More

Drug Companies Set To Donate Vaccines To Poor Countries

First Posted: 04/15/11 05:54 PM ET Updated: 06/15/11 06:12 AM ET

Pandemic Vaccine

Drug companies are set to donate vaccines and antivirals to poor countries, and share patented technology under a deal to strengthen defenses against the next flu pandemic, senior diplomats said on Friday.

Countries have been meeting this week at the World Health Organization (WHO) to improve their response to flu epidemics after poor states complained they were overlooked in the 2009 pandemic.

Tentative agreement was reached late on Thursday between all countries taking part in the talks, except for the United States which still has to give its final approval, the diplomats said. [nLDE73D2D0]

Countries would share virus samples with the WHO's network of laboratories in return for affordable vaccines derived from them under the agreement.

The industry has pledged to donate drugs and knowhow, covering half of the $58 million annual cost of boosting defenses in the poorest nations, according to senior envoys.

"We have a deal. It is a complete deal. It addresses all challenges. We are very, very optimistic," a senior diplomat told Reuters on Friday afternoon.

"The package is there. Everybody is ready to take it. But we are still waiting for the United States to say the final 'yes'," he said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The U.S. delegation was expected to report back to the closed-door talks after receiving instructions from Washington.

"The U.S. remains actively engaged in seeking a negotiated solution," David Kennedy, U.S. spokesman in Geneva, said, declining to comment further on any stumbling blocks.

DEAL BY MIDNIGHT?

The aim is to reach agreement by midnight on Friday on a draft deal to be presented for approval by health ministers at the WHO's annual meeting being held from May 16-24.

Negotiations began four years ago between WHO's 193 members after the deadly H5N1 bird flu virus emerged in southeast Asia. A year later, Indonesia stopped sharing flu virus samples with WHO laboratories, demanding its share of vaccines.

Indonesia's delegation has joined the near-consensus reached in the latest round of talks this week, diplomats said.

During the H1N1 swine flu pandemic in 2009-2010, many developing countries complained that they had no life-saving antivirals or vaccines to combat the new virus.

The WHO helped distribute 78 million vaccines, donated by rich nations and drug makers, to 77 developing countries, but regulatory and other hurdles slowed the process.

The industry has now pledged to step up its role.

"The agreement is companies can choose what they want as part of their contribution. They will choose from a shortlist of very meaningful contributions," the senior diplomat said.

"They can transfer technology or know-how for manufacturing vaccines exclusively during pandemic times. This is key. They can donate important amounts of vaccine or antivirals," he said.

Drug company executives say current production capacity for pandemic flu vaccine is 1.1 billion doses. GlaxoSmithkline, Novartis and Sanofi-Aventis are among major flu vaccine makers.

Under the deal, 10 percent of production would be earmarked for developing countries, diplomats said. But the WHO would decide where the doses were best deployed to combat outbreaks.

"It gives flexibility to the WHO to think strategically on how resources should be spent," the senior diplomat said.

By Stephanie Nebehay

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

Drug companies are set to donate vaccines and antivirals to poor countries, and share patented technology under a deal to strengthen defenses against the next flu pandemic, senior diplomats said o...
Drug companies are set to donate vaccines and antivirals to poor countries, and share patented technology under a deal to strengthen defenses against the next flu pandemic, senior diplomats said o...
Filed by Laura Schocker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 95
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Josephius
No, not microbio, molecular bio and biochemistry!
11:50 PM on 04/19/2011
For FREE? Nooooooooo! Oh, those horrible people!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Heather XW
05:05 PM on 04/17/2011
"Donating"

This is what I see. Manufacturing a tax deduction thru donation because that would be better than a total loss and sending the vaccines to the incinerators because they expired.

AP IMPACT: 40 million doses of expired swine flu vaccine to be burned; $260 million lost

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/07/01/ap-impact-million-doses-expired-swine-flu-vaccine-burned-million-lost/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dyson
debunking pseudoscience, one fallacy at a time.
06:44 PM on 04/17/2011
As you well know, flu vaccines expire each season. For the pandemic of 2008, the appropriate action was to produce enough vaccine to ensure there was enough for everyone if needed. The fact that it was not all used is not relevant to the current initiative for companies to produce new vaccines and give 10% to developing countries.

Your link indiates the surplus vaccine from swine flu is going to be destroyed, not sent to the third world, so your comment is inapt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Heather XW
07:14 PM on 04/17/2011
"The fact that it was not all used is not relevant to the current initiative for companies to produce new vaccines and give 10% to developing countries."

