iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

New Health Care Advocacy Group Launches With $5 Million In The Bank (EXCLUSIVE)

Deval Patrick Health Care

First Posted: 04/14/11 06:07 PM ET Updated: 06/14/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- The newest health care advocacy campaign already has millions of dollars in the bank. Launched by Democratic lawmakers and reform proponents, the two-part program is meant to frame the debate around the law during the 2012 election cycle.

On Thursday, Gov. Deval Patrick (D-Mass.), former Gov. Jim Doyle (D-Wis.) and several Democratic operatives launched the latest variation of a pro-health care, non-governmental organization. The project has a dual track: a 501c(3) group, called “Know Your Care,” to promote the Affordable Care Act, and a 501c(4) group, “Protect Your Care,” to lobby on the law's behalf.

The project already has a healthy fundraising stream, a source familiar with the campaign told The Huffington Post.

The $5 million launch figure gives an early indication that the organization will succeed where other health care advocacy groups have failed: primarily, in turning the tide of public and political opinion in the law’s favor.

In addition to the money, Know Your Care brings some high-profile names to its staff: Patrick and Doyle will serve on the board. Neera Tanden, who worked on President Obama’s health care task force team, will be on the board as well; Paul Tewes, Obama’s state director for the Iowa caucuses, will serve as senior adviser; Tanya Bjork, a former top adviser to Doyle, will serve as campaign manager; Jim Margolis, a top ranking communications consultant, will serve as the group’s media adviser; Eddie Vale, a former top hand at the AFL-CIO, will be communications director; and John Anzalone, a major Democratic pollster, will do the polling.

“Our efforts here are to really to make sure that this is a factual debate and that the facts are out there,” said Doyle. “It is critical that people understand what the benefits of this act are, and I look forward to making sure those facts are known across the country.”

How the organizations will structure their operations or spend their money isn’t entirely clear. Officials at the launch were coy with strategy and plans, stressing only that Know Your Care and Protect Your Care will be informative in nature, will be active in races and will work through the 2012 election until the major components of the law are implemented in 2014.

Only the 501c(4) organization can engage in lobbying -- so long as it pertains to the organizational mission -- but neither side of the operation has to disclose its donor names.

“The rules are the rules,” said David Donnelly of Public Campaign Action Fund, a group that promotes ethics in government. “We want to change them. There some groups who feel like they have to disclose their donors, [...] there are others that choose not to. The problem comes if they start pushing the boundaries on tax law, spending more money on electoral work than issue advocacy.”

The new campaign has the luxury of working on an issue that seems likely to remain firmly in the political spotlight. The president’s health care reform is already a fault line in the 2012 Republican presidential primary.

Obama advisers insist the legislation passed by in Massachusetts by former governor -- and potential GOP candidate -- Mitt Romney (R) was the intellectual foundation for the Obama administration’s own law. Fellow Republicans have insisted that Romney will end up having to either apologize or better explain his role in the Massachusetts legislation. But for now, he provides Know Your Care and Protect Your Care with the type of hook that they can use to make their campaign a bi-partisan one.

“If people are attacking Mitt Romney for his health care plan,” said the source familiar with the group’s efforts, “we would defend Mitt Romney and his health care plan.”

On Thursday, Patrick previewed the type of line that could inevitably come from his new organization.

“I give Governor Romney genuine and sincere credit for his role in working with a Democratic legislature, a Democratic U.S. Senate, a Republican White House, a broad coalition of business and labor leaders and patients’ advocates and experts in the medical field who came together to invent our health care reform,” said the current Massachusetts governor. “And, frankly, that broad coalition -- I guess with the exception of Governor Romney -- has stuck together to refine it.”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The newest health care advocacy campaign already has millions of dollars in the bank. Launched by Democratic lawmakers and reform proponents, the two-part program is meant to frame the d...
WASHINGTON -- The newest health care advocacy campaign already has millions of dollars in the bank. Launched by Democratic lawmakers and reform proponents, the two-part program is meant to frame the d...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,633
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:49 PM on 06/06/2011
Average Cost per Person by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Source : http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/2/38980580.pdf

--------­-­------ Per capita costs for the year 2008 ----------­------

United States........ $7,538 .... 100% of US per capita cost.
Canada.................. $4,079 ...... 54% of US per capita cost.
France.................... $3,696 ...... 49% of US per capita cost.
Germany................ $3,737 ...... 50% of US per capita cost.
United Kingdom.... $3,129 ...... 42% of US per capita cost.
Japan..................... $2,729 ...... 36% of US per capita cost.

Using the Canadian model and applying their per capita cost to the US population, we could cover EVERYBODY AND SAVE over $3,459 per person per year.

