More

Potential GOP Presidential Hopefuls Bash Obama, But Who Will Run?


First Posted: 04/30/11 01:14 PM ET Updated: 06/30/11 06:12 AM ET

(AP) - It sure looked and felt like the Republican presidential contest was under way Friday in the first-primary state of New Hampshire, even if the politicians on stage remained coy about their expected candidacies.

Five possible contenders, including three considered in the top tier, hacked away at President Barack Obama before enthusiastic conservatives, but aimed no barbs at each other. All of them deplored higher taxes, government regulations and Obama's 2010 health care law. They generally differed more on style than policy, a tactic that may change in coming months.

Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty portrayed himself as a can-do achiever who reined in government in a Democratic-leaning state.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney painted himself as a free-market champion and philosophical heir to the nation's founders.

Minnesota congresswoman Michele Bachmann said Congress should not raise the debt ceiling despite economists' warnings of dire consequences.

Two other hopefuls, former Sen. Rick Santorum and pizza magnate Herman Cain, called for deeply lower taxes and an embrace of the nation's religious heritage.

The occasion was a packed dinner hosted by the conservative group Americans for Prosperity in Manchester, the state's largest city. Each candidate spoke for eight minutes and then fielded two questions. They did not address each other.

Those who skipped the event included former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and real estate mogul Donald Trump.

The audience responded about equally to all five speakers, and no candidate landed a knockout punch or made a serious gaffe. It was an affair with little intra-party squabbling. Obama and congressional Democrats were the constant target.

Romney spoke in broad terms, portraying himself as a lover of freedom and capitalism, while saying Obama looks to Europe for inspiration and guidance. He said the nation's greatness "is being challenged by those who would make the country more like Europe."

"We got it right, they got it wrong," he said.

Romney said the health care law he signed in Massachusetts, which required all residents to obtain insurance, reduced unfair public subsidies of people who could afford their own care. It was a slightly stronger defense than he often gives. But Romney again said he never would impose the plan nationwide. And he called for repealing the Democrats' 2010 health law. That plan resembles his state plan in some ways.

Pawlenty praised congressional Republicans' efforts to revamp Medicare, but stopped short of endorsing every detail of the House-passed plan. He said the eligibility age for Medicare should be raised, and Medicaid should be handed to states as a block grant program. As for Social Security, he said, wealthier people should not receive the same inflation adjustments that others receive.

Pawlenty apologized again for his past support of a "cap-and-trade" system to limit greenhouse gas emissions and allow businesses to trade the right to produce them.

"It was a mistake, it was stupid, and I'm sorry," he said.

But he boasted of cutting taxes, tying teachers' pay to performance, and curbing personal injury lawsuits in his Democratic-leaning state. "If we can do it there, we can do it anywhere," Pawlenty said.

Bachmann, a tea party favorite, called for a litany of tax cuts and an end to government bailouts of ailing industries and subsidies of mortgages. She said she would auction Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae "to the highest bidder," starting at 50 cents.

In rapid-fire fashion, Bachmann said she would "zero out" the capital gains tax and alternative minimum tax. She would scrap the U.S. tax code, she said, "and adopt a national consumption tax."

'Let's get rid of what we've got and start over," Bachmann said.

"And I won't rest until Obamacare is finally repealed, and it will happen," she added.

Romney got a jump on his rivals, criticizing Obama's energy policies during an afternoon photo op at a Manchester gas station.

"There's almost no silver bullet to do anything of significance in the country," Romney said after greeting a few people filling their cars at a Manchester gas station. But gas prices depend on current and future supplies and demands, he said.

"And the president's policies have made people very uncertain about the future of the supply of gasoline in this country, because we're not developing our own resources of oil, gas and coal in the way we should," he said.

Industry experts say there's almost nothing a president can do to hold down fuel prices over short periods. Obama says his policy of a balanced emphasis on petroleum production and newer, alternative fuels is the wisest course.

