More

British Petroleum's Profits Rise As Asset Sales Outweigh Disaster Costs

Bp Profits

By JANE WARDELL   04/27/11 06:51 AM ET   AP

LONDON -- BP PLC posted a 16 percent rise in first-quarter net profits on Wednesday as gains from the sale of major assets to pay for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill outweighed the ongoing cost of that disaster.

But replacement cost profit, the measure most closely watched by analysts to indicate an oil company's health, fell 2 percent as lower production and higher charges from the spill overrode the benefits of a rising crude oil price.

Net earnings of $7.2 billion for the three months to March 31 compared with $6.2 billion for the same period a year earlier. Revenue rose 18 percent to $88.3 billion after the company sold off more than $24 billion in assets to pay for the Gulf spill.

Those asset sales led to a fall in production, however, lowering replacement cost profit to $5.48 billion. The measure is closely watched by analysts because it excludes changes in the value of crude inventories and measures the amount it would cost to replace assets at current prices. It also excludes one-offs such as asset sales.

Chief Executive Bob Dudley has been targeting higher growth exploration to reverse a 30 percent drop in BP's share price since the April 20, 2010, explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig, which killed 11 men and caused the biggest offshore oil leak in U.S. history.

The stock price was up 0.6 percent at 467.05 pence ($7.68) in early trade on the London Stock Exchange.

The catastrophe in the Gulf caused BP to plunge to its first full-year loss in almost 20 years in 2010 and forced the resignation of chief executive Tony Hayward, who was at the helm when the disaster happened.

The first quarter results include a $400 million pretax charge for the oil spill, adding to $40.9 billion set aside by the company last year.

BP last week sued Transocean, the owner of the rig, and contractor Halliburton, for around $40 billion each in damages, based on its estimates of its liabilities.

But the court cases are likely to take years and BP could face tens of billions of dollars more in fines and penalties if it is prosecuted.

In the meantime, production levels have fallen as the London-based company sold oil fields and refineries and U.S. regulators banned further drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

BP said that production for the first quarter was 3.58 million barrels of oil equivalent per day, an 11 percent drop on the first quarter of 2010. However, it said that fall shrank to 7 percent after adjusting for the effect of acquisitions and divestments and entitlement impacts in its production-sharing agreements.

Most of the decrease in production was weighted toward the company's highest margin areas, and primarily reflected the impact to Gulf production because of the drilling moratorium, higher turnaround and maintenance activity in the North Sea and in Angola and an interruption to the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System.

Ranged against that production decline was a fire sale of assets, including a $7 billion deal with Apache Corp. that offloaded properties in the U.S., Canada and Egypt, that has so far brought in some $24 billion to help pay for the Gulf spill.

With its future in the U.S. uncertain, BP has signed energy exploration agreements in Indonesia, China, India and Australia. Most notably, it agreed to pay India's Reliance Industries $7.2 billion for a stake in key oil and gas blocks.

However, its attempts to move into new ground hit a stumbling block in Russia. The company is seeking a $16 billion share swap with Russia's state-backed OAO Rosneft but the deal was tied up in legal red tape after a dispute with BP's shareholders in its other Russian venture.

A quartet of Russian billionaires, BP's partners in the older TNK-BP venture, won an injunction in the London courts, claiming the new deal violates their own agreement with the London-based company.

BP gained some critical breathing room on the Russian problem just hours before its annual general meeting last week when Rosneft agreed to move the deadline to complete the deal to May 16.

The company also announced Wednesday that it would pay a dividend of 7 cents per share in June, half the size of the dividend it paid out to shareholders for the same quarter in 2010.

The company suspended its dividend for nine months following political and public pressure, reinstating a 7 cent per share payout for the final quarter of 2010. The BP dividend has wider significance in Britain, where it accounts for one pound in every six invested by pension plans.

