iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mortgage Debt Relief For Distressed Homeowners Won't Hurt Big Banks, IMF Says

First Posted: 04/15/11 08:41 PM ET Updated: 06/15/11 06:12 AM ET

Mortgage

NEW YORK -- A broad mortgage debt-relief program for distressed homeowners would not significantly impact the nation's four biggest banks, according to a report released this week by the International Monetary Fund.

Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo have enough money to withstand the resulting losses, IMF economists projected in their report.

The findings cast doubt on the notion that a broad-based program to reduce troubled homeowners' mortgage debt would hurt the nation's financial system.

If the four lenders established a year-and-a-half long program to reduce debt on first mortgages by 15 percent for borrowers at risk of foreclosure, and also worked to lower loan balances by 30 percent until 2015 for seriously-delinquent borrowers and those in foreclosure, they'd face little consequence, the IMF said.

"Our stress tests highlight the capital strength of U.S. banks," the organization said in its report, noting the lenders' ability to manage "even under a severe shock."

State attorneys general and some federal agencies are seeking to penalize the nation's five biggest banks for abusing homeowners and breaking federal rules and state laws during the foreclosure process. Officials are pursuing as much as $30 billion in fines.

Federal bank regulators at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency object to those efforts, instead pursuing modest fines and a redesign of how mortgage firms treat borrowers to ensure abuses don't occur going forward. Some Republicans in Congress have argued that a broad-based mortgage relief program would hurt banks' balance sheets and impede lending.

The costs associated with a widespread principal reduction effort -- which would impact millions of homeowners -- as forecast by the IMF is significantly greater than what is currently under discussion by state and federal officials in the foreclosure abuse probes.

The nation's five largest mortgage firms have saved more than $20 billion since the housing crisis began in 2007 by taking shortcuts in processing troubled borrowers' home loans, according to a confidential presentation prepared for state attorneys general by the nascent consumer bureau inside the Treasury Department and obtained by The Huffington Post.

The report, prepared by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, suggests the $20 billion figure should be used as a starting point in settlement discussions with the targeted firms. Many more billions would likely have to be levied as penalties to discourage the firms from taking a similar approach in the future and compensate homeowners for abuses, including reducing distressed borrowers' loan balances, some officials have argued.

The IMF's projections came as part of a report that touched on the problems afflicting the nation's housing market.

Purchases of new U.S. homes dropped in February to the slowest pace on record, according to the Commerce Department. Prices declined to the lowest level since 2003, according to the National Association of Realtors. About 6.9 million homeowners were either delinquent or in foreclosure proceedings in February, according to Lender Processing Services, a Florida-based data provider.

More than 2.8 million homes received a foreclosure filing in 2009, and nearly 2.9 million residences received a foreclosure filing last year, according to RealtyTrac, a California-based data provider.

Government programs designed to reduce monthly mortgage payments -- like the Obama administration's signature effort, the Home Affordable Modification Program -- have had limited success. Industry programs to mitigate foreclosures have had a similarly lackluster result.

"The primary shortcoming has been the inability to induce the payment reductions needed to address borrowers' high-debt profiles and/or the principal reductions to address the large negative equity position of many homeowners," the IMF said in its report.

Nearly a quarter of homeowners with a mortgage owe more on that debt than their homes are worth, according to CoreLogic, another real estate data provider. Underwater homeowners collectively owe $751 billion more than their homes are worth.

"As a result, modified loans have had high redefault rates, slowing homeowners' efforts to de-leverage and restore their credit scores and lengthening the foreclosure process," the IMF wrote in its report.

The average borrower in foreclosure has been delinquent for 537 days before eviction, up from 319 days in January 2009, according to LPS.

"These considerations suggest that more structural policies, such as renegotiation or some form of debt reduction -- including writedowns of mortgage principal by banks -- may be needed," the IMF wrote in its report.

The international organization said its analysis "suggests that banks in the United States have room to take such measures, which could help relieve some of the problems in residential real estate markets."

Representatives from 10 state attorneys general offices, along with officials from the Justice Department and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, met with banks again this week, the second time they've discussed the ongoing investigation with bank representatives, Associate U.S. Attorney General Tom Perrelli said on a conference call with reporters on Wednesday.

