iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Minimum Wage, Labor Investigations Targets Of Missouri Republicans

Missouri_statehouse

First Posted: 04/28/11 05:50 PM ET Updated: 06/28/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Earlier this year, Missouri business leaders presented lawmakers with a six-point plan they said would bring jobs to the state during tough economic times. Since then, state Republicans have aggressively pushed the agenda and added their own legislative tweaks. Critics say the business-friendly platform is currently one of the most aggressive attacks on low-wage workers.

Backed by the Missouri Chamber of Commerce and other trade groups, the "Fix the Six" plan includes a few of the business community's perennial gripes -- tort reform, workers' compensation reform, and corporate tax reform -- but it also pushes two reforms that have infuriated progressives and labor groups: capping the minimum wage and making it more difficult for employees to sue for discrimination.

In 2006, Missourians voted to add a cost-of-living adjustment to the state's minimum wage so that it would keep pace with inflation. The minimum wage has since risen from $5.15 an hour to $7.25, where it matches the federal rate, and has remained there since 2009.

A bill that has passed the Republican-controlled state House of Representatives would eliminate any future cost-of-living boosts. In explaining the bill in a committee hearing earlier this month, state Rep. Jerry Nolte (R) said, “By putting more pressure on the people who are doing the hiring, my concern is we’ll continue to work our way into a jobless recovery and lose more jobs."

In a brief provided to The Huffington Post, the state chamber argues that the cost-of-living adjustment makes it hard for businesses to keep employees on their payrolls, "particularly affecting entry-level workers."

Opponents of the reform point out that three-quarters of Missourians voted for the original cost-of-living increase in 2006, and the initiative passed in every county in the state. Lew Prince, a small business owner who testified against the current bill, told HuffPost that he believes a capped minimum wage would do nothing to bring business to the state.

"All they're doing is taking an extra buck out of Missouri, which comes out of our economy," said Prince, who owns the Vintage Vinyl record shop in St. Louis and starts his workers at $8.50 an hour. "It's morally wrong and it's economically stupid."

A bill currently in the Missouri Senate would also scale back the state's employee discrimination laws. Right now, discrimination only has to be a "contributing factor" in an employee's termination for a worker to be eligible for compensation, whereas the new law would require it to be the "motivating factor." The bill would also cap damages in discrimination lawsuits by putting them on a sliding scale according to the size of the business. In a statement this week, Gov. Jay Nixon (D) called the bill "unacceptable" and said it undermined the Missouri Human Rights Act.

"This bill would make it harder to prove discrimination in the workplace and would throw new hurdles in the path of those whose rights have been violated," Nixon said.

Lara Granich, director of Missouri Jobs with Justice, a coalition of labor and community groups, said she believes the "Fix the Six" platform is part of the broader anti-labor atmosphere seen in states like Wisconsin, Ohio and Maine this year.

"I think [the bills] are all part of this dynamic happening in our state where the business interests smell blood in the water," said Granich. "They're doing everything to roll back the progress working people have made in the state in the last decade."

With regard to both the proposed changes to minimum wage and employment discrimination law, Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) recently tweeted, "Ugh."

But arguably the biggest change to Missouri employment law isn't found in a "Fix the Six" proposal -- it's in a budget amendment added by House Speaker Steven Tilley (R) that would effectively end all investigations by the state labor department. By eliminating all nine of the state's labor investigators and cutting $379,000 from the department's budget, the amendment would render Missouri incapable of enforcing child labor legislation or addressing wage theft claims.

Tilley told the Columbia Daily Tribune earlier this month that his amendment was aimed at ending the enforcement of "prevailing wage" law in Missouri. State law requires that certain minimum wages be paid on publicly funded construction projects; the wages vary county by county. Tilly told the Daily Tribune that he'd heard labor investigators were "harassing and picking on non-union contractors" in prevailing-wage cases. Tilley did not respond to requests for comment from HuffPost.

State Rep. Jacob Hummel (D) spoke against the amendment on the House floor. He told HuffPost it was "a back-door attempt to stop all prevailing-wage investigations.

"There's currently an attack on the prevailing wage in this state right now," he said. "I guess it’s easier to get rid of the investigators than to change the law."

Even if the intended target of the budget amendment is prevailing-wage enforcement, there would be collateral damage if it passed, according to the Missouri labor department.

“If budget cuts removed the Department’s Division of Labor Standards investigators, there would be no entity to enforce the state’s wage and hour laws or the child labor laws," a department spokesperson said in a statement. "There would be no protection for workers who are underpaid or for children in the workplace.”

In 2010, Missouri's labor department collected $200,000 in restitution for minimum-wage violations and another $500,000 for prevailing-wage violations. In 2009 and 2010, the department issued 1,714 citations for child-labor violations and levied $31,000 in fines. Among the worst violations in recent years: one child had his legs crushed in a meat processing plant, and another had his hand mutilated in a meat-tenderizer at the restaurant where he worked.

