iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

IRS Funding Cut Days Before Report Shows $330 Billion In Uncollected Taxes


First Posted: 04/11/11 07:03 PM ET Updated: 06/11/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- As part of the budget deal hashed out on Friday evening, lawmakers agreed that no additional federal funds would be used to hire new IRS agents.

Then on Monday, the Government Accountability Office publicly released a study showing that, as of the end of fiscal year 2010, roughly $330 billion in federal taxes had never been paid -- an amount that, if collected, would represent nearly nine times the amount of savings as the budget itself.

The dual developments aren’t shocking. Despite evidence that a single dollar spent on enforcing the tax code could result in up to ten dollars in revenue, politicians, naturally, are reluctant to align themselves with tax collectors. And yet, the sacrificing of funds for IRS agents in the continuing resolution deal underscores a particular problem that seems bound to confront fiscally conscious lawmakers.

“Cutting back on IRS enforcement could easily cost the treasury much more in revenue than it saves,” said Chuck Marr, Director of Federal Tax Policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

The GAO report, which looks specifically at the issue of passport holders who have failed to pay their full share of taxes, underscores Marr’s point. Titled “Federal Tax Collection: Potential for Using Passport Issuance to Increase Collection of Unpaid Taxes,” the study labels poor enforcement of tax laws and the tax code as a “high-risk” hole in government policy. In fiscal year 2008, passports were issued to about 16 million individuals. Of those, more than 224,000 owed more than $5.8 billion in unpaid federal taxes.

A good chunk of the evasion, the GAO concluded, was committed by individuals with “substantial personal assets” including multi-million-dollar homes and “luxury cars.” One passport recipient bought a house for $2 million and another property for $1.5 million despite owing $1 million in federal taxes.

“If you look, you can find records of most capital gains income,” said Rob Shapiro, former U.S. Undersecretary of Commerce. “People deposit it in their bank accounts or the institutions may issue reports if it is capital gains on stock transactions. So it is not hard to pick it up if you have the manpower to look for it. And again, given that the salary of an IRS agent is at least as high as the average salary in America, the fact that there is a ten-to-one ratio for the returns on auditing tells you that [tax evasion] is coming from the high-income brackets.”

Regardless of who the worst evaders are, the GAO concludes that “IRS enforcement of federal tax laws is vital,” not just to pinpoint the offenders but to promote “broader compliance.” And what do the study’s authors cite as a compelling reason to beef up IRS functions? A “federal deficit” that “continue[s] to mount.”

Indeed, several close observers of the budget debate have wondered exactly how lawmakers can shudder at going after tax evasion while simultaneously preaching fiscal responsibility on the stump. Marr, for one, noted that Congress has already disbanded a tax reporting provision in the president’s health care reform law that would have resulted in stronger compliance. That was scuttled for politically obvious reasons: the paperwork it placed on small businesses was deemed well beyond burdensome. But the decision to deny funding for more IRS agents doesn’t have such an easy-to-distill an explanation.

“Hiring more IRS agents would have allowed the Obama administration to enforce its agenda, insofar as its agenda is to make sure that people don't cheat on their taxes,” wrote Jonathan Cohn in The New Republic.

Obama has made buffing up the IRS a relative hush-hush plank of his tax reform agenda. Upon entering office he advocated for more funds for the agency, and as part of his 2012 budget, he proposed a 9.4 percent increase so that it could hire roughly 5100 new employees. The proposal, which pivoted off of previous studies that reached similar conclusions as the GAO's, was met with somewhat frenzied pushback from conservative circles -- the specter of black-suited tax collectors roaming the streets undoubtedly on the mind. And almost immediately, the suggested increase in IRS funds became a target of cut-happy legislators.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- As part of the budget deal hashed out on Friday evening, lawmakers agreed that no additional federal funds would be used to hire new IRS agents. Then on Monday, the Government Accoun...
WASHINGTON -- As part of the budget deal hashed out on Friday evening, lawmakers agreed that no additional federal funds would be used to hire new IRS agents. Then on Monday, the Government Accoun...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,062
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (44 total)
09:51 PM on 04/13/2011
An Alternative to Capitalism (which we need here in the USA)

Several decades ago, Margaret Thatcher claimed: "There is no alternative". She was referring to capitalism. Today, this negative attitude still prevails.

I would like to offer an alternative to capitalism for the American people to consider. Please click on the following link. It will take you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?"
which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:

http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm

John Steinsvold

Perhaps in time the so-called dark ages will be thought of as including our own.
--Georg C. Lichtenberg
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladymcbeth45
02:07 PM on 04/13/2011
Here we go again....can't go after the wealthy...their the new sacred cows in America.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
10:45 AM on 04/13/2011
Wow, just goes to show you...these guys in D.C. really don't know what's going on. They're just shootin' from the hip (like they do in Texas) without any regard for hard financial data (which may not actually exist in Washington) and rational decision-making.

