iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Arctic Ice Melting Faster Than Previously Thought: Report

Arctic Ice Melting Sea Levels Climate Change

By KARL RITTER   05/ 3/11 10:59 AM ET   AP

STOCKHOLM -- A new assessment of climate change in the Arctic shows the region's ice and snow are melting faster than previously thought and sharply raises projections of global sea level rise this century.

The report by the international Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program, or AMAP, is one of the most comprehensive updates on climate change in the Arctic, and builds on a similar assessment in 2005.

The full report will be delivered to foreign ministers of the eight Arctic nations next week, but an executive summary including the key findings was obtained by The Associated Press on Tuesday.

It says that Arctic temperatures in the past six years were the highest since measurements began in 1880, and that feedback mechanisms believed to accelerate warming in the climate system have now started kicking in.

It also shatters some of the forecasts made in 2007 by the U.N.'s expert panel on climate change.

The cover of sea ice on the Arctic Ocean, for example, is shrinking faster than projected by the U.N. panel. The level of summer ice coverage has been at or near record lows every year since 2001, AMAP said, predicting that the Arctic Ocean will be nearly ice free in summer within 30-40 years.

AMAP also said the U.N. panel was too conservative in estimating how much sea levels will rise – one of the most closely watched aspects of global warming because of the potentially catastrophic impact on coastal cities and island nations.

The melting of Arctic glaciers and ice caps, including Greenland's massive ice sheet, are projected to help raise global sea levels by 35 to 63 inches (90-160 centimeters) by 2100, AMAP said, though it noted that the estimate was highly uncertain.

That's up from a 2007 projection of 7 to 23 inches (19-59 centimeters) by the U.N. panel, which didn't consider the dynamics of ice caps in the Arctic and Antarctica.

"The observed changes in sea ice on the Arctic Ocean, in the mass of the Greenland ice sheet and Arctic ice caps and glaciers over the past 10 years are dramatic and represent an obvious departure from the long-term patterns," AMAP said in the executive summary.

The organization's main function is to advise the nations surrounding the Arctic – the U.S., Canada, Russia, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Iceland and Finland – on threats to the Arctic environment.

The findings of its report – Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic – will be discussed by some of the scientists who helped compile it at a conference starting Wednesday in the Danish capital, Copenhagen.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

STOCKHOLM -- A new assessment of climate change in the Arctic shows the region's ice and snow are melting faster than previously thought and sharply raises projections of global sea level rise this ce...
STOCKHOLM -- A new assessment of climate change in the Arctic shows the region's ice and snow are melting faster than previously thought and sharply raises projections of global sea level rise this ce...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,985
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (40 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:17 PM on 05/30/2011
Alas, the men who decide to flood the atmosphere with CO2 and other stuff that contributes to global warming will never be hurt by rising waters. Even if two or three of their seaside mansions sink beneath the waves, they'll always have several mountain retreats, including of course a huge one in Switzerland.
Worst case: They lose a few million to unload a doomed coastal mansion. If they notice it, they'll surely take it as a tax write-off -- though only if their usual tax-evasion scam gets noticed by the IRS.
The men who make the decisions to create the crisis will never be among the people who pay the price for those decisions.
Seems like a perfect system...for the winners.
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
09:00 PM on 05/25/2011
Does anyone here have a good grasp of why denialists cling to every twisted contradictory shred of nonsense that they can find to justify their position?

I think that you can have a million references and testimonials from brilliant researchers, and the flat earth denialists will keep coming out of the woodwork of the Heritage Foundation pantry with repetitions of the same twisted distortions to try to cast doubt on reality. If they don't have faulty science in hand, then they use politics and economic mumbo jumbo.

Fear of change? Love of the status quo? Busted BS detectors? Love of conspiracies? Hatred of science? Love of money? Inability to observe? Blind trust in Republican synthetic" information"?
04:47 PM on 05/24/2011
Between 1989 and 1993, U.S. and European climate researchers drilled into the summit of Greenland's ice sheet, obtaining a pair of 3 km (1.9 mi) long ice cores. Analysis of the layering and chemical composition of the cores has provided a revolutionary new record of climate change in the Northern Hemisphere going back about 100,000 years, and illustrated that the world's weather and temperature have often shifted rapidly from one seemingly stable state to another, with worldwide consequences.[40] The glaciers of Greenland are also contributing to a rise in the global sea level at a faster rate than was previously believed.[41] Between 1991 and 2004, monitoring of the weather at one location (Swiss Camp) showed that the average winter temperature had risen almost 6 °C (11 °F).[42] Other research has shown that higher snowfalls from the North Atlantic oscillation caused the interior of the ice cap to thicken by an average of 6 cm or 2.36 in/yr between 1994 and 2005.[43]

