More

'Own The Dodgers' Campaign Underway

Own The Dodgers

2011-04-04-tcmhuffpo.jpg   First Posted: 05/02/11 08:38 PM ET Updated: 07/02/11 06:12 AM ET

A campaign to build support for public ownership of the Los Angeles Dodgers could succeed if Angelenos believe three things - a public bid is in the best financial interest of the team, it is the ultimate expression of Dodger pride, and it is a guaranteed way to prevent the baseball team from ever moving outside of the City of Angels, the man behind the campaign told The City Maven today in an interview.

Stanley Stalford grew up wanting to become president of the Dodgers. While that didn't happen, Stalford's love for the team remained. About eight to nine months ago, he began to formulate a plan that would allow the public to own the team. Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig's decision to appoint a monitor to oversee the Dodgers' operations, which many see as an attempt to get Frank McCourt to sell the team, made now the right time to push the public ownership idea.

"It went from a great idea to actually putting something together a week and a half ago," Stalford said in an interview at his home in Hancock Park. "When the commissioner seized day-to-day management control of the Dodgers, it (became) pretty obvious that the next step is that they're going to dispose of the team."

For Dodger fans, public ownership could mean an upgraded stadium, lower concession prices and cheaper parking, Stalford said. That's because the bid would be a cash purchase, eliminating debt payments. Also, the corporation would be nonprofit.

"Our proposed structure eliminates the profit motivation," he said.

Under the proposal, the Dodgers would be governed by a board of 15 civic leaders, five of whom would be part of an executive committee.

The team is valued at $800 million, according to Forbes. Stock ownership of the team would be done in a manner similar to an initial public offering. Stalford expects a structure like what is in place with the Green Bay Packers. There, more than 4.7 million shares are owned by 111,507 shareholders, with no one person allowed to own more than 200,000 shares, according to the team.

It is expected that a public bid of the Dodgers would include a:

  • Low stock price
  • Required minimum investment
  • Limited number of shares
  • Dividends would not be paid on the shares.

"This is the ultimate expression of fan pride," Stalford said. "This allows Dodger fans to put their money where their mouths are."

The first goal of the "Own the Dodgers" campaign is to get as many fans as possible to sign on as supporters. Stalford and his team hope to use those supporters to show investment firm how serious they are about the bid. The campaign is online at OwnTheDodgers.com, and accounts have been set up on Twitter and Facebook.

Ultimately, ownership of a sports team that is so beloved by fans comes down to trust, Stalford said.

"There is a willful disregard for the public trust that (team owners) buy when they buy the team," Stalford said.

"They don't just get the parking lots and the stadiums and the revenue and the TV rights. They buy all of that good stuff but ... they're buying a level of responsibility for managing a public trust and a public asset, like the Dodgers. The breach of that trust is what is so damaging to Dodger fans and why it's time for us to stand up and say enough is enough."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

A campaign to build support for public ownership of the Los Angeles Dodgers could succeed if Angelenos believe three things - a public bid is in the best financial interest of the team, it is the ulti...
A campaign to build support for public ownership of the Los Angeles Dodgers could succeed if Angelenos believe three things - a public bid is in the best financial interest of the team, it is the ulti...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
06:15 PM on 05/03/2011
L.A. is tightly controlled by Incompetent Crooks who have run the city in BK -- Tony V, Council Prez Garcetti, and their millionaire and billionaire boyfriends are all of the same ilk. As Spiro Agnew said, "Seen one slum, you've seen them all," -- "See Frank McCourt, you've seen all the miscreants."

In addition to not allowing anyone to own more than 100,000 shares, we should exclude anyone is a friend of Tony V, Fat Tommy, Erika G, Hebie We$$on, etc.

