More

Autism Checklist Takes 5 Minutes, Could Spot Warning Signs By Age 1

Autism Checklist

By LAURAN NEERGAARD   04/28/11 09:38 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- A simple checklist that parents fill out in the waiting room may help doctors someday screen for warning signs of autism as early as a baby's first birthday.

San Diego pediatricians tested the tool with more than 10,000 babies at their 1-year checkups, looking for such things as how the tots babble, gesture and interact with others.

The research, being published Thursday, is a first step in the quest for earlier autism screening. It's not ready for routine use, as more work is needed to verify its accuracy. But it also may prove valuable in finding more at-risk babies to study what causes the developmental disorder.

"There are subtle signs of autism at one year if you just look for them," said neuroscientist Karen Pierce of the University of California, San Diego, who led the study. "Let's just get these kids detected early and treated early."

Recent data suggest about 1 in 100 U.S. children has some form of autism, which ranges from mild to severe problems with behavior, communication and socialization. The American Academy of Pediatrics already urges autism screening during regular doctor visits at ages 18 months and 24 months. Yet a 2009 study found that on average, children aren't diagnosed until they're 5.

Experts say early therapy can lessen autism's severity, even if they don't know exactly what types will prove best. "The earlier you start, the better," said Dr. Lisa Gilotty of the National Institute of Mental Health, which helped fund the study.

Hence the interest in younger screening.

"This is very exciting work, to think we may be able to identify children with autism this early," said Dr. Susan Hyman of the University of Rochester and a pediatrics academy autism specialist, who wasn't involved in the new study.

But, she cautioned, it's not clear how best to do that: "I don't think screening for autism at 12 months is ready for prime time."

Thursday's study uses a 24-question checklist written in easy-to-understand terms that parents can answer in about five minutes. It was developed a few years ago to detect broader signs of language or developmental delays. Pierce signed up 137 pediatricians to use the questionnaire during every 1-year checkup and refer babies who failed for further testing. Those youngsters were re-evaluated every six months to age 3, when a diagnosis could be certain.

Of 10,479 babies screened, 184 who were sent for further testing followed through – and 32 eventually were diagnosed with autism, Pierce reported Thursday in the Journal of Pediatrics.

That's consistent with expected rates of detection that young; Rochester's Hyman said some forms of autism don't become apparent until age 2 or even later.

Numerous other children were diagnosed with language delay or some other developmental problems, so that in the end, the screening accurately predicted some problem in 75 percent of those kids, Pierce calculated. But there were false alarms for 1 in 4, who had no problems.

The children began treatment at around 19 months. In addition, Pierce's program does MRI scans and other tests as part of broader research into autism's biological underpinnings, studies now limited by the few numbers of babies being identified as at risk when they're so young.

One big puzzle: Only a fraction of the total 1,318 babies who failed the initial screening were referred for follow-up. The study couldn't tell how much of that gap was recording error, or if doctors or parents weren't worried enough to follow up right away, or if families went elsewhere.

Still, the study shows early screening is feasible in the hectic everyday offices of regular pediatricians. That's important as scientists now develop various screening tests, said Geraldine Dawson, chief science officer of Autism Speaks, which co-funded the work.

Pierce says other cities should consider the screening – but doctors first must know where to send families for follow-up testing. That can cost several thousand dollars, and state programs for free evaluation of at-risk children may have waiting lists.

For now, what should worry parents? Pierce's top concerns:

_Lack of what she calls "shared attention." Around age 1, babies should try to "pull your attention into their world," pointing to a bird and watching to see if you look, for example, or bringing you a toy, she said.

_Lack of shared enjoyment, where a baby may smile at mom but not engage if other people try peek-a-boo.

_Repetitive behaviors like spinning a car wheel rather than playing with the toy.

