More

NH Bullying Legislation Change Shot Down By Senate

Bullying

KATHY McCORMACK   05/ 4/11 12:37 PM ET   AP

CONCORD, N.H. — New Hampshire's Senate voted unanimously on Wednesday to reject changes to the state's anti-bullying law that received strong support from the House, such as limiting school responsibility in dealing with off-campus incidents.

Senators said the current law is only months old and that schools have just put policies into place to handle bullying. Senators agreed the law needs further study before any changes are made.

Many states have been moving in this direction of extending school involvement to off-campus bullying, but some New Hampshire lawmakers wanted to restrict the boundaries to school grounds. The House passed a bill in March that would remove the off-campus provision and make other changes. The Senate's rejection leaves the measure's future in doubt.

Sen. Molly Kelly, a Senate Education Committee member, described the strong testimony at a recent hearing from students who were bullied and from educators and parents who support the current law. "They were close to begging us to keep the law the way it is," she said.

New Hampshire amended its 10-year-old anti-bullying law last year for the electronic age, now that tools like Facebook and Twitter also present golden opportunities for belittling and bullying. The change also allowed districts to step in "if the conduct interferes with a pupil's educational opportunities or substantially disrupts the orderly operations of the school or school-sponsored activity or event."

Some legislators believe the revised law gives schools too much authority over children. They say once a child leaves school grounds, it's the parent's responsibility to combat bullying.

"Bullying's bad; it's always existed, and nothing we do is going to stop it," said Republican House member Ralph Boehm, the bill's main sponsor and a former Litchfield school board member who said he was bullied as a child in the 1960s. "But the thing is, people do have freedom of speech and the freedom of speech can be mean," he said, so it's unconstitutional for school districts to punish children for what they say or do outside of school.

Sen. James Forsythe, a Republican, said Wednesday there were some provisions in the bill that did strengthen parental rights. However, he noted, no parents testified in favor of them during the hearings.

Nancy Willard, a Eugene, Ore., resident who runs the Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use, providing help with youth risk online issues, noted that courts have given schools the reach to combat off-campus bullying.

"School officials clearly have the authority to respond to any situation – regardless of the geographic origin – if that is causing a substantial disruption at school or making it impossible for another student to receive an education," she said.

All but five states have laws addressing bullying and 29 of them have provisions addressing cyberbullying. Last year, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick signed into a law a bill cracking down on bullying, passed after the suicides of two students believed to be victims of intense harassment, 15-year-old Phoebe Prince of South Hadley and 11-year-old Carl Walker-Hoover of Springfield.

When cyberbullying issues started emerging several years ago, Willard said, school administrators were afraid of the additional liability.

"It appears they are shifting because they know that they have to respond to these off-campus incidents because they sure as heck are going to have an impact at school," she said.

Educators and administrators – many of whom worked to revise New Hampshire's law last year after four teenagers were accused of coercing a special-needs student into getting a tattoo against his will – strongly support keeping the additional authority to fight bullying off school grounds.

Malcolm Smith, a family education and policy specialist at the University of New Hampshire who was part of a team working on the law last year, said research showed a direct link between "what happens at the burger joint, what happens at the skating rink and what happens in the school."

When parents or schools try to deal with bullying issues on their own, he said, they usually don't get resolved.

"It takes a community working together to solve this meanness that we're seeing," he said. "When you look at the data, our kids are becoming meaner than they've ever been before."

When schools want to fight off-campus bullying, it's not their intent to infringe of free speech or expression, said Robert Trestan, a civil rights counsel for the Anti-Defamation League in the East.

But, for example, if a student tweets from a home computer something that threatens the safety or learning ability of another student, he said, schools need to be on top of that.

"Social media is their social scene," he said of schoolchildren.

Rep. Donna Schlachman, a Democrat from Exeter, introduced last year's bill to update the law because of concerns she was hearing from parents and educators about bullying. She characterized the recent House vote approving the changes as "an overgeneralization about parents' rights."

