More

Banks Illegally Foreclosed On Dozens Of Military Borrowers, Federal Investigators Say


First Posted: 05/05/11 05:39 PM ET Updated: 07/05/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Two of the nation's largest mortgage firms illegally foreclosed on the homes of "almost 50" active-duty military service members, according to a Thursday report by the Government Accountability Office.

The report does not identify the two mortgage companies. GAO investigators attributed the finding to federal bank regulators, who recently completed a three-month probe into allegations of improper foreclosures carried out by the nation's 14 largest home loan servicers.

The GAO report, which focused on problems in the mortgage industry and the lack of federal oversight, is the first official study to feature a partial tally of military families whose homes have been illegally seized. The 50 or so wrongful foreclosures were discovered during regulators' review of only about 2,800 loans that experienced foreclosure last year.

Millions of other foreclosures in recent years have not been reviewed by regulators. More than 2.8 million homes received a foreclosure filing in 2009, and nearly 2.9 million residences got one last year, according to RealtyTrac, a California-based data provider.

Federal bank supervisors "could not provide a reliable estimate of the number of foreclosures that should not have proceeded," they said in their April report on improper mortgage servicing. Two months earlier, the head of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which oversees national banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, said that only a "small number" of home seizures should not have occurred. The large number of wrongful foreclosures identified by the GAO from such a small sample suggests that the problem could be more widespread.

As foreclosures have surged to record levels, banks and other mortgage firms have been caught ill-equipped to handle the ever-increasing workload, Treasury Department and Federal Reserve officials have repeatedly said. Due to years of under-investment by banks in their mortgage processing operations, regulators and experts have found that shortcuts were taken and procedures were not followed. Homeowners are bearing the brunt of these decisions.

Improper mortgage practices affecting military borrowers are "perhaps the most egregious cases," wrote five Democratic lawmakers in a joint letter Thursday to bank regulators.

"The idea of wrongfully forcing service members’ families from their homes while their loved ones are risking their lives to protect our country is not only unconscionable, it’s illegal," said Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), one of the co-signers, in an emailed statement.

Members of the armed forces on active duty are covered by the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, a law designed to protect them from financial distress. The legislation restricts foreclosure of properties owned by active-duty members of the military. Violations are handled by the Justice Department's civil division.

The Justice Department has reportedly said it's investigating allegations of improper foreclosures on service members that were commenced by mortgage subsidiaries of Morgan Stanley and Deutsche Bank AG, two of the world's largest banks. Bank of America recently announced it would change the way it handles military borrowers.

A 50-state coalition of attorneys general and bank supervisors along with the Obama administration are also in talks with the nation's five largest mortgage firms -- Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial -- to resolve allegations of wrongful foreclosures and improper mortgage practices. Fines could reach up to $30 billion, according to people familiar with the matter.

JPMorgan Chase disclosed in February that it had improperly foreclosed on the homes of 18 military families. Stephanie Mudick, an official at the nation's second-largest bank by assets, told a House panel that the lender had either rescinded the foreclosure sale or reached a settlement for 12 of those military borrowers, and was working through the rest.

The firm's mistakes were a "painful aberration," Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan's chairman and chief executive, said in a February statement. In April, the bank agreed to pay $56 million to settle claims of improper mortgage practices when dealing with military borrowers.

On Thursday, JPMorgan spokesman Tim Keefe said that the bank had found additional cases of military families whose homes were illegally seized. Although he did not specify the exact number, a separate JPMorgan official said the total was less than 30. Keefe said the bank had committed to providing new homes and full forgiveness of any mortgage debt owed to the lender for these borrowers.

By taking shortcuts in processing troubled borrowers' home loans, the nation's five largest mortgage firms have saved more than $20 billion since the housing crisis began in 2007, according to a confidential presentation prepared for state attorneys general by the nascent Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection inside the Treasury Department and obtained by The Huffington Post in March.

In February, Holly Petraeus, who leads the bureau's unit overseeing military borrowers, sent a letter to the chief executives of the nation's 25 largest banks urging them to follow the law when it comes to dealing with service members.

