More

Dodd-Frank Could Have Resolved Lehman, Regulator Argues

Lehman

First Posted: 04/18/11 05:40 PM ET Updated: 06/18/11 06:12 AM ET

The failure of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., which caused financial panic and sent markets into a tailspin, could have been avoided had last year's financial reform law already been in effect.

A Monday report from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation says the firm could have been wound down in an orderly manner, maintaining the value of its assets and ongoing operations. Counter-parties would have been prevented from fleeing and financial markets likely would have absorbed the outcome with minimal disruption, the report concludes.

The legislation that forms the basis of the FDIC's report, known as Dodd-Frank for its principal sponsors in Congress, seeks to end the perception that some financial firms are too big to fail. This could prevent future taxpayer-funded bailouts by allowing regulators to wind down large institutions outside the bankruptcy process. It came in response to the extraordinary steps taken by policymakers in 2008-09 to shore up the U.S. financial system after bankers' and traders' outsized risks failed to pay off, necessitating trillions of taxpayer dollars for equity investments in private firms and asset- and debt-guarantees.

FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair hailed the report's findings. Had Dodd-Frank been in place, it says, Lehman’s creditors may have recovered as much as 97 cents on the dollar. By comparison, they're forecast to receive about 21 cents on the dollar.

The optimistic analysis assumes that the FDIC would have fully used its newly-gained powers in the months leading up to Lehman's Sept. 2008 failure to plan for its demise, find a ready buyer and maximize the value of its assets, thus minimizing the effect the failure would have on the broader market and on taxpayers. The report assumes the FDIC would have begun taking action about six months earlier, in March 2008.

But the global investment bank had substantial operations overseas. It also had about 8,000 subsidiaries and affiliates, Harvey R. Miller, one of Lehman's bankruptcy attorneys, said last September before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. And on the day of its bankruptcy filing, the firm was a party to more than 10,000 derivatives contracts worldwide relating to about 1.7 million transactions, Miller said.

Finance experts say regulators will never be able to resolve failing international firms like Lehman in the kind of orderly manner envisioned by policymakers.

"We need a cross-border resolution authority, but we're not going to get one," said Simon Johnson, a former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund and a professor at MIT’s Sloan School of Management. "The disruption in the U.S. was due to what happened in Europe and the U.K., and unless you have a cross-border regime you can't deal with that going forward."

"And that's not something anyone is working on," he added.

Policymakers in office at the time, including Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and current Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, argue the government was forced to bail out firms and their creditors because they lacked a legal mechanism to resolve so-called “nonbanks,” whose size and reach prevented them from undergoing an orderly wind-down in bankruptcy.

But Lehman was not bailed out and panic ensued as markets were caught unprepared. Commentators and Wall Street figures point to the government's decision to let the firm fail as the biggest mistake of the crisis, one that led to such widespread panic that investors fled and asset prices plunged, making bailouts of multiple other banks inevitable.

Dodd-Frank would have helped if Lehman were purely a domestic outfit, Johnson said, but if that were the case, bankruptcy should have been used to "let the market sort out the winners and losers.”

Lehman entered bankruptcy claiming $639 billion in assets. It's the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history. Fees associated with the filing have already topped $1 billion and continue to grow.

