iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Budget Deal Allows Regulations To Move Forward On For-Profit Colleges

College Graduates

First Posted: 04/09/11 09:50 PM ET Updated: 06/09/11 06:12 AM ET

Much of Friday's last-minute budget gridlock centered on policy disputes over funding for Planned Parenthood and environmental regulations.

But another largely unnoticed provision at play in last week's negotiations involved rules that would regulate billions of dollars of federal student loan and grant money allotted to college programs with a track record of poor student outcomes. A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) confirmed on Saturday that the final deal will not include a measure that would have prevented the Obama administration from cracking down on certain schools.

Last week, a bipartisan group of House members pushed for a rider in the spending bill that would block the Department of Education from implementing rules that would punish certain for-profit college and community college programs for saddling students with debts they cannot repay.

Designed as a consumer protection measure, the Department of Education's proposed "gainful employment" rules would limit federal student aid for programs with a track record of leaving students with high debt burdens. The for-profit college industry, which relies on such funds for the vast majority of its revenues, has viciously fought the regulations over the past year.

"It is imperative that the final (budget bill) retain this important funding limitation," lawmakers backing the rider, including House Education and Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline (R-Minn.), wrote in a letter to House leaders earlier this week. "These regulations are a clear example of federal overreach into the affairs of American institutions of higher education,"

On the other side of the debate, more than 40 civil rights and consumer advocacy groups urged Reid to block the rider from any budget compromise.

Their letter to the Senate Majority Leader said the provision would prevent the Department of Education from doing what was needed "to protect students and taxpayers from the most toxic choices."

"The Department of Education's proposed gainful employment regulation recognizes that some current career education programs are so toxic that they doom students to a lifetime of debt burden and waste millions of precious taxpayer dollars," the letter read.

The House voted on a similar amendment to block the Obama administration from implementing gainful employment rules in its February budget bill, a measure that received overwhelming support from Republicans and more than 50 Democrats.

Gainful employment rules would apply to career-focused programs at both for-profit and non-profit colleges, but the for-profit college industry has mounted an unprecedented lobbying campaign against the regulations. As drafted, the rules would track students after they leave college and evaluate them in two ways: whether they are paying down the principal on their student loans and whether they have attained an income that allows them to manage debts.

Far from sweeping, a draft version of the regulations would allow degree programs for-profit colleges and other vocational schools to remain fully eligible for federal aid money even if less than half of their students are repaying the principal on their loans. Some could remain eligible even if only a third of students are in repayment. Programs that fail to meet certain requirements could lose access to federal student loan and grant money -- crucial revenues for the for-profit sector.

Data released by the Department of Education earlier this year showed that a quarter of all students enrolled at for-profit schools defaulted on federal student loans within three years -- more than double the rate of those who attend non-profit institutions. For-profit college students make up less than 15 percent of enrollment nationwide but comprise nearly half of all student loan default rates.

The Department of Education has not yet released a final version of the gainful employment rules, but is expected to do so within months.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Much of Friday's last-minute budget gridlock centered on policy disputes over funding for Planned Parenthood and environmental regulations. But another largely unnoticed provision at play in last wee...
Much of Friday's last-minute budget gridlock centered on policy disputes over funding for Planned Parenthood and environmental regulations. But another largely unnoticed provision at play in last wee...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,054
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike HeXt
Common sense: a free service I offer
07:40 PM on 04/11/2011
This is a small victory for students who have gotten burned by these schools.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScottV
Damn Right I'm a Democrat!
04:38 PM on 04/11/2011
Again we see the GOP's greed and corruption machine at work trying to ripe-off the American taxpayer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Grimway
07:39 AM on 04/12/2011
The artical said Bipartisan. So. You are getting it in both ends...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:53 PM on 04/11/2011
No school should be run for profit as education is an investment in the future of this country. Any amount of education will pay back many times as workers advance through the job market.