Including the impact of the Gulf spill, net cash provided by operating activities for the first quarter was $2.4 billion, compared with $7.7 billion in the same period of last year.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
LONDON -- BP PLC posted a 16 percent rise in first-quarter net profits on Wednesday as gains from the sale of major assets to pay for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill outweighed the ongoing cost of that d...
LONDON -- BP PLC posted a 16 percent rise in first-quarter net profits on Wednesday as gains from the sale of major assets to pay for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill outweighed the ongoing cost of that d...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 62
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
05:53 PM on 04/27/2011
I can't for the life of me understand why ANYBODY in our country(USA) would EVER buy a single thing from BP. When I see peoole filling up ant a BP station it infuriates me. it makes me wonder if people can read or understand just what they did or if they even care. Apparently not. Oh well maybe the next spill will cause more damage and kill more people. That way maybe it will get peoples attention. Maybe if one of thier family members dies they will wakeup and smell the coffee.
mm3264
Volunteer Of America, Occupy Wall St
04:11 PM on 04/27/2011
Scabby .Become a fan (187)
Unfan (187) .4 hours ago (12:11 PM) "BP last week sued Transocean­, the owner of the rig, and contractor Halliburto­n, for around $40 billion each in damages, based on its estimates of its liabilitie­s."

Prediction­: BP will win the case but Transocean and Halliburto­n will pay damages with taxpayer money.
================================================================
Transocean is not an American company. It is now based in Switzerland so that it can avoid paying any U.S. taxes, (thanks to it's Republican friends) and still rake in billions in U.S. subsidies.
mm3264
Volunteer Of America, Occupy Wall St
04:05 PM on 04/27/2011
As long as the Republican Party forces the American middle class to subsidize big oil why would anyone be surprised?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arthur-metz
03:18 PM on 04/27/2011
Tell BP no more drilling off our coast lines and no more of our tax money to aid them - tell BP to pay out the full 10 Billion and to get the Gulf waters really cleaned up - Every BP Franchisee station in the USA should be demanded to close it's pumps until this is done - that should cause some uproar at BP headquarters and get fast attention to matters - As long as we allow BP to take their time it's our fault as a nation of people - not one elected official - all of us - this is not an American Company - this is a foriegn entity on our soil doing horrible ongoing damage - let's stop them now.
02:41 PM on 04/27/2011
As the story goes...
LONDON -- BP PLC posted a 16 percent rise in first-quarter net profits on Wednesday as gains from the sale of major assets to pay for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill outweighed the ongoing cost of that disaster.
The problem is all the chemicals they dumped in the ocean to disperse the oil...hmmmm where did it go? Let me take a guess...the ocean floor! Sunk the oil...not solved the problem. Cleanup in the eyes of taking care of the corporate rich folk. The US government should take them to court and force there to be some type of written agreement for the long term affects on the people, land and environment of the areas affected. They should be held accountable long term. Let’s see years down the line what their wonder chemicals effect will be. Glad to see that their profits are up (selling assets to cover the spill..boo hoo....gouging us on gas prices)cause I go straight to work and then if I need anything I pick it up on my way home. GAS is expensive...wish I had a 16% increase in profits for any reason. My suggestion is if every country that gouges America for our needs I say we do the same..sell antibiotics, food, medicines and anything they need from us at the same outrages markup. Let’s see one antibiotic pill $700. Sounds like a plan to me!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jambala99
A GOP vote is a character flaw at this point.....
02:14 PM on 04/27/2011
...because BP has only paid out 4 Billion of it's fund to help Gulf Residents. It's trying to only pay out about 10 billion, and then get HUGE tax write offs from their disaster. They may actually PROFIT from the gulf spill......
photo
Almondo
Agnostic Realist Tradevknaught
07:53 PM on 04/27/2011
Actually, they have already claimed the loss, so they HAVE PROFITED MASSIVELY at this point.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jambala99
A GOP vote is a character flaw at this point.....
08:15 PM on 04/27/2011
...figures, I was expecting it.....
photo
mykittywinks
You get what you get here...
12:37 PM on 04/27/2011
For all you leftist out there BP has employes that get payed from proffits. And why is it any of your business what any private company does anyway.. Maybe you should get off your back sides and invent some renewable energy which has not been discovered yet...Class envy is a tool to control the anger of the brainless.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dbos
Single payer universal health insurance agent
12:54 PM on 04/27/2011
billions in taxpayers money given to oil companies
oilfield
small manufacturing business owner
09:22 PM on 04/27/2011
can you send a link on that one....money given to them? or just a quick depreciation schedule?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jambala99
A GOP vote is a character flaw at this point.....
02:17 PM on 04/27/2011
Let's see, you misspelled 3 words in your first sentence, and you are lecturing US on being brainless? Unless you are demonstrating by example, I don't understand your methodology.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
antipodal2u
Just say NO to hypocrisy
12:25 PM on 04/27/2011
Thier profits and thier losses. On the back of the taxpayer.
12:19 PM on 04/27/2011
No mention of the 20 year contract deal with Iraq? I don't think this story is complete without referencing the back story on the war with Iraq and how oil companies are profiting.
12:15 PM on 04/27/2011
It's the dollar, not the oil. Printing the stuff is not the way to grow an economy. The Arabs who controll the price want more for an increasingly worthless piece of paper. Soon they and the rest of the world won't want any. It's in the news every day. Won't be long now.
12:11 PM on 04/27/2011
"BP last week sued Transocean, the owner of the rig, and contractor Halliburton, for around $40 billion each in damages, based on its estimates of its liabilities."

