More

Spain Launches First 'Right To Be Forgotten' Case Against Google

By CIARAN GILES   04/20/11 09:32 AM ET   AP

Google Right To Be Forgotten Spain

MADRID -- Their ranks include a plastic surgeon, a prison guard and a high school principal. All are Spanish, but have little else in common except this: They want old Internet references about them that pop up in Google searches wiped away.

In a case that Google Inc. and privacy experts call a first of its kind, Spain's Data Protection Agency has ordered the search engine giant to remove links to material on about 90 people. The information was published years or even decades ago but is available to anyone via simple searches.

Scores of Spaniards lay claim to a "Right to be Forgotten" because public information once hard to get is now so easy to find on the Internet. Google has decided to challenge the orders and has appealed five cases so far this year to the National Court.

Some of the information is embarrassing, some seems downright banal. A few cases involve lawsuits that found life online through news reports, but whose dismissals were ignored by media and never appeared on the Internet. Others concern administrative decisions published in official regional gazettes.

In all cases, the plaintiffs petitioned the agency individually to get information about them taken down.

And while Spain is backing the individuals suing to get links taken down, experts say a victory for the plaintiffs could create a troubling precedent by restricting access to public information.

The issue isn't a new one for Google, whose search engine has become a widely used tool for learning about the backgrounds about potential mates, neighbors and co-workers. What it shows can affect romantic relationships, friendships and careers.

For that reason, Google regularly receives pleas asking that it remove links to embarrassing information from its search index or least ensure the material is buried in the back pages of its results. The company, based in Mountain View, Calif., almost always refuses in order to preserve the integrity of its index.

A final decision on Spain's case could take months or even years because appeals can be made to higher courts. Still, the ongoing fight in Spain is likely to gain more prominence because the European Commission this year is expected to craft controversial legislation to give people more power to delete personal information they previously posted online.

"This is just the beginning, this right to be forgotten, but it's going to be much more important in the future," said Artemi Rallo, director of the Spanish Data Protection Agency. "Google is just 15 years old, the Internet is barely a generation old and they are beginning to detect problems that affect privacy. More and more people are going to see things on the Internet that they don't want to be there."

Many details about the Spaniards taking on Google via the government are shrouded in secrecy to protect the privacy of the plaintiffs. But the case of plastic surgeon Hugo Guidotti vividly illustrates the debate.

In Google searches, the first link that pops up is his clinic, complete with pictures of a bare-breasted women and a muscular man as evidence of what plastic surgery can do for clients. But the second link takes readers to a 1991 story in Spain's leading El Pais newspaper about a woman who sued him for the equivalent of euro5 million for a breast job that she said went bad.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

MADRID -- Their ranks include a plastic surgeon, a prison guard and a high school principal. All are Spanish, but have little else in common except this: They want old Internet references about them t...
MADRID -- Their ranks include a plastic surgeon, a prison guard and a high school principal. All are Spanish, but have little else in common except this: They want old Internet references about them t...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AG creative
Ba Gawk!
05:40 PM on 05/03/2011
Fascinating. I totally wish I could delete all instances of my name and have many times considered using some black hat techniques to flood servers worldwide with disinformation & wild goose chases. But then I know it will only strengthen the existing search data, so I digress.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:17 PM on 04/22/2011
A private citizen of any country can't force Google to amend its records. A country can! Refuse to obey the court order from the highest court, Google will be banned in no time in that country.
04:44 PM on 04/21/2011
If it's your dirt...it's okay.

But if it's dirt on US interests, then it'll get deleted.

Move along people, nothing new here.
04:05 PM on 04/21/2011
I personally believe that you should have the right to completely disappear from the web and reappear any time that you want simply by contacting your service provider and paying a small fee to have your presence completely wiped from cyberspace.
12:39 PM on 04/22/2011
Your service provider wouldn't be able to do much. You'd have to contact Facebook, Google, and every website you've ever connected those services to and ask them to remove any reference to you from their servers. You leave a footprint almost everywhere you go on the web.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AG creative
Ba Gawk!
05:42 PM on 05/03/2011
Perhaps Alfred is leaning towards a 'real id' solution which will close the internet as we know it (as far as anonymous trollies & crazies) but make sure that you could disappear & reappear at your own choosing.

Reality is that it's not about people, it's about boosting search terms to sell products.
01:41 PM on 04/21/2011
If the exact search is no longer being sought after, then once a certain number of years have passed, it should be wiped away.
12:31 PM on 04/21/2011
yeah, sorry, that's just not how the internet works.
04:43 PM on 04/21/2011
Unless it's you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kurios
Cogito, ergo sum verus Americana!
12:10 PM on 04/21/2011
i think this is a bad idea...people need to not forget atrocities or else they can happen again...the freeflow of information itself should be a behavior check...if you don't want to be remembered for something then don't do the deed
02:49 PM on 04/21/2011
But what about the people who are found not guilty or who actually didn't have ANY involvement once all the fact were known, but only the initial accusations were picted up by the media, not the later determinations of innocence?
04:43 PM on 04/21/2011
Except if Google or the US government doesn't want you to read their dirt.

That's not fair is it?
photo
Boobuzuela
Satire identical to actual Republican positions
12:06 PM on 04/21/2011
Ahh, the electronic memory hole!
MtnGeek
Partisan thinking is an oxymoron
10:23 AM on 04/21/2011
Google's old tag line of "Do no evil" is harder and harder to stomach with each encroachment on people's privacy. They really will be the "big brother" people fear if they are not kept in check.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Wojtkowski
Physengrammer (Physicist/Engineer/Programmer)
12:05 PM on 04/21/2011
How is google encroaching on people's privacy? It's a search engine. They don't hand pick your search results.
photo
jonester
Politics: whining and compromises
12:18 PM on 04/22/2011
If the information is about you, we should have the right to delete it if the website hosting the material won't.

I had an issue where a website had my name, address, and phone number public. The website refused to delete the information and it took weeks for me to get Google to delete it; I actually had to get my attorney involved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AG creative
Ba Gawk!
05:43 PM on 05/03/2011
we think they're giving a free service, but they're mining our search data and behavior.
photo
PenguinLinux
got root ?
12:53 PM on 04/21/2011
Do you use Facebook or have an iPod, Phone, Mac, Pad, etc product from Apple) ????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paulbenjouse
Media Futurist
09:48 AM on 04/21/2011
If the credit bureaus are required to "wipe away" problematic references after a number of years, so should Google. I tend to agree with the plaintifs

Paul Benjou

Ad Blog: www.MyOpenKimono.com
11:15 AM on 04/21/2011
I couldn't have said it better. Before reading this article, I was unaware that Google wouldn't remove old and damaging information. People change, and your searched history should reflect that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kurios
Cogito, ergo sum verus Americana!
12:12 PM on 04/21/2011
do they really change?.,..how many lame insincere apologies you heard from people doing horrendous deed...there are some deeds you can commit that makes you not deserve a second chance