cont.
07:15 PM on 05/24/2011
The moderators don't want you to read the rest, but you can find it here; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenland#Geography_and_climate
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
08:18 PM on 07/01/2011
And what are your informed conclusions based upon this research?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nmaddog7
07:00 PM on 05/23/2011
3 legit articles that help show we don't know where AGW may take us yet:http://bit.ly/kwwvsN
From New Scientist,SciAmerican,Nature: trees may grow 500 miles further north, Asia's glaciers aren't in as bad shape as we thought, and Antarctic ice is actual pretty stable.
I know AGW is bad everyone,here are a few positive things we can look at.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael J OConnell
Enduring curiosty and quest for rationality
10:44 PM on 05/21/2011
Just as states and the feds sued the tobacco companies for decades of lying and spreading doubt about the harm their products cause, within this decade we should see law suits against Exxon and other big money players who are doing the same with greenhouse gasses and climate change. Once again some very powerful players are putting profit ahead of humanity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:21 PM on 05/24/2011
If you want to see who's generating green house gases, buy a mirror.
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
08:51 PM on 05/25/2011
What a really intelligent comment.

For a sock puppet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SaveWillowpark
12:28 PM on 06/11/2011
It is typical troll behavior to insult and belittle those who offer intelligent comments and good sources. If you want to disagree fine. Offer an argument that I can read that does not attack the opposing viewpoint please.
09:59 PM on 05/19/2011
Wow. Where to start? Do these people know that sea ice melting does not cause sea level to rise? 90% of an iceberg is under water, right? So ice is 10% lighter than water. When ice melts there is no more water floating above sea level, but the water is 10% denser than the ice was. A cubic meter of ice displaces 0.9 cubic meters of sea water and when it melts a cubic meter of ice makes 0.9 cubic meters of water. Only land based ice melt causes sea level rise. I'd think these "educated" people would be smarter than this.

Aside from that, the actual measured rise in sea level is 7/10ths of an inch per decade, down from 8/10ths in the 1990s. These scare tactics are based on the assumption that sea level rise will increase dramatically when currently the rate is decreasing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
12:31 AM on 05/20/2011
Do you know where icebergs come from? Antarctica & Greenland, which are above the sea level.
So, fill a glass of water all the way to the top, then put an ice cube in it.

"Only land based ice melt causes sea level rise."

Warming of the ocean also causes sea level rise via thermal expansion.

"I'd think these "educated" people would be smarter than this."

:^D They are!

Aside from that, the actual measured rise in sea level is 7/10ths of an inch per decade, down from 8/10ths in the 1990s. These scare tactics are based on the assumption that sea level rise will increase dramatical­ly when currently the rate is decreasing­.

So what the rest of us have to decide is whether to believe thousands of the best scientists on Earth, or a guy running around in his underpants who considers scientific fact "scare tactics." Unsurprisingly, only House Republicans are getting this wrong.
04:16 PM on 05/20/2011
The Arctic Ocean is not covered in ice because of ice bergs falling off Greenland. The Arctic ice is there because even salt water freezes when it gets cold enough. The loss of Arctic ice does not cause sea level to rise.

Yes, thermal expansion does cause sea levels to rise (I never said it didn't).

Don't take my word for the current rate of sea level rise, use your own google. Or just check out Wikipedia; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise - "Current sea level rise has occurred at a mean rate of 1.8 mm per year for the past century,[1][2] and more recently, during the satellite altimetry era of sea level measurement, at rates in the range of 2.9-3.4 ± 0.4-0.6 mm per year from 1993–2010.[3][4][5][6][7] A new assessment suggests that there has been an observed reduction in the prior rate of sea level by 2mm/yr from 2005 (a 60% reduction from the 1993 to 2005 rate) to a level of 1mm/yr.[8]"

For the metrically challenged an inch is 25.4 millimeters (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millimeters), so sea levels rose just over 7 inches in the 20th century. From 1993-2010 it rose at a rate of just under 12 inches per century and now is rising at a rate of just under 4 inches per century. Quick, somebody save the Maldives!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trickish Knave
Both sides suck, but neither will admit it.
04:43 PM on 06/01/2011
"Do you know where icebergs come from? Antarctica
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
08:38 PM on 05/19/2011
You can tell the clowns from the Heartland Institute, but you can't tell them much.