Language delays are worrisome if they accompany other problem signs, she said: "If they wave and they point, that's a good sign the brain is readying itself to be ready to speak."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

WASHINGTON -- A simple checklist that parents fill out in the waiting room may help doctors someday screen for warning signs of autism as early as a baby's first birthday. San Diego pediatricians tes...
WASHINGTON -- A simple checklist that parents fill out in the waiting room may help doctors someday screen for warning signs of autism as early as a baby's first birthday. San Diego pediatricians tes...
Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 73
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Debbie338
What we manifest is before us
10:32 AM on 05/02/2011
Are you listening, Jenny McCarthy?
12:18 PM on 05/02/2011
You apparently didn't understand the article, which is about early detection, not causes. Babies get shots as soon as they are born. I personally witnessed a peaceful looking and healthy newborn baby getting convulsions and crying incessantly right after a shot he received not long after he was born. It was so bad he had to stay in the incubator for hours after the fact. If you don't think those vaccines don't affect their central nervous system and their brain development, I have a beach front property to sell you in Oklahoma.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
12:52 PM on 05/02/2011
It's not about causes, but then you comment on "causes". CNS events are listed as risks. It's happened, but it is not even remotely common.

All drugs, biologics, and devices that work have risks. It's horrible when they occur. I know of someone who had a reaction to anesthesia as soon as it was administered, and ultimately died, and there hadn't even been an incision yet. A terrible thing, but it would have been an equally terrible thing to not make an attempt to surgically remove the tumor they had.

The equation is risk vs. benefit, not risk only.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonshouldrule
07:51 PM on 05/02/2011
Yoda, did you not read that the researcher who claimed vaccines were causing autism has been completely discredited? His research was faked, and this was proved beyond a doubt.

That's not to say there aren't risks involved, but they are much less than the risks of the diseases themselves.
04:32 PM on 04/29/2011
Sorry if there is some redundancy, I was booted of the internet and lost my posting mid-formulation:

In 1975 congress passed the 'Individuals with Disabilities Education Act' (IDEA), Public Law 94-142. This provides federal funding to states to assure that students (up to age 21 yrs) with disabilities receive a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) in the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE). This law was then amended with PL 99-457 to include programs/services for preschool children 3 through 5 years old and early intervention programs for handicapped infants and toddlers from birth through age 2.

To initiate the assessment process to determine if your child qualifies for these services, which are free, contact your state's Early Intervention program or child's public school.

Children with disabilities are entitled to seek spec
02:50 PM on 04/30/2011
These services represent a shared sacrifice from working taxpayers and are not "FREE." Other citizens are helping the afflicted families to carrry the burden. A lot is lost in translation when you attach the word "free" to these extremely high priced services. Many of these families need help for sure, but they need to have a solid understanding of how this help comes to them. It is due to a sacrifice that other working people in this country make, not because of some magic "freebie" or "gift" from the government.
04:59 PM on 04/30/2011
Agreed that all taxpayers (including parents of children receiving the services) contribute to this as well as many other aspects of public education, which in the vernacular most refer to as free (as a contrast to tuition based private schools). These special education services are meant to make a Free And Public Education (FAPE) available to ALL children. No, not a magic "freebie" or a "gift" but a very necessary provision for children with special needs to guarantee the they have the same opportunity to receive a FAPE as theirs peers without special needs. In my earlier post I used the term 'free' primarily as a contrast to the very costly lifelong therapeutic services families with children on the spectrum are faced with and which are often NOT covered by insurance.

I don't believe that those receiving special education services need to enter into them with a sense of hat-in-hand gratitude/indebtedness to the generosity of the taxpayer. Firstly, these parents are also taxpayers. And parents navigating through the special education system, if not initially, then as they move through it tend to be VERY well informed about all aspects of the system.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
01:00 PM on 05/02/2011
You're taking things a little too far. Do you say a quiet thank you to taxpayers whenever you drive on a non-toll road? Everyday you don't get burgled thanks to the actions of taxpayer-paid police? I could go on forever.

