More

New Brain Cancer Treatment Approved By FDA

Brain Cancer Treatment

By MATTHEW PERRONE   04/15/11 01:51 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- Device maker Novocure said Friday the Food and Drug Administration approved its first-of-a-kind treatment which fights cancerous brain tumors using electrical energy fields.

The FDA approved the device for patients with aggressive brain tumors that have returned after treatment with chemotherapy and other interventions. Patients with recurring brain cancer usually live only a few months.

Studies showed that people using the device lived about as long as those taking chemotherapy, roughly six months. However, patients using the device had significantly fewer side effects.

For decades, doctors have treated cancer with three methods: drugs, radiation or surgery. Novocure's NovoTTF device represents a fourth approach.

The portable device uses electric fields to disrupt the division of cancer cells that allows tumors to grow and spread. The electric fields have little effect on healthy cells because they divide at a much slower rate, if at all, compared with cancer cells.

"The reason why this is so exciting is that we now have FDA approval of a totally new type of treatment for cancer," said Dr. Herb Engelhard, an associate professor of neurosurgery at the University of Illinois in Chicago. Engelhard helped conduct the study of NovoTTF but received no compensation from the company.

"All of us as investigators were skeptical at first, but I have seen the scans and I believe this is killing cancer cells in patients," Engelhard said.

The NovoTTF is a six-pound device that patients carry with them in a small bag. The electrical current is sent from the device to four electrodes which are attached to the patient's shaved head.

A panel of outside advisers to the FDA narrowly voted 7-6 in favor of the effectiveness of the device last month. The FDA is not required to follow such recommendations, though it often does.

A 237-patient study failed to show a survival benefit for patients using the device, compared with those taking chemotherapy. Patients in both groups lived just over six months, on average. However, those in the device group reported higher quality of life and did not have the side effects of chemotherapy, such as nausea, diarrhea and infection.

"This is as effective or better than anything that's ever been tried after standard treatment has failed. And while you're on it, you don't have any side effects from the treatment." said Al Musella, founder of the Musella Foundation for Brain Tumor Research and Information in Hewlett, N.Y. Musella's father and sister-in-law died of brain cancer.

Known as Glioblastoma, the disease is the most aggressive form of brain cancer, with a five-year survival rate of just 2 percent for patients over 45 years old, according to American Cancer Society. Glioblastoma affects about 10,000 U.S. patients every year.

Standard treatment is six weeks of high-dose radiation along with a chemotherapy pill, and then additional chemotherapy for at least six months or until the tumor stops responding.

Novocure is a privately-held company based in Portsmouth, N.H., and Haifa, Israel, where the NovoTTF device was invented. Pharmaceutical giants Pfizer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson are among the investors in the company.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

WASHINGTON -- Device maker Novocure said Friday the Food and Drug Administration approved its first-of-a-kind treatment which fights cancerous brain tumors using electrical energy fields. The FDA app...
WASHINGTON -- Device maker Novocure said Friday the Food and Drug Administration approved its first-of-a-kind treatment which fights cancerous brain tumors using electrical energy fields. The FDA app...
Filed by Laura Schocker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 55
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:39 PM on 05/05/2011
Sounds interesting I guess, but as someone with a GBM, I don't think it will matter one bit. It would be nice if they could do better genetic analysis of tumors so we could focus efforts on those with a genetic profile more likely to benefit from treatment. More research on promoters and inhibitors and the like. Either way, I probably don't stand to benefit from most of it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeCanDoMore
Enjoying a fact based reality.
01:16 PM on 04/17/2011
Not available to you if your medicare voucher is used up. Thanks Sen Ryan.

The Medicare that we have in place now is guaranteed, Unlike the GOP / Ryan plan, where we have to go d i e if we are old and have greater med expenses in a year than $15,000.

Whatever GOP accuses Dems of doing, is what they themselves are doing. Rationed health care and death panels. = GOP. Believe it.

Cut waste elsewhere, not on the lives of the elderly who do not travel in the millionaire circles of the GOP who have no compassion for them. Rich are no more entitled to life than the poor, despite the fact that they may have devoted their lives to obtaining power and riches, and certainly not because they are mutants with no compassion gene. Lets get revenue back to how it was before we were in a ditch. Duh. Don't be spun.
10:57 AM on 04/17/2011
Quality of life is definitely a worthwhile improvement.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
05:35 AM on 04/17/2011
Fund research, not wars.

