More

Obama Picks Leon Panetta For The Pentagon, David Petraeus For CIA, Ryan Crocker And John Allen For Afghanistan

Panetta

First Posted: 04/27/11 07:11 PM ET Updated: 06/27/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- In a high-level reshuffle of his national security team, President Barack Obama intends to move CIA Director Leon Panetta to the Pentagon July 1 to replace retiring Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, while Gen. David Petraeus, the top commander in Afghanistan, will leave the Army to lead the CIA by Sept. 1.

Marine Lt. Gen. John R. Allen will take over from Petraeus in Afghanistan this fall to work with a new U.S. ambassador, Ryan Crocker, selected to replace the current ambassador, Kark Eikenberry.

The president will make the formal announcements Thursday, according to a senior administration official. The appointments all require Senate confirmation. To ensure “a seamless transition," however, the White House said Obama intends to begin the nomination and confirmation process now. The official said Crocker will be nominated “as soon as we can, and we seek early confirmation."

The changes will bring to the Pentagon an old Washington hand, a highly experienced manager and budget expert whose deep understanding of the federal bureaucracy and Congress is badly needed, administration officials and outside experts said.

Afghanistan's swaps will put in place a civilian-military team highly experienced in counterinsurgency warfare and in the close coordination of diplomatic, political and combat initiatives needed. Eikenberry, the departing ambassador, had notoriously acrimonious relations with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and did not get along well with the military high command, including Petraeus, senior staff officers said. Crocker, a career diplomat and former U.S. ambassador to Iraq, is renowned in national security circles for having devised, with Petraeus, a tightly coordinated and finely detailed civilian-military campaign plan is helping guide that war towards its conclusion.

But there will be no change in Afghan war strategy, said the senior White House official who briefed reporters Wednesday on condition of anonymity. “The strategy that Petraeus is now implementing is the strategy that Allen will be implementing: the beginning of a transition to Afghan lead" in the fighting and the beginning of a draw-down of U.S. forces “this summer."

The Obama administration’s selections drew immediate bipartisan support, with former President George W. Bush endorsing Panetta and Petraeus as “good public servants," and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor calling the selection of Petraeus “a real confidence builder."

Announcement of the long-rumored changes came after “months of consideration," the official said. Gates, named defense secretary by President Bush in November 2006, announced more than a year ago that he intended to retire before this summer. Although Panetta was an early choice, it took several sessions of persuasion by the president to convince him to take the job.

“Leon loved being CIA director, and it showed in the energy and enthusiasm he brought to it," the senior White House official said Wednesday. Asked if Panetta was reluctant to depart, he said, “It was a difficult decision to leave the agency."

Panetta, 72 and the grandfather of five, is the son of Italian immigrant parents who came to California to open a restaurant. He spent 16 years in Congress, rising to chair the powerful House Budget Committee before being tapped by President Bill Clinton as his budget director and, later, his chief of staff.

He has an easy laugh but a strict moral code. In a 2008 article for the Washington Monthly, he lashed out at the Bush administration’s treatment of detainees. “We either believe in the dignity of the individual, the rule of law, and the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, or we don’t," he wrote. “There is no middle ground.’’

At the CIA, Panetta stood his ground under political attacks from the right and the left. After Obama insisted the United States could fight terrorists while still abiding “by the rule of law," former Vice President Dick Cheney accused the administration of making the American people “less safe." And Panetta fended off an attempt by Attorney General Eric Holder to open criminal investigations of CIA officers for alleged torture and other detainee abuses.

At the Pentagon, however, the challenges will be more severe than rhetorical, managing the war in Afghanistan, completing the U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq and figuring out what to do in Libya. Growing budget pressures will force the Pentagon into painful reductions in funding and troops strength, and Panetta will have to referee between budget hawks in Congress and the military brass in the Pentagon who will fight for their share.

Those who know Panetta dismissed his lack of experience working directly at the Pentagon.

“He’s an excellent choice -- he is very smart, very quick, a very hands-on user-friendly administrator," said Gordon Adams, who handled defense budget issues at the Clinton White House while Panetta was OMB director. “He’s always had the talent to work on both sides of the aisle, and boy -- is that talent going to be needed!"