The agency's new powers "give us the tools to end Too Big to Fail and eliminate future bailouts," Bair said in a statement. But, she noted, "much work remains to be done."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The failure of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., which caused financial panic and sent markets into a tailspin, could have been avoided had last year's financial reform law already been in effect. A M...
The failure of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., which caused financial panic and sent markets into a tailspin, could have been avoided had last year's financial reform law already been in effect. A M...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 92
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ndem
04:59 PM on 04/25/2011
For full legal case of WaMu v JPMorgan see comments in this article: www.businessinsider.com/average-american-family-hurt-by-economy-2011-4
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ndem
04:58 PM on 04/25/2011
Buy Silver Crash JP Morgan
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ndem
04:57 PM on 04/25/2011
37. In January of 2005, in order to place insiders in his targeted company, Dimon sent a number of senior and junior executives to Washington Mutual to begin "new chapters"in their lives. The most significant transfer to Washington Mutual was Stephen J. Rotella, an I8-year veteran of WMorgan Chase, who held the posts of chief executive officer for Chase Home Finance, executive vice president for JPMorgan Chase, and member of the JPMorgan Chase executive committee. At Washington Mutual, Rotella took the job of president and chief operating officer.
38. In addition to Rotella, at least 4 senior vice presidents & a chief financial
officer transferred from JPMC to Washington Mutual as plants in late 2004 & 2005. These included, Steve Fortunato, a 12 year veteran ofJPMC serving as Senior Vice Pres., Chase Home Finance, responsible at JPMC for merger analysis, forecasting and mortgage servicing valuation; Tai Bindm, Chief Financial Officer & Exec Vice President for Chase Home Finance; John Berens, senior vice Pres. of default services, managing over 2,000 JPMC employees; Youyi Chen, PhD, senior vice president responsible for managing the interest rate risks of JP Morgan Chase's mortgage servicing rights portfolio; & Bill Murray, senior vice president, led the MSR valuation, pricing & reporting functions for JPMC's Capital Markets group. Upon information and belief, Rotella and the other JPMC executives that transferred to Washington Mutual understood and agreed to help with Dimon's long term plan and goal for IPMC to acquire Washington Mutual, and thereafter provided substantial assistance to
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ndem
04:53 PM on 04/25/2011
as an extraordinary gain."
23. The deal capped a years-long effort on the part of Defendants to acquire
Washington Mutual and expand its operations to the West Coast As JPMC's Chief Executive Officer of Retail Financial Services, Charlie Scharf, stated in an October 2, 2008 letter to Washington Mutual employees after the acquisition:
"During the last few years as we have been building our own business, we kept
tract of banks that would complement our franchise and help us become a
better bank for our customers, our employees and our shareholders.
Washington Mutual consistently was at the top of the list."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ndem
04:53 PM on 04/25/2011
Summary of Claim - Overview
20. In September of 2008, motivated by greed and unrestrained by moral or legal boundaries, the Defendants exploited a perceived liquidity crisis in the banking industry to improperly and illegally take advantage of the financial difficulties of Washington Mutual, Inc.
("WM1'), the nation's largest savings and loan association. Defendants used the crisis as a backdrop and lever to negotiate the seizure and sale of the banking operations of WMI--Washington Mutual Bank, Henderson, NV and Washington Mutual Bank, FSB, Park City, UT (together, "Washington Mutual Bank" or "WMB")--stripped of liabilities, from federal regulators. In negotiating with the federal regulators, JPMC misused confidential financial information of WMI and WMB (collectively referred to as "Washington Mutual") that it had gained through deceptive means and under false pretenses. JPMC's purchase of WashingtonMutual's core operations from federal regulators culminated a years-long scheme designed to wrongfully exploit the opportunity of a financial crisis in Washington Mutual.
21. On September 25, 2008, after weeks of pressure by the Defendants upon Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC") and other federal regulators, the FDIC and the Office of Thrift Supervision agreed to the Defendants' terms. On that day, the OTS seized Washington Mutual Bank, passed the bank to the FDIC as receiver, and the FDIC sold the crown jewels of Washington Mutual to ..IPMC at a fire sale price. In the deal, JPMC acquired the extensive banking franchise of Washington Mutual for the severely undervalued sum of 31.9 B
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
03:49 PM on 04/20/2011
"Wall Street figures point to the government's decision to let the firm fail as the biggest mistake of the crisis, one that led to such widespread panic that investors fled and asset prices plunged, making bailouts of multiple other banks inevitable." Wait a minute, I thought that the S&P was near pre meltdown levels? What about all those bonuses on Wall Street. The only ones hurt were the home owners and thos that lost their jobs. Well they didn't loose their jobs, the jobs are right there in China and India, but some one else is doing them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:32 AM on 04/19/2011
Paulson pushed Lehman (which had one of the better leverage ratios on the street when it went bankrupt) to both cover for everything that Goldman was doing, and to assure that the Bush Family could own a bank again. George Herman Walker, the President's cousin, was label to purchase the extremely profitable Neuberger Berman (which was part of Lehman) at a fire sale price after Lehman was pushed off the cliff.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
10:15 AM on 04/19/2011
In my opinion ! they saved goldman when they should have save Lehman instead !

because when Lehman went so did consumer confidence!!

I know I know but tis true tis true !!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Walking an 87-year-old in the sand isn't easy
01:23 AM on 04/19/2011
Yet, the FDIC resolved WaMu without it actually being proven/declared insolvent and JP Morgan gained $1.9 billion on that deal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Walking an 87-year-old in the sand isn't easy
01:30 AM on 04/19/2011
The FDIC decided that $1.888 Billion was a just and fair price for the bank.  It is interesting to note that the auction offer presented by the FDIC permitted banks to bid $0.0 for the bank, and also totally disregarded the stockholders and bondholders, as well as other liabilities of the bank.  The FDIC required only the administrative costs for the transaction, and held the bank for only a few hours before ownership was transferred to JPMorgan.  Washington Mutual Bank was forced to file Chapter 11 the following day.  They lost $26 Billion in stock of WAMU (WMB) due to the bank seizure. 
The recent declines in the stock market are well known, but few people realize that WaMu may have been the straw that broke the camel's back. This seizure impacted not just Washington Mutual Inc investors, but all types of investments in all US stock markets. Shock waves have cascaded throughout stock markets worldwide. This leads one to question whether Washington Mutual Bank should have been seized that September evening. The sale of WAMU, for a fraction of its worth, was conducted without regard for the bondholders or shareholders of the bank, much less for the effects to the confidence in our stock markets and our government in general.
Should WaMu have been seized, that fateful day?
 Did the regulatory bodies overseeing WaMu do their jobs properly?
You be the judge.

It appears JPMorgan may have known well in advance of the plans for seizure (by some reports three weeks in advance). It is unknown whether the other banks were also unofficially informed of the seizure, well in advance.  Was the auction a fair playing field? Did all the bidders have the same information JPMorgan had?

