More

Why The Knicks' Mike D'Antoni Needs To Be Fired

Dantoni

First Posted: 04/25/11 04:58 PM ET Updated: 06/25/11 06:12 AM ET

Mike D’Antoni has to go.

There, I said it.

The truth is D’Antoni is a nice guy who belongs as an assistant coach solely dedicated to designing fast break style and scheme. But, in a league where you simply cannot win without consistent defense, D’Antoni’s time as a head coach has come and gone.

The Knicks just don’t know how to win, which, of course, is a direct reflection of the head coach. D’Antoni’s coaching style of “we’re going to do everything possible to push tempo and outscore you” is a fun system that produces excitement and some regular season wins. His teams consistently rank at the top of the league in points scored and at the bottom in points allowed (28th this season and dead last in 2009-2010 when they gave up 107.8).

But I can’t reiterate the downside of such a system enough. Winning playoff basketball is predicated off of half-court execution and defense. Boston -- as I predicted before the series began -- did not allow New York to run. The Celtics made the Knicks beat them in a slow game, which they couldn’t do. Better yet, the C’s did what every good club in the playoffs has always done to D’Antoni teams … make them play defense.

To be fair, not all of the onus falls on him. Despite the uber-gifted duo of Amar’e Stoudemire and Carmelo Anthony, the Knicks’ roster is full of holes. As great as he’s been, Stoudemire has been playing out of position all season as a center.

Anthony meanwhile is a superior talent but still, eight years into his career, not an actual superstar. Debate it all you want, but he's just not.

Lastly, Chauncey Billups -- at 34 years old -- is not the right man to direct this offense. He doesn’t have the sheer speed of Raymond Felton and thus could not lead the transition game as effectively. Moreover, it’s very challenging to bring a team together after infusing such egos and talent midway through the season. There are a lot of moving parts for a team still searching to find the right balance of top heavy talent and ancillary parts.

But that’s where it stops. D’Antoni still had plenty of opportunities to will his team to wins against Boston.

Game One was an abomination. New York held a double-digit lead for much of the game, yet somehow seemed shell-shocked when Boston made its run. Memo to the Knicks: This is the NBA … everyone, especially a team like the Celtics, can make a run. You have to take the punches and fight back. The Knicks though -- lacking the winning framework its head coach -- rolled over like a hot batch of Pillsbury dough.

As bad as that was, nothing was worse than Game 2.

Despite the absence of Stoudemire and Billups, New York once again outplayed Boston for much of the night. Anthony was brilliant, scoring 42 points and grabbing 17 rebounds. But, as always in crucial games, D’Antoni’s team folded.

First off -- and this goes for the entire series but especially Game 2 -- where in the world was Landry Fields, playing just 15 minutes?

D’Antoni instead turned to the ice cold Roger Mason, Jr. along with Jared Jeffries and Bill Walker. But why? Mason hasn’t made a jumper all season nor has he played any significant minutes. Jeffries -- whom D’Antoni made it a point to acquire in late February after buying out the defensively minded Corey Brewer -- is a good defender but awful offensively. Walker is a long-range chucker and perhaps the worst defender on the league’s worst defensive team.

Fields could have very well made the difference in that game, and would have helped the whole series. A capable scorer, the rookie was also the best rebounding guard in the entire NBA. Without him, the Knicks may have missed the playoffs altogether, yet when push came to shove, D’Antoni went with Mason, who shot under 39 percent for the series and was a marginal defender at best.

Better yet, why was Jeffries in the game that final possession? Perhaps D’Antoni can make the case for using Mason as an extra shooter to spread the floor, but Jeffries is one of the league’s worst offensive players. His turnover attempting to pass to a wide open Walker was terrible for sure, but in reality ... he had no business being in the game.

In addition to his inability to manage his substitutions and rotation, D’Antoni also hampered the Knicks’ by not making the necessary in-game tactical adjustments. He burned all of his timeouts way too early each of the first two games and inexcusably didn’t prepare his team for the famed Kevin Garnett alley-oop lob in Game One.

When Garnett posted up Jeffries to give Boston the lead in Game 2, he absolutely had to send the double-team. Case in point: Carmelo had 42 in that game, but he couldn’t even get a shot off after his three-pointer put New York up three with 2:35 remaining. Doc Rivers -- by sending constant double-teams at Melo -- forced someone else to beat them. D’Antoni meanwhile let Garnett body Jeffries into the paint for five seconds before draining the pivotal jump hook.

Many people will also point to Carmelo’s refusal to foul Delonte West on the ensuing Celtics possession following Jeffries’ mishap. Once again, let’s be fair: This is two-sided. Melo had to know he needed to commit that foul -- that is just basketball 101. The 9th graders I coach know to make that foul. But then again, why was he even in the game to begin with?

