More

Roger Federer Loses To Jurgen Melzer At Monte Carlo Masters

Federer Melzer

JEROME PUGMIRE   04/15/11 02:54 PM ET   AP

MONACO — Roger Federer lost to Jurgen Melzer 6-4, 6-4 in swirling wind in the Monte Carlo Masters quarterfinals Friday, his earliest tournament exit since Wimbledon last year.

With dust and clay blowing off the court, Federer was ousted from his first clay-court tournament of the season.

"I don't think I played terrible. I thought it was OK," he said. "It was still the first week of clay, so I don't expect myself to play my very best. If I would, that would be a pleasant surprise."

Federer, the winner of 16 major titles, lost to Melzer for the first time in four matches. It was also was the first time this year Federer was beaten by someone other than Rafael Nadal or Novak Djokovic.

"I think I should have definitely gotten one of the sets," said Federer, who wasted seven break points against the seventh-seeded Austrian. "Every time I had this slight opening, things didn't go my way."

Nadal, the six-time defending champion, fared far better. The top-ranked Spaniard beat Ivan Ljubicic 6-1, 6-3 for his 35th straight win at the tournament. Nadal will next face third-seeded Andy Murray, who downed Portuguese qualifier Frederico Gil 6-2, 6-1.

Melzer sealed the victory when the second-seeded Federer chopped a weak forehand into the net. Melzer next plays fourth-seeded David Ferrer of Spain, who defeated 11th-seeded Viktor Troicki of Serbia 6-3, 6-3.

"I have beaten Rafa last year. I have beaten Nole (Djokovic). So this was the one missing," Melzer said. "I had a few shots on the line, a few bad bounces that were going my way. You need that to beat Roger."

Melzer received treatment on his back after the first game, but had no trouble after that. Federer credited Melzer's attacking play, but said the left-handed Austrian also enjoyed some luck.

"Either he shanks them and they stay in play, he hits the line," Federer said. "All those things accumulate to something quite frustrating. That's what made it hard."

Melzer said Federer caught the breaks in the fourth round of the U.S. Open last year.

"When we played at the U.S. Open, there were a lot of key points where I felt I was unlucky," Melzer said. "I thought, luck is going to turn. It did today."

Federer said he couldn't remember losing to a left-hander other than Nadal in seven or eight years. The Swiss star said the conditions were tough on both players.

"I think probably being down in the score didn't help, that the wind started to come maybe after the first set when I was down," he said. "Even in the wind, I had all my chances to come back into the match.

"He did well. I think he played aggressive, was able to mix it up. Obviously, I wasted way too many break-point chances today, which was unfortunate."

Two years ago at Monte Carlo, Federer lost in straight sets in the third round to countryman Stanislas Wawrinka – ranked 16th at the time, seven places lower than Melzer. Federer went on to win the 2009 French Open and complete his career Grand Slam.

The last time Federer lost before the semifinals was at Wimbledon last July when he was beaten by Tomas Berdych in the quarters. Outside the Grand Slams, Federer hadn't lost this early since his second-round exit to Ernests Gulbis at the Italian Open nearly a year ago.

This latest defeat raises more questions about whether Federer is slipping further behind Nadal and Djokovic.

"Well, always a surprise when Roger lose, because he's unbelievable what he did in this sport," Nadal said. "But, you know, the day was difficult, I said before. That probably didn't help him a lot."

Nadal lost his serve once when the players swapped breaks at the start of the match. Although he saved two break points serving for the match at 15-40, he was troubled more by the weather than by Ljubicic.

"It was a very difficult day to play tennis. A lot of wind, changing directions the wind all the time," Nadal said. "He didn't play well. That's for sure. Ivan didn't have his best day."

Murray said he liked the way he was hitting against Gil, but Nadal is an altogether different opponent.

"I'll have to play one of the best matches of my life," Murray said. "But that's what I've got to be ready for, prepare myself mentally to do. If I do that, I'll definitely make it very difficult for him."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SPORTS

MONACO — Roger Federer lost to Jurgen Melzer 6-4, 6-4 in swirling wind in the Monte Carlo Masters quarterfinals Friday, his earliest tournament exit since Wimbledon last year. With dust and cla...
MONACO — Roger Federer lost to Jurgen Melzer 6-4, 6-4 in swirling wind in the Monte Carlo Masters quarterfinals Friday, his earliest tournament exit since Wimbledon last year. With dust and cla...
Filed by Michael Klopman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
PotholesInMyLawn
Your micro-bio is empty
07:02 PM on 05/08/2011
Look cats have had 6 years to focus on beating Roger... for 6 years he has had a target on his back and people have learn how to win against him... (took them long enuff)

Now he has to go back to the lab and retool... Roger is far from done... will he get to #1 again...
I think so... the way the point system works you lose more when you fail to defend...