It's my opinion that in a waning economy and waning flu vaccine uptake they are implementing a strategy that will cover or soften their bottom line.

The link I supplied is evidence of the loss of revenue when deductible donations are not in place. You misconstrued the message.

Also you must know that the patents are running out for the pharmaceutical industry.

"The drug industry will lose control over more than 10 medicines with sales of nearly $50 billion this year, a reversal that highlights the problems drug companies now face."

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/03/07/business/07drug.html?sort=recommended&offset=2

So if you add that to another 1/4 billion in losses from unused vaccines you can see the pressure for ingenuity from pharma.
photo
cable1977
Against logic there is no armor like ignorance
09:18 AM on 04/18/2011
So, you must be suggesting that the WHO is willing to inject individuals with expired vaccines, correct? Just trying to make sure I understand the conspiracy theory correctly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Heather XW
10:10 AM on 04/18/2011
Your statement does not relate to my post.
EvolveorPerish
R E anna what have you done?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sonic hedgehog
A true word needs no oath
02:57 PM on 04/17/2011
There is no evidence that SV40 caused any cancer in humans. Just because you found something in tumors doesn't mean that it caused the cancer in the beginning.
EvolveorPerish
R E anna what have you done?
03:44 PM on 04/17/2011
Hey, you should check out the entire site. Its based on a group of MD's and health care professionals who are daring to come out about vaccines, despite the risk they pose to their careers. Its refreshing.
I know a bunch personally who do not dare to come out publicly as they are afraid of the persecution (like my kid's ped).

The tide will turn, the truth will be unvealed, its just a matter of time.

Its ok if you roll your eyes : ) wouldn't expect less.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric Mann
Do you want to be on the opposite side of Progress
EvolveorPerish
R E anna what have you done?
12:54 AM on 04/18/2011
Yes, Lord forbid we should base health on a healthy diet instead of the pharmaa co's.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeCanDoMore
Enjoying a fact based reality.
01:31 PM on 04/17/2011
Nice idea, but I can't say I really rust these people. Just make sure they are not about to expire.
photo
playsindirt
So much dirt, so little time.
12:55 PM on 04/17/2011
Let's see if their rates of autism rise.
EvolveorPerish
R E anna what have you done?
02:39 PM on 04/17/2011
Experimenting on children, what an honorable endeavor!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dyson
debunking pseudoscience, one fallacy at a time.
06:51 PM on 04/17/2011
Many 3rd world countries actually have better vaccination rates for infants than the USA or UK. One example is Brazil, where there is a 98-99% uptake.
Check it out:
http://apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/en/globalsummary/countryprofileresult.cfm

I don't hear of epidemics of autism there though.
06:43 AM on 04/18/2011
http://www.ntn24news.com/latinamericanews/4411-rios-christ-statue-lit-blue-raise-awareness-autism

"Rio's Christ statue lit up in blue to raise awareness for autism
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - (Reuters) - Rio de Janeiro 's iconic Christ the Redeemer statue received a blue lighting on Friday (April 01) night to raise awareness for autism, a common disorder which is widely overlooked. The Brazilian city's celebrations for World Autism Day also included a religious service on top of the Corcovado mountain attended by dozens of children who suffer with autism.

According to a Brazilian government survey, autism occurs in 1 in 110 children; a rate which is similar worldwide....."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dyson
debunking pseudoscience, one fallacy at a time.
10:34 AM on 04/18/2011
How does this work then?:
USA autism rate 1 in 64
Brazil autism rate 1 in 110.
If vaccines cause autism then I'd assume we vax twicew as much as Brazil do. But no, they vax at 98-99%, much more than us.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Taximom5
12:11 PM on 04/17/2011
They're donating the vaccines that consumers in developed countries are refusing, because of the ever-increasing reports of severe adverse effects (not to mention the reports of vaccine manufacturers' non-reporting of those same severe adverse effects during the safety testing).

Also interesting that we are seeing news reports of vaccine manufacturers' generous donation of (unwanted) vaccines, but we are NOT seeing the news concerning Poul Thorsen, researcher employed by the CDC to come up with the "Danish" study (which supposedly debunked a link between vaccines and autism).

Poul Thorsen was indicted this week on charges of embezzlement and money laundering--he is charged with stealing $1,000,000 in research money.

This calls into question the validity of his research.