A settlement that includes reducing distressed homeowners' mortgage balances is still on the table, officials said, despite banks' objections.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
NEW YORK -- A broad mortgage debt-relief program for distressed homeowners would not significantly impact the nation's four biggest banks, according to a report released this week by the International...
NEW YORK -- A broad mortgage debt-relief program for distressed homeowners would not significantly impact the nation's four biggest banks, according to a report released this week by the International...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 125
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
05:40 PM on 05/29/2011
Thanks so much for the article. I am desperately looking for debt relief and help from the government of some kind. Your article and the website http://mortgagedebtrelief.co are the only things that have given me good answers.
01:08 PM on 05/14/2011
thanku so much for this article keep them coming please.i read your column everyday hoping for some real progress on this issue.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cats530
16 Trillion To Banksters Per GAO Audit
04:08 PM on 04/26/2011
"So look at how Chief Banking Shill, otherwise know as acting comptroller of the currency John Walsh, insists that the banks can’t be asked to pay for anything remotely resembling the damage they’ve done. This by the way, winds up being the reverse of what any respectable economist wold recommend. For markets to function properly, businesses that do damage are not only supposed to pay for any harm they do to their customers, but also to third parties. That’s why polluters are either regulated, or else subject to extra charges so that the cost of their goods reflects the true social cost. Even conservative economists like Harvard’s Greg Mankiw firmly support this notion."

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/04/occ-makes-patently-false-claim-that-slap-on-the-wrist-servicing-penalties-could-hurt-banks.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BonnieDoon
Fool me once...
06:54 PM on 04/19/2011
IMF Structural Adjustment for US - Write Down Mortgages
posted by Alan White at Credit Slips

http://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2011/04/i-have-argued-for-some-time-that-deleveraging-us-homeowners-who-still-carry-more-than-10-trillion-in-mortgage-debt-is-no.html


"I have argued for some time that deleveraging U.S. homeowners, who still carry more than $10 trillion in mortgage debt, is not only a social imperative but essential for the economic recovery. According to the IMF in its latest semiannual report, failure to deleverage American borrowers is a continuing threat to global economic stability. The Washington consensus is now fractured, apparently, with the IMF and economists on one side and the banks bleating on the other, with Treasury dithering in ambivalence."

"Meanwhile, in vaguely related news, S&P, in a bid to restore its credibility after the massive reclassification of AAA mortgage-backed securities to junk, now takes a flyer into the budget debate and announces US Treasury debt's AAA rating is under review. Really S&P? Where would you then suggest SWF's park their excess capital instead? Fannie and Freddie issues, perhaps."
photo
lackofoversight
GOP --- Greed Over People
03:34 PM on 04/18/2011
"Mortgage Debt Relief For Distressed Homeowners Won't Hurt Big Banks".

It was so gratifying to read the above HuffPo headline. (sarcasm)
God forbid we should hurt the Big Banks.
Hasn't that been the Administration's policy all along? They will do anything possible not to hurt Wall Street or the Big Banks. Frankly, it's disgusting.
02:41 PM on 04/18/2011
"Homeowners Won't Hurt Big Banks, IMF Says"

I'd love to read the reverse of that as a headline. That'll be the day
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stox1994
01:14 PM on 04/18/2011
This mess from the government, mortgage companies, banks and Wall Street will continue for years while the executives walk away with millions in bonuses. This relay expense will go on for generations.
05:34 PM on 04/28/2011
I think you mean the mess caused by people who can't manage their financial lives and pay their bills.

If people were paying their mortgages we wouldn't be were we are now.

Have some personal responsibility.
05:03 AM on 04/18/2011
Still banks will never go for it...