It is a service paid for by the government. The money is already allocated in the budget. The money is only wasted when people DON'T utilize it. Those who choose or need to use it have already paid their fair share.
09:04 AM on 04/29/2011
Miscommunication between the two sides of the brain can manifest itself as Autism, ADHD, or other neuro-behavioral symptoms. Early recognition and intervention can do so much for these children to improve their outcome. I've been reading what the Brain Balance website has to say about improving rhythm and timing through learning techniques... it's good info from a hopeful perspective and is worth a read. http://www.brainbalancecenters.com
09:37 PM on 04/29/2011
Please evaluate such sites very carefully. What are the claims? Is there research in peer reviewed journals to back the claims versus just testimonials and anecdotal evidence. Is this based on solid science? Also note that a chiropractic neurologist is not a neurologist (M.D.).
05:54 AM on 05/04/2011
Thank you for the link Jennifer. I'm sure my daughter's teachers knew about it Brain Balance but I never did. I'm going to explore it further and save the link to my bookmarks. Again thank you.
photo
VeggieLove
apparently, my micro-bio is empty
02:21 AM on 04/29/2011
This is great news.

On the other hand, how much do the parents of children with autism have to spend out of pocket? Are services like speech, occupational therapy, and others paid for by schools, health insurance, etc.
03:26 AM on 04/29/2011
If a parent, child, teacher, etc. is concerned about their child's development (birth-3) or educational functioning (age 3+) they can initiate a request for an assessment. For birth-3 this may be through the public school system or it may be through the state (varies by state). For ages 3+ this request is typically submitted to the the principal of the public elementary school the child is attending, or for preschoolers, the public school in the child's neighborhood. Testing is then conducted by specialists such as school psychologists, school speech-language pathologists, etc. . A meeting is held with parents to discuss test results and if the child qualifies for services. If s/he qualifies an IFSP or IEP meeting is convened with parents and services are arranged. IFSPs/IEPs are legal contracts. Services are free. Every year the IEP/IFSP is reviewed/updated. Every 3 yrs re-determination of eligibility is required (sooner as needed).

IFSP services are often home-based. Treatment goals are family oriented. IEP services are typically school base. Treatment goals focus on increasing the child's ability to function in the school setting. The key at this age (3+) is that a child's impairment must negatively impact his/her education (academics, socializing..). Therefore, schools often distinguish between a medical diagnosis of autism and what they consider an educational diagnosis of autism.

