More

FDIC Shuts Down Two Banks, Raising This Year's Total To Twenty Eight

Bank Failure

04/ 8/11 08:45 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Regulators on Friday shut down small banks in Illinois and Nevada, lifting the number of U.S. bank failures so far this year to 28 after 157 succumbed in 2010 to the gutted economy and mounting bad loans.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. seized Western Springs National Bank and Trust, in Western Springs, Ill., with $186.8 million in assets and $181.9 million in deposits. It also closed Las Vegas-based Nevada Commerce Bank, with $144.9 million in assets and $136.4 million in deposits.

The failures of Western Springs and Nevada Commerce are expected to cost the deposit insurance fund $31 million and $31.9 million, respectively.

Heartland Bank and Trust Co., based in Bloomington, Ill., will assume the assets and deposits of Western Springs National Bank. Los Angeles-based City National Bank is taking over Nevada Commerce Bank.

The FDIC and Heartland Bank and Trust will share losses on $100.8 million of Western Springs' loans and other assets. It will share losses on $111.1 million of Nevada Commerce Bank's assets with City National.

Illinois has been one of the hardest-hit states for bank failures. Sixteen banks were shuttered in the state last year. The shutdown of Western Springs National Bank was the fourth bank failure in Illinois this year.

California, Florida and Georgia also have seen large numbers of bank failures.

The 157 bank closures last year topped the 140 shuttered in 2009. It was the most in a year since the savings-and-loan crisis two decades ago.

The FDIC has said that 2010 likely would mark the peak for bank failures. Already this year the pace of closures has slowed: By this time last year, regulators had closed 42 banks.

The 2009 failures cost the insurance fund about $36 billion. The failures last year cost around $21 billion, a lower price tag because the banks that failed in 2010 were smaller on average. Twenty-five banks failed in 2008, the year the financial crisis struck with force; only three were closed in 2007.

The growing number of bank failures has sapped billions of dollars out of the deposit insurance fund. It fell into the red in 2009, and its deficit stood at $7.4 billion as of Dec. 31.

The number of banks on the FDIC's confidential "problem" list rose to 884 in the final quarter of last year from 860 three months earlier. The 884 troubled banks is the highest number since 1993, during the savings-and-loan crisis.

The FDIC expects the cost of resolving failed banks to total around $52 billion from 2010 through 2014.

Depositors' money – insured up to $250,000 per account – is not at risk, with the FDIC backed by the government. That insurance cap was made permanent in the financial overhaul law enacted in July.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:12 AM on 04/11/2011
Hmm, this is becoming more common place, and of course the FDIC are terrible at forecasting how much this kind of stuff will cost in the future. I track the daily treasury statements on a daily basis. They show how much the US Treasury withdraw from their coffers to add to the 'deposit insurance fund'. It's quite interesting and can reveal when they're in trouble! An example of the kind of charts I look at (on a daily basis) is here: http://greshams-law.com/2011/03/03/daily-treasury-statement-update-mysterious-stock-market-indicator/
photo
kokobell616
Your micro-bio is pending approval
07:14 AM on 04/10/2011
Just getting my conspiracy theory out there. Is this just what the larger banks want? When you systematically cause the smaller banks and credit unions to close. You are then able to increase your leverage. When the banks that took over these two as well as the others this, and passed years loose out to the big five. They are more able to follow the current rules and still reap a huge fiscal reward.

Heres hoping that when this economy turns around there will still be some people willing to start small town banks that continue to spur growth all across America.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:56 PM on 04/09/2011
The REAL business of banking ... is an utterly boring business. It is dependable to bring you to the top of the tallest building in your town, if it does not put you to sleep in the process.

Your business, literally, is to sell money. If you place the money wisely, you earn a fractional profit. (If you try to gouge, you either 'make nothing' or go to jail for Usury or both.) If your customer loses, you lose everything(!) too.

Plenty of very tall buildings have been built in towns and cities all around the world by people who know how to play this boring but steadily-profitable game. But the "high rollers" who have the utter audacity to say that they are "too big to fail" (sic) merely prove, again and again and again, that they know nothing of it.