Prediction: BP will win the case but Transocean and Halliburton will pay damages with taxpayer money.
12:11 PM on 04/27/2011
the reason gas is going up in price is because oil is traded as a comodity on the market. the true price of a barrel of oil is something like $35.00. by the time the speculators get done it is ove a hundred. please get your facts straight. the speculators are the ones making the money for the oil companies. as long as energy is allowed to be traded as a comodity, the prices will continue to rise out of control. oil is basicaly a 'future'. traders are speculating on the future availability of oil. that drives the price thru the roof.
12:18 PM on 04/27/2011
What is your source for $35.00 per barrel?
05:23 PM on 04/27/2011
Trus cost of production and shipping.
11:36 AM on 04/27/2011
The quick and short answer to "why BP's profits are up" is; We are paying $5.19 a gallon for gas. BP has literally passed the bill for the Gulf oil spill cleanup, to the American people.
12:19 PM on 04/27/2011
Why is the price of corn up over 100%?
05:23 PM on 04/27/2011
Global warming....
photo
Almondo
Agnostic Realist Tradevknaught
07:56 PM on 04/27/2011
A fraud scam called ethanol.
11:30 AM on 04/27/2011
Tell me how this occurs....Crude oil costs rise to $116 per barrel....gasoline goes up to cover the cost per barrel (alledgedly). Oil company profits don't remain the same .....they skyrocket!!! How is that possible.....we are being manipulated by big oil and the government. TIME TO NATIONALIZE THE OIL COMPANIES
12:20 PM on 04/27/2011
Well said, comrade.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snakeman663
12:20 PM on 04/27/2011
Oh my good friend as my late Dad once said if the gov. would brew beer it would cost 20$ a 6 pack and that was 30 years ago. You see if you have not had your eyes open for the last 40 years are so the gov. puts so much red tape on everything they do that you pay with your first born child to pay for it. We was told many years ago the if the price of oil went up the price of gas would go down that makes no since right well now it is there and gas has gone up with it. I say force the auto industry to make cars that get better gas millage like 80 mpg's they have the know how now do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bryanmerrittper2
11:05 AM on 04/27/2011
Lots of people are gouging us and its our own fault for not using our own recorces. Why on Gods green earth do we let the Arabs and every tin horn dictator who comes along screw us? Not to mention the oil future spectulatores who are also making obscene profits out of this fiascio. Lets start using our own oil and watch world oil prices drop like a rock. We need to stop being dependent on foreign oil allright but by using our own we have plenty enough to last into the distant future and by then we will have other technology. But for now let's use what God has blessed us with....
11:31 AM on 04/27/2011
exactly!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
ErnestineBass
No longer a cog in The Machine.
11:58 AM on 04/27/2011
In order to do that, we'd have to nationalize our nation's energy reserves as Hugo Chavez did in Venezuela.

Just guessing here, but I'd say the FreeMarket-Lovin'AynRand-Worshippin'Socialism-Hatin'TeaPublican types will likely have a problem with that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snakeman663
12:23 PM on 04/27/2011
yes i have a problem with that you want to give politicians the power over us with our fuel no way you think your getting screwed now just wait.