More

Court OKs Federal Funding For Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Stem Cell Funding

First Posted: 05/02/11 01:22 PM ET Updated: 07/02/11 06:12 AM ET

An appeals court ruled on Friday the Obama administration can continue using federal money to fund human embryonic stem cell research, a possible avenue toward new treatments for many medical conditions.

The appeals court overturned a ruling by a federal judge who found that the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines on such research violated the law because embryos were destroyed and it put other researchers working with adult stem cells at a disadvantage to win federal grants.

Opponents of human embryonic stem cell research, including many religious conservatives, argue that it is unacceptable because it destroys human embryos.

Such stem cells come from days-old human embryos and can produce any type of cell in the body. Scientists hope to be able to use them to address spinal cord injuries, cancer, diabetes and diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.

U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth last August blocked the taxpayer funding. His decision was put on hold pending appeal so federal money continued to flow after the White House warned research costing millions of dollars would be lost if halted.

A panel of three judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, all appointed by Republican presidents, voted 2-1 to vacate Lamberth's injunction, saying the challengers were unlikely to win on the merits.

The U.S. law was "ambiguous" and "did not prohibit funding a research project in which an ESC (embryonic stem cell) will be used," the majority opinion said.

"This is a momentous day -- not only for science, but for the hopes of thousands of patients and their families who are relying on NIH-funded scientists to pursue life-saving discoveries and therapies that could come from stem cell research," NIH Director Francis Collins said in a statement.

Shortly after taking office in 2009, President Barack Obama expanded federal funding for research involving human embryonic stem cells in hopes it would lead to cures for diseases.

In a bid to answer critics, Obama directed the NIH to come up with an ethical process for paying for such research, specifically that the embryos come from fertility clinics and were going to be thrown away otherwise.

Since the appeals court ruling was on the injunction Lamberth issued, the focus now turns back to his courtroom where the two sides have been arguing over the specific merits of whether the stem cell guidelines are legal.

The U.S. law on embryonic stem cell research funding prohibits the NIH from funding the creation of human embryos for research or the research in which a human embryo is destroyed, leading the judges to argue over its true intent.

'LINGUISTIC JUJITSU'

Judge Douglas Ginsburg, appointed by President Ronald Reagan, wrote that it was "entirely reasonable" for the NIH to interpret the law as "permitting funding for research using cell lines derived without federal funding, even as it bars funding for the derivation of additional lines."

In a dissenting opinion, Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson, appointed by President George H.W. Bush, said the federal law was clear about banning funding for human embryonic stem cell research and that the court majority was engaging in "linguistic jujitsu" to back it.

The case emerged from two researchers who opposed work with embryonic stem cells and sued to block such funding. They argued that they were at risk of being squeezed out of federal grants for their own work with adult stem cells, which do not involve the destruction of embryos.

The researchers, Dr. James Sherley, a biological engineer at Boston Biomedical Research Institute, and Theresa Deisher, of Washington-based AVM Biotechnology, could appeal the ruling to the full appeals court, a lawyer involved in the case said.

Samuel Casey of the Law of Life Project, an attorney involved in the challenge, said he was disappointed but not surprised by the ruling, and was gratified that it was narrow.

Bernard Siegel, executive director of the Genetics Policy Institute and founder of the Stem Cell Action Coalition, hailed the decision as lifting a cloud of uncertainty over research.

"This case is not over by any stretch but this lifts the cloud temporarily," he told Reuters. "This is still fundamental research that needs to take place before we can advance it fully and translate it into cures. For them to hold it back in 2010, 2011 and on into 2012 would be a travesty for patients."

Gary Rabin, chief executive of Advanced Cell Technology, which is developing treatments for two eye diseases using embryonic stem cells and has gotten approval to begin human clinical trials, praised the ruling.

"You're at the very beginning of what will ultimately be a tidal wave of opportunities within the embryonic stem cell community," he said. "We believe this is the first step for us for ensuring that our cell lines will be fundable by the government."

(Additional reporting by James Vicini and Tabassum Zakaria in Washington and Bill Berkrot in New York, editing by Will Dunham)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 167
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:51 PM on 05/09/2011
TOXICSHOCK, thanks for your polite and thoughtful reply. I was unable to respond below.

You wrote, "Perhaps we misunderst­and one another. Your comment implies that a human zygote is a -living- human."

I do imply that. I don't know what else to call what I was in my first days of life, other than a human. "Zygote" simply refers to a stage of development, much like "adolescent" and "adult."

