More

U.S. 'Strong Dollar' Policy Fades From View As Currency's Value Declines

Dollar Policy

First Posted: 04/22/11 09:32 AM ET Updated: 06/22/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON (Glenn Somerville and Tim Reid) - For years, Treasury secretaries parroted a line that the U.S. was committed to a strong dollar policy. But as the greenback slides close to all-time lows, President Barack Obama's administration has been noticeably quiet.

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner last used "strong dollar" language in November, and a glance through his speeches and news databases shows he has had almost nothing to say on the matter since.

Meanwhile, record low interest rates, the Federal Reserve's bond buying program, staggering budget deficits and the White House's export-driven jobs policy all have contributed to the dollar's decline.

All this has a growing number of investors and currency experts thinking Washington is passively accepting a gradual decline in the currency, hoping it helps engineer a vigorous enough recovery to get a battered economy in order.

"There is no obvious evidence of that in official rhetoric or in the commentary of key officials, but de facto the United States is permitting if not aiding a deliberate dollar decline," said Allen Sinai, chief global economist for Decision Economics Inc. in Boston.

"The heart of the dollar decline," he added, stems from the super-loose monetary policy run by the Federal Reserve for more than two years as opposed to fiscal or tax policy.

"Markets aren't going to buy the dollar when you offer zero interest rates and have an economy that is growing at roughly one-third the rate of China's -- that's an easy choice for investors."

On Thursday, the dollar index, a gauge of the U.S. currency against six advanced country currencies, fell to 73.735, its lowest level since August 2008, setting up a possible run toward its record low of 70.698 touched in March 2008. The euro soared to a 16-month high above $1.46.

Geithner last year flatly denied he is pursuing a policy aimed at cheapening the dollar.

"We will never use our currency as a tool to gain competitive advantage," he told reporters last November after a meeting in Kyoto, Japan, of finance ministers from the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation group. "I'm happy to reaffirm again that a strong dollar's in our interest as a country."

Undeniably, though, financial markets see the dollar on a slide against other currencies that is likely to continue, in no small part because current trade policy seems to demand it.

"It's implicit in the administration's call for a doubling of exports, that can't happen without the dollar falling," said David Gilmore, a partner at FX Analytics in Essex, Connecticut.

The U.S. government's consistent pressure for a revaluation of the currency of its major trading partner, China, only underline these perceptions.

Much of the argument for the dollar's decline -- down 6.2 percent this year against that basket of six major currencies

-- comes back to the Fed's policy of keeping interest rates low to spur a fledgling recovery from the 2007-2009 financial crisis.

It's a policy that's drawn criticism from the world's new economic powerhouses in Latin America and Asia, who say U.S. monetary policy is fueling global inflation and hurting efforts to balance the global economy.

"I've noticed there's a strategy by the United States and advanced countries to increase exports and reduce their imbalances at the cost of emerging markets," Brazilian Finance Minister Guido Mantega, a former economics professor, said last year.

Strong corporate earnings reports this week showed the declining dollar has helped U.S. companies sell drugs, chemicals and food in foreign markets.

A former White House economist in the Obama administration, who requested anonymity, summed it up:

"I don't believe the U.S. is actively pushing a weak dollar policy -- but I would say this: the fact that interest rates are low and the U.S. is aggressively pushing monetary stimulus, that has the effect of depreciating the dollar," the former official said. "That is certainly a mechanism which would result in a de facto weak dollar policy."

PLAYING WITH FIRE?

There are major dangers with such a strategy, not least of which are the inflationary risks it creates.

The Fed's buying up of U.S. government debt, also known as quantitative easing, is to many the equivalent of cranking up the dollar printing presses at the central bank, devaluing the value of the currency in the process.

"When you print money or create money...it weakens the value of the dollar" and stokes potential inflation, said Representative Steve Stivers, a freshman Republican from Ohio.