"I appreciate your assistance in ensuring that your bank does not overlook its obligations -– legal and otherwise -– to your military customers," wrote Petraeus, whose husband, David, leads U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Two of the nation's largest mortgage firms illegally foreclosed on the homes of "almost 50" active-duty military service members, according to a Thursday report by the Government Account...
WASHINGTON -- Two of the nation's largest mortgage firms illegally foreclosed on the homes of "almost 50" active-duty military service members, according to a Thursday report by the Government Account...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,514
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (63 total)
  1 of 8  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Carolab 02:48 AM on 05/06/2011
Ibanez Aftermath: SJC Hears Arguments In Important Faulty Foreclosure Transfer Case
May 2, 2011

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard  Read More...
01:28 AM on 05/09/2011
Because they insist on foreclosing" They lose example : 1500 X 24 months = $36,000, they pay 2 years of Property Tax payments, approx. $5000. Pay their employess, to process the paperwork, for 2 yrs. $$$$$?
Maintenance fees.$$$$ Vandalism Repairs$$$$....... Then sell the home for half of what the original buyer would have agreed to.
makes no sense.
01:47 PM on 05/12/2011
Talbott's group Financial Services Roundtable,ha spent $5.1 million on lobbying sofar in 2009These recent http://t.co/HCNYLLd via @CNNMoney
01:18 AM on 05/09/2011
Along with Many Months of Missed loan Payments. How can this help anyone. The Banks want it 1 way, Theirs.
01:17 AM on 05/09/2011
I cant see how it Benefits the Bank, When they WONT work out a Deal, with the Borrower at its PRESENT VALUE.
I know they signed on the dotted line. But this has affected the WORLD........

I have seen MANY FORECLOSED HOMES, the bank has to now pay to clean it up, or keep it cleaned up..... Then when it FINALLY does sale, its for Much less than What the Original Borrower would have Given them!
photo
fam3d2008
The bigger the government-the smaller the citizen!
10:15 AM on 05/08/2011
Wow- 4.7 million people defaulted on mortgage payments and banks are receiving the criticism. I'm not surprised on the spin of this article. "Almost 50 " military homeowners didn't have their paperwork "properly " processed. Let's just do some math exercises.....4,000,000 people default on an average mortgage of $100,000 ( a conservative number-pardon the pun) yielding non-payments to banks equaling $$47,000,000,000. That's $47 Billion dollars in losses that banks and lenders would have had to swallow without foreclosures. To try and recoup losses. banks would be forced to close, people in those banks would lose their jobs, the economy would be further damaged and our court system would become clogged with squatters trying to invoke legal rights to unowned homes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kimberly Hasler
TGIF...thank God I'm a Female
08:19 PM on 05/08/2011
@fam
You don't get it do you? 4.7 million people defaulted on mortgage payments Because these wonderful banks got involved in Preditory Lending, and that whole fiasco that tore the financial fibers to shreds for millions of people including homeowners, businesses, corporations etc. We see and feel it all around us. When people lost their Jobs because their employer had to shut down, that scenario was repeated millions of times. BECAUSE OF GREEDY BANKS. I am one of those whom is about to lose my home because my husband lost a Damn good job. they decided it would be cheaper to go over sea's and have another country do their product. Sound Familar?? People arn't asking banks to swallow lanything, home owners are asking banks to WORK OUT A SOLUTION. After all, it certainly wasn't homeowner's fault this whole mess happened, Bank's sure don't want to take the blame, so comprimise. Help people stay in their homes at whatever cost...if that means bringing down the price of the home, or making interest rates a 1%, so be it. People like you seem to think most morgatgee's are taking advantage of the situation. Of course there are, there usually are in most problems like this, but the majority are willing cooperative homeowners that are trying there best to keep their home, and keep the Banks happy. We can have the best of both worlds if Banks just take the time to look into it.,
photo
fam3d2008
The bigger the government-the smaller the citizen!
08:42 PM on 05/08/2011
Exactly what is predatory lending? Did banks and fannie and freddy just kick in the door to peoples apartments and put a gun to their head to sign a mortgage agreement? Don't people take the time to read a 30 year agreement before they sign it? if they don't understand what they are signing-they should go to a lawyer or legal aid and make sure they know what they are doing. In addition- the people in Government who " persuaded" banks, fannie and freddie to lower the financial requirements necessary to get mortgage approval had a great deal to do with the whole mess. Why does no one go after them? When this whole mortgage mess erupted- banks had already borrowed from the fed at a rate of 4% to issue mortgages at 5%. If 1 mortgage goes under- 4 more mortgages will now yield 0 profit. financial institutions have a fiscal responsibility to their shareholders as well as various requirements by law to maintain cash reserves as well as show good judgement in lending. So they did the only thing they could do- sold the mortgages to 3rd parties who would flip them quickly to a 4 th party, etc. This is what caused mortgages to become worthless and mortgage holders to be unsympathetic to the plight of homeowners. . I am truly sorry to hear of your plight- and i wish you well.
06:13 PM on 05/07/2011
I was initially against a foreclosure freeze...now I am for one. Here is why. The BIG BANKS, especially BANK OF AMERICA, are dragging their feet on a settlement with the AG's. A foreclosure freeze should be in effect until a settlement is agreed to. Otherwise, the banks, especially Bank of America, will drag this process out. Meanwhile we now know fraudulent foreclosures were not only caught in the process, but also were effectuated. This is not only a travesty...it's a CRIME. Will Eric Holder ever prosecute these banks? Or is it hands off?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vikingway2deal
05:41 PM on 05/07/2011
I believe the GAO is spot on with it's assessment that improper foreclosures is more widespread. If banks saved 20 billion by cutting corners in foreclosing on people's homes the then the $56 million settlement for Chase is a really low dollar figure for them to pay. Why are there any settlements with any of the banks until a full invention has been bright to bear by the Feds to determine no only how many military families were swindled out of the homes but all the other non-military families that were fleeced out of their homes.
01:51 PM on 05/07/2011
SEAL Team 6's next mission is to go after the people propagating this travesty