As far as the "living" part goes, what are we at that stage if not "living." The opposite seems to be "dead," and I know you're not saying that, so I would ask what you are asserting with that choice of words. Thanks.
photo
Peter Baksa
Author - The Point of Power
11:41 AM on 05/06/2011
Thank you ! Allowing intelligent thoughts to manifest in improved life situations is as important as having those intelligent thoughts. Intend declare detach your way to an improved life - The point of power @ amazon.com Barnes and Noble
05:48 PM on 05/04/2011
As a person who dreams of the day when a cure can be found for multiple sclerosis , it is hard to imagine how anyone could question how stem cell research is not a great thing. For over 20 years I have dreamed of a time when my body would stop wasting away, and I can live a life free of pain and know that I will be around to see my grandchildren.
I have had the privilege of working with some of the leading ms specialist in the U.S. First hand, I have seen how far the treatments have come and I know that stem cell is the key to finding a way to reverse the damage done by MS.
photo
Peter Baksa
Author - The Point of Power
11:42 AM on 05/06/2011
Could not agree more - thanks for the post.
03:08 PM on 05/06/2011
Thank you Peter.
05:49 PM on 05/03/2011
"U.S. Government, I'd like to rip apart some living human beings for research that has thus far been completely fruitless. Can I kindly have billions of dollars of taxpayer money to help me? I can? Thanks!"
photo
Franklin1776
Micro-bio rocks! So does Cell-bio!
10:12 PM on 05/03/2011
Of course not. 

1) We don't give out money to kill human beings, but we do give it out to study cells.

2) Based on your previous posts, you'd never score anywhere near what you'd need to get a government grant (with the republican congress the best scientists in the country are competing for 6th percentile these days).  It's doubtful you've even passed high school given the data I've gathered about your scientific prowess.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p c r
Compassionate and Conservative are polar opposites
11:39 PM on 05/03/2011
F&F'ed for pointing out an obvious truth.
06:35 PM on 05/04/2011
Are you telling me the embryo doesn't cease living as part of this process?

Again, wow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p c r
Compassionate and Conservative are polar opposites
11:00 PM on 05/03/2011
Frozen clunmps of cells that haven't even designated what sort of cells they are going to become yet are not people. This is why they are so important for research. These are cells that are never going to be implanted. They will stay in a freezer until they are used for research.
What do you choose? Using cells that aren't even designated as belonging to a specific organ or function yet to possibly cure Parkinson's or regenerate nerves and heal spinal cord injuries or cure leukemia in a living breathing functioning human or letting real people die while these cells sit in a freezer until they degenerate into nothing?
06:34 PM on 05/04/2011
I suppose there is always the path of not making people in dishes, then freezing them for our convenience. But what kind of sick society would we be if we did that?
10:28 PM on 05/04/2011
From below, I think I understand. Not having certain fully developed organs, chosen randomly by you, makes you a non-human being.

Are you religious? Do you think some fairy goddess goes around changing non-human beings into human beings.

Tell you what, find me ONE single biology book that states that non-human beings become human beings by becoming older and bigger. Thanks.
05:50 AM on 05/03/2011
Again the -Liberals- are pulling the wool over the eyes of -Real Americans- buy having a program of stem cell research that never seems to produce actual real successful results with only vague promises of future success. They the scientific community is only interested in building a -Ponzi Scheme- of vague hope to all the human beings that have horrendous incurable diseases. This false hope is causing additional inhuman suffering to people who are given false hope again and again and again, so that the research community can live high and mighty? Just look at the history of the greatest -Ponzi Scheme- of all time and all the additional pain and suffering and experimentation and false hope for millions of human beings with mental illness who have suffered horrendously for the last hundred years in the name of science???
photo
Franklin1776
Micro-bio rocks! So does Cell-bio!
06:56 AM on 05/03/2011
Yeah.  We researchers live a posh life on the high and mighty.  The only person who is high around here is you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DakkonA
www.DisentangledReality.com
08:42 AM on 05/03/2011
*yawn* Next please.
08:49 PM on 05/02/2011
Better than wasting them.
06:48 PM on 05/04/2011
Let's not waste the handicapped, the condemned, or the elderly either. We could do a lot of useful research on them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p c r
Compassionate and Conservative are polar opposites
10:27 PM on 05/04/2011
The handicapped, disabled, the condemned and the elderly are actual living, breathing people. They are capable of independent life, even if they need medical assistance. Their bodies (which these embryos being used for research don't have) are capable of assimilating nutrition and oxygen. They are sentient beings with nervous systems capable of feeling.
It is presumptious of you to lump undesignated clumps of cells in with real people. And I know that you will claim that these clumps are real people, but they are not. They will not be people unless they are allowed to be put in an accepting uterus that will connect them to a "host" that provides oxygen and nutrition until it develops from just a clump of cells into a person. The embrryos in the freezers being used will never be implanted. They will either be trashed or utilized for research that will help living, breathing people.
photo
toxicshock
Sassy, snarky, smart
12:05 PM on 05/06/2011
Fallacy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
firstcougar1
Not what you think . . .
08:04 PM on 05/02/2011
These were all republican appointed judges. Science triumphs over a narrow religious view. Keep religion out of science and out of our government. My religion is my religion and is no one elses business.
08:52 PM on 05/02/2011
This is precisely the advantage of lifetime appointments for the federal judiciary. I'm glad to see the system working so well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jaczar
Humanity above Profit
07:16 PM on 05/02/2011
YES!!!
photo
Franklin1776
Micro-bio rocks! So does Cell-bio!
06:13 PM on 05/02/2011
You walk into a room that's on fire.  There's a crying baby and a great big freezer full of embryos/stem cells.  You have time to save the kid or the freezer.  Which one do you save?
06:58 PM on 05/02/2011
not quite...
A blastocyst in no way shape or form constitutes a "crying baby". Its ok to debate but lets not draw conclusions based on false perceptions. Anyone in their right mind would save the baby... but that isnt what we are talking about here.
photo
Franklin1776
Micro-bio rocks! So does Cell-bio!
09:02 PM on 05/02/2011
Yes, it is.  A baby is a living, breathing, human being...and an embryo is not.  Of course you'd save the baby, it's alive.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jaczar
Humanity above Profit
07:18 PM on 05/02/2011
You save the baby, of course. Silly game you play.
photo
Franklin1776
Micro-bio rocks! So does Cell-bio!
09:02 PM on 05/02/2011
explain that to the people who think that cells are the same thing as .... people.
05:42 PM on 05/02/2011
A person who has a chronic disease will benefit tremendously from this. The last administration put us backwards in research.
I have MS for which there is no cure but stem cells have helped many people with MS. Finally this opens up new possibilities.
06:59 PM on 05/02/2011
The last administration made me want to leave America and join a less archaic, superstitious, and religious society.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
luvobama
Hospice volunteer...
08:13 PM on 05/02/2011
I wish you lots of strength!!!!  Fanned.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
caland
SOCIALISM IS AWESOME
05:21 PM on 05/02/2011
"Aids, Cancer and Alheimers Cure Minutes Afterward"
05:14 PM on 05/02/2011
Why don't I ever here about the promotion of R&D of adult stem cells that are fully developed. Most people when you talk with them never heard that stem cells can be extracted from adults. I thinks the pro abortion group needs something to justify their deeds so they claim that ebryos are the only place where you can get stems cells. Wake up America!
photo
Franklin1776
Micro-bio rocks! So does Cell-bio!
06:09 PM on 05/02/2011
Because somatic stem cells won't help us cure things like Parkinsons, Alzheimers or spinal cord injuries.
Wake up, a cell/embryo is not a person.  The reason I know is that you can't put a person into a vat of liquid nitrogen but you can put an embryo into one. 