The same sentiment was expressed by Republican Senator Jim DeMint, who told the Senate Banking Committee last month, "The quantitative easing, monetizing of debt, or however we term that, has caused some concern about...the long-term value of our currency."

Indeed, with U.S. gasoline pump prices soaring partly because investors have been able to borrow money cheaply in the U.S. and invest it in crude oil and other commodities, Obama has been lashing out. On Thursday, he announced that a group of federal agencies were being asked to probe fraud in the energy markets.

Of course, no Obama administration official is ever likely to officially endorse a declining dollar. There is no political upside to being a "weak dollar" president.

But analysts say allowing a slow decline in the dollar isn't a policy to be feared unless the fall turns into a rout.

"It's a necessary part of both global rebalancing and domestic rebalancing, given that the U.S. has agreed that it needs to rely less on debt-financed consumer spending and more on export-driven growth," said C. Fred Bergsten, director of the Peterson Institute think-tank in Washington.

Bergsten, a noted commentator on exchange-rate policy, noted there has been essentially a nine-year "bear market" in the dollar since 2002, aside from brief upward spurts in value when the global financial crisis struck in 2008 and again last year when Europe's debt crisis was acute.

That means a substantial amount of foreign exchange rate rebalancing has taken place, aside from a continuing disconnect between the value of fast-growing China's yuan and the dollar. Bergsten estimated the yuan remains undervalued by around 20 percent.

In financial markets, major players anticipate a continuing decline for the dollar, partly connected to skepticism that the Obama administration and opposition Republicans are anywhere near agreement on how to tame towering deficits.

"Absent problems elsewhere in the world, history and economics suggest that America's current fiscal and monetary policy stance will put continued pressures on the dollar," said Mohamed El-Erian, co-chief investment officer of top bond manager PIMCO, which has $1.2 trillion in assets under management and is betting against U.S. treasuries.

And influential investor Jim Rogers warns that investors will stop buying increasingly risky U.S. government assets even if the returns go up from current levels.

"At some point along the line, people are going to realize it's absurd to lend money to the United States government at 30 years in U.S. dollars at 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 percent interest," he told Reuters Insider.

(Additional reporting by Donna Smith, Thomas Ferraro, Mark Felsenthal and Jennifer Ablan in New York, editing by Kristin Roberts and Martin Howell)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON (Glenn Somerville and Tim Reid) - For years, Treasury secretaries parroted a line that the U.S. was committed to a strong dollar policy. But as the greenback slides close to all-time lo...
WASHINGTON (Glenn Somerville and Tim Reid) - For years, Treasury secretaries parroted a line that the U.S. was committed to a strong dollar policy. But as the greenback slides close to all-time lo...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 259
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
iflew
Dyno Remediator
09:33 PM on 04/25/2011
A dollar's strength is weakened by inflation. Inflation is bad for retirees given our current mix of congress and decline in GDP.

Letting the dollar settle against other currencies gives our economy a chance to recover. We are not likely to go back to some sweatshop goods which have become established off shore. Regrowing some and creating other industries may help us find our economic advantage goods again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whitewater
11:24 AM on 04/25/2011
Washington is treating the dollar as if it will be worthless tomorrow and spending before the bottom drops from under the dollar.
10:03 AM on 04/25/2011
The president has so little effect on the value of money that this article is completely laughable

