iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Workers At Walmart-Contracted Warehouse Claim Wage Theft

Walmart

First Posted: 04/12/11 06:29 PM ET Updated: 06/12/11 06:12 AM ET

The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Dukes v. Wal-Mart, the largest class-action civil-rights lawsuit in American history, and will soon decide whether the sex-discrimination case -- which could affect 1.6 million women -- can move forward.

Less attention has been paid to a much smaller class-action lawsuit, recently filed in Chicago, that involves Walmart’s business -- perhaps because it involves far fewer workers, and because the retail behemoth isn’t actually named in the suit.

A group of eight workers has accused Wisconsin-based Schneider Logistics, a Walmart contractor, and Reliable Staffing, an Illinois-based temp agency, of violating state and federal labor laws at the Elwood, Ill., warehouse where the workers load and unload trucks and containers carrying goods bound for Walmart stores in the Midwest.

Schneider is contracted to run what is effectively a Walmart distribution center. The warehouse inked its contract with Walmart back in 2006.

Reliable and other staffing agencies supply the workforce for Schneider and other warehouses like it in the Chicago area, and much of the staffing comes on a temporary rather than direct-hire basis. The suit could involve hundreds of warehouse employees if it is certified as class-action.

As In These Times first reported, the workers claim their employer reneged on the promise of a $10 hourly rate for their work, a “piece rate” for each of the items they schlepped and bonuses for “team lifts” on especially heavy goods. Robert Hines, who’s been working on and off in Chicagoland warehouses on a temp basis for years, said he wasn’t compensated for what was often grueling work.

“I noticed after a couple of weeks that my checks didn’t match my hours,” said Hines, who claims he sometimes worked more than 50 hours per week and was shortchanged on overtime, too. “People are breaking their backs, trying to feed their families and be right.”

Hines and other workers marched on the warehouse earlier this year, hoping to resolve the issue short of a lawsuit, but they were encouraged to go to court by a local advocacy group, Warehouse Workers for Justice.

Abraham Mwaura, one of the group’s organizers, said “perma-temp” work, in which workers retain temp status in spite of working for the same company for months or even years, has become a common form of employment in Chicagoland’s sprawling warehouse network. It’s particularly prevalent in Will County, where Mwaura’s group estimates 30,000 warehouse workers are employed.

Warehouse worker complaints aren’t exactly uncommon. In 2009, a separate group of employees at the same distribution center filed a class-action suit accusing a different staffing agency of wage theft.

Greg Rossiter, a Walmart spokesman, said the company wouldn’t comment on litigation that it isn’t directly involved in, pointing out that “the facility isn’t operated by Walmart nor are the people who work in it employed by Walmart.” But he did say the retailer keeps an auditor at the facility to monitor the work environment and productivity level.

In a statement, a spokeswoman for Schneider said, “Schneider does not employ any of the workers at issue. The plaintiffs in the litigation were employed by a third party vendor to another vendor to Schneider. Schneider has at all times complied with Illinois and federal law and declines further comment on the pending matter as a courtesy to the involved parties.”

A woman who answered the phone at Reliable Staffing said the company’s president was traveling and could not be reached.

“Many [big retailers] are using this model,” said Mwaura. “They hire a third party to run the warehouse, and a third party hires the temp agencies. That’s become the way to compete in this industry. They’re just moving the cost to someone else. Ultimately, the people who pay for it are the workers.”

Surveys done by Mwaura’s group have determined that the vast majority of warehouse workers in the area are African-Americans and Latino immigrants, and more than half of them have temp status, which often puts health insurance and other benefits out of reach.

The perma-temp system “gets people stuck on the job ladder,” Mwaura said. “There’s no job mobility. They’re not going to make you a supervisor. You may not even have a job tomorrow.”

A warehouse like the one in Elwood might have a dozen or more staffing agencies operating within it, said Chris Williams, the attorney whose Chicago legal clinic filed the class-action suit. Williams said the pay scheme is often too complicated for workers to understand. He believes the workers may have been shorted as much as 20 percent of the pay due them, but he said some math still has to be done.