Anthony had five fouls. He shouldn’t have been anywhere guarding the backcourt. That responsibility should have gone to someone else.

Games 3 and 4 were much of the same. The Knicks -- who shot a woeful 40.6 percent during the sweep -- looked uninspired and unprepared; like they knew the series was already over.

This has been a constant theme with D’Antoni coached teams before. Can you recall any key playoff win by his Phoenix teams? Despite an array of talent: an MVP in his prime, Steve Nash; young and healthy star, Amar’e; NBA Sixth Man award winner, Leandro Barbosa; All-NBA defender, Raja Bell; and guys like Joe Johnson and Boris Diaw – D’Antoni never once took his teams to The Finals.

With the threat of the lockout looming, Walsh could very well keep D’Antoni for one more year to avoid the dreaded buy-out. The 59-year-old coach will make $6 million next season, his last under contract with New York.

The Knicks don't have the good fortune of waiting though. Anthony and Stoudemire are both at the point in their careers where if either one of them are ever going to win, it has be now. Chris Paul and Deron Williams -- the two elite point guards in the league -- are free agents after next season, as is the NBA’s premier center, Dwight Howard. Next season’s performance is crucial for a franchise desperately trying to lure one of these three players and create its own version of “The Big Three,” which is all the reason more to fire Mike D’Antoni.

Quick Poll

Should the Knicks fire Mike D'Antoni?

Absolutely!

No Way!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SPORTS

Mike D’Antoni has to go. There, I said it. The truth is D’Antoni is a nice guy who belongs as an assistant coach solely dedicated to designing fast break style and scheme. But, in a league w...
Mike D’Antoni has to go. There, I said it. The truth is D’Antoni is a nice guy who belongs as an assistant coach solely dedicated to designing fast break style and scheme. But, in a league w...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 154
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HHGodd
Ronald Reagan: Deficit Hawk!
10:29 AM on 04/27/2011
I've been song this for a while now. I'm a die- hard Knicks fan and it's been a painful experience ever since Pat Ewing left. D'Antoni is a good guy but he's not a good head coach. No team can ever won a championship if they only play one side of the ball. In the small chance that might happen them the side being played has to be defense. There is no way a team should be so strong on once side of the ball but so terribly weak on the other. Mike Brown or Rudy Tomjanovich are good choices for the team because they coach both side of the ball and they know how to win.
01:58 AM on 04/27/2011
Landry Fields?? Are you serious?? I thought he was great in the regular season but he crumbled in the playoffs scoring something like 2 points a game. It was sad to watch and when he was taken out of the game it was like ending his and the fans torture. Did you not watch the games? The guy went invisible and was not ready for prime time at all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ruolivert
10:42 AM on 04/27/2011
He lost all his credibility with that statement. I like Fields but he was not up to the challenge this series. Of course that must be D'Antoni's fault as well
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mississippi Red
Stoke City: ugly football that works
11:39 PM on 04/26/2011
The Knicks should fire coach, trade Amare and Carmelo for players willing play D, pass the ball, and play with heart. They need to look at why Chicago and OK City are rising to the top. And they need to realize why the Suns, Dallas, Denver, never quite made it. The Suns came close because they had a bunch of winners on their teams, but their key players (Amare, Marion, Chuck back in the day) and the coach (D'Antoni) just don't have what it takes to make the mental adjustment to win.
08:34 PM on 04/26/2011
Damn this guy is pissed off. Cut the the coach and the Knicks some slack. They have a completely new roster that's going to need to build chemistry. Had they not acquired this new roster, they probably wouldn't have had the privilege to play against the Celts. Of course the celtics made a run in game one... Because they are a bunch of hardcore veterans with arguably the best point guard who can tear any offense up, especially the New York Knicks who now wreak potential. Carmelo is an all-star and is superstar caliber, as was Tracy McGrady. Though, I do consider their defense to be pretty underwhelming.
Or maybe I'm just missing something because I don't follow the Knicks.. Go Kings! Here We Stay!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
SA Texas 2
No Escape For Millionaire Tax Dodgers
06:19 PM on 04/26/2011
Defense wins championships. Duh, Mike D' Antoni !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
SuperDW
Ask not what your country can do for you but WTF?
02:35 PM on 04/26/2011
I would keep D'Antoni around another year - UNLESS there was a replacement coach who could attract free agents as well, or better.
01:56 PM on 04/26/2011
While maybe he should be fired, I can't say everything is his fault. He didn't make the decision to bring in two of the weakest, softest defensive players in the NBA.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:41 PM on 04/26/2011
i'm not a defender of mike d'antoni AT ALL, i realize he's not a defensive minded coach, but in this day and age, coaches always take the rap for an organization's failures that many times are not the coaches fault.