go knock on the Fed's door
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
10:29 AM on 04/25/2011
Natems agreed F&F.....I keep a knocking but they say I can't come in
07:54 AM on 04/25/2011
Improve the export picture. MAKE ALL IMPORTS MORE EXPENSIvE,LOOK AT GAS,for the consumer.Keep interest rates low to aid economic recovery.Seniors getting income from savings get screwed.
Really,dont they realize low interest rates are Ng ? Nobody borrows without a job.keeping those adjustable rate mortgages down?
I dont think they have a clue,what to do.Average person gets whacked again.
04:57 AM on 04/25/2011
What a bunch of rump portals we have running this country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themodernleader
08:58 PM on 04/24/2011
Our present monetary is beneficial to banks and harmful to the nation.  That is the reason the policy continues.  There will come an accounting that will please no one.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:59 PM on 04/24/2011
It's a shame how deeply any story that is even remotely critical of this administration gets buried here.
photo
LunaPark
Don't believe it until it's officially denied
12:05 PM on 04/24/2011
Two periods in the last 30 years that saw the strongest US growth; the Reagan years and the Clinton years, were also periods of the stongest US dollar.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SorenK
09:58 AM on 04/24/2011
Weaker dollar, higher prices for imported oil and all other imported goods that is the Obama recovery plan? WOW.
04:06 PM on 04/24/2011
Our trade deficit (imbalance) for 2011 currently stands at more than $160 billion dollars (and growing). The trade imbalance is a huge reason why jobs are being lost here at home, and why our manufacturing base is being "exported" abroad.

You get those jobs back by bringing the trade deficit into balance, and you do that by boosting exports (not imports).

And how do you boost exports? By lowering the purchase cost of U.S. goods abroad; and yes, that is done by letting the dollar fall relative to other currencies.

This country stands to gain much by letting the dollar "fall" relative to other currencies. The fact that energy-hogs in this country (you included) have to pay more at the pump is of little concern to people such as me; there is a much larger issue here, and that is trying to save an economy from collapse.

You on the other hand will just have to buy a bus pass...
12:03 AM on 04/24/2011
That is why I love GOLD. The government is intentionally destroying the dollar, and the liberals call it conspiracy theory. Printing money at the speed of sound.

Why is OIL so high? Funny if you match up how much the dollar has been destroyed, the answer is very clear.
11:24 PM on 04/23/2011
Be real. The FED is DELIBERATELY devaluing the $US. The printing presses are running at full speed.

Go look at Germany in the 1920's.

Trillions in national debt become pretty meaningless - and are easily paid off when your currency is hyperinflating.

But then a loaf of bread is selling for $100,000 amd all your savings are worthless.........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fineartgalaxy
Speaking from the heart, always.
10:42 PM on 04/23/2011
The last resort for the Baby Boomers of retiring in some Godforsaken island not even known to National Geographic where the SS check would be stretched a lot more, is now also fading. Baby Boomers, we need to talk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fineartgalaxy
Speaking from the heart, always.
10:20 PM on 04/23/2011
Well, now that the mighty dollar is getting to be not so mighty, maybe we can do away with the Fed's bank and start printing money. After all, the banks are making tons of money from the Fed. Everybody is making money from the government. Except most of the voters.
12:04 AM on 04/24/2011
Printing money is fraud, that is exactly what is happening now. We need a gold standard, to avoid the fraud, that pickpockets the poor and middle class.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
10:04 PM on 04/23/2011
FORTUNE states today NO PATRIOTISM - dump the dollar!
April22
Some experiences in life are ineffable
08:40 PM on 04/23/2011
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 gave the Federal Reserve the responsibility for setting monetary policy to influence the availability and cost of money and credit in the US.

The Federal Reserve Act was prompted by the Panic of 1907, when the NYSE fell 50%.

Most republicans favored a private banking system with little government interference.

Most democrats favored a government run system free from Wall Street's interference.

A compromise was struck and the Federal Reserve Act was signed into law.

A long history of compromises by the Democrats, which would have better served out country had they had a bit more backbone and fight.

Wall Street has been controlling this system for a very long time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
10:03 PM on 04/23/2011
And no one can go after the big banks because they determine our credit rating.  We would shoot ourselves in the foot if we would go after them.  We are held hostage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fineartgalaxy
Speaking from the heart, always.
10:35 PM on 04/23/2011
Maybe we should start going after them, in criminal court.
11:27 PM on 04/23/2011
The panic of 1907 was a contrived event - justification for creation of the FED - and a way to put this nation's monetary system under the control opf PRIVATE banks.

The FED cares only about the interests of its owners - PRIVATE BANKS - not the nation, not the taxpayer.