“Part of it is they’re trying to incentivize productivity -- the more you work, the more you get paid,” Williams said. “Sometimes [workers] will go into a truck and unload everything just to find a few boxes, like a needle in a haystack,” only to be paid for just the items they were sent in for. “They get the short end of the stick.”

Hines, who started working in the warehouse last August, described the items he unloaded from containers as “anything and everything you’d find at Walmart,” save for groceries. He said workers were often told they were moving too slow, and it was common for workers to be put off the clock while they waited at the warehouse for a new container to come in.

Hines quit after working in the Schneider warehouse Thanksgiving week. He said his plan is to start his own landscaping business, which will let him set his own hours and spend more time with his kids.

“If I work for myself, I figure I won’t sell myself short,” he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Dukes v. Wal-Mart, the largest class-action civil-rights lawsuit in American history, and will soon decide whether the sex-discrimination case -- whi...
The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Dukes v. Wal-Mart, the largest class-action civil-rights lawsuit in American history, and will soon decide whether the sex-discrimination case -- whi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 800
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
photo
RealConservativeAmerican
Conservation is Key
10:30 AM on 05/03/2011
Wouldn't Walmart have saved money by avoiding the middle-man temp agency altogether? Why couldn't they have just hired warehouse workers for $10 an hour? I wonder how much they contracted it out for. I used to work for a Defense Department print shop and they had a hiring freeze. They couldn't have me on the payroll so they contracted me at double the rate they would have paid me as an employee but half of that went to the temp agency . . . but apparently, it looks better on paper. WTF!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
01:23 PM on 04/14/2011
The trend is going to automated warehouse operations using electronic smart tags. A few people are all that's needed to operate a huge distribution center. But still, chiseling workers isn't right.
11:26 AM on 04/14/2011
I wish people would wake up and stop supporting these crooks, thats what hurts them,.I don't go to Walmart and do just fine. I shop local, buy less but support my community
photo
RealConservativeAmerican
Conservation is Key
10:26 AM on 05/03/2011
ME TOO! Buy local! We have the best tailgate markets where I live. The only thing I still need from China are cute Chinese people who speak broken English. Love 'em!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danglines
10:55 PM on 04/13/2011
Greedy corporations!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vietveter
To the FAR LEFT
08:14 PM on 04/14/2011
Don't get mad at the corporations.

Get REAL MAD at the elected officials that write the laws under which the corporations operate.

1/2 of those guys don't know who they work for and if/when it goes to court

the side with the most money wins
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KMBerger
"Cui adhaereo, prae est,"
10:49 PM on 04/13/2011
Seems to me that in order to lower costs firms justify not following labor law and paying fair wages by passing the buck down the various tiers. Ultimately, Walmart is culpable because it hires only the cheapest vendors to keep its costs to consumers down. What most don't realize that the this hurts American workers, who are now seeing a return to the brutal Capitalism of the late 19th and early 20th Century. We need another Upton Sinclair to do some real muckraking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vietveter
To the FAR LEFT
08:15 PM on 04/14/2011
Don't forget

unions have bankrupt the country

NOT !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lawrence Oherlabia
04:21 PM on 04/19/2011
Is this any different than the scam they played when they hired cleaning vendors who in turn hired illegal immigrants to clean Wal Mart stores? The company knew about it, had actual knowledge what rates their contractors were paying the workers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdecisneros
my micro bio is empty because I went to the micro
05:13 PM on 04/13/2011
We know how they keep their prices low.
05:10 PM on 04/13/2011
This along with all corporate theft is easy to solve -- just put the executives in jail. It has always puzzled me why most white collar crime is handled by letting the criminals give back the money with no punishment. Would we let bank robbers off if they promise to give back the money?
02:12 PM on 04/13/2011
Walmart and its cohorts are the economic equivalent of a WMD.
02:06 PM on 04/13/2011
Walmart is not the employer here, yet it is the main focus of the article and the numerous "evil Walmart" comments.