Private services are expensive and often Autism is not covered by insurance. Something which is frustrating to parents and service providers!
04:47 PM on 04/29/2011
I wish it worked the way in the late '90s... I doubt that it always works that well even now. We knew there was something odd about our son when he was in preschool. When he was 5, we had to shake the trees for a speech therapy evaluation for a fluency problem, but we were told the therapist was out sick and there was no substitute. His kindergarten said he refused to participate, lying under the table most of the time, but that he was "brilliant." He was tracked into a gifted program because he maxed out tests on verbal areas (but completely flunked in others). Things had come to a head by the time I found out that I could initiate a request for assessment. We were offered a meeting in which we were told that the district didn't have the means to conduct the appropriate test. Because our son wasn't failing academically, they didn't have any program to put him in. We had to find, pay for, and get on the appropriate specialist's waiting list for 6 months before we finally got the diagnosis of Asperger's Syndrome. (Our insurance did pay for some cognitive therapy sessions for panic disorder.) It was only then, when he was age 11, that we got an IEP meeting.
12:23 PM on 04/29/2011
My younger son is not autistic but was born failure to thrive is all around delay, but making slow consistent progress. By age 3 months we had him enrolled in Early Intervention. I had never even heard of this. from the NICU to pediatrician to multiple specialists, it was recommended all around to have him evaluated by Early Intervention (State/County funded) in order to give him the best chance for catching up by school age. There is continuity too. Early Intervention is for 0-3 and their efforts are to improve a child's functionality in the home. Then from 3 - 5 the efforts are to teach functionality in a pre-school setting so that by the time the start Kinder-g they are mainstreamed. I am very thankful for this support. Every three months we evaluate and set goals and mark achievements. I am very fortunate that my son is social engaged. Families with challenges like Autism need support as do fmilies that face other challenges.
01:21 AM on 04/29/2011
Does anyone know that speech-language pathologists do this for a living? We evaluate and diagnose communication disorders. This 1 minute screening is basic communication assessment 101 for the speech-language pathologist.
06:30 AM on 05/04/2011
My daughter was seeing a speech language pathologist for early education intervention because of traumatic birth due to listeria sepsis and having to be bagged at birth 3 times. In the years since we've since learned she's missing the part of the brain that connects the right half with the left ( http://scenicbeauty.tripod.com/corpuscallosum.html that part in the middle of the brain in the picture of this website is what she's missing). We then found out the antibiotics at birth may have made her deaf as well, so she was put in speech, OT, and PT 4 times a week. She was even elligible for summer intervention. Then it was her physician and her husband who her her pediatric neurologist, before she left the practice after her son died, that she might be autistic as well. When they left, her new neurologist kept fighting us saying there was no way she could have both conditions but her pediatrian referred us to an autisic specialist who diagnosed her.
07:06 AM on 05/04/2011
Autistic-like behaviors are often present in many children who may be severely impaired and yet they are not autistic. I am not in anyway saying this is the case with your daughter. I am in no position to make such a call! However, I mention this because there are differing views among those who diagnose autism. To a certain extent diagnostic labels are only as helpful as the services/treatments they help you receive. You treat the symptoms/behaviors/issues that are most affecting the child's ability to function and facilitate the best quality of life. Your daughter's condition is obviously medically complex and what's most important is that she is receiving the intervention services she needs and has such a committed and involved family! All the best!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sandiegowoman
11:26 PM on 04/28/2011
My grandson,in my care, was part of the UCSD study, MRI's and therapy. I knew at 12 mo something was wrong but the pediatrician blew me off. Stumbled on to the study at UCSD. He got the preliminary diagnosis at 15 mo, in intensive therapy at 16 mo until age 3. The whole team was unbelievable. He cannot carry a conversation yet, but can repeat the dialogue of 40-50 kid videos. He cannot or will not chew so only eats pureed food. Just started looking at other kids. Does not like to be held or touched. Parents MUST go by their gut and if not happy with doctor, get another opinion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dirtytrickz
i crunch numbers for a living
06:57 PM on 04/28/2011
My son was one the babies screened at 12 months in this program, and is also one of the 32 who have been diagnosed later, when he turned 3. If it wasn't for early intervention at this stage, he may not have had the "mild" diagnosis.
04:16 PM on 04/28/2011
The medical community has no clue because Autism's symptomalogy is not medical. While its origin may be biological, it is not a medical disease. Anyone who's ever been to a typical pediatrician's office knows they don't know their patients; they're overwhelmed with them. They breeze in long enough to apply the stethoscope and they're gone. Drive-by medicine.

If you want your child screened and referred appropriately for Autism, find yourself a speech-language pathologist. A disorder of communication requires someone who diagnoses and treats them. Doctors don't.

Hospitals have SLPs, school districts have them. Go to www.asha.org for more information.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GraniteSkyline
I wish you happiness!
05:49 PM on 04/28/2011
Thanks!
01:28 AM on 04/29/2011
Yes!. As a speech-language pathologist I am often sorry to find out how few people know what we do! We DIAGNOSE and treat speech, language, cognitive-communication, swallowing disorders (to name some) from birth throughout the lifespan. We do not require a doctor to make a diagnosis (although insurance for some reason often requires a doctor's referral). As a matter of fact, it is often frustrating to find a physician making (incorrect) communication diagnosis as the diagnostic weight is often given to the physician. In the best of circumstances treatment/diagnosis is a collaborative process. Input from multiple specialists and caregivers are needed to gain a well-rounded sense of the child's needs.
photo
Christschool
Proud to be on the Left
03:22 PM on 04/28/2011
The best screeners for early signs of autism are parents of autistic children. Every pediatric office should employ several of them to screen.

While many parents of autistic children didn't identify it when their children were growing up, as the years go on your world revolves around it so much that you see all types of autism. You can spot it dead on now and early too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaurieAnn
Wake Up! Grow Up! Lighten Up!
02:43 PM on 04/28/2011
Early screening is ready for prime time; or it least i think so.  Early screening is not necessarily the same as formally diagnosing such a young child.  What it does allow for is intensive early intervention which can be extremely beneficial.