Improve quality of life for all victims, natural or manmade.
03:12 AM on 04/17/2011
There will always be some new hyped up cancer drug on the market. Its a market necessity. Too much money goes into the cancer industries for there not to be some new breakthrough. But at the end of the day, if you ask me, a practicing internist, to place a bet on who will triumph- Glioblastoma Multiforme or your new hot shot cancer drug/intervention, hands down, every time, my money is on the GBM. Its ready for any and everything we could throw at it, other than a full on brain and body transplant. Good luck!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bebe36
Grateful for every day.
03:56 PM on 04/17/2011
My younger sister died of a GBM 22 months after the first symptoms appeared.

She lived very well for all but the last seven weeks. She lived on her own, worked, traveled, drove a car and managed a normal life.

But when the tumor recurred at the base of the brain, there was no more to be done.

She understood and accepted her fate. She was far braver than I would have been.

I miss her every day.
08:32 PM on 04/17/2011
thank you for sharing that touching story. i too lost a family member to GBM. my grandfather was a titan- former director of medical services (aka surgeon general) of India, top cardiologist of his time, brought to an untimely end by GBM. all these bogus treatments just prolong agony and give false hope. shame on them
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Smith
02:52 AM on 04/18/2011
High dosages of THC have proven effective in research...there are several dramatic anecdotal accounts as well...
02:03 AM on 04/17/2011
And like radiation treatments, these energy field treatments are likely to give rise to secondary cancers.
05:28 AM on 04/17/2011
Beats ignoring the real cancer you currently have though.
07:40 PM on 04/16/2011
As a veteran of cancer and treatment options as well as the electrosurgical device industry (which is a different type of device), I understand the wish to destroy a tumor with as little damage as possible to the surrounding tissue.

I am curious, however, as to how the application of "electrical energy fields" is utilized in this procedure.

Our brains are constantly bombarded by electro-magnetic fields. Microwave radiation is introduced to our brains knowingly (cell phones) and unknowingly from every transciever in the area that we may find ourselves, microwave ovens, radiation from TSA to medical/dental xrays, natural radiation from the enviornment, the obvious radiation from human errors like poorly planned nuclear power plants. Then there are the lower frequency higher voltage electrical sources all around us from the wall sockets to huge electrical line towers.

Frequency alone is very important to the introduction of elecrtrical fields to the human body. If they are two low the body will respond by muscle spasms, if the are two high the body site gets cooked.

Since I haven't looked up the specifications on this device and the concept behind it or the clinical trials information, I can only say that I hope it works better in the future and that it's not just another shot in the dark when it comes to that decision time that I and millions of other cancer patients have had to make on how much is too much treatment vs. the desire to live on.
12:54 AM on 04/17/2011
This is based on a theory that is actually pretty old. Several people used to use variations on this device to treat cancer, apparently with pretty good success. The FDA would then shut them down. I know of one guy in Germany who has a whole system of various machines that do this, and I know several people who recovered after treatment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeCanDoMore
Enjoying a fact based reality.
01:18 PM on 04/17/2011
Best of luck to you.
05:09 PM on 04/16/2011
I wish I'd known about this about a year ago, as my mother would have been a good candidate for such a treatment. Progress is made slowly, but at least it's being made!
02:50 PM on 04/16/2011
My nephew's wife started having headaches and the doctor found she had brain cancer. They told her in July she wouldn't live until Christmas. She took chemo and it seemed to be helping shrink the tumour, but she died in the middle of the night in September. She had a bad cough and her husband got her some cough syrup. Then later, she had a nose bleed and was dead before anyone knew it.
05:32 AM on 04/17/2011
That's terrible. Certain types of brain cancer seem to be basically incurable.
08:22 AM on 04/17/2011
That's so sad. Brain tumors are an awful thing to suffer through. My
mother had brain tumors secondary to cancer somewhere else
in her body, but it was close to the lining of her brain, and
she suffered greatly. I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy.
She was like a stroke victim.
It's nice to hear about any kind of new treatment.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Devout Presbyopian
12:55 PM on 04/17/2011
NCI:
''One study in mice and rats suggested that cannabinoids may have a protective effect against the development of certain types of tumors. [3] During this 2-year study, groups of mice and rats were given various doses of THC by gavage. A dose-related decrease in the incidence of hepatic adenoma tumors and hepatocellular carcinoma was observed in the mice. Decreased incidences of benign tumors (polyps and adenomas) in other organs (mammary gland, uterus, pituitary, testis, and pancreas) were also noted in the rats. In another study, delta-9-THC, delta-8-THC, and cannabinol were found to inhibit the growth of Lewis lung adenocarcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo .[4] In addition, other tumors have been shown to be sensitive to cannabinoid-induced growth inhibition.[5-8]