"There's a sense where `We don't want the state telling us as parents how to raise our kids, how to educate our kids, or what our disciplinary rights are,'" she said. "I think it's a misreading of the law that occurred that made people feel schools were overreaching into the rights and privacy of kids and parents."

Boehm's bill would require school district employees or board members who know about an instance of off-campus bullying to tell the school principal, who would then have to bring it up with the parents of both bully and victim within 48 hours.

That provision has some school officials worried that the law revision would actually ratchet up the responsibility of schools.

"Every school board member under the existing law would as a citizen still have the opportunity to report bullying if they observed it," said Dean Eggert, a lawyer who has represented school districts throughout the state. "I'm not sure if the idea of reducing liability for school districts is consistent with imposing a duty on school board members to report bullying. The two seem to be moving in different directions."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

CONCORD, N.H. — New Hampshire's Senate voted unanimously on Wednesday to reject changes to the state's anti-bullying law that received strong support from the House, such as limiting school resp...
CONCORD, N.H. — New Hampshire's Senate voted unanimously on Wednesday to reject changes to the state's anti-bullying law that received strong support from the House, such as limiting school resp...
Filed by Erica Liepmann  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trekie70
Lifelong bibliophile and political junkie
03:06 PM on 05/16/2011
Kudos to the NH Senate for exercising good judgement and rejecting the idea of lessening schools' responsibilities when it comes to bullying. There are too many cases occurring where incidents were reported and the school administration sat on their hands and did nothing.
11:59 AM on 05/05/2011
Contrary to Hlynn's (and others on this forum) assertions, the bullying of Phoebe Prince was carried out loudly and blatantly within the school building. Furthermore, students reported the bullying to school administrators who did nothing. Every single school administrator from the superintendent to the school principle to the vice-principal should be relieved of their positions and their pensions immediately. They betrayed their reponsiblity to one of their students who was being psychologically tortured every day. This was a life and death situation which those adults chose to ignore. Bullying and xenophobia are rampant from elementary school to university levels, and until people like Sharon Chanon Velazquez and her buddies are sent to prison for their crimes, the epidemic will continue.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:28 PM on 05/04/2011
Schools should not be responsible for what happens off-campus! The parents are responsible for that. They are the ones who should be monitoring the use of their own children's whereabouts, actions, and words as well as their phone and computer use since the parents allow the students to have them and usually also pay for the service.

If it's found out at school that student are bullying off-campus, then the parents should be called, go to school, and take care of it. That should be the end of it. It's called parental accountability. And if the parents won't do anything about it, then it should be called criminal harrassment and the police and courts can get involved.

Schools cannot be parents for students. Schools are there to educate, not parent. If someone was bullying/harrassing at a business, no one would say the boss or owner of the business was responsible for the actions of the employees during their private time. Why should schools be held responsible for what students do when they are not at school? And if they're bullying at school, they should be made to leave and get counseling at the parents' expense until the school deems them capable of following school rules so they can return.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
iLdoRight
Encouraging The Rightest Rightness
10:25 PM on 05/07/2011
Good comments! Perhaps first offense for in school bullying could be expulsion until parents come in and apologize to the class.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TeraWatt60
Cogito Ergo Sum
05:08 PM on 05/04/2011
Why am I not surprised that it Republican legislators trying to water down an anti-bullying bill...no you can not raise those entitled little he//ions of yours to belittle and bully others in pursuit of "success" and especially you do not get to let them pick on LGBT kids or others...or YOU get to face the consequences YES!
08:44 AM on 05/05/2011
Schools can't be in charge of what happens off school grounds. Why do you think they should be held responsible for what happens to someone on a Saturday night far away from school?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:27 PM on 05/04/2011
Just more republikons continuing to be as stupid as possible. Someone should clue them that kids have the right to feel safe in their classrooms, school grounds, and to and from school. Teachers, parents, staff, and even police can COOPERATE to make sure that happens.

Bullies do not have the right to destroy the learning environment of other kids. If that's against their "free speech" rights, too damn bad.
08:45 AM on 05/05/2011
This bill isn't crossing out the school environment, it reaches into the non-school life of students which is not their responsibility.