iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Budget Bill Vote Surrounded By Drama, Last-Minute Lobbying (UPDATE)

John Boehner

First Posted: 04/14/11 12:40 PM ET Updated: 06/14/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- The White House and Congressional lawmakers awoke Thursday morning to the possibility that an 11th-hour deal struck to keep the government funded through the end of the fiscal year could potentially fall apart on the House floor.

On Thursday, a flurry of last-minute lobbying commenced from backers of the continuing resolution, which will cut $38.5 billion in spending through the end of September. Though far less dramatic, the scene was reminiscent of the build up to the vote on the Troubled Asset Relief Program in fall 2008, when leaders from each party found themselves clashing with their respective bases.

With a House vote scheduled for 4 p.m. on Thursday, lawmakers remained cautiously optimistic about the vote count. Rep. Peter Roskam (R-Ill.), who is whipping members for GOP leadership, told MSNBC that he believed the bill “will pass with strong Republican support.” He declined to say how many Democrats would be needed. And Erica Elliott, a spokeswoman for House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said things were "looking good” while acknowledging, implicitly, that her boss had not been whipping Democratic lawmakers.

Numerically, the landscape was a touch more complicated. A senior House Democratic aide predicted that as few as 50 Democrats would vote for the CR, among them Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.). There were, however, several high-profile figures among the likely no votes, including Democratic Caucus Chairman John Larson (Conn.) and Vice Chairman Xavier Becerra (Calif.).

“None of those people would vote for anything that smells of compromise. No one ever expected their votes," said this aide.

If, indeed, only 50 or so of the 193 House Democrats backed the bill, GOP leadership would only be able to withstand around 100 defections from their own ranks.

“I feel no ownership of that or any responsibility to it, except that we do not want to shut down the government," House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in a press conference on Thursday. “I don’t have any idea” how many Democrats will vote against it, she said, adding: “We have not whipped it, we have not encouraged one way or another, people are just making their own judgments... I have always thought that if he couldn’t get 218 votes that there would be Democrats who could put it over the top. It’s just a question of how many.”

Underscoring the uncertainty of the vote count, the White House dispatched three top-ranking economic advisers -- Brian Deese, Jason Furman and Gene Sperling -- to the Hill to help persuade Democratic lawmakers to support the budget bill.

The night before, Pelosi, who has hinted that she too will oppose the deal, had reportedly erupted at Sperling because she was not consulted during negotiations. Aides on the Hill said the incident was being overplayed in the press, but they acknowledged rising resentment among Hill Democrats over being “taken for granted” by the administration.

“They didn’t include House Democrats in negotiations,” said one top aide, “so of course they’re now uncertain how we’ll vote.”

At the same time, Republican leadership was suffering from its own frictions with the base. Since the parameters of arrangement were announced late Friday night, conservatives of the party have done little but sour. The online community quickly bemoaned that the package did not cut far enough.

“If House Republicans vote for the bipartisan compromise, they should be driven into the street by the tea party movement and horsewhipped - metaphorically speaking. In reality, they should be primaried,” wrote Redstate.com’s Erick Erickson.

Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, a potential Republican presidential candidate, broke with the ranks and called for the bill to be defeated. Not helping matters, a Congressional Budget Office report released on Wednesday afternoon showing that the practical deficit reduction the plan produced this year was $352 million, not $38.5 billion.

Boehner, whose deputies had not even reached out to conservative Blue Dog Democrats as of Tuesday night, suddenly became omnipresent. An op-ed supporting the budget deal was penned for Politico -- a piece of journalistic real estate with particular resonance among Capitol Hill conservatives of both parties. Soon thereafter, the speaker was tweeting with rapidity about every minute cut that was part of the final language. Boehner also appeared on Laura Ingraham's radio show Thursday morning to defend the deal.

"I expect this first step will pass today," Boehner said at a press conference on Thursday, predicting that there would be a "bipartisan majority."

UPDATE: A Hoyer spokeswoman said the morning meeting between White House economic advisers and the House Democratic whip team focused almost exclusively on Obama’s speech and the GOP budget, not on the CR.