Earlier this year, state Sen. Jane Cunningham proposed a bill that would roll back the state's child labor laws by eliminating the prohibition on employing children under 14, as well as the restrictions on how many hours a week a child could work.

Missouri isn't the only state this year where Republicans have taken aim at child labor regulations. In Maine, Gov. Paul LePage has voiced his support for loosening the laws, and Tea Party-backed Utah Sen. Mike Lee argued that federal child-labor laws are unconstitutional.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Earlier this year, Missouri business leaders presented lawmakers with a six-point plan they said would bring jobs to the state during tough economic times. Since then, state Republicans ...
WASHINGTON -- Earlier this year, Missouri business leaders presented lawmakers with a six-point plan they said would bring jobs to the state during tough economic times. Since then, state Republicans ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 318
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
01:47 PM on 04/29/2011
Maybe my fellow republicans in the house should practice what they preach! I think they need a cap on their wages as does Congress. I use to be a republican but now I am a man without a party . How about it ? Who wants to vote for a pay cut/cap now? By the way Im not happy with your idea to put our elderly and disabled on private insurance in lieu of medicaid. Lets cut foriegn aid and foriegn aid before we cut domestic spending.
07:33 AM on 04/29/2011
About the inactive between 15 and 64 years, please read the article and comments, published on the blog of Fisascat Abruzzo, on public companies, located in "voluntary liquidation", from December 2010, partly because of an alleged deficit of 19 million euro:

http://fisascatabruzzo.blogspot.com/2011/04/riunione-oggi-laquila-presso-lance.html

Learn that certain "rights" to employment are provided through "unusual competitions. "

Seeking Justice for the Oppressed

http://ch.indymedia.org/it/2011/04/81289.shtml

http://www.scribd.com/doc/53732074/Seeking-Justice-for-the-Oppressed

The Will of an employee of Abruzzo Engineering:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/51246592/Il-testamento-di-un-dipendente-di-Abruzzo-Engineering
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:11 AM on 04/29/2011
Sooner or later each and every person in this world will have to realize that wealth concentration is the bane of humanity. Each of us is complicit in the exploitation of others, degradation of the natural world, and the squandering of human potential according to our use or misuse of the social contract. If we take more material wealth from it than is necessary to self develop, we commit these crimes. The more indulgent and concentrated the wealth, the greater the crime.

That contention does not translate into a demand for equal economic outcomes as the right likes to say; it results in "equitable" outcomes. The latter is kryptonite to right wing ideology, so they always bleat the equality meme to escape discussion of fairness, equity, justice, equanimity, ethics, and "the commons".

However, equity does not give credence to the absurd disparity that now exists either. It is simply pathological to seek such indulgence in the midst of such need; and especially egregious given the modest amounts of wealth required to attend to the developmental imperative. Perhaps humanity is settling for mediocrity because that is what the absurdly rich must sell to exist.

The left is merely one step closer to the realization of human potential than the right, but it works against its own interests to the extent it chases the same pathological prize. Additionally, the rise to power by minds like Trump, Bachmann, Inhofe, Ryan, and so many others is only possible with an aberrant concentration of wealth.
photo
MarsAmbassador
Per angusta ad augusta
12:25 AM on 04/29/2011
Child Labor Laws, collective bargaining rights, unions, the Civil Rights Act, the 14th Amendment (which is the only thing keeping Dred Scott from being the law of the land), tearing down Roe v. Wade (which is a PRIVACY law stating WE own our own bodies, not the government, other individuals or corporations), Medicare, Social Security, etc. There isn't anything accomplished over the past 100 years for the greater good of our society that Republicans don't want to destroy or dismantle. Please remember that at the polls.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
benney44
10:21 PM on 04/28/2011
The Missouri Legislature is an embarrassment. Even the Dems will screw their constituents for the right campaign contribution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Monday Morning
“Try and fail, but don't fail to try.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Monday Morning
“Try and fail, but don't fail to try.
09:45 PM on 04/28/2011
Legislature looks to sacrifice health for profit
State Rep. James Miceli, Democrat of Wilmington, came off as an idiot moments ago on the radio when he discussed the House vote, earlier this week, to repeal medical ethics law that went into effect less than two years ago. The Massachusetts Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Manufacturer Code of Conduct outlawed free meals and gifts that salesman and lobbyists for Big Pharma and medical-equipment makers were showering on doctors. Rep. Miceli voted for the law, but earlier this week he voted to repeal the law, one of the nation's toughest in this area. His rationale? The restaurant industry was hurting from the ban.