Capture is optional
12:39 PM on 05/07/2011
Is this how we treat the very people who are putting their lives on the line for us citizens back home who are sleeping under their watch. It burns me up when I see or hear about those people out there screwing other people over one way or another. What if shoe was on the other foot, how would you like it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JLeamer
Leamer is a former journalist/broadcaster statione
02:52 PM on 05/06/2011
My Mother used to say; "The Love of money is the root of all evil"...This greed comes pretty close to making that a true statement.
09:46 AM on 05/07/2011
Your mother got that saying from the Bible...it is an exact quote.
11:59 AM on 05/07/2011
and his/her Mother is exactly right. That good ole Bible is right once again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gilruth8441
12:38 PM on 05/07/2011
its not america the free anymore, its the american greed
photo
mykittywinks
You get what you get here...
02:44 PM on 05/06/2011
Jail the leftist bankers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jonathon Grace
The only gay agenda I have is to live well.
02:53 PM on 05/06/2011
What in the world is a "leftist" banker?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gilruth8441
12:40 PM on 05/07/2011
hey jonathon ithinka leftest banker is a bank that hires only left handed people. lol im just like you never heard of that before
05:01 PM on 05/06/2011
Ya know, you can only stretch stupidity so far..... Your rubber band just broke.
02:42 PM on 05/06/2011
In my opinion, Geitner should have never been appointed. It was one of the first mistakes the Obama administration made by doing so.

Lets face it, the Fed is loaded with the same people who brought us this financial mess we are in. To think or believe they would be the people to rectify the situation is patently absurd. The only way we can resolve our financial mess is to bring people in from outside the cabal of financiers who constantly scratch each others backs. Will never happen though as they are so well entrenched in our financial/political system, it would be impossible to do so. The end result is financial chaos.

One of the first things our Congress should do, break up the five largest banks in the US. Next and if possible, take all of the under performing mortgages from these five banks and divvy them up equally among the new banks created and all banks. Just like an insurance company, the risk is spread among many as opposed to a few. Get rid of the government backed deal on under performing mortgages that encourages banks to foreclose. Compel the banks to provide mortgages to qualified borrowers as a percentage of their total assets...if the banks fail to do so, no tax breaks. Return commercial banks to their previous status regarding loans and mortgages. The bank cannot bundle and resell more than say 50% of the mortgages they make.