Adams likened Panetta to Mel Laird, a congressman picked by Nixon to run the Pentagon in 1969. “You could say what Laird knew about defense could be written on the back of an envelope," he said, “but he managed the draw-down at the end of the war and everybody loved him. Leon knows a lot more about defense than Laird ever did. Leon is capable of tough love, and that’s what the military services are going to need."

Jane Harmon, a California Democrat and longtime chair of the House Intelligence Committee who came to know Panetta during her nine terms in Congress, also discounted Panetta’s relative lack of experience at the Pentagon. He had little direct experience in intelligence when he went to the CIA, “and he didn’t blow the place up," she observed. “He restored and built morale. He’s managed the agency better on the Hill than any of his predecessors."

Petraeus, who will retire at age 58, has had his differences with the CIA, which issued more grim assessments of the war in Afghanistan than the upbeat reports the general provided publicly. But friends say he eagerly accepted the CIA job when Obama offered it to him last month.

Petraeus is famously fit. As a battalion commander in the 101st Airborne in 1991, he was accidentally shot in the chest during a live-fire exercise. After emergency surgery, the story around the Screaming Eagles goes, Petraeus demanded to be sent back to his troops. His doctor agreed after Petraeus dropped to the floor and smartly began executing pushups.

But the four-star general recently admitted to being tired after almost a decade of uninterrupted combat service, and he has said he looks forward to working hard, but in a more benign environment, at the CIA.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- In a high-level reshuffle of his national security team, President Barack Obama intends to move CIA Director Leon Panetta to the Pentagon July 1 to replace retiring Defense Secretary Rob...
WASHINGTON -- In a high-level reshuffle of his national security team, President Barack Obama intends to move CIA Director Leon Panetta to the Pentagon July 1 to replace retiring Defense Secretary Rob...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 335
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
12:55 PM on 04/29/2011
The same team HuffPost railed on this Gen (and team), Moveon.Org dubbed Betrayus (without a single liberal standing up against it.. you know like they DEMAND the conservatives do at every turn) and who Obama voted against his work/requests(or did his classic abstain) is now somehow worthy of the moving not only form the debacle that is Afghansitan but to oversee the CIA. IF MoveON.org, and the Huffpost, use their past reasoning, the person now betryaing their stated cause is none other than President Barack Hussein Obama.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss

I have an idea................. GET OUT! Get out of the ascalated cluster mess in Afghansitan. Get out of the covert war in Pakistan and get out of LIBYA!.

I thought Obama would get this right. His actions are no different than Bush's, with worse results!

I am against every single foreign war engagement the US i s involved in. I stood agains the lunacy of entering Iraq, more than those demoratic spokes holes who insisted they had WMD), sending ground troops to Afghansitan (Does no one in the Pentago have a HISTORY BOOK?) , the covert war in Pakistan (where is the Kennedy Vietnam reference when you really need it?) and the support for bombing in Libya... slippery slope with former Qitmo prisoners leading the rebel cause. Carlin was partly correct about military intelligence... trouble is, it is the political hacks (not military).
03:15 PM on 04/28/2011
I hope Obama gives Petraeus some more medals, Gaddafi is about to catch him!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CDRUSNret
03:25 PM on 04/28/2011
what..are you in junior high?
photo
Never Again
It makes no difference which 1 of us u vote for...
11:52 AM on 04/28/2011
@ CDRUSNret
Re: How do you know the Paks aren't letting us do it with a back channel wink and nod?

Cite some source of internatio­nal law that states that "drones" (a misnomer BTW) are a "violation of internatio­­nal law."


I agree there could be some backroom agreement, but I think it is less likely recently because of the Raymond Davis incident.