The average person is not "too big to fail". Bailouts are only for big corps that make billions in profit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builderman55
Featherless Biped
08:27 PM on 04/17/2011
Nice that someone is willing to tell the truth...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
darma2u
04:10 PM on 04/17/2011
Does the American economy mattered; unless like Hedge Fund manages they are betting against us? Keeping people in homes strengthens families, community, economy and home prices. If the mortgage rate and Principal are lowered to actual worth, not the inflated value it was sold for, so everyone involved got their piece of the pie at the expense of the buyer, the community, and local economy stabilizes? Strengthened economy creates less chaos. Instead banks/Wall Street continue further fraudulent behavior, telling homeowners (worried about a looming foreclosure & still paying the mortgage) they are working with them , yet loosing paper and lying to Judges when they go to court.( Is this subterfuge getting them more through foreclosures?) This is like the S $ L Scandals where the Wall Street/banks/etc got rich! ”Lincoln Savings and Loan collapsed in 1989, at a cost of over $3 billion to the federal government .” Look further see the involvement of Alan Greespans’, the Bush family and more on both sides of the politics.
My question - why not back this plan for everyone, because the direction we are going There will be more foreclosures. See what is happening in Wisconsin, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, let alone the rest of the nation even California and Florida.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five
http://parsec-santa.com/bigbrother/BushS&L.html
http://tipggita32.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/what-is-jeb-bushs-role-in-the-lehman-brothers-meltdown/
Dreamaholic
I'm having a micro-meltdown
03:52 PM on 04/17/2011
Like we did not know this already?
11:19 PM on 04/17/2011
The fact that millions of us Americans have been saying this doesn't mean anything - when the IMF says it, it's official.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BonnieDoon
Fool me once...
03:32 PM on 04/17/2011
On-the-money Editorial in today’s New York Times:

“Wrongful Foreclosures”
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/opinion/17sun2.html

A couple of excerpts:

“What was not looked for is far more significant. Because so few files were examined, the regulators’ report says, “the reviews could not provide a reliable estimate of the number of foreclosures that should not have proceeded.” So much for the burning question of the extent of wrongful foreclosures.”

"To add insult to injury, the agreements leave it largely up to the banks to investigate themselves on those issues. They require banks to choose, hire and pay independent consultants to check a sample of pending foreclosures; banks are then supposed to reimburse wronged borrowers. The regulators pledge to ensure that the reviews are comprehensive and reliable. We’re not holding our breath."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BonnieDoon
Fool me once...
03:23 PM on 04/17/2011
From Morgenson NYT 04-17-2011
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/business/17gret.html

“Elizabeth W. Magner, a bankruptcy court judge, the Eastern District of Louisiana is just one of many judges overseeing cases involving troubled borrowers. Because her judicial duties seem to have made her an expert on mortgage servicing, Ms. Magner’s views could not be more timely and important. This is especially true, given that state attorneys general seem intent on striking a settlement with servicers before they have conducted a comprehensive and thorough examination of industry practices.”

“By presiding over a variety of cases involving borrower abuse, Ms. Magner has probably done more investigating than some of the attorneys general who are so eager to cut a deal with the banks.”

“The use of a robo-signer in the Wilson matter seemed to be the last straw for Ms. Magner. In sanctioning Lender Processing, she wrote: “The fraud perpetrated on the court, debtors and trustee would be shocking if this court had less experience concerning the conduct of mortgage services.”

““Serious problems persist in mortgage loan administration. But for the dogged determination of the United States Trustee’s office and debtors’ counsel, these issues would not come to light and countless debtors would suffer.””

“For those arguing servicing errors encountered by troubled borrowers are rare mistakes, Magner’s rulings should be required reading. “The deference afforded the lending community has resulted in an abuse of trust,” she wrote in the Wilson ruling.”
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackranger
02:55 PM on 04/17/2011
I have been pondering the reasons for the banks not negotiating on the loans rather than foreclosing. It is clear that it is a large expense to leave someone in a home with no payments, then foreclose, then let the property sit empty until it is resold. Why are the banks not moving faster now to off load the homes with no payments or reduced payments. I think I am starting to figure it out. first the bank foreclosed on some of the loans they actually carried, such as from the banks they bought. But now, since the banks are "servicing" the loans for those marked down mortgages, I am sure they are charging for that service and I seriously wonder if the payments that are reduced while waiting for the "loan modification" are being, in part, siphoned off by the charges the banks make for servicing. Furthermore, it would make sense that the bank makes money for handling the foreclosure as part of that service agreement (I would love to see those service agreements). If the banks were not making money on servicing, I suspect they would be a lot more anxious to make a deal with the person currently in the property. That person would most likely pay more for the property than a short sale buyer, would not incur the costs of realtors and lawyers involved in the foreclosures and sales. Has anyone looked at this aspect?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
McKeaton
01:59 PM on 04/17/2011
Grand fraud...covered by the international arms of the private Federal Reserve bank of all banks....