Djokovic is on a run.. Nadal needs another way to win... Federer will be back...
photo
Dhammi
Surprise me to the very brink of tears!
10:25 PM on 04/17/2011
One thing has changed that I find refreshing - Federer is not so arrogant when he is interviewed these days. Sure he has been a great player but we don't have to be reminded every time he is on air. The last couple of tournaments showed his unwillingness to change his game is catching up with him. The young guns have him figured out pretty well I'd say. Just another rung on the ladder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RichieB
Science is true whether you believe it or not
08:55 PM on 04/16/2011
No disgrace for RF. He is still 3 or 4 in the world and that's pretty darn good. Clay is his worst surface. Djokovic is the one winning everything in sight. Even Nadal has started off a little slow this year.
photo
Dhammi
Surprise me to the very brink of tears!
10:21 PM on 04/17/2011
Nadal is a few thousand points ahead of the pack so he can afford to be a 'little slow' at this point. He played a great match today.
photo
Sesame2009
Don't Probe Me, Bro!
02:59 PM on 04/18/2011
Actually, this is a better start for Nadal than last year which was his best year ever. 

He equaled his performance at the Australian Open and bettered his performance at Indian Wells and Miami.  Last year he lost to Ivan Lubicic and Andy Roddick in the Semifinals.  This year he lost to Djokovic in the finals. 

Anyway, no disgrace indeed for RF.  Melzer is a leftie who obviously studied a bunch of Nadal tapes and played JUST like him.  It's all about match-ups. 

I think Federer has got a lot of good tennis years in him.  I just hope he isn't too stubborn to realize that he's going to have to adjust his game in order to keep winning.  Djokovic and Melzer are just two other players who have figured out how to beat Federer.  If he doesn't change the way he plays, there will be many others. 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RichieB
Science is true whether you believe it or not
03:28 PM on 04/18/2011
Yep, spin it high to Fed's onehanded backhand. I have that same problem. He's still got some good years left in him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
Honey Badger Don't Care
02:39 PM on 04/16/2011
Sigh
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mike dougles
10:38 AM on 04/16/2011
He is getting old.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
linton
Perseverance is one short race after another.
12:05 PM on 04/16/2011
So am I!
photo
Sesame2009
Don't Probe Me, Bro!
02:04 PM on 04/17/2011
Not to get too picky, but the guy who beat Federer is 2.5 months OLDER than Federer. 

It's not just age.  The rest of the field is just figuring out how to beat Federer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
linton
Perseverance is one short race after another.
08:04 AM on 04/16/2011
It happens to all the great champs eventually. There comes a time when the young ones start to beat you up and take over the game. The invisibility wears off.
Tiger can make it though because golf is different.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctorkosan
PhD Chem E, HBS
12:42 PM on 04/16/2011
Invincibility? Cause I could always see him.
01:53 AM on 04/16/2011
Fed's days of dominance are over. He could still win a major, but that's looking more and more unlikely at this point. After awhile, the results don't lie.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fopplssiegeparty
05:45 PM on 04/15/2011
While I agree that Federer appears to be on the downswing, he has always played poorly in the wind.
01:51 AM on 04/16/2011
We never seem to hear about the wind when he wins.....
photo
Cory111
Life is good...
10:39 AM on 04/16/2011
Your post is a bit windy!!!
photo
LogicalMathMan
Math, Finance, English, Business Instructor
01:01 PM on 04/15/2011
I think Serena's fuchsia outfit distracted him.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
10:52 AM on 04/15/2011
Love Federer.........but dude..........you're 29 now........I play and know that a difference of just two years in age makes a difference in stamina .........so ease out of the big games.......
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
J0E1
Phil Hill 2012
10:12 AM on 04/15/2011
He's peaked.  It happens to everyone.  It was a great run and one to beat for years to come.
03:18 PM on 04/15/2011
Yeah, alas, 29 is about the natural time for tennis players' physical capacity to be declining.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
Honey Badger Don't Care
02:40 PM on 04/16/2011
True but I still think he has a few good years left.
photo
Sesame2009
Don't Probe Me, Bro!
05:31 PM on 04/17/2011
The guy who beat him is actually 2.5 months OLDER! 

It's not just his age.  The rest of the field has just figured out how to beat him.  Melzer is a lefty who played just like Nadal.