IMAGINE : No Fuss. No Bills. Everybody covered. NO PROBLEM.
..........................................................................................................................
Look at the savings again :

That's $3,459 (In 2008 US dollars).
That's $3,459 per PERSON (for every man, woman and child).
That's $3,459 per YEAR.
That's $3,459 per person per year - EVERY YEAR.
That's $3,459 per person per year - EVERY YEAR - FOREVER.

We can no longer afford to ignore Single Payer.
..........................................................................................................................

$3,459 per person X 310 million people = 1,072,290,000,000 per year.

That's over $1 trillion wasted every year.

Thats' what we lose EVERY YEAR that we don't adopt a single payer/universal health care system as is available in most Western countries.

No Fuss. No Bills. Everybody covered.

Say goodbye to bankruptcies due to medical bills !

That's Single Payer !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolyn LeBeauf
05:22 PM on 04/17/2011
The republicans have always done a good job of convincing people to vote against their own interest, now it's time the dems tell the american people jsut how good OBAMA health care reform will help them.
12:35 PM on 04/17/2011
US Health system has been driven by the supply side ignoring the demand side on one end and making the community more as a consumer driven to accept what has been offered on the other end. Consumersim in health & education will lead to deprivation for even those who can afford today. I do not say that health system in India is very good but it is delivering to a large extent within its limitations. I feel US could take a leaf out of the same to reform its health system. Lack of resources, here in India, have incultated in health & hospital managers like us a sense of prudence in every aspect of delivery of care right from planning a health facility to delivery of care including marketing. What is needed currently in India is third party financing f the demand side i.e. good health insurance and health management plans. What US needs today, is improving the access by making health services affordable.
11:41 AM on 05/13/2011
Many of us in the US have been switched to high deductible ($3000 -$5000) health plans, through our employers as our only health insurance option. This is already impacting my access to health care. When my doctor recommends a follow up treatment or specialist consult I have to decide if I can afford to spend up to $3000 to have something checked out. Even though the doctor recommends the followup - unless I am drastically sick I cannot justify spending the money, even though in the long run it could be detrimental to my health. At $50 or even $200 I would follow the docs orders. I agree that this is not an affordable or efficient health care system.
12:33 AM on 05/14/2011
I empathise with you Theo. As rightly pointed out by you, it is neiter affordable nor an efficent system. Insurance coupled with such high deductible negates the very purpose of indemnity.
What I feel is that healthcare reforms that protect the rights of citizens need to be put in place. I do not advocate any punitive measures towards healthcare providers or health insurance companies, for they are in the business for making profit out of their investments in these businesses. However, the very purpose of their business - customer service, has to be delivered, appropriately in a cost effective and cost-efficient manner.
I would like to re-iterate again that low cost delivery models of Asian countries provide adequate insightts for US healthcare to learn from them.
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
12:24 PM on 04/17/2011
GOOD! It is time now that Democrats finally launch a huge group of people to do nothing but scrap all of the Republican, TBagger, "hate jock" lies that too many ignorant people believe and keep blasting the truth onto the airwaves. And it is a huge job, considering the Conservative media and their preponderance to blow everything but the truth out of proportion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:46 AM on 04/17/2011
As a European (Dutchman) I had the chance to take a pack of Mutual Insurances. I can have all medical care FOR FREE, payments are moderate. Every year there is a surprise on my bankaccount, they pay back what they made for "profit". Nice system, I am insured for: legal assistance, house and furniture, traveling and tickets, healthcare and medicines , car, and legal responsabilities. I even could finance my house overthere if it was not free of debt. My income is 20% below average..
What keeps the American to start a Mutual??
03:52 AM on 04/17/2011
Long overdue that the Dems finally tell their side of the story and how health care has been a success.

Among other things, too, the polling is showing that there is vast support for Medicare:

http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/medi.cfm

And that the law has worked in preventing health insurance companies from canceling you when you get sick:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/03/17/us-insurers-idUSTRE62G2DO20100317
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
12:28 PM on 04/17/2011
It is sad that the good things in life are not taken seriously until they're about to be taken away. Like TBaggers who are happily using Social Security & Medicare not understanding that they've been shouting against their own successful social progam use.
02:20 PM on 04/16/2011
Obviously they have not read the bill.
09:47 AM on 04/16/2011
Please support keeping Dr. Don Berwick as the CMS Administrator. He is the leader that is needed to help our sick health care system become healthy. http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/pages/100000-Voices-for-Don-Berwick/172147666169859
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
05:19 PM on 04/15/2011
My Party, Democrats, just spent $62 million in one second firing 10 missles into Lybia. ( Our "allies" shot one missle. That's less than a million. Of course our "allies" have national helath care and that would be countries like England, France). That one amount, $62 million, is just a minute amount of what our Pentaon is spending HOURLY on our POLICE ACTIONS in the world. Both parties OK spending TRILLIONS and TRILLIONS to the American War Profiteers who in turn pay millions to our Politicians. Shut down the d**n government before we take one dime from the suffering AMRICAN people. I know that sounds very harsh, but honestly people, it will just be a very small preview of what we all are facing in the near future from our "government". We ALL will be sunk into a new, worst Depression. Not our Politicians--they will be movng to Du Bai, Switzerland, the Cammon Islands, etc. where they have their lobyist paid millions stashed. While we suffer from little or no medical assistance, they ill be liv ing the high life of the new Jet Set. And if we have an honest ellection against their ruling, as we've seen, the Politicians will take the ellection results and crunch the count inf their own favor. (on their home computers.) WE ALL NEED TO STAND AGAINST THIS TRAVISTY. If we cut back two or three missle firiings a week, we would have enough for Medicare and the Teachers/schools.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Valentine
Retired SEIU Member
06:16 PM on 04/15/2011
Zing .... fanned and favored for hitting the nail on the head.