As for international law, it is not the drones that are illegal; it is the unauthorized use of force against another sovereign state that is illegal.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CDRUSNret
12:06 PM on 04/28/2011
so then your entire statement was incorrect?
photo
Never Again
It makes no difference which 1 of us u vote for...
12:20 PM on 04/28/2011
Actually, no. If Pakistan is no longer consenting to our action on its soil, these actions would violate the prohibition of the use of force against another soveriegn state. Attacking Pakistan was NEVER AUTHORIZED by the United Nations Security Council.
photo
Never Again
It makes no difference which 1 of us u vote for...
12:30 PM on 04/28/2011
Oh and by the way, "paks" is offensive.
photo
imusintheevening
With,without,who'll deny it's whatthe fights about
10:44 AM on 04/28/2011
Anyone else feel very uncomfortable with Petraeus heading the CIA?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CDRUSNret
11:32 AM on 04/28/2011
nope...he's much more qualified than Panetta was.
10:39 AM on 04/28/2011
You can shuffle all you want

You should still bring us out of this war

Put the TARPI pipeline on hold, yea we get the fact the US wants the oil (but actually more importantly all the minerals like lithium)

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/231826/1-trillion-minerals-discovered-afghanistan-daniel-foster
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:31 AM on 04/28/2011
Leon Panetta looks like he's wearing a rubber mask of himself

Discuss
10:06 AM on 04/28/2011
And yet the war continues...

Yea I know know we need to the TAPI pipeline
Yes I get the part where we need their oil, but actually more importantly their lithium from that deposit we stumbled upon last year (worth $1-3 trillion) even though we've known about the minerals locations for years (and darn you china for tryna go in there first and take our business, we started a war dammit you can't just cherry pick no fair!)
Yes I get how you're trying to destroy the Islam culture subtly and as a bi-product (although natural selection of ideologies would have done so over a longer period of time, oh no you say? before you get mad at someone who respects Islam, has been to the holy land and owns a Qu-ran - just look at Christianity and Judaism in the Western World (and most of Europe)
Yes I get that we're hunting Osama who is either dead, not there, or safe and sound in a bunker somewhere until we need to bring him out captured

But even so,
Can you end the war ffs please?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
innerpuppie
The truth is an absolute defense...
09:58 AM on 04/28/2011
The GOP is applauding these picks. Anything they love so much gives me the creeps.
photo
Never Again
It makes no difference which 1 of us u vote for...
10:19 AM on 04/28/2011
They applaud it because they love a military/intelligence agency that does whatever it wants with impunity. Thank you, Mr. President.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
conservatism = "low-effort" thinking.
09:22 AM on 04/28/2011
"The changes will bring" nothing. The same old catering to the conservatives instead of boldness and a new direction to really improve things.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CDRUSNret
10:31 AM on 04/28/2011
Panetta caters to conservatives??
09:15 AM on 04/28/2011
My reaction is why all these old dinosaurs? Why aren't these guys living in Boca and eating earlybirds? Come on Obama, you will have to do better than this.
jokerdanny
my other bio is a macro
09:30 AM on 04/28/2011
your an agist
photo
Never Again
It makes no difference which 1 of us u vote for...
09:11 AM on 04/28/2011
This president has shed his campaign skin and what was found underneath grows uglier and uglier by the day.

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/index.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WryAwry
Hating haters since '55
09:10 AM on 04/28/2011
How many Pink Panther films have there been, now?
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
09:10 AM on 04/28/2011
Why not just run a press release from the White House?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A dean89
08:55 AM on 04/28/2011
I thought he's gonna pick General Wesley Clark for Sec of Defense
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CDRUSNret
10:32 AM on 04/28/2011
Thank god he didn't. Wes is all about himself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
StraferX
The Lord is my Shepherd
08:51 AM on 04/28/2011
So obama, against his campaign promises to stop the wars has just made another deeper move to follow through with Bushes plans.

Bravo! Bravo! the greatest wool puller in history.

Oh, BTW didn't a congressional hearing just find that the guy Petraeus replaced McChrystal actualy was doing a great job and did nothing wrong.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p47nandmosquito
12:35 PM on 04/28/2011
I'm don't know why you would say that this is "another deeper move to follow through with Bushes plans." As a Democrat, I still recognize that eliminating the only stabilizing influence in a country overnight is not a wise choice. He already has us almost out of Iraq, and he's working on winding down Afghanistan, while keeping Libya a limited intervention. These are the facts.

As to your congressional hearing comment, I'd like to know who was involved. Since the Republicans seem to be spending most of their efforts to try to make Obama look bad, it wouldn't surprise me to see them generate another false conclusion purely so they can say, "obama did something else stupid," when in fact Obama hasn't done anything stupid for a while other than being way too conciliatory to Republicans.