Looks like the vaccine industry paid off the press to report their "generosity," and NOT to report the unethical and illegal behavior of the lead researcher in charge of proving vaccines' supposed safety.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Heather XW
12:51 PM on 04/17/2011
Just to add to your enlightening post;)

Some commentary on the indictment from an attorney who is reviewing the Thorsen documents:

"The maximum is 20 years on most of the counts but such extreme sentences are rarely imposed, unless severe aggravating circumstances exist (like "scientific" fraud affecting the safey of vaccines and global vaccine policy)."

"The indictment suggests that Thorsen promoted himself to obtain the CDC grants but this does not seem realistic to me, given all the background information we have, including the CDC-WHO-Brighton_GAVI emails and other documents showing how aggressively vaccine authorities were seeking epidemiology to exonerate vaccines of any role in causing NDD's or autism."

"There is a warrant for Thorsen's arrest but bringing him to the US from Denmark may take some time. Denmark and the US does have an extradition treaty."

“He allegedly used the money to buy a house in Atlanta (headquarters of the CDC), a Harley Davidson motorcycle, an Audi and a Honda, along with allegedly cashing several cashiers checks. The indictment requires him to give up the motorcycle, house and cars.”
http://tucker.patch.com/articles/autism-researcher-indicted-for-stealing-grant-money-from-cdc-2

http://adventuresinautism.com/ThorsenIndictment.pdf
http://adventuresinautism.com/Thorseninformationsheet.pdf
http://adventuresinautism.com/ThorsenPraecipe.pdf

http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.com/2011/04/poul-thorsen-indictment-is-out.html?spref=f
photo
cable1977
Against logic there is no armor like ignorance
09:33 AM on 04/18/2011
If Thorsen stole money, then he should goto jail.

Why does doing something like that call his research into question when his theft is not at all related to his research? Thorsen wasn't even the first author, nor is there any actual evidence that the work from that paper was fraudulent, improperly obtained, or in violation of any ethics. None of the other authors have retracted the paper for any reason whatsoever.

For an example of an individual who's unethical behavior relates directly to his research you need look no further than Wakefield. Wakefield's unethical behavior, for which he had his license to practice removed, was in direct relation to his research (i.e. performing unwarranted invasive procedures without ethical approval). Also, his work has been demonstrated to be fraudulent and the majority of his co-workers, as well as the publication journal, have retracted one of his papers.

So, since you are willing to use such a unrelated event to avoid the conclusions in the paper in which Thorsen was an authors, I must therefore assume that you are willing to completely disavow any and all work connected with Wakefield, right? Or are you a hypocrite?

I'll also point out, that the paper that Thorsen was involved in is one of many papers coming to the same conclusion, unlike Wakefield's paper.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sonic hedgehog
A true word needs no oath
01:53 PM on 04/19/2011
LOL!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeCanDoMore
Enjoying a fact based reality.
01:33 PM on 04/17/2011
Drug companies are too powerful Power breeds corruption. Thanks for the post. F and F.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Hendricks
see wikipedia
01:30 PM on 04/16/2011
Side note - will drug companies be hiring on National Hiring Day?
National Hiring Day #3 is suggested for May 19, 2011. This is a day that corporations are encouraged to hire new employees. Corporations are called on to put patriotism first and help their country in hard times. Those corporations that cannot hire, are asked to stop firing for that month.

There has never been a time In American History where hiring people would hurt corporations less, and help the country more.
OverseasVet
Stationed not deployed
10:49 AM on 04/16/2011
Evil big pharma just wants more people to live so they can sell them medicine in their old age.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeCanDoMore
Enjoying a fact based reality.
01:34 PM on 04/17/2011
As long as its not more than $15,000, in which case, go crawl quietly in to your corner. But not if you have money.
EvolveorPerish
R E anna what have you done?
02:42 PM on 04/17/2011
And chemo, diabetes, and neurological diseases are great ways to sell more drugs, make more profits. Woo-hoo, go big pharmaa, save the world!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dyson
debunking pseudoscience, one fallacy at a time.
06:37 PM on 04/17/2011
And what are you going to do when your kid gets meningitis - take him to a homeopath?
08:06 PM on 04/17/2011
love irony!
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
07:58 AM on 04/16/2011
Haven't they been through enough already.
photo
stape45
Spin this!
05:44 PM on 04/15/2011
Nice to know that things have gotten that much better, here at home.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littlerabbit
05:08 PM on 04/15/2011
It sounds like a great idea -- but aren't we the consumers the ones providing the subsidy?