Now, the first thing that comes to mind is that this segment of the restaurant business cannot be more than tiny, and the drop-off that the industry is feeling must be do to the economic slowdown. However, even if it were true, how can we change a law designed to ensure more honest medical care for our citizens because of some rinky-dink dollars-and-sense byproduct? Rep. Miceli, speaking on WBUR's Radio Boston program, went on to explain the rationale for his original vote, but again talked about the impact on the restaurant industry.

Now maybe there are more legitimate reasons for adjusting, not repealing, the law (and some of them are listed in this article) but Rep. Miceli's comments -- in tandem...

http://thehubsterblog.blogspot.com/2011/04/legislature-looks-to-sacrifice-health.html
09:43 PM on 04/28/2011
I live in the Puget Sound area and the minimum wage here is about 8.50/Hr . With that as a single man of 65 yrs I can pay my rent, buy food and gas and make my utilities. I can save a bit for unexpected difficulties if I do all my own meals and use television as my entertainment. This website might qualify as such if so many stories did not cause so much concern.
My point is that the minimum wage should do at least this, it must be a living wage. If you can't do that, for the people who make your living for you as an employer, than your business model needs some real work! As for state legislators your jobs are to better the lot of the population NOT the captains of industry!
We just might as well cover the child labor laws the righties want to change.Seems to be along the lines of the Shrub's idea of no child left behind. Stupid and obstructionist.
It is impossible to understand the thinking so prevalent on the right and how the right can be so very, very wrong.
09:59 PM on 04/28/2011
Well said brother, fanned, thank you
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:41 PM on 04/28/2011
Low paying jobs without benefits and protections should attract new workers in droves to The Screw Me state.
photo
An Independent Woman
Honni soit que mal y pense
09:29 PM on 04/28/2011
Between republicanT legislatures and the recent rulings of the less-than-Supreme Court, the Democrats have a perfect set up for 2012. How quickly will they blow it? I'm taking bets......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
euromarkusx
Political Party: Lobster
09:23 PM on 04/28/2011
I have a solution to fix unemployment.

Pay the workers NOTHING.

* We'll have 0% Unemployment
* The wealthy can have their tax cuts
* Companies can have record profits
* And all of this goodness will trickle down to the workers

Problems solved!

I'm so pround of myself.

- Donald Trump
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChinaC
09:19 PM on 04/28/2011
In a nutshell, nobody supports unions.
09:23 PM on 04/28/2011
Wrong.
09:32 PM on 04/28/2011
You mean like the thousands of Wisconsinites who demonstrated against Gov. Walker's union-busting legislation, and the thousands of others who have signed enough petitions to recall at least 6 Republican state senators? See also the massive pro union demonstrations in Ohio, Michigan, Florida, Indiana, etc..
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gronkie
Radical Independent
09:10 PM on 04/28/2011
I have been advancing the concept that the Republicans are the spear carriers for Anti-American Multi-Nationals, who want to turn America into a third world country so they more easily exploit the resources and labor that America possesses, all for the sake of an additional couple of percent of profit. In case anyone doubts it, here is the proof:

1) Dismantle unions
2) Dismantle Social safety nets
3) Dismantle public education
4) Dismantle minimum wage
5) Dismantle child labor
6) Dismantle health, safety, and environmental regulations

All of these things are front and center on the Republican agenda, and when taken as a whole they add up to a third world country. If you are supporting Republicans, you are supporting the destruction of America. Elected Republican leaders are being handsomely for their treason, what are YOU getting out of this?

If you are supporting the GOP's agenda, then I have one thing to say to you:

Stop thinking like a Republican and start thinking like an American.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rmjagg
pending
09:20 PM on 04/28/2011
very succinct .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Quitcherbichin
If you are posting here, thank a veteran.
09:09 PM on 04/28/2011
Sounds like a well thought out viable plan to me. Discrimination lawsuits are among the most frivolous. We would be much better off if the person/entity who brings the lawsuit, and not just the discrimination suits, were made to pay the legal feels and court costs if they lose the suit.
photo
irochfpst
no right turn
08:55 PM on 04/28/2011
i guess the right to work for less wasn't enough for the corrupt business leaders in these states. this gives new meaning to the idea of serving the community. soup lines anyone? their line about this helping the economy is just plain bull. this is just another effort to rip people off and run away with their money. cretens!
photo
SOD
As kind as possible and as unkind as necessary.
09:13 PM on 04/28/2011
Why do you think employees should be forced to join a union and pay dues as a condition of employment?

Wages are about 4k lower in right to work states. However, when adjusted for inflation wages are about 4k higher in right to work states. That's something union leaders don't tell anyone. When labor costs more, the value of a dollar decreases, which in turn increases the cost of living. Making 4k more in a pro big labor state is irrelevant when the cost of living is 8k more.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
unclelew
09:18 PM on 04/28/2011
So, if we all make $1 a hour, we'll all be rich.