For politicians, it's all about manufacturing reality based on emotion and not sound budgeting principles. In fact, most politicians I know, or have known, struggle with ordinary financial calculations; such basic math is way over their "pointy" little heads. But the one financial concept politicians can easily comprehend...is the revenue in-flows that line their pockets, courtesy of K Street lobbyists and other assorted corporate malcontents. We're in big trouble, man...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lincutious
The Understanding
08:07 PM on 04/12/2011
Free society depends on free thought.
Free thought does not = absorbing the opinions of television personalities.
Free thought is: actively pursuing truth to its unmistakable minimum, becoming educated in that which fires your emotions, and conversing with others in attempts to seek clarity.
05:16 PM on 04/12/2011
Good to see fiscal conservatism in all it's glory. Fits right in with fixing budget problems by cutting revenue.. Do all republicans get educated in Texas or did they not bother to learn basic checkbook balancing, let alone accounting? At least they squeezed a chapter on creationism in there... Every study I have seen shows you get many times the cost of tax enforcement in tax revenues.. Unfortunately since republicans are ideologically boxed in by their dogma can't do the right things when they should. They would rather put the nation in the wayback machine and dial up the 1800's than admit to more failed dogma...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegreenhornet
civil rights lawyer
04:18 PM on 04/12/2011
The republicans did the same thing in Michigan. When corporations were regularly being discovered to have defrauded the state out of tax dollars, the republican answer was to reorganize the treasury department and get rid of the tax fraud auditors. I guess they had far less reported cases of charting tha way. Go figure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeanette DeBella Bogue
pretty sure I'm going straight to hell....
02:07 PM on 04/12/2011
Nice going, fellas! When we have outstanding funds to be collected, let's reduce the numbers of employees who can go out and actually collect these funds.

The next best idea is for states to discontinue the child support enforcement offices.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
macrocosm
We are sorry your micro-bio did not meet our guide
01:36 PM on 04/12/2011
That it Progressives ... put the pressure on... if there must be compromise then make sure there are at lease a few Democratic ideas on the table!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
macrocosm
We are sorry your micro-bio did not meet our guide
01:37 PM on 04/12/2011
at least*
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wrightthewrong
Medicare for All
12:57 PM on 04/12/2011
This is all part of the conservative plan. Like they passed Medicare Part D in order to bankrupt the program, they will talk about tax reform while cutting IRS agents that would pursue fraud and tax avoidance, elevating the deficit. This country is TOTALLY screwed.
photo
AGooglyMinotaur
Ahh, Theseus. It appears you are out of thread.
12:54 PM on 04/12/2011
Wow. That's 5 times all the budget cuts. Nice job, congress. Way to be -400% efficient.
12:44 PM on 04/12/2011
The only reason the tax code is complicated is because of all the loopholes the rich have built into it for themselves. We could simplify the tax code by just making the rich use the 1040A like most low-income Americans. This would enormously simplify our tax code and bring in all the revenue we need.
12:27 PM on 04/12/2011
Drop the income tax and then we can get rid of the IRS. Implement a fair tax. Then people are only taxed for what they consume. The left should love this because the rich people that they despise will consume the most.
12:41 PM on 04/12/2011
Yeah right. Under your proposal the only taxes the rich will pay will be sales tax in Monoco and the Cayman islands, and hundreds of offshore places where they hide their money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RPIL
I like facts so I'm liberal
12:56 PM on 04/12/2011
The rich will write everything off as a business expense. If you are going to post cartoon caricatures like "rich people they despise", at least have something in the post of substance to offset the obvious bias.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
moose and squirrel
Very soon we would both be completely twisted...
12:24 PM on 04/12/2011
i used to think it was ok to give up a little medicare and ss to help with the budget deficit......but c. rap like this always changes my mind.  my new position is to not give an inch until all othe avenues have been exhausted
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RPIL
I like facts so I'm liberal
12:51 PM on 04/12/2011
Cutting the military should be one of the first areas of debate. We all have heard about the $50 hammer and $100 toilet seat but we don't want to go there. I can't figure out why.
10:40 PM on 04/12/2011
If they end the wars the rich will starve . Great ! More unemployed millionaires .
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
12:23 PM on 04/12/2011
The IRS is a dinosaur from out of the past that needs to be ended anyway. The tax system is ludricous and should difinitly be replaced by a system that works without spending over three hundred and fifty billion each year of resoueces, that's well over a trillion dollars every presidential four year term. Are there proposals out there that would be viable as a replacement? Of course there are, and would bring us into the present day needs and save the taxpayers, business and the individual.
photo
MovieGuy2010
You can't fight in here..this is the war room!
03:07 PM on 04/12/2011
350 Billion?

Are you saying the operating budget of the IRS is 350 Billion dollars?

it's actually closer to 11 Billion, which is a not small, but there are THOUSANDS of IRS offices all over the country?

Could it be more effecient, probably, but I don't think it's on par with the kind and level of waste, fraud and abuse we see in the military budgets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erick Whinbush
03:17 PM on 04/12/2011
Well, are you saying that the IRS budget is $350 Bn per year? Just looked at the GAO and the IRS requested $12.1 Bn dollars for FY 2010.
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-754