And, alas, both the Treasury and the Fed likewise prove that they know nothing of it, either. Alas, neither of these institutions ever saw a bribe they didn't covet.
SamEasy
You really don`t want to know.
12:20 AM on 04/10/2011
If they would allow me to leverage every dollar I could gather by 25 times, I guarantee you I could turn a profit. This is basically what US banks are allowed to do, but too much leverage leads to exposure to failure for any lendor. Some European countries were leveraging at over 60 times deposits! And lets not forget about the derivative fraud perpitrated by Wall Street!! No limit to leverage!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Canadian system is limited to 16 times leverage and that is why our country has been more stable throughout this recession. We are boring, but logical.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:17 AM on 04/10/2011
As both of us well know, that's not reality. It's like looking at a dollar bill through a kaleidoscope, picking out each of the reflections and calling each one a dollar bill.

I believe the word is, "Rumpelstiltskin." Or, "international tulips."

This is why we have things like "impossible trade-deficits," "pick-a-number billion (that's with a "B") dollar compensation" for a small handful of executives. And, meanwhile, on the reality side of things, effective unemployment north of 40% and rising.

Every nation on the planet, at the same time, is basically having to confront the reality that ... this ... is not reality.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
11:39 PM on 04/09/2011
Papa Bush had the Savings & loan fiasco and real estate bust. Georgie brought the country to near financial collapse and giant real estate bust, The Country can NEVER withstand a Third Bush in the Whitehouse. I predict Jeb WILL try for it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mcmutter
A Groover has to expect a few setbacks .....
07:25 AM on 04/11/2011
banksters will back the jebster ....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
08:26 AM on 04/11/2011
where else would you think all that extra $1/ gallon of gas money is headed?
09:47 PM on 04/09/2011
Is anyone going to jail?

You cost the taxpayers $31 million and you just walk away?
11:47 PM on 04/09/2011
From Forbes Magazine --

"This year, we not only tracked chief executive compensation, but we also looked at the kingpins who run private equity and hedge funds. Reaping the rewards of percentage fees, the 20 top Wall Street fund managers earned an average of $658 million in 2006, versus $145 million for the 20 highest-paid chief executives."
11:48 PM on 04/09/2011
..meaning, it's sad to think they can walk away from things and STILL have made out like (wildly successful) bandits.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themodernleader
07:52 PM on 04/09/2011
   We have a banking syatem that is near the level of bankruptcy. there is no lending because there is no need from qualified borrowers. Even credit card holders that are legitimate risks are not using credit cards. we have a failed economic system that money lending to big banks will only exasperate.  Cutting 38 billion dollars of government spending may be a enough stimulus withdrawal to shut down the system.  We are living in perilous tmes led by dangerous leaders in all branches of the government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richie MuadDib
loves to be censored
06:17 PM on 04/09/2011
Time to put your money in a credit union.

Interesting that banks are consolidating, as the FDIC bails some out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeyJaii
Socialism.
05:47 PM on 04/09/2011
As long as my money is FDIC insured and I'm getting 100% of my money back I'm good.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richie MuadDib
loves to be censored
06:20 PM on 04/09/2011
Well, you get your deposit back, but our taxdollars help fund the banks bad decisions, and then another gets to pickup the banks assets, without so many of the debts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HockeyMom
I was here before SP and will be long after her.
01:52 PM on 04/10/2011
Did you realize that they can take years "giving" you your money back. After the largest transfer of wealth from the Northeast to the Southwest, bushy gate, people were 20 years getting FDIC to pay.
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
03:24 PM on 04/09/2011
One thing is sure........... the officers at these banks got their yearly raises and bonuses right up to the momement they were declared insolvent........
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USNDC
Smartest President ever ? ... not even close.
04:41 PM on 04/09/2011
It's kind of like our politicians paying themselves as they bankrupt our nation with $14,300,000,000,000 of crushing federal debt.
12:53 PM on 04/09/2011
How long will it be before some banks have to take over the banks who took over these two banks!
Apparently, this is a never ending cycle!