Only way to save our banking system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gilruth8441
12:48 PM on 05/07/2011
banks not the only mortgage lenders in this country. there are mortgage companies that lend money on anything. they are called speculatirs or investment loan companies. until we get rid of this democratic office holders then things are onluy going to get worse
03:28 PM on 05/07/2011
I agree, but we only have so many words in a post here. Frankly, I would get rid of all of the loan originators and speculators. One way to reduce specualtion with the exception being a multi-family home with renters, if you don't reside in the home you purchase, you cannot deduct any of the interest costs or business costs associated with a purchase.

On a local/state level, if the house is a non-residence, you pay a higher property transfer tax if applicable in local of the purchase.

Also, no state tax benefits for a spec purchase.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vikingway2deal
01:55 PM on 05/07/2011
This would be a good start. I think Paul Krugman should be head of the US Treasury. He has a good moral compass, advocates for middle class and poor and has won a Nobel Prize in Economics.
03:22 PM on 05/07/2011
A good choice, but he would never make it through confirmation. The Republicans in the Senate would go apoplectic. Too bad as he would probably do a good job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mspat44417
Rock it if ya got it...Music
02:17 PM on 05/06/2011
I use to say " I can't believe " what some companies do..But now with out A blink I believe the awful things companies are doing on a regular basis like this..I mean really foreclose on their homes..When will the greed stop in this country...The only reason the government is looking into it is probably because someone is putting the pressure on them...I really do feel that the government really doesn't care about us regular Americans any more..Its all about who has money.. As sad as that is...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gilruth8441
12:50 PM on 05/07/2011
you right mspat. we nothing but a country of greed. opbama letting all big business screw us. we the land of greed and its catching up on us
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vikingway2deal
02:10 PM on 05/07/2011
Banks have be lying to and cheating their customers for generations. My personal policy in dealing with banks now is to challenge their excessive fees, use only my bank's ATM or McDonald's 99 cents fee ATM. If a bank is charging me inappropiate fees I bring it to their attention to give them an opportunity to correct it. If they refuse I file a formal complaint with the US banking regulators. Too many customer complaints for a bank
is not good for the bank. Banks are happy to resolve your complaint once you mention filing a complaint with the banking regulators, others are dense enough to wait for a letter from the bank regulators regarding your formal complaint.
02:09 PM on 05/06/2011
At the outset, knowledgeable voices called for the termination of Secretary of the Treasurer, Timothy Geitner, clearly a ."Wall Street" kind of guy. Egregious conduct of financial institutions continues unabated;no restrictions were placed nor enforced on those villains of the financial tsunami in the first place that $dollars supplied for their support were to be recycled into the economy; instead they plowed the funding into more profit generation for their own gain.

WELLS FARGO has protected misconduct in an environment of a "slaughterhouse," whether in abuses by those in handling and processing of loan modifications on a dual track with foreclosures, or ordinary conduct of "business" with PLATINUM VISA and MASTER CARD consumers/customers.

In terms of foreclosures and modifications, repeated losses of required documentation submitted by borowers left victims bruised and battered; properties "fell" into foreclosure, blamed on default of borrowers; no recourse?.

Experienced managers were replaced with "supervisors" unlikely to hold a GED much less facile in basic business law in disputes of charges after product misrepresentation by PLATINUM card holders with excellent credit and prior banking relationships; phone and writtten communications futile; "supervisors" have no "managers;" "managers" do not take calls.

In once case of clear misrepresentation, denial by the merchant was acceptable as was his extension of "store credit" over one year (cash flow provided by the customer) after such abuse forcing filing of the dispute, noticed by an unsigned form letter threatening a derogatory report to Credit Bureau(s) were his charges not paid.
03:42 PM on 05/06/2011
could you please write in a coherent manner?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gilruth8441
12:52 PM on 05/07/2011
lol he talks just like a politician mfgarrison
02:00 PM on 05/06/2011
Comerica Bank, Bank of America, and other listed with the story, have been taking short cuts. The GAO also needs to look at morgage brokers as well as banks. I am willing to bet the number of illegal foreclosed homes is 100 times higher then this story lists as being found.
It is sad the the US Goverment is just now looking into this. Once again they are behind the curve.
01:58 PM on 05/06/2011
Chase Bank are disgusting thieves