The government, not business should be the premeir educator in this country as all education should be done for the good of all, and just not for the greedy few.
photo
sindurrella
now where did I put my bootstraps?
03:51 PM on 04/11/2011
Republican's don't think it's government's job to regulate fraudulent businesses - they're too busy promoting their extreme social agenda - no birth control, no abortions, no welfare, no medicare, no jobs, no NPR, and on and on (sadly)...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pooka47401
Reality is the leading cause of stress!
12:49 PM on 04/11/2011
I work with the Poor and I have had many clients come in to request food and then say "I am in college online". They borrow thousands of dollars with the promise that they are going to graduate from college and get a good job. These are people who would never be hired by an employer. Last week a disabled woman came in and said that she "got a degree in Education and a Masters Certification ". She has been applying for teaching jobs at the local University and Junior Colleges. She is not the brightest bulb on the block and her hygiene is deplorable. She has borrowed thousands of dollars and will have to pay it back out of her $674 SSI. She and others like her are defenseless against those Con men who want to suck what ever money that they can out of those who don't know better.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Godfearing
Is it Birther NRA or NRA Birther?
11:44 AM on 04/11/2011
Republican Tea Party Birthers want to cut federal spending while they are funding a student loan default program for private colleges that will amount to almost a trillion dollars. Lobbyist buying politicians will never be outlawed and the National Debt will never decrease.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chrystal Ji Davey
Chem. Dance. Theatre.
11:25 AM on 04/11/2011
Horrible...the public needs to be educated first and foremost.
photo
Daeira
Belief does not bestow truth.
11:05 AM on 04/11/2011
There are so many good reasons why these kinds of schools should be denied federal money:

1. Lack of recognized accreditation makes their degrees worthless in many job markets
2. Outrageous tuition rates when compared with community colleges who have better outcomes
3. Hiring commission-based telephone salespeople disguised as "Academic Advisors"

To name a few. When a school advertises that its strength is earning your "degree" while at home in your pajamas and not on any academic quality of the program, something is wrong. There are no good reasons to spend federal money on these places.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Godfearing
Is it Birther NRA or NRA Birther?
11:46 AM on 04/11/2011
F&F ~ Spot on Daeira! Have you ever wondered how many comments come from lobbyists.
photo
ken607
Nothing natural about gas,nothing clean about coal
06:59 AM on 04/11/2011
republicans will find ANY WAY TO SCREW SOMEBODY WHY SHOULD STUDENTS BE ANY DIFFERENT. YOU SO CALLED TEABAGGERS ARE NEXT.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
McKeaton
10:11 AM on 04/11/2011
...when they won't get the Alzheimers prescriptions free....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles E Evans
Liberal kind of guy.
05:19 AM on 04/11/2011
Does this include the Glen Beck college?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chrystal Ji Davey
Chem. Dance. Theatre.
11:24 AM on 04/11/2011
No, but probably does include I.T.T. Beck.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:13 AM on 04/11/2011
I can be sympathetic to the innovation's for profit schools
might bring, but let's be honest, the vast
majority of them are greedy and simply
out to get their student's hooked
on federal money.

Their drop out rates are terrible and the worst
should be fined or made to go out of business,
or even throw some in jail for corruption.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicanada
Blogger, radio co-host, writer, editor, voice-over
11:20 PM on 04/10/2011
for profit high school and grade school . . . coming soon to a neighborhood near you.
10:39 PM on 04/10/2011
It's a shame that these students are getting scammed like this. These types of schools prey on the people who know next nothing about education and finances.

These students should have went to a proper college. . . where the debt is smaller and you still have a minimal chance of finding a job.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
McKeaton
01:07 AM on 04/11/2011
Debt sl aves are created early....so they will pay dearly expensive ( entire life) for one BIG mistake....predatory loan students...

Dear people applying for these FRAUDulent and destroyer institution...DO NOT...You'll live a nightmare for the rest of your life...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ppossom
His life is full
04:54 AM on 04/11/2011
Increased enrollment DECREASES the amount of funds available to public schools for educating students, whereas increased enrollment at for profit schools increases profits available for executives and dividends.
schatsie
Wall Street is Worse than Vegas
09:20 PM on 04/10/2011
Watch INSIDE JOB including the deleted scenes...expecting a Republican Executive to regulate or self regulate is like expecting pigs to fly......
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]