Friday's dinner honored Ovide Lamontagne, a tea party favorite in New Hampshire who unsuccessfully sought the GOP Senate nomination last year.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
(AP) - It sure looked and felt like the Republican presidential contest was under way Friday in the first-primary state of New Hampshire, even if the politicians on stage remained coy about their expe...
(AP) - It sure looked and felt like the Republican presidential contest was under way Friday in the first-primary state of New Hampshire, even if the politicians on stage remained coy about their expe...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 836
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
realpolitic 05:22 PM on 04/30/2011
Republicans love a national consumption tax because it is unfair and falls most heavily on the poor who spend most of their money on basic consumption alone, such as food.  Then they want to greatly reduce taxes, especially on the wealthy, which they can do because they want to get rid of social security, Medicare, and Medicaid. These programs provide income stability and medical care to the elderly,  Read More...
12:24 PM on 05/05/2011
It's so amazing that there are so many people out there that truly believe that 1) if you raise taxes on the poor, and 2) remove taxes on the corporations and filthy rich, that it will result in a booming economy for everyone. I have heard that the next step in the Grand Old Perverts big plan is to remove all funding for economics classes, because a stupid populace plays right into their yard.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AggieReal
Nothing fails like prayer. Do something.
05:37 PM on 05/03/2011
If these guys wait any longer to test the water their big toes will rot off..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I just had to say that.
01:22 PM on 05/02/2011
This is why conservatives never learn from history: they have a neurotic need to repeat it.
11:31 AM on 05/02/2011
The candidates of the republican party all sign a pledge that states they will not raise taxes and will not vote to close the loopholes in the tax laws for corporations. Only George Herbert broke his promise and raised taxes. Does this remind you voters of another "party".....marching their nation to destruction in lock step? I don't think "the people" need to pay more takes...just let the uber rich and corporations pay their fair share and the mess made by the republicans and their rich supporters will be cleared up. Without that happening, we will be just so much waste being flushed down the toilet. Also note that the same corporations that took up St Ronald 's offer and off shored their employee base are now starting to move their workers out of China & India to places where they can pay the workers less and have fewer rules & regs regarding the environment. Not happy with messing up our economy....just moving it around the world to effect global economic failure....then these uber rich people and their businesses can run world slavery and be the fattest cats the world has ever know...and no I am not an extremist...just putting the puzzle pieces in place. Very sad.
10:21 AM on 05/02/2011
Less taxes for business and the wealthy and no regulation. Great.....all the things they put in that led to the largest recession since the great depression, also the result of Republicans in charge. So some bridges fall down and small businesses along the Gulf Coast are devastated by oil spills, they represent BIG BUSINESS.
11:00 AM on 05/02/2011
Thats a well known truth, and for those whom think otherwise, well they just need to have their heads examined
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Martinez
09:01 AM on 05/02/2011
The right wing noise machine has already started...now questioning why the President took so long (9 months) to get Bin Laden. Folks...the right is silent and will not give the President the credit he deserves by being focused, like a laser, on getting Bin Laden...instead they will slowly start the criticism...watch for it in the next couple of days...though it has already started.
08:51 AM on 05/02/2011
De-regulated banks and Wall St. trash the economy, BP trashes the gulf and Japan's nuclear industry irradiates every fish in the Pacific and STILL they de-cry regulation. And you wonder why I can't get behind these people?
photo
rbenjamin
Rule 5 rules
07:56 AM on 05/02/2011
The Presidential landscape just shifted with the death of Bin Laden. A triumph for Obama. How can the GOP noise machine spin that negatively? Not that they won't try.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
07:44 AM on 05/02/2011
"No regulations and no taxes" say the corporate elites spokespeople. I wonder who These right wingnuts represent. Surely not working middle class Americans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NVEnvy07
02:57 AM on 05/02/2011
What a bunch of chumps, I really cannot wait to see them go after each other in the republican primaries though....omg it will be better than celebrity death match!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PAbodysurfer
12:09 AM on 05/02/2011
GOP circus looking more and more like a bust in 2012....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
07:46 AM on 05/02/2011
Only if Americans are lucky.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyI52
12:05 AM on 05/02/2011
They vilify regulations????

They want to go back to love channel days..when companies dumped poison in our waters and caused cancer in families and their children
When the river at Phily burned/
When DDT killed the bird in the fields..
New drugs caused heart failure.
New drugs caused birth defects ( children without legs or arms..
When unsafe cars killed thousands.
When speculation sucked all the money from the savings and loan banks.

When derivatives sucked the money out of the housing markets and put millions out on the street.

When miners died when unsafe coal mines exploded.

When ramped speculation sent this country into a great recession.

When oil companies ran amok in the gulf and caused the greatest environmental disaster on record?

That is what Republicans want??

To go back to those good old days of no government regulations?

If you believe that then you probably drank the cool aid and believe:

You can trust big business.... they are all wise, what is good for business is good for America..... Big business, creates jobs in America? Big business stands with the American worker they would never close 100.000 of factories to move overseas, where labor is so..so much cheaper..

The Republicans have the interests of the middle class , the workers at heart.

You want to go back to those days? Then vote Republicans, Be a fool.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
07:47 AM on 05/02/2011
They want to go back even though it will destroy the planet, knowing that only They will survive....there is no justice!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:59 PM on 05/01/2011
Ron Paul..He never has to apologize for past gaffes...Happens when you are principaled
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
07:49 AM on 05/02/2011
Ron Paul is very principaled and very wrong . His "Libertarian Objectivism" is tantamount to Authoritarian Anarchy. Rule by the richest.
10:10 PM on 05/01/2011
When someone like Pawlenty, apologizes for something he was for, before he was against it, shows me, he has no back bone. That also tells me he is not fit to making Presidential decisions. You make an opinion ,or choice,an you stick with it , not because the base is upset or that it is unpopular with some. Indecisive an second guessing years after it happened shows, pandering on his part. Not a good trait as a leader.
photo
DoctorJohn
Little blue boat in a big red ocean
09:30 PM on 05/01/2011
These so-called presidential hopefuls denounce the regulatory role of government as if the 2008 depresion wasn't caused by the lack of regulatory oversight of Wall Street. To them, its as if nothing happened.