My son is 14, with autism and never received early intervention because I could not convince a pediatrician there was a problem until he was already six years old.  

Anything that can be done to get more children intervention will be beneficial for the child, their families, the schools and society in general.  

Early Intervention is Where it's At!
Helloise
Healthy skeptic admires reason, trusts intuition
06:39 AM on 04/29/2011
I'm no expert, but I have worked with a number of kids with autism and based on my relatively slim experience, there seems to be a remarkable difference between the kids who received early invention and those who did not. In fact, I would say that is true with all disabilities. I think the excuse used to be that experts were loathe to make diagnosis too early in the event that they were wrong, but the kind of interventions that I'm aware of would certainly not interfere with normal development and have quite the reverse effect on the kids that need it. I'm so sorry that you weren't able to take advantage of the early interventions, but admire you for fighting for them for others.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaurieAnn
Wake Up! Grow Up! Lighten Up!
07:03 AM on 04/29/2011
THank you so much for your kind words Helloise.  From the other children affected with autism and their parents that I have met along the way I have observed the same as you; children who receive the early intervention really do make better progress and sustain the progress as they grow up.  My son is now being eclipsed by peers who were more severely affected as youngsters but because of an earlier diagnoses they received the early intervention services mine did not.

There are times when I still grieve that it took our son so long to be diagnosed and the that he missed what could have been so helpful but fighting for others comes with the territory for me.  I take great comfort in knowing that by raising awareness of the disorder and advocating for others, there will be a groundswell of those who will ready to work on behalf of our young adults who have autism as well.
photo
mikey09
Living off the grid.
02:33 PM on 04/28/2011
Such a baffling condition....and I wonder why so many kids today verses the past...but early detection is alway key to any condition so glad te studies are continuing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NotEve
Facts are of no use against the irrational
05:16 PM on 04/28/2011
Its not known whats behind the epidemiology of the condition. It's widely believed that the spectrum disorder has both genetic and environmental components, since the genetics haven't changed there's a lot of attention given to possible environmental triggers. Even so, its doubtful that there's just one environmental factor at work. To my knowledge none of the research has yet identified a single, compelling environmental factor associated with Autism.

While the incidence rates may very well be increasing, we can't ignore the fact that this condition is a spectrum of disorders that were once diagnosed very differently. Due to the evolving diagnosis and definition of Autism it may appear that the incidence rates are increasing more than they actually are. What we call Autism today, went by many different diagnoses/descriptions in the past.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
afgail
Wise and strong.
10:15 PM on 04/28/2011
With the expotential increase in harmful chemicals in our food, air and water that could damage healthy genes, it is foolish to dismiss genetics for the rise in incidence in autism.
EvolveorPerish
R E anna what have you done?
02:14 PM on 04/28/2011
32 out of 10,479 were diagnosed at age one. That's 1 out of 327. I wonder why there is a jump in the rate after the age of one to 1/110 or less. Hmmm.

