining soap opera. As the ratings for his absurd General Hospital appearances illustrate, America will watch this guy do just about anything.

So what do you think, ABC? Isn't it about time we saw a telenovela starring James Franco featuring characters breaking the fourth wall to discuss real-life issues a la "The View"?

That show would have everything.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

"All My Children" is hanging on for dear life. After moving the entire production from New York to Los Angeles to save money, publicly cutting the paycheck of its most well-known star, and eliminat...
"All My Children" is hanging on for dear life. After moving the entire production from New York to Los Angeles to save money, publicly cutting the paycheck of its most well-known star, and eliminat...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 466
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
11:39 PM on 04/18/2011
How can they do this ? This is peoples jobs they are playing with, everyone who made the move with them is just being told oh well such is life?? This is crazy not for just the employees but all the fans who tune in everyday to have something to look forward to. I have followed All My Children is I was old enough to watch and understand what it was all about. I almost stopped watching when the killed of Zach Slater ( soap name ) I believe alot of fans left with him. But I like other stars on it also so I tune in every day.Please stop this craziness let these actors do there jobs. They do them well. The people at home don't want another game show or talk show they just want you to LEAVE OUR SOAPS ALONE!!!! ALL MY CHILDREN SHOULD BE AROUND ANOTHER 41 YEARS!!!!!!!!!!
11:13 AM on 04/15/2011
Too sad!! I hope they change their mind. No one is going to watch chew or whatever they are doing now. I will never watch abc again.
01:22 PM on 04/13/2011
I am 28 and grew up watching soap operas. First All My Children from 1992-1995, then once I got to college and afterwards, the Young and the Restless. I stop watching AMC because the writing begin to suck. They started doing stupid storylines, one being Erica's aborted baby being stolen and implanted in someone else. After that, I became appalled. I watched Y&R because I thought it was well written and better produced than all the other soaps. I like the storylines and it was, at one point, very diverse. However that begin to wane, the Young and the Restless is still produced and directed well, but the writing has become worse. I never watched Guiding Light and As The World Turns, but it does not surprise me that they were cancelled. I love the soap genre, but now, I know that they will not last. I'm getting tired of the same thing over and over. The lack of diversity, the sillyness, the terrible writing, these people should get a rude awakening and be axed. These writers have struggled to revamped their shows because of some of their loyalty to conservative fans. Furthermore, being on daytime, there is so much censorship. So with that being said, good riddance.
04:58 PM on 04/12/2011
This article is outstanding and a fair, real look at the hurdles facing daytime. Viewer tastes change and this genre hasn't revamped since the days of black and white television. What was once shocking and scandalous in stories (the same stories still being usedtoday) aren't shocking or scandalous. They're old and stale. Viewers know too much about medicine, DNA, law, etc., to find the stories credible or the people in them likeable/rootable. Something has to change at the networks or -- like all dinosaurs -- they'll become extinct.

On the other side of the scale, however, are viewers who want things instantly. After all, how can an era ruled by Twitter and Facebook and instant communication, downloads, and contact co-exist with the idea of a story/show that plays out over generations?

Viewers don't *want* to wait a decade for a couple to get together. It seems they can barely wait 6 months. They also don't want their favorite characters/couples to lie, cheat, steal, plot, murder, attempt to murder, or any of the things that made yesterday's soap stories so legendary. Look at Luke and Laura. Viewers flocked to a guy who raped the girl. Now parents would SCREAM (and rightly so) if a network tried to tell those college, teen, or pre-teen girls rape was romantic or love

The biggest problems soaps have is BOREDOME. When I can take a year off, come back, and find the show exactly the same (no lie!), there's a problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ztck5356
10:41 PM on 04/12/2011
A year? I went to work on my first job in the 80's and after 7 years I decided to quit to stay home with my children and I turned on the soaps and nothing had changed! It was as though I never stopped watching! They all have the same theme, they sleep with the entire family members, they never let a couple stay married, the babies always miscarriage....you know, as the world turns!
02:30 PM on 04/12/2011
I will be very sad when the day comes and there aren't any daytime soaps on the air.
01:39 PM on 04/12/2011
But will Susan Lucci survive? I mean, gosh, I think she lives on that set. Would she wander the streets, looking for something to overreact to?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vivian Alicia Evans
11:37 AM on 04/12/2011
I would not miss Soap operas. I agree with FiredUpRTG with the suggestions of 2, 3, 4 and gardening shows aimed at the general public. Enough of these decorating shows there needs to be a balance.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FiredUpRTG
Don't start no stuff; won't be no stuff…
09:26 AM on 04/12/2011
Daytime needs
1) More game shows, but not the kind where people eat worms and animal nether-parts. More skill & trivia games.
2) Juicy old movies, 70's movies of the week, old 70/80's mini series; we are losing our sense of movie & tv history.
3) Repeats of current primetime shows, maybe a week or two behind original airing.
4) Telenovelas with mapped out stories and definite endings.
5) Parenting shows, in the style of Dr.Oz/the Doctors, with psychologists, pediatricians, teachers, stay-at-home moms, working moms, work-at-home moms.
6) Exercise shows.

If I were home, I'd watch that channel all day.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ME623
CHILLIN
06:16 AM on 04/12/2011
I watched AMC back in the day, during high school years; some while in my 20's. After awhile it got so predictable and boring. I knew AMC had hit rock bottom, when they reincarated Jesse Hubbard after 20yrs. C'mon people, really! Soaps are not as good as they used to be.
05:49 AM on 04/12/2011
I never watched AMC.

So much so , I saw this acronym and thought American Movie Classics
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kvolovesart
02:32 AM on 04/12/2011
Soaps are boring...but how can a show with dozens of high priced paychecks compete with reruns of "housewives?". Which costs nothing in comparison to make and has more viewers...it cannot...they are obsolete...like bookstores and soon to be movie theaters...
07:29 PM on 04/11/2011
I watched all my children from 2003-2010. And I stopped because it got boring. All the interesting pot stirring characters left. I don't understand why they thought every character needed to have a heart of gold or be more relatable. You want to watch soap operas because there are outrageous unbelievable characters. They are switching babies, drugging people and setting them up, sleeping with their sister's husband. All that needs to go on with two consistencies there are no apologies and it's all highly glamorous.

This is not a complicated thing to figure out. You want Erica to be a bitch and get in cat fights not trying to save children or be socially conscious, the point is this isn't real life. To be honest no one is watching the real housewives or jersey shore to see characters evolving into better people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clayton139
Fight The Right-Wing (R) Spin Machine! VOTE 1% OUT
01:44 PM on 04/11/2011
NOO!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:32 PM on 04/11/2011
The head of ABC daytime and the soaps' executive producers and headwriters are arrogant and destructive. They obviously resent the fact that they work in daytime and not primetime and take it out on viewers by writing horrible, pointless, and senseless stories that completely ignore past history. They ruin characters' integrity and play favorites with actors.

But many soap fans with their silly "campaigns" are just plain whacked, and you can sorta see why TPTB are so jaded. Still, with so much money at stake it is completely unfathomable why soaps have been allowed to get into such a state.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThatBKChick
01:23 PM on 04/11/2011
Soap operas was "reality" t.v. for the babyboomers. Unfortunately with reality t.v. not showing a slow down soap operas are done! Why watch fiction when we can watch the likes of Jersey Shore and Bravos Real House Wives?