Ryan Grim contributed to this report. It has been updated to include remarks from Rep. Pelosi and Speaker Boehner.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The White House and Congressional lawmakers awoke Thursday morning to the possibility that an 11th-hour deal struck to keep the government funded through the end of the fiscal year could...
WASHINGTON -- The White House and Congressional lawmakers awoke Thursday morning to the possibility that an 11th-hour deal struck to keep the government funded through the end of the fiscal year could...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,804
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (47 total)
06:59 AM on 04/26/2011
Documentary - "I Voted Today" is a short documentary celebrating the role each individual person had in the last U.S. election. 2008 was the year that America wrote a new chapter in history. But behind the big campaign speeches and debates, beyond the packed stadiums and the hype on TV were the actions of everyday people. Those who volunteered, those who didn't just stand by - they were the ones who helped write this history. "I Voted Today" is about one of these people.

To watch please visit - http://www.cultureunplugged.com/play/4615
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grf67
10:13 PM on 04/14/2011
The baggers have destroyed the GOP. It could not have happened to a more deserving pack of hypocrites and self-serving racists. Always vote and let the repubs set a record for 1-term congressmen and women. Repubs cannot be trusted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
toffee
God fearing Tea Partier
08:06 PM on 04/14/2011
Bachman for speaker, organgy skin MUST GO. We the Tea Party can not tolerate Obama's lap dog as our speaker of the house.

Go Michelle.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mgray34
Fighting ignorance one post at a time.
08:25 PM on 04/14/2011
Does that include your two fans? I can't tolerate that either lol
10:16 PM on 04/14/2011
those 3 have a higher total IQ than all of yours
06:49 PM on 04/14/2011
somehow i don't see the tea party greeting them with cries of good job boys. job half done.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
06:39 PM on 04/14/2011
Do you believe it mere coincidence the 2008 bonuses on Wall Street amounted to $32-billion — “a remarkable reward for tanking the economy and an amount of gain on the part of the rich that roughly equaled the losses of those at the bottom of the social pile?

Put crudely, these Social Darwinian Policies that Republicans favor on behalf of the rich are purely designd to: privatize profits and socialize risks and thus allow the banks and the political class to put the screws on the people (structural adjustment austerity programs if you like).

As a matter of fact we could look back to Mexico when the standard of living of the population dropped by about a quarter in four years after the financial bail-out of 1982 & led to massive undocumented workers across our border. .

The result was what was known as ’systemic moral hazard as Professor David Harvey puts it.. “Banks behave badly because they do not have to be responsible for the negative consequences of high-risk behavior”.

The current bank bail-out is this same old story, only bigger and this time centered in the United States and to tell you the truth when Secy Paulson got his $700 Big ones to help out his investment bank colleagues, it was only a matter of time before you could hear the other shoe drop.

So are we going to wait until America looks like the southern latitudes before we do something about this?
10:18 PM on 04/14/2011
80% of every dollar spent by barak is for social programs taht is where the waste and red ink is
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tmf945
10:41 PM on 04/14/2011
Spell check is your friend...and while you are discovering that, back up your statement...I'll wait...and wait....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dashcat
Sanspoof is my idol
05:34 PM on 04/15/2011
Why are you against social programs? How come you aren't against corporate welfare? How come you don't mind redistributing the wealth upwards but hate it when it get;s redistributed downwards? Where are the jobs all the rich people are supposed to be creating?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
katylied
It's just a ride
06:27 PM on 04/14/2011
Oh my dyslexia kicked in, I meant invisible hand of the free market....heh ;)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
katylied
It's just a ride
06:22 PM on 04/14/2011
They (repubs) keep repeating "It's YOUR money!" Yeah, it's also your highways, your schools, your clean water, etc.... Just who do you think keeps us safe from 'the free hand' of the invisible market?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
katylied
It's just a ride
06:17 PM on 04/14/2011
DWS is speaking now. Say what you want, but I like her.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roxiehart
They both reached for the gun
06:25 PM on 05/25/2011
OK- Why are all Dem womon soooo u_gly?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Monday Morning
“Try and fail, but don't fail to try.
05:48 PM on 04/14/2011
2011 Budget Deal Is A Raw Deal!