Cannabinoids may cause antitumor effects by various mechanisms, including induction of cell death, inhibition of cell growth, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. [9-11] Cannabinoids appear to kill tumor cells but do not affect their nontransformed counterparts and may even protect them from cell death. These compounds have been shown to induce apoptosis in glioma cells in culture and induce regression of glioma tumors in mice and rats. Cannabinoids protect normal glial cells of astroglial and oligodendroglial lineages from apoptosis mediated by the CB1 receptor. [10,11]
------------------
(continued below)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Devout Presbyopian
12:55 PM on 04/17/2011
In an in vivo model using severe combined immunodeficient mice, subcutaneous tumors were generated by inoculating the animals with cells from human non-small cell lung carcinoma cell lines.[12] Tumor growth was inhibited by 60% in THC-treated mice compared with vehicle-treated control mice. Tumor specimens revealed that THC had antiangiogenic and antiproliferative effects.

In addition, both plant-derived and endogenous cannabinoids have been studied for anti- inflammatory effects. A mouse study demonstrated that endogenous cannabinoid system signaling is likely to provide intrinsic protection against colonic inflammation. [13] As a result, a hypothesis that phytocannabinoids and endocannabinoids may be useful in the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer has been developed.[14]

Another study has shown delta-9-THC is a potent and selective antiviral agent against Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), also known as human herpesvirus 8.[15] The researchers concluded that additional studies on cannabinoids and herpesviruses are warranted, as they may lead to the development of drugs that inhibit the reactivation of these oncogenic viruses. Subsequently, another group of investigators reported increased efficiency of KSHV infection of human dermal microvascular epithelial cells in the presence of low doses of delta-9-THC.[16]
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/cannabis/healthprofessional/page4
OverseasVet
Stationed not deployed
01:23 PM on 04/16/2011
According to the FDA the device is approved for use on glioblastoma multiforme only when conventional therapy fails and the tumor recurs or progresses. The approval is based on one study that showed no difference between chemo and the device. Controls were not mentioned in the announcement and haven't found a reference yet. They did say that this type of cancer does not respond well to chemo which suggests that it would not respond well to the device either. Without the mention of controls one has to speculate whether no treatment maybe as efficacious.
05:12 PM on 04/16/2011
Usually the treatment once chemo stops working is high dose steroids, which have severe side effects. No treatment would incur a very rapid decline of the patient, and fairly quick death. With this treatment, it sounds like they are saying is is AS effective as chemo, just not any better. Perhaps a combination therapy is in order?
OverseasVet
Stationed not deployed
04:01 AM on 04/17/2011
It appears that a study to answer your question is underway: http://www.physorg.com/news194876151.html . I remain a skeptic. Electricity has been promoted as a cancer cure ever since it was harnessed by Ben Franklin. The good news is that it appears this is a scientific study and the device may prove to be useful.
11:52 AM on 04/16/2011
I wonder if pressure waves would work as well?
photo
froidytoidy
Underwhelmed Independent
11:41 AM on 04/16/2011
Wouldn't this work in all cancers? Disrupting out of control cell division is what it is all about and with this modality, the quality of life escalates.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frenchfrog
11:33 AM on 04/16/2011
Yay! Progress. Everyday, a little more progress. Keeping hope.
10:24 AM on 04/16/2011
Tears of small infants found to bring life back to the elderly, NPR #Notintendedtobeafactualstatement
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeCanDoMore
Enjoying a fact based reality.
01:30 PM on 04/17/2011
Ins@ne behavior by TP / GOP confirmed to be caused by nanotechnology. ie, molecule sized robots with external control, that can be inhaled or injected.

Who is holding the joystick? Find out in the next installment of What Happened to My Country, and why don't these people make sense anymore?

(#Notintend­edtobeafac­tualstatem­ent)