More

Paul LePage Under Fire In New Ad For 'Roll Back' Of Child Labor Laws (VIDEO)

Paul Lepage

First Posted: 04/19/11 04:27 PM ET Updated: 06/19/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- A national advocacy group fighting for the rights of lower-wage workers has a new ad out criticizing Maine's governor for trying to loosen the state's employment standards.

"Governor Paul LePage wants to roll back child labor laws," says the narrator of the spot, which is sponsored by the National Employment Law Project (NELP) and the progressive Maine People's Alliance (MPA). "He supports legislation to have kids work longer hours, later at night and for less than minimum wage."

At the end of the ad, LePage's office phone number is flashed on screen and viewers are encouraged to call his staff and speak out.

WATCH:

The minimum wage in Maine is $7.50 an hour, and there is no training- or subminimum-wage for students. But under a new piece of legislation, employers would be able to pay anyone under the age of 20 as little as $5.25 an hour for their first 180 days on the job.

The bill, LD 1346, also eliminates the maximum number of hours a minor 16 years of age or older can work on a school day and allows anyone under the age of 16 to labor for up to four hours on a school day during hours when classes are not in session.

Another bill, LD 516, would allow 16- and 17-year-old students to work until 11:00 p.m. on school nights. Currently, they're allowed on the job until 10:00 p.m. It would also allow students to work for a total of 24 hours per week, four more than current law allows.

“The reckless tampering with Maine’s longstanding child labor laws would encourage children to work longer hours, later into the night, and for less than the minimum wage,†said Christine Owens, executive director of NELP. "Governor Paul LePage and the bill’s supporters seem to have forgotten that Maine’s child labor laws were enacted in 1847 because children were so exhausted from work that they were falling asleep in school. Now, in an ill-advised move, they are trying to repeat history."

LePage's office did not immediately return a request for comment.

Last month, The Huffington Post spoke with Rep. Bruce Bickford (R), one of the co-sponsors of LD 1346. He argued that the government should stop standing in the way on child labor issues.

"This is in no way an attempt to abuse child labor, which some may look at and say, 'We've fought hard for kids and we've done this or that,'" he said. "Kids have parents. Let the parents be responsible for the kids. It's not up to the government to regulate everybody's life and lifestyle. Take the government away. Let the parents take care of their kids."

Bickford said he supported making it easier for young people to get a job so that they can earn some extra spending money and build up their resume and skills, arguing that, students now have plenty of time after school that they could fill with employment.

The ad will start airing on Tuesday in Portland, Maine's largest city. The MPA, which has a statewide membership of 32,000, is also coordinating an outreach campaign in the child labor issue.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- A national advocacy group fighting for the rights of lower-wage workers has a new ad out criticizing Maine's governor for trying to loosen the state's employment standards. "Governor...
WASHINGTON -- A national advocacy group fighting for the rights of lower-wage workers has a new ad out criticizing Maine's governor for trying to loosen the state's employment standards. "Governor...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,736
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (74 total)
  1 of 6  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
weebils 10:22 PM on 04/19/2011
I am not just paying lip service when I say this is despicable. When my son was fifteen one of his teachers had lined up a job for him with a major corporation. Believe me when I say this was an adult salary , a real nice amount. The problem is it would mean his having to commute and work long hours and that included weekends. He was already working two part time jobs and playing sports. One of the part  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
txgrandpa6
Progressive Democrat living in Texas!
01:42 PM on 04/24/2011
Should this nation tamper with the stringent child labor laws that are now in place, who will we be selling our merchandise to. Most other nations take their national economy very seriously and if we allow children to work longer for less than, by reason, the overhead for the company goes down and they can sell their product for a lesser cost. That may seem like a positive, but other nations would not be able to compete and they would refuse to import our products due to the lax child labor laws that are being proposed. Altering the child labor laws is a bad economic move on a national level. That would have the same effect on any state that tampers with its child labor laws while others maintain strict laws, where would they sell their products? As usual, American politicians are very short-sighted in their thinking on any economic matter.
photo
ojolsen
my micro-bio is empty
12:46 AM on 04/24/2011
Sign the LePage recall petition here http://www.Walmardens.com
09:43 AM on 04/24/2011
There is no recall in ME.
photo
ojolsen
my micro-bio is empty
11:06 PM on 04/25/2011
Its a petition to institute recall
09:18 AM on 04/23/2011
I can't believe this guy wants this! This country is going to fall further behind in educational development policies if he gets what he wants. He needs to look at labor laws for adults not kids!
07:39 PM on 04/21/2011
The Federal Minimum Wage is $7.25. If Maine's is $7.50 then good for them
The proposal is to pay students $5.25 for 180 hours. Jobs may be scarce in Maine
and adults are having to take these same jobs to support themselves and maybe
a child. Students will then have the advantage of being hired, besides which the
Students will have expenses for travel the same as anyone else. Students should not be working until 11 p.m. either. They need more sleep than going to bed after
midnight. I hope Maine does not even start this slippery slope.
09:20 AM on 04/23/2011
I agree! Jobs are scarce everywhere! If anything we should make child labor laws tighter to promote adult employment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
txgrandpa6
Progressive Democrat living in Texas!
01:44 PM on 04/24/2011
Happy to be Fan 4. Great analysis of the employment situation in Maine, not to speak of the nation on a whole.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepostalfeminist
07:38 PM on 04/21/2011
In Australia the Federal Minimum Wage is $15 pr hour or $569.90 pr week. It is a living wage!