The fiscal 2011 budget deal negotiated between the White House and House and Senate leaders is not as devastating to the concerns of the middle class and the poor as H.R. 1, the 2011 budget recently passed by House Republicans—but that is not saying much.

With this budget deal, two fundamental problems remain. First, low- and middle-income households are being asked to bear the brunt of the burden for deficit reduction, while people at the top of the income scale and corporations have not been asked to sacrifice anything of consequence. Second, investments we need to make as a nation to build a new foundation for broad middle-class prosperity are being shortchanged. We will pay the price in the form of fewer jobs, stagnant communities and continued slippage in such areas as transportation and renewable energy.

Here are some details about the 2011 budget deal that should be of particular interest to middle-class people: (For more details about the budget resolution, H.R. 1473, see the documents produced by the House and Senate appropriations committees.)

Read More:

http://themiddleclass.org/node/459
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ron ray
Justice: Big Bird has a job, Mitt's a 47%er.
05:35 PM on 04/14/2011
So I guess Obama now knows how to deal with boehner -- negotiate well into the night. From the end of happy hour into the night he'll stand his ground for billions in cuts. but when closing time gets close, he'll sign whatever you put in front of him.
photo
richjustdonothaveenough
To a 3rd world America
05:38 PM on 04/14/2011
Haha! Just start negotiations at 5:00 PM. Boehner will give in before the bars close.
photo
richjustdonothaveenough
To a 3rd world America
05:29 PM on 04/14/2011
Dear disappointed TP folk.

As a liberal, I have heard countless times over the past 2 years, "Don't let perfect be the enemy of the good." Today you can also take solace in these words.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treadway123
treadway123
05:07 PM on 04/14/2011
It must have been unspeakably hard as Boehner watched one Republican after another jumped his ship as it came into harbor, an wonder if the Demacrates would come to the Rescue! Boehner has NO control or unity in his party. While I admire those Demacrates an Repulicans who voted NO------I admire those who realized that we must get busy an move on an voted Yes! I sit now an wonder how Boehner must felt as he slowly realized he would have to depend on the Demacrates to rescue him out of a total desasterouse vote that he was so possitive his own party would support him on? This had to break this leaders confidence that he had some kind of control over this party, an will now doubt his ability to lead in the future.
photo
ruthtruth
seeker of truth, willing to listen
05:04 PM on 04/14/2011
Gee whiz! Is the right having trouble getting their own party to go along with the program. How many tears has Johnny Boy shed over this while looking over his shoulder to see the sneering Cantor making sure he doesn't give in to doing the right thing for the country. I think one of the problems Mr. Speaker has is Cantor. Cantor is starting to sound more and more like a bagger and could be looking to stab Boehner in the back. This whole thing is just starting to boil and many are going to get burnt. The sad part is that we are going to get royally screwed if the right/baggers get their way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treadway123
treadway123
05:10 PM on 04/14/2011
I have always thought Cantor an Ryan was out to under mine Mr. Boehner from the very beginning! Mr. Boehner couldn't appear any where hardly with out Cantor or Ryan looking over him like hungry bears to a feeding of some sort.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blogger x
Both parties sold us out a long time ago.
04:04 PM on 04/14/2011
There is no room for middle of the road, fair minded people in American politics.

You either are Blue or Red.
You either support Obama fully or are a Teabagger.
You either are pro-war or weak on defense.

But why can't we think outside the box? Why do we have to pick sides if both sides are wrong?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PATina
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
04:13 PM on 04/14/2011
I've been trying to understand this myself. The best I can come up w/ is that many can no longer process information of more than two variables. I call it binary thinking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Monday Morning
“Try and fail, but don't fail to try.
05:35 PM on 04/14/2011
Thank you PATina! Excellent observation! F&F!
06:50 PM on 04/14/2011
well sure we suck, but look at those guys.