More

Military In Space: Less Money, More Junk To Track

By DAN ELLIOTT   04/12/11 02:57 PM ET   AP

Military Space Junk

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. -- The future of the U.S. military space program will include tight budgets, complicated demands and increasing threats from orbiting debris and anti-satellite weapons, an Air Force general and a Pentagon official predicted Tuesday.

"Dependence on space is high, higher than it's ever been, for sure, in the Department of Defense," Gen. William Shelton, head of the Air Force Space Command, said at the National Space Symposium.

Shelton said he expects no increases in his budget, while demands for critical services such as the Global Positioning System, which is run by the Air Force, won't decline.

GPS uses satellite signals to pinpoint the location of receivers on Earth. It has become essential not only to thousands of military weapons, ships and aircraft but for civilian uses in cellphones, cars and aviation, fostering a $110 billion industry, Shelton said.

"Nobody's going to relieve us of that responsibility," he said.

With the military space program facing flat budgets, Shelton told space contractors at the symposium that the Defense Department and industry must find a way to contain costs, especially on launches.

Another concern is "counterspace" threats to satellites from the ground or space, he said. Shelton didn't elaborate, but China has demonstrated the ability to knock out an object in space, destroying one of its own satellites with a missile in 2007.

Gregory Schulte, deputy assistant secretary of defense for space policy, said China is developing a range of other space capabilities, including lasers and devices to jam satellite signals.

"We watch the Chinese very carefully," Schulte said Tuesday in an interview with The Associated Press.

"We want to engage the Chinese. We want to talk to them about the responsible use of space, but at the same time we also want to deter them and others from thinking that they would benefit from attacking our space systems."

The United States is also working with the European Union and other nations to develop a space code of conduct to reduce the risk of creating more debris, Schulte said.

The military currently tracks about 21,000 objects in orbit, including active satellites and human-made debris from dead satellites and spent rockets.

That number is expected to triple by 2030, partly because improved sensors will be able to pick up smaller objects that are currently undetectable, but also because of new debris, some created when existing pieces collide and break into more, smaller pieces, Shelton said.

The U.S. is taking steps to reduce the amount of space trash it creates, he said.

"In fact, if the Air Force wants to launch a satellite and it's going to leave some debris in space, they have to come to the deputy secretary of defense and ask for an exemption to do that and explain why they're doing it," Shelton said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. -- The future of the U.S. military space program will include tight budgets, complicated demands and increasing threats from orbiting debris and anti-satellite weapons, an Air ...
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. -- The future of the U.S. military space program will include tight budgets, complicated demands and increasing threats from orbiting debris and anti-satellite weapons, an Air ...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Rude Monk
No God can stop a hungry man
01:01 AM on 04/14/2011
No more military in space,unless you want to be stuck on this rock for next century.
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
06:40 PM on 04/13/2011
Sure........ if a US based company wants to leave something behind in space they have to seek permission.......... but the Chinese can do what they want.......... they don't ask for anyones permission......... as evidenced by the satellite they blew up spreading debris everywhere.........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
11:59 AM on 04/13/2011
The best answer would be a treaty that simply bars outer space (not including things in orbit since but anything beyond) for military use. The rest of the world has tried various times to get such a treaty and major powers such as Russia and China have wanted it but the US has blocked it. Obama should make this a priority of course if he did the tea baggers would go crazy,... crazier.
12:25 PM on 04/13/2011
You mean the Outer Space Treaty of 1967? It says that sovereign and private entities may not claim ownership of any object or property beyond Earth's atmosphere unless the object was transported to space from Earth. In other words, the moon is the common property of all mankind, but the Apollo lunar module descent stages remain the property of the U.S. government.

Furthermore, while there are several military application of Earth orbit (most practically reconnaissance, communications, and navigation, but conceivably weapons platforms as well), I can think of no practical military applications beyond Earth orbit, and neither can any of my fellow space enthusiasts.

For example, how could a military asset on the moon or in lunar orbit impact defense considerations on Earth? What could they do there that they can't do much better and vastly cheaper from Earth orbit? I don't think there are any clever answers to those questions.

If you mean that military powers should not have access to Earth orbit from this point forward, well, that ship has long since sailed, and in some contexts, commercial assets are approaching military capabilities.

For example, GeoEye-1 produces unclassified 50-cm imagery for commercial applications such as Google Earth, but that imagery is downsampled from a classified 41-cm optical resolution available only to the U.S. government. GeoEye-2 will have a classified 25-cm optical resolution.

And then there's GPS, which is a phenomenal commercial success even though those channels are merely a secondary capability of military satellites. Russia, China, and Europe are also deploying their own constellations of dual-use navigation satellites.

I guess I'm not sure what it is you are proposing to ban and why.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
emphatico
.....is very politically incorrect.
06:34 AM on 04/13/2011
".....about 21,000 objects in orbit....."

Wow!! That's a lot of stuff! We're not only littering the Earth, but we're also littering the space - the universe.
photo
THE GREAT PURIFIER
If you are going through hell, keep going.
01:02 AM on 04/13/2011
But - hey! - on the upside, we STILL have the money, the resources and the know-how to deploy the weapons of mass destruction into space. Isn't working for military-industrial complex such a wonderful thing and such a joy to behold?
09:25 AM on 04/13/2011
There are no weapons in space. Only reconnaissance satellites (including missile warning), military communications satellites, and navigation satellites (including GPS). Intercontinental ballistic missiles do fly trajectories which climb into space and reenter the atmosphere, but those weapons are obviously earth-based.
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
06:41 PM on 04/13/2011
Don't be so sure...........