P.S.  What's an ebryos?
05:46 PM on 05/03/2011
Is that really your scientific definition of a human being? "An organism that cannot be put into a vat of liquid nitrogen?" What if a researchers discovers a way to put adult human beings into a vat of liquid nitrogen? Would that then make then non-human beings?

Wow. Try opening a junior high biology book sometime.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
EmmaDarian
All in all, I'm loving every rise and fall (RHCP)
06:27 PM on 05/02/2011
Once again, adult stem cells and embryonic stem calls are not interchangeable. They have different advantages and disadvantages.
05:55 PM on 05/03/2011
Right. One big advantage of adult stem cells is that you don't have to kill anyone to get them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:00 PM on 05/02/2011
Finally some common sense is getting through. And from Republican judges no less.Good news.
04:59 PM on 05/02/2011
It's ridiculous that anyone would be against this. Stem cells have the potential to solve most debilitating diseases. Just imagine Christopher Reeves could of walked again before he died and Micheal J Fox could do Back to the Future 4....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:13 PM on 05/02/2011
I believe that Mr. Reeves did experience some mobility before his death due to this work.
05:27 PM on 05/02/2011
The question is so much less than whether stem cell research should happen. Such research has NEVER been outlawed. Bush took a step forward by providing federal funding for embryonic and adult stem cell research. Of course, we only heard that he somehow banned embryonic stem cell research. The question is how the government should involve itself in the research while respecting ethical concerns about creating/destroying life. Obama didn't lift any "ban," he simply changed the process for approving stem cell lines so as to receive federal funding. Any number of lines are still rejected and there are still legal limitations. In the decade or so that private, federal, and state funds have been poured into the research, the results have been less fruitful than hoped. This debate is greatly exaggerated.
photo
Franklin1776
Micro-bio rocks! So does Cell-bio!
06:12 PM on 05/02/2011
Killing embryos/cells is not "destroying life".  It it were, every time you scratched an itch (thus killing a whole lot of skin cells in the process) you'd be considered a serial killer.  Moreover, you can't shove a life into a -80 degree freezer but you can with an embryo.  Obama lifted the ban on the backwards policies of a backwards administration. The rest of your comment is just utter nonsense.  "Less fruitful than hoped"?  Based on what facts?
04:55 PM on 05/02/2011
Adult stem cells are a much more viable option for R&D. This is just another ploy to direct funds to connected insiders.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:04 PM on 05/02/2011
Typical nonsense propagated by Christoholic GOPsters.
05:11 PM on 05/02/2011
No, they're not. If that were true then doing battle with the hysterical zealots is simply a waste of time.
05:17 PM on 05/02/2011
Adult stems cells are NEVER promoted in the media. Ever ask yourself why?