Please explain why the United States, and Maine in particular, has a minimum wage of $7.50 and wants to open child labor laws to pay children $5.25 an hour! This is happening in a country were the richest among us makes multiple millions pr year! How can these people even look in the mirror in the morning? SHAME!
08:19 PM on 04/21/2011
Good morning (Australia time) postalfeminist. You are quite correct about our minimum wage and many businesses pay above just to encourage workers. Before I retired last Christmas I was working as a kitchenhand in the hospitality section of our local technical college and I received $28.35 per hour. Sure I had to work some late nights, but the conditions were excellent. I feel sorry that so many Americans have to work for such grossly inadequate wages - how does this happen in a country which is (generally) looked up to as first world?
11:12 AM on 04/21/2011
There is a Federal Child Labor Law that can only be amended by congress, and sets the MINIMUM standard states must follow. Before critisizing Maine, take a look. Maine's proposed law is more generous and more kid "protective" than existing Federal law:

http://www.dol.gov/elaws/faq/esa/flsa/028.htm

While it is illegal for states to pass child labor law that is less limited than Federal child labor law, states DO have the option to pass laws that are more restrictive. Check out the existing child labor laws in YOUR state before bashing Maine:

http://www.dol.gov/whd/state/nonfarm.htm

http://www.dol.gov/whd/state/agriemp2.htm
05:07 PM on 04/21/2011
It may be legal but, it still doesn't make it right. Especially when it's being changed for all the wrong reasons.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:03 AM on 04/21/2011
This is nothing but a slimy, backdoor repeal of the Min Wage Law...and worse.

The biggest clue?

Legal ADULTS (18 and 19 year olds), not just children, would be included and subject to sub-minimum “training†wages.

But of course, it wouldn’t stop there.

This bill would be amended down the road to also include 20 and 21 year olds...then 22 to 24 year olds. It wouldn’t end till EVERYONE was subject to a “training†wage, which, of course, amended over the years, would be reduced less and less, till it would be a mere token.

Their ultimate goal: virtually EVERYONE working who's out of diapers and still capable of navigation, working for less and less, sharing fewer and fewer part-time jobs.

Taken to its logical extreme (the GOP always goes there, don’t they?), we’re talking the eventual return to SLAVERY (isn’t that the ultimate cheap labor?), or at the very least, feudal serfdom.

You think I'm kidding?

It took a war to end highly profitable slavery.
10:42 AM on 04/21/2011
It is illegal to pay someone 20 or older less than the Federal minimum wage.

There is no state option to "repeal" the minimum wage established by the Fed.

States DO have the option to establish a state minimum wage HIGHER than that established by the Fed.

BTW, the Fed min wage for those under twenty is $4.25.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:57 AM on 04/21/2011
Think about how sly and sneaky this bill really is - the true goal.

Employers not only win by paying super-low “training†wages for 6 full months, every other employee expense directly based on those “training†wages is also lower - expenses like payroll taxes, health insurance, UI, workers comp.

Bottom line, under this scheme, it would be to the employer’s advantage to perpetually pay “training†wages.

Since profit is the sole business motive, one 18 year old is as good as another - all replaceable and interchangeable. Sorry, kid, your 180 days are up. NEXT!!
01:19 AM on 04/21/2011
I want to see the Republican Party go back to being one of common sense, compassion & respectability, like under President Eisenhower, President Ford & Nelson Rockefeller. The party has been hijacked since 1980.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:52 AM on 04/21/2011
An 18 year old who commits a crime pays the adult fine / serves the adult sentence.

Why should that same 18 year old be forced to suffer sub-minimum wages under some Child Labor Law “training†wage scheme?

Under this bill’s logic, an 18 year old would apparently be adult enough to serve time for a crime - but not adult enough to get regular minimum wage.

Pure exploitation and pure fail.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:40 AM on 04/21/2011
18 year olds are LEGAL ADULTS.

They should be paid as LEGAL ADULTS.

Anything else is age discrimination and worse, pure exploitation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
George Global
Diogenes has left the building
12:37 AM on 04/21/2011
Let's turn LePage into LePagoMaine...in honor of two things...
1. Mel Brooks Governor Lepetomane in Blazing Saddles..."not enough harrumphing around here..." and
2. After LePetomane, the early 20th century French flatulist...who made his stage living sucking up air and blowing it out the same place LePage does...no, really.
12:47 AM on 04/21/2011
George Global : Fanned before, Faved again. Iv'e heard about that guy. He was known as a "Fartist".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
George Global
Diogenes has left the building
12:54 AM on 04/21/2011
As should LePage...faved, already a big fan...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:34 AM on 04/21/2011
The GOP knows they could never repeal the Min Wage Law up front, so next best strategy - systematically gut it through the back door any way(s) they can.

Honestly, HOW do these people become so vile?
10:47 AM on 04/21/2011
Only congress can roll back the Federal min wage.

It is illegal for any state to pay someone 20 or older LESS than the Fed min wage.
03:56 AM on 04/24/2011
Which is 4.25, hardly enough in some states. Not much of a goal for the states to have to meet.
photo
Electriq
A haiku would have been a bit showy.
12:28 AM on 04/21/2011
It's pretty obvious that LePage's intent is to exploit children as a cheap labor force.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:58 PM on 04/20/2011
“It's not up to the government to regulate everybody's life and lifestyle.†- Rep. Bruce Bickford

Funny, they seem to have NO problem jumping in the middle of gay marriage, abortion, marijuana, etc.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
George Global
Diogenes has left the building
12:39 AM on 04/21/2011
No, regulating everybody's life and lifestyle is up to business...our natural masters...fnf
07:41 PM on 04/21/2011
Great point!