It pains me that they will blend into the woodwork and deny that they ever supported flat earth denialism when their hoax is revealed for what it is.

I wonder if there will be something equivalent to war crimes trials for these monsters in a decade or two?

We shall see.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robco1
07:58 PM on 07/01/2011
Can you say "class-action?"

Astroturfers should take note; the internet leaves a trail. Discovery phase is going to suck -- for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
02:02 PM on 05/19/2011
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110518/ennew_afp/entertainmentfilmfestivalcannesusobamafonda_20110518154556

Peter Fonda calls Obama 'traitor' at Cannes

Wow, another Fonda wing nut!!

Who'd have thunk it??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robco1
09:16 PM on 05/19/2011
Hey, who would have thunk that Inhoff's attack dog Wegman would bite himself? The world is a strange place...

Really, who thinks they can lift text from others word-for-word and pass it off as their own? Falsifying information, distorting information and outright plagiarizing a report to congress? http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2010/11/usa_today_reports_that_wegman.php

Now, who would have thunk that the first piece of peer-reviewed literature produced by Anthony Watts would refute his favorite canard about poorly sited weather stations and urban heat islands? http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Anthony_Watts

Oh, almost forgot...

SourceWatch has some pretty interesting skinny on your friends over at Heartland Institute: "In its 2008 annual report to supporters, Heartland outlines that corporate sponsorships start out at $10,000, with the next rung up being 'silver' sponsors which contribute $25,000, 'gold' sponsors donating $50,000 and 'platinum' sponsors kicking in $100,000."

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Heartland_Institute
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
08:23 PM on 07/01/2011
Racism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
09:46 AM on 05/19/2011
Has "Beijing Jim" Hansen commented on this yet???????

I hope you'll all be going to the upcoming climate conference:--

http://cfact.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=87b74a936c723115dfa298cf3&id=1166304fe8&e=1218aea89f

Restoring the Scientific Method
The Heartland Institute will host its sixth International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC-6) on June 30 and July 1 in Washington, DC at the Marriott Wardman Park. Heartland will be joined in Washington by dozens of think tank cosponsors and hundreds of scientists in an effort to "restore the scientific method" to its rightful place in the debate over the causes, consequences, and implications of climate change.

The theme of the conference, Restoring the Scientific Method, acknowledges the fact that claims of scientific certainty and predictions of climate catastrophes are based on post-normal science, which substitutes claims of consensus for the scientific method. This choice has had terrible consequences for science and society. Abandoning the scientific method led to the Climategate scandal and the errors and abuses of peer review by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The scientists speaking at this conference, and the hundreds more who are expected to attend, are committed to restoring the scientific method. This means abandoning the failed hypothesis of man-made climate change, and using real science and sound economics to improve our understanding of the planet's ever-changing climate.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
11:39 AM on 05/19/2011
And when they cite the Heartland Institute's annual freak-fest of global warming/climate change denial it's a tacit admission that they haven't a grasp of even the basics of the scientific method.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
11:48 AM on 05/19/2011
Let's all sing along..............
"Makin' up data the old hard way,
fudgin' the numbers day by day,
ignorin' the snow and the cold & a downward line,
HIDE THE DECLINE,
HIDE THE DECLINE"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
12:30 PM on 05/19/2011
Come on, precious, tell everyone exactly what declined.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
01:44 PM on 05/19/2011
You again? Don't you ever tire of shi//ing for an institution that is entirely funded by oil companies?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
01:59 PM on 05/19/2011
It never gets old............................
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
07:49 PM on 05/19/2011
And we have tacit admission.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
04:05 PM on 05/16/2011
It took a while, but the flimsy dominoes of climate change denial are starting to fall.

Deep Climate's [ http://deepclimate.org/ ] investigation into the Wegman Report on the "hockey stick" to a cngressional committee and subsequent charges of plagiarism and misconduct against Wegman and coauthor Said, has resulted in the retraction of a paper stemming from the report in the journal Computational Statistics and Data Analysis.