With those limitations, Dodger ownership spread throughout the fans is a great idea!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sidplicity
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banan
02:46 PM on 05/03/2011
We all get to pay for Jim Irsay's new stadium colts fans or not. And we didn't get a share or even a free ticket.
02:29 PM on 05/03/2011
The problem is, how do you come up with 1.5 billion or so? The stadium is a dump and needs to be replaced, the parking lot was designed by a drunken sailor, and the team sucks. So 800 million or so for the team, and then another 500 million or so for a new facility. We need to find, um, 150,000 people to each put in 10,000. Count me in, that's one.
12:37 PM on 05/03/2011
I got 5 on it
12:17 PM on 05/03/2011
As long as no tax money is spent, then why not. I don't watch baseball, so I don't really care. But I know the team is important to a lot of people. I'd rather that my tax dollars got towards fixing all the potholes. So again, if private individuals want to invest, then go for it. But absolutely no public money.
VA Jill
Retired RN, Army mom. Bring the troops home!
12:16 PM on 05/03/2011
It's worked well for the Green Bay Packers for many years.
11:59 AM on 05/03/2011
one of the largest media markets and the privates have not managed to take care of business; the guy used the dodgers as his personal piggybank with the fans making the deposits. 
 
Public owned should be pride to the city/county imagine the Dodgers moving... maybe to San Jose; I know the Giants and A's would block.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elbrando
The dream shall never die - Ted Kennedy
09:38 AM on 05/03/2011
The Green Bay Packers are the only team in the NFL that is publicly owned. They would NEVER have been able to stay in Green Bay (a city that has a little over 100,000 people) unless they were publically owned.

I think this should be a new trend in sports. Have ALL of the teams become publically owned.
InLosAngeles
Speaking Truth to Groupthink
08:32 AM on 05/03/2011
It would be a very interesting investment if structured properly, ie in the interest of shareholders, and not simply a novelty investment. It could be run as a non-profit or low profit with perhaps a small distribution. A debt free purchase with a cap on the debt it would be allowed to borrow could be very interesting. Hopefully a structure would be created to avoid easy takeovers, because illiquid, small cap stocks can be "pushed" around by very large investors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
duckie digdoug
05:33 AM on 05/03/2011
dont really care. but if they represent the city, shouldn't they be owned by the city.
02:30 AM on 05/03/2011
As a proud owner of two shares of the Green Bay Packers, I will be awaiting the chance to own a bit of the Dodgers.
photo
jukesgrrl
Stop the Republican war on women's bodies.
03:29 AM on 05/03/2011
I'm afraid the minimum investment for the Dodgers is going to be more than two shares, but I know a lot of sports fans who share your sentiment. Ownership by the fans is in the interest of the fans and would promote civic pride. I wish Angelenos the best with this plan. I have a friend who owned stock in the Boston Celtics for awhile. It turned her into a huge Celtics fan and she still follows the NBA rabidly.
11:27 PM on 05/05/2011
The plan calls for 1,000,000 shares being put aside without the a minimum investment. That means that you could buy one or two shares...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rktboy
Fire this mother up!!
02:01 AM on 05/03/2011
Despite all you nay-sayers poo-pooing the idea, thusfar, I must say, I'm one of those suckers who would LOVE to give a few bucks to own a piece of the Dodgers--particularly if it meant McCourt would leave baseball forever (or even better, buy out the SF Giants).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just walkin the dog here
So, just where is this micro-bio? This it?
01:42 AM on 05/03/2011
What? Are you people like crazy? I don''t give a whomping funt about baseball. So like is the MLS team next? "our team is red hot hot,your team is doddlY squat" Rollerball lives! Simple answer. O.K. how about this, the place hold what 54,000 people? If they each offer $20,000 (average), the could raise $1.0 billion towards buying the team. Let them form like an REI Coop and do that. get tired of it, sell your 1/54,000th share. be part of a select group of 54,000 people that owna team. It could work,
InLosAngeles
Speaking Truth to Groupthink
08:35 AM on 05/03/2011
I'll put you down as a "mostly NO"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just walkin the dog here
So, just where is this micro-bio? This it?
11:58 AM on 05/03/2011
Yeah, I think I'll use my $20,000 to buy the L.A. Galaxy outright.
12:57 AM on 05/03/2011
Who gives a rat's @ss?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cosmiCataclysm
11:36 PM on 05/02/2011
Who gives a F*CK!?