Why?
02:49 PM on 04/13/2011
And what rock have you been living under?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
go2goal
Business Consultant
05:17 PM on 04/13/2011
What don't you understand about subcontractors being used in a Wal-mart warehouse to move Wal-Mart goods.....as temporary workers.

Are you totally ignorant?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Insanity rules
02:02 PM on 04/13/2011
The temporary and contact workers is the way a lot of Spain employers are doing. They hire contract workers for 6 months at a time. If they did it the other way the taxes/benefits/etc in the socialist country are overwhelming. They have to keep the older workers instead of the ones who may be better at it because it costs so much to lay off permanent workers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverstreet
All you need is love
02:51 PM on 04/13/2011
My son in law is a Spanish engineer. He worked without a contract for many years for the same employer. He was never laid off. Now, he has a contract, which means security. He's not old. He's 34. He paid his dues. He also makes good money and has great benefits.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Debra White
01:30 PM on 04/13/2011
That's how Wal Mart makes so much money. Squeezing employees for every dime and donating handily to candidates to make laws anti labor. Hey Wal Mart is smart. That's how they became so big. Greedy sob's
02:11 PM on 04/13/2011
Except that they are not Walmart employees. 95% of the commenters here seem to overlook that detail.
02:50 PM on 04/13/2011
Who benefits in the end? WalMart.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AuntInAZ
Hypocrisy is one of my pet peeves.
01:33 AM on 04/14/2011
@Warren Lauzon
No, they are not DIRECTLY WalMart employees, but the temp agencies are contracted by Wal Mart. If companies like WalMart were not trying to cut corners to save money by dumping on the workers these kinds of stories and issues would not exist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flyby777
Tea parties are for little girls, not government
03:44 PM on 04/13/2011
This is why I will continue to shop at the small mom and pop stores. It is the only way that I can, as an individual, support small business. If anyone wants to see small business grow than this is what you need to do.
photo
carolo
retired Democrat
12:48 PM on 04/13/2011
Then you should vote to get the union in Walmarts. If all employers treated people fairly there would have been no need for unions. But fact is, they don't. For years people have been working less than 32 hours so their employer doesn't need to pay their insurance. Employers can fire you on the spot a week before you can draw a pension. They can put you on any crap job they want and put new hires on the job you've always had with no explanation. When employers start treating you like a box of rocks, join a union.
12:31 PM on 04/13/2011
Welcome to employment without labor representation. Where in regard to following established labor law: the employer is the enforcer, judge, and jury.

And here's the best....... In most states, if your employer: bounces your paycheck, refuses to pay your negotiated wage rate, and / or "disappears"-the most you can legally collect is minimum wage for the hours you worked. (I know from personal experience) -Gotta love those "right to work" states!
12:19 PM on 04/13/2011
I quit shopping at Walmart around a year ago and feel good about it. I think what they sell is substandard and I would rather pay a few cents extra to assure I am not helping to support an organization that takes advantage of the community they are located in, their vendors and those they employ.
01:31 PM on 04/13/2011
Dead on. While in college I replaced my $14 toaster oven every year. I finally decided to invest in a better one and it has lasted me for the past 3 with no signs it is going to give out any time soon. Same goes for most of the other stuff at Walmart. In the short term you might spend less on an item, but in the long run you probably will spend more on replacements. Not to mention the damage done to local businesses, the mistreatment of employees, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Var Enyo
My micro-bio didn't meet their demands...
06:28 PM on 04/13/2011
I quit shopping there at least 10 years ago because I could see what was coming. All these 'people' who whine about everyone being communists are going there at least once a week and buying crappy poisonous goods from...a communist country. I look for old American or Japanese items which last a heck of a lot longer and can be repaired.
12:09 PM on 04/13/2011
where's the article on how this site is being sued for not paying its bloggers a dime yet profiting off them?

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/04/13/unpaid-writer-files-105m-class-action-suit-huffington-post-aol/
03:57 PM on 04/13/2011
Interesting, but somebody just want a asut of somebody else's ppie. Blghgers are generally not paid because they get to post whatever they want, when ever they want, cross post , i.e., not exclusive at their optoion, etc. Frivilous lawsuit to me.