I'm sure its just better diagnosing as these researchers were probably not looking hard enough for symptoms. They just weren't focused on the task at hand, right?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DakkonA
www.DisentangledReality.com
04:11 PM on 04/28/2011
What are you talking about?
EvolveorPerish
R E anna what have you done?
04:33 PM on 04/28/2011
I'm asking the question, why does the diagnosis increase after the age of one?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NotEve
Facts are of no use against the irrational
05:18 PM on 04/28/2011
Its a lot easier to diagnose developmental disorders as children get older and their lack of development becomes more apparent.
VA Jill
Retired RN, Army mom. Bring the troops home!
02:08 PM on 04/28/2011
The medical community wants to reduce everything to the lowest common denominator because they really have no clue about autism either. My son did not exhibit any of these behaviors at the age of one year. He didn't really exhibit any until he was nearly 3, after he had a tonsillectomy and didn't really "come out" of the anesthesia for over 48 hours. It was 13 more years before we could ever get a diagnosis.
02:03 PM on 04/28/2011
This would have saved me 4 years of fighting doctors and preschool. When my daughter should have been forming words, everyone chalked it up to my daughter having mild hearing loss. We now know she no longer has hearing, but is missing her entire corpus callosum (the bridge the connects the two halves of the brain and has over 250 billion nerve fibers). Then we were told there was no way she could have autism on top of missing part of her brain but I fought to have herevaluated and sure enough, she's is autistic with an IQ of 60. Then it took until 8th grade and the school threatening to put her into foster care before the school committee would even agree to even put her into an autistic school because she wasn't "autistic" enough. Just one frustration and red tape after another.
12:34 PM on 04/29/2011
Hang in there Happyhomemaker29. I feel sick over your frustrations. There is no doubt the school districts do everything they can to getting out of funding and assisting families in your situation. I hope you had/have the strength to fight them. It's hard enough to get by day to day sometimes and then to muster the energy, time and money to fight "the man" just isn't right. I hope that when you lay down at night you know you are not alone. Peace be with you.
06:43 AM on 05/04/2011
Thank you Jmols. I honestly believe they kept her in mainstreaming, simply because the more special needs students they get, the more money they get. It's a shame really because these kids are really getting screwed in the process. Not to mention teachers poorly equipped to handle these students, others children trying to learn around them, when they're being disruptive and tempermental (like my daughter during an autistic breakdown) and they have to take the whole class to the library because she's throwing things at people.) I always felt bad for the other students and teachers. It has to be so hard to them to teach and learn in that environment. Also, if they don't have a teacher who understands my daughter's needs, then my daughter can't learn as well. By they time we got her into the autisic school she was in the 8th grade but on a 2nd grade level for some things and a kindegarden level for others realisticly. She somehow passed 7th grade (with failing exams of averaging 30-50 and classes of 30-70) with an 85. Go figure. No Child Left Behind. Whoo Hooo!
01:04 PM on 04/28/2011
My son who is 16 has autism.We were informed about these red flag symptoms 15 years ago.
I don't see any breakthroughs here,However the real significance of this story is the mainstreaming awareness factor that hopefully will reach uninformed parents.

But if you are planning to call up that friend and give her this cutting edge news that if your child isn't being appropriately social it may be a sign of autism.Don't be offended if they yawn.
Zidlow Marx
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaurieAnn
Wake Up! Grow Up! Lighten Up!
02:40 PM on 04/28/2011
I also think the other difference from 15 years ago is that many, many more physicians are aware and educated enough about autism to either instigated such screenings on their own or at least provide follow-up on parents concerns.  When my son was 4 months old I had concerns but I had to switch pediatricians twice before I finally was a able to get a diagnosis when he was six (this was 8 years ago and my son never lost language; he had very precocious language at the time.)
photo
Christschool
Proud to be on the Left
03:28 PM on 04/28/2011
Agreed with you. I'm the parent of an 8 year old with autism. Much of the public is very ignorant as is the medical establishment still. Just being "shy" isn't a true sign of autism, nor is being particularly behind socially. Its much more than that. I explain my son's autism to my co-workers as this : Combine these ingredients: high anxiety that interferes with functioning, OCD that interferes with functioning, hyperactivity that interferes with functioning and learning disabilities and you have my son's autism.

Eye contact, which many people believe is a sign of autism is difficult for most people to understand what is meant. If your infant doesn't stare at strangers or look at people doing things, this can be an early sign. If they don't look at you while your talking that isn't autism. No pointing at 12-14 months is a big sign and one of the first.
04:34 PM on 04/28/2011
I really think one of the toughest and most important things to do, is not to bury your head in the sand
.No matter what your child's symptoms are.I know as a father when my son wasn't acting the way the other kids were acting,I really did not want to face that horrifying diagnosis.
But we must...this one thing can mean the difference between a highly successful ABA treatment and not.It's heartbreaking and I wanted to run away.But I'm so glad i didn't I love my son deeper then i could a "normee" child,because there is also a huge emotional need to protect and defend the defenseless..Unlike wild animals that prey on the weak