Washington Mutual was not aware of these backroom discussions between JPM and the FDIC. In fact, Washington Mutual, through Goldman Sachs, was trying to sell the bank on the open market to those very same banks, but curiously their attempt drew no bidders.

Why would a bank bid openly with Washington Mutual when they knew the FDIC was offering a deal, behind Washington Mutuals back for only the choicest assets instead of the entire bank?  The FDIC was offering a much better deal, then Washington Mutual was able to offer, you see the FDIC offered the bank for the price of $00.00.  Their behind the scenes discussions interfered with the banks ability to sell itself. 

Did JPM know three weeks prior to Sept 25 of a possible FDIC seizure? Was the bidding process fair and impartial? That is an issue for a Congressional Hearing to decide. The entire matter is currently under a clandestine investigation. 

http://wamustory.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NessEliot1932
Tax Fraud at 94% since we cannot Prosecute
01:55 AM on 04/19/2011
SUMMARY OF CarolAB's Important Post!

FDIC decided WAMU was WORTH $1.888 Billion (NOT $26.000+ BILLION) and permitted bank bidbing of $0.0 while completely disregarding stock and bond holders and in a few hours the FDIC then transferred WAMU to JPM control. Then JPM forced WAMU to file Chapter 11 the following day causing a lose of $26 Billion in WAMU stock due to JPM seizure.

Few people realize the JPM seizure of WaMu may broken the camel's back - The USA Stock Markets as the LOSSES were so STUNNING Shock Wave to so many investors.

Was the auction a fair playing field? Should WaMu have been seized, that fateful day?

It appears JPM knew 3 WEEKS in advance of the plans for seizure! WAMU was unaware of the backroom discussions between JPM and the FDIC and thought Goldman was trying to sell the bank on the open market but no bank bid openly on WAMU perhaps because they knew the FDIC was dealing with JPM. Basically, the FDIC and JPM partnership blocked any deal WAMU could have made to save its Assets.

This issue needs INVESTIGATION and perhaps Prosecution of Washington-Wall Street COLLUSION for MASSIVE PROFIT!

http://wamustory.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NessEliot1932
Tax Fraud at 94% since we cannot Prosecute
01:34 AM on 04/19/2011
TRUTH IS TOLD!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Walking an 87-year-old in the sand isn't easy
02:01 AM on 04/19/2011
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF SUB-PRIME MORTGAGES THAT WERE ACQUIRED FROM WAMU HAVE BECOME PERMANENT MODIFIED LOANS. This information is even hidden from JP Morgan Chase employees. Without this vital statistic, Obama is wasting the taxpayers’ money!

Washington Mutual was the LARGEST bank failure in the history of this country.
The value of the bank as estimated before the FDIC stepped in was 321 Billion give or take. What did it sell for to Chase with the FDIC help?
About 1.9 Billion of or about .005 cents on the dollar

http://freeforeclosurelawyer.com/foreclosure-victims-blog/tag/wamu/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwalter
The State is a gang of thieves writ large.
01:08 AM on 04/19/2011
Lehman and all of the other financial firms that failed deserved to fail. Why would we want to preserve a company that can't sustain itself?
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:06 AM on 04/19/2011
In the meantime, the Admin, Wall Street, cheerleading media etc., are all ignoring a potentially far worse crisis, and almost immediately upon us, originating in China:

http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/04/2011415133455105416.html#
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laura r
11:51 PM on 04/18/2011
When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.”

– Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850 ), French economist, statesman and author
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NessEliot1932
Tax Fraud at 94% since we cannot Prosecute
11:45 PM on 04/18/2011
FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair hailed the report's findings.

Says FDIC can Wind Down BIG BANKS ORDRLY NOW using Dodd-Frank!

What are we waiting for? We have FIVE BIG ZOMBIES ready for this APPROACH so lets “MARK-TO-MARKET” and BEGIN UNWINDING THEM!

RANK_BANKS­TER___A M T HIDDEN ENR0N-STYLE

1 JPM CHASE $78.7 TRILLION (UP $2.7 Trillion from beginning of years)
2 B OF A $68.2 TRILLION
3 G0LDMAN $48.7 TRILLION
4 C1TIGROUP $47.2 TRILLION
5 MORGAN STANLEY $42.1 TRILLION

http://www.occ.gov/topics/capital-markets/financial-markets/trading/derivatives/dq410.pdf

Search for Table 2

How CAN YOU CONTINUE TO HIDE this much FRAUD?

They want to DUMP IT ON THE USA CITIZENS but Dodd-Frank changes that!

Counter-parties PAY and financial markets absorbed the Outcome

NO MORE TAXPAYER BAILOUTS while we sort through the JU.NK of these FIVE BANKS and sell off the GOOD PARTS to the market!
11:45 PM on 04/18/2011
Report:

"As long as we could have foreseen the exact course of events in the crashing of a historic bubble we misses, and also had the timing right to start acting right at 6 mo. in advance, the passage of Dodd-Frank would have allowed us stop the chain of events that lead to the financial crisis. So under Dodd-Frank, we should feel safe.

Signed,
Sheila Bair
Federal Doppelgangers of the Investment Community (FDIC)"