USA Today:
http://www.usatoday.com/weather/climate/globalwarming/2011-05-15-climate-study-plagiarism-Wegman_n.htm
and
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/sciencefair/post/2011/05/retracted-climate-critics-study-panned-by-expert-/1
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
09:49 AM on 05/19/2011
"It took a while, but the flimsy dominoes of climate change denial are starting to fall."
You obviously didn't get the message. AGW is a bust. The Church of Climatology has been outed. No more snake oil for sale.....................
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
01:51 PM on 05/19/2011
Just oil. All hail Exxon!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
11:37 AM on 05/19/2011
When they use phrases like "Church of Climatolog­y" it's a tacit admission that they have no logical rational scientific argument to make.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
01:52 PM on 05/19/2011
This one is through the glass.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
01:29 PM on 05/16/2011
It took a while, but the dominoes of climate change denial are starting to fall.

Remember Deep Climate's http://deepclimate.org/ investigation of the Wegman Report and subsequent charges of plagiarism and misconduct against Wegman and coauthor Said?

It has resulted in the retraction of a paper stemming from the report in the journal Computational Statistics and Data Analysis.

Another one:

http://rabett.blogspot.com/2011/05/rabett-is-always-right.html

The paper Analysis of the impacts of station exposure on the U.S. Historical Climatology Network temperatures and temperature trends, coauthored by a group of climate change deniers including Anthony Watts, John Christy, and Roger Pielke Sr, has shown us what we already know, namely that there is no net "urban heat bias" in the surface station temperature record.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
10:37 AM on 05/16/2011
‘Beijing Jim’ at it again............
I found this one in my old notes. It always brings a smile to my face when I read it.

‘Beijing Jim’ Hansen: Sea Level Rise of Many Metres This Century “Almost Dead Certain”
GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time)

You gotta hand it to the guy, despite almost every single one of his prognostications turning out to be wrong, he doesn’t bat an eyelid but just right on going. And they keep letting him.

The latest escapade from Beijing Jim involves a paper he’s writing which says it’s “almost dead certain” that the sea will rise by a multiple number of metres this century. As Treehugger reports:

“[Business as usual] scenarios result in global warming on the order of 3-6°C. It is this scenario for which we assert that multi-meter sea level rise on the century time scale are not only possible, but almost dead certain.”

That classic scientific definition, "dead certain".

I just can't understand why America isn't buying that snake oil any longer.......LOL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
01:52 PM on 05/19/2011
Why does no one ever fave or fan you? Could it be that you have no credibility?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
01:56 PM on 05/19/2011
That's all you've got Jim Boy?????................ROFLAAUIOGS!!!!
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
11:08 AM on 05/20/2011
So says Baghdad givemtheirwish.
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
09:30 PM on 05/15/2011
"Grampa, why didn't anyone try to stop global warming when you were growing up?"
" Well, they did try, but the evil fossil fuel companies corrupted most of the politicians and spread falsehoods about the climate and about climate scientists. People would repeat things that they were told to repeat and sometimes the things they were told to repeat were lies, and a lot of people started to believe the lies. It was a bad time, with greedy people trying to take everything for themselves with no sense of responsibility or care about future generations. "
10:28 AM on 06/23/2011
Dad, why do we speak Chinese here in Missouri?

Well son, about fifty years ago we decided to listen to some crackpots who assured us that, despite not being able to predict the weather for the next day, they knew that the world would end if we didn't switch to "green" energy and pay more taxes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
08:26 PM on 07/01/2011
The igno.rance of this post is complete. The Chinese have already bought and sold you, dear, and it was to GET your burnables.

Wake up already.
03:20 PM on 05/11/2011
As long as the water covers New york and San Francisco it's a good thing
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
08:16 PM on 05/15/2011
What a perfectly daft, and horrid little comment. You must be inordinately proud of your abject misanthropy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trickish Knave
Both sides suck, but neither will admit it.
10:03 PM on 07/01/2011
Way to give that thesaurus a workout.
01:16 AM on 05/25/2011
The educated folks in San Francisco will be fine RDA as that town is very hilly. I was raised on the Gulf Coast in a town that is flooding a lot more than it used to because of subsidence related to pumping of groundwater. It is the coastal folks in Florida, Alabama, Texas, the Carolinas, Georgia and Mississippi who are in real trouble.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
02:13 PM on 05/10/2011
123000 = 123 x 10^3

123000 = 12.3 x 10^4

123000 = 1.23 x 10^5

Like that, I would say.

Or we could just stop worrying about where the decimal point is and let all the ice melt. That would settle it.