for one, the knicks two star players (stoudemire and anthony) are known to be complete defensive liabilities. secondly, the trade just happened barely 2 months ago. how can you expect a team to resolve those type of chemistry issues just before the playoffs? the knicks were actually on their way to building something exciting before upper management blew that all up.

as far as billups, that's not d'antoni's fault, he came with the trade. holes in the roster? blame the owner/gm for that. mortgaging their future to bring in a "superstar". it might sell tickets, after all, basketball is in business to make money. now he's expected to coach a team that he had no input in putting together?

i'm so sick of this free agency business model of big market teas trying to buy a championship. it started with the heat acquiring shaq, then the lakers with malone/payton, then boston with the big 3, now back to miami again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ruolivert
06:20 PM on 04/26/2011
I believe the only reason we're having this discussion is because Billups and Stoudemire got hurt. The Knicks had a really good shot and beating the Celts in game one before Billups went down and used all the emotional energy just to keep game 2 close. Games three and four really showed how out matched they were. Let D'Antonni have a training camp with this squad and see how they do next year before we judge him
01:26 PM on 04/26/2011
As usual, I'm less than convinced this reporter knows anything about basketball. However, he got lucky with his pick, both the GM and coach need to go.
02:35 PM on 04/26/2011
Walsh should stay. D'Antoni should go.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cjfrog
12:43 PM on 04/26/2011
fire him!!
12:20 PM on 04/26/2011
i'd keep him to implement the offense while new york puts a better roster together. if they intend to be uptempo billups doesn't fit. either start douglas or try to get a point guard. someone who can run, penetrate and shoot(felton?).

knicks also need a big, athletic mean spirited big man. stoudemire is nice but not really a physical presence on defense.

landry fields does not have me convinced either.
11:34 AM on 04/26/2011
(Apologies if this point has been made before, with full acknowledgement that it would have been made far more intelligently by anybody but me.) Points allowed per game is an incomplete metric of team defense. With a run and gun style, that means opposing teams get more possessions. More possessions, ceteris paribus, means more points given up. Thus, while a slow clock-draining team might have better defensive PPG number, they might actually be *less* effective in a per-possession sense.

D'Antoni's teams during the Suns' years of relevance gave up plenty of points per game, but also played more than acceptable defense when adjusted for number of possessions in a game. You just need the horses; this year, the Knicks' stable started out so-so and was depleted by a bone-headed front office move.
02:23 PM on 04/26/2011
They do count points per possession now, both offensive and defensive, though they report it as "points per 100 possessions" because apparently basketball fans are deemed unable to handle the number if it has a decimal point in it.
03:16 PM on 04/26/2011
Oh, I'm not saying it's a stat that isn't in regular use among people that follow the stats of the sport, I'm just saying that some people (like the author of the original article) are too glib in their assessment of team defense when looking at points per game. And as you correctly pointed out, the same holds for offense.

See kids? Statistics! They're awesome! Math rules! Study math and you will be a better basketball player, coach, or fan!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctorkosan
PhD Chem E, HBS
11:24 AM on 04/26/2011
Amare and Carmelo are lousy at playing defense and that is the problem along with no point guard that can run the D'Antoni offense. The team also lacks a center.
With that many holes, they are lucky to have made it to the playoffs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pepimartinez
11:24 AM on 04/26/2011
Mike's fast passed, hectic style of offense cost the Knicks the two games against Boston down the stretch. With leads, they didn't hold the ball and kept up the "7 seconds of less" offense, and that allowed Boston back into the game.

Close and late, they faltered because while turnovers don't hurt you in the first through third quarters because they can make up the scoring, they kill you in the final minutes of the game.

You can't win in the NBA with one strength, and the Knicks only had one: scoring. In games one and two, they showed what happens if you play strong defense in the playoffs. In game three and four, they showed what happens when you rely solely on scoring.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ruolivert
06:23 PM on 04/26/2011
How about losing your point guard with a few mintutes left in a tight game cost them, how about losing the best player your team had this season, Amare, before the second game started cost them. How about playing the defending Eastern Conference champions with 3 HOFers cost them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pepimartinez
07:50 AM on 04/27/2011
Game one and two were lost on coaching. They had the chance to win late, and they didn't because they were still throwing up bad "7 seconds or less" shots. Mike can't be blamed for 3 and 4, and honestly, neither can Melo.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
10:20 AM on 04/26/2011
Phoenix decided to fire D'Antoni because his teams didn't play defense. Dallas made the same decision with Don Nelson. Sacramento made the same decision with Rick Adelman.

These teams have since been in decline (though Dallas had one good year with Avery Johnson), and the style of basketball is definitely not as fun.

This is an intelligence test. If New York fires D'Antoni, then the Knicks failed the test.
02:38 PM on 04/26/2011
If they keep D'Antoni, they need to hire a defense coach in addition to the Head coach. Lawrence Frank coaches the D for the Celts. Seems to work.