If we put the Military Industrial Complex back in the bottle and cut the DoD down to the defend our boarders size we as a nation would be much better off .... and with health care for all.

Imagine that.
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
12:31 PM on 04/17/2011
Sometimes You can't get rid of the chaff untill ready to use the grain. Same as you can't weed out the evil doers until time to reward the good.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danglines
04:39 PM on 04/15/2011
Great! Be on the offensive. Not just offensive like the pubs!
03:35 PM on 04/15/2011
A true healthcare fix will not be accomplished until we have a dual
private/public choice system for everyone in the United States to choose from.

A public system paid for by a national sales tax and eliminating
insurance or copay requirements could deliver free complete healthcare
including medications, eye care and dental without any restriction for prior
conditions or means tests, no restrictions period if you use public care.

No one will be without care and this dual private/public system could
drastically reduce costs from the $2.6trillion spent last year by as much as a
$trillion annually.

Private insurers and providers could supply private care without government
mandates.

No government funding would go to private providers.

Patients would be able to go back and forth between the two systems if they
choose to.

States, employers and individuals would no longer be forced to pay for or be
involved with healthcare, (which would be paid for by a national sales tax). and
everyone shopping in the United States, whether they are here legally,
illegally, rich or poor, 40million tourists all would be paying pennies on every
dollar spent so that we can have free unrestricted public healthcare delivered
efficiently from the public system at fraction of what is now spent for
government funded care.

This is how to save lives, money and the US economy in a way that will stimulate
employment by getting rid of healthcare financial burdens for taxpayers,
families and businesses.
06:53 PM on 04/15/2011
This sounds like a good idea, and at the very least, a good starting point for a better system.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rybalaw
07:29 PM on 04/15/2011
Former Gov. Terry Sanford (D-NC) wrote a op ed piece that advocated Medicare for all and repeal of the Federal Corporate Income Tax supported by a 5% VAT. Is this what you are advocating
02:56 PM on 04/15/2011
I spent three weeks in the hospital over Christmas. My stay was much worse than my stay back in 1972. My first week was spent in a "free market" hospital and the next two were spent in a government facility. To my dismay, the "free market" hospital was much worse than the government hospital. They both leave much to be desired, however, and the problem is the unskilled immigrant labor that is being brought into both types of facilities to reduce costs. The higher paid nurse and doctors were mostly good but the aids that, as a patient, you deal with all day and night are terrible. The cultural gap is obvious as they don't understand how Americans expect to be treated and don't know how to do it. It is now common place to leave patients rolling around in their own urine and feces. It is also common to, instead of getting the rest that you need, to be awakened at all hours so that they can take your "vitals" that no doctor or even nurse sees. They also took my blood so many times that I arrived home feeling and looking like a bloody like a dart board. I also lost 50 pounds in 3 weeks, even though everyone I asked said that it was not healthy for someone 5'10" tall to weigh 130.

Thanks to uncontrolled immigration and government meddling in everything, our hospitals are now 3rd world. The only way I will go back is unconscious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sbrownin
03:11 PM on 04/15/2011
0bama calls them 'those countries that use to be known as Third World....now we are them. What you import, you become.
02:25 PM on 04/16/2011
Never heard that before. Good point. Very good point!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Valentine
Retired SEIU Member
02:52 PM on 04/15/2011
Putting your health into the hands of a for profit corporation is crazy.

Greedy corporations don't care about your health.
06:59 PM on 04/15/2011
I agree. There is a built in conflict of interest. Their (insurance companies) primary duty is to shareholders, not patients. That's why the only moral way to deliver healthcare is a non-profit system.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
429freckles
Ex Republican Now Devoted Democrat
01:54 PM on 04/15/2011
It's about time for someone to tout the benefits of this plan. I'm thrilled.