More

Federal Reserve Prepared To Fight Inflation, Just Not Yet, Official Says

Fight Inflation

First Posted: 05/05/11 09:24 AM ET Updated: 07/05/11 06:12 AM ET

LAS CRUCES, New Mexico (Pedro Nicolaci da Costa) - Inflation remains well under control, despite the spike in oil prices, but the Federal Reserve stands ready to raise interest rates if price pressures appear to be getting out of hand, top Fed officials said on Wednesday.

John Williams, in his first speech as president of the San Francisco Fed, argued that the recent spike in commodity costs will likely be transitory.

"The economy today faces many pitfalls, but I don't believe that runaway inflation is one of them," Williams said, adding that he would not prejudge a possible need for additional bond purchases in the future.

In response to evidence of economic weakness last summer, the U.S. central bank in November announced it would buy some $600 billion in Treasury bonds in an effort to keep long-term borrowing costs low and support the recovery.

In some of the first public speeches by Fed officials since a policy meeting April 26-27 at which the central bank said it would complete those purchases on schedule by the end of June, policy makers who spoke on Wednesday explained why they are in no rush to pull back ultra-loose monetary policy soon.

Eric Rosengren, the dovish president of the Boston Fed, who is a voter this year on the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee, struck much the same note as Williams, saying a return to 1970s-style inflation was not likely.

He said tame wage growth and high unemployment are helping cushion some of the inflationary impact of higher food and energy costs, by keeping consumer inflation expectations under control.

A rise in inflation expectations can be self-fulfilling if it leads workers to demand higher wages.

But with high unemployment, workers have little power to demand higher wages because they can easily be replaced.

JOB MARKET HEALING SLOWLY

Another U.S. central bank official, Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart, saw steady but modest job growth of about 200,000 jobs per month through the rest of this year after a slow spell.

"It may take three years before the size of the nation's work force reaches prerecessionary levels," he said in a speech in Atlanta.

The U.S. Labor Department will report figures for April nonfarm payrolls on Friday. Economists expect that 186,000 jobs were added in April, according to a Reuters poll.

Rosengren said increases in overall U.S. inflation due to supply shocks since the mid-1980s have generally been temporary, a pattern that should play out again.

"We should expect the impact on inflation to be transitory -- and that total inflation will converge back to core inflation, which remains well below 2 percent," he said.

The U.S. consumer price index jumped 2.7 percent in the year to March. But so-called core CPI, which excludes more volatile food and energy costs and is a gauge of underlying price trends, climbed just 1.2 percent. The Fed's informal target is 2 percent.

Not all Fed officials are equally sanguine about inflation. Richard Fisher, the Dallas Fed's hawkish president and also an FOMC voter this year, cited worries about rising prices.

"The headline (inflation) numbers have gotten a little stout," he told reporters after a speech. "We have to carefully monitor" how inflation expectations evolve.

Still, he stopped well short of calling for near-term interest rate hikes.

And Lockhart, of the Atlanta Fed, said no tightening of monetary policy is imminent.

"It's a bit premature now to anticipate it's going to happen right away," he said.

The sequence and pace of steps that the Fed takes when it is time to reverse its easy money policy will depend on economic conditions at the time, Lockhart added.

READY TO FIGHT INFLATION

If inflation does begin to act up, officials said the Fed has both the tools and the will to attack price threats by bringing up interest rates quickly.

"I am committed to responding decisively, and as forcefully as necessary," the Boston Fed's Rosengren said, "to ensure that long-term inflation expectations remain stable and that food and energy prices are not passing through to other prices."

In response to the worst recession in generations, the Fed slashed official borrowing costs to effectively zero and implemented an array of unorthodox lending facilities to heal frozen credit markets. Many of those measures have been shuttered as market conditions improved, but the controversial buying of assets to keep down long-term rates has continued.

"Should it prove necessary to counter inflationary pressures, I will be among the first to advocate the unwinding of some of the stimulus we have provided," Fisher said.

Fisher cited a rebound in manufacturing and capital goods orders as not only a positive short-term indicator of economic momentum but also potentially a sign that the U.S. economy was finally moving away from an overreliance on consumer spending.

"They are harbingers of needed rebalancing," he said.

(Additional reporting by Ros Krasny in Boston, Ann Saphir in Los Angeles, and Joe Rauch in Atlanta; additional writing by Mark Felsenthal; Editing by Leslie Adler)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
LAS CRUCES, New Mexico (Pedro Nicolaci da Costa) - Inflation remains well under control, despite the spike in oil prices, but the Federal Reserve stands ready to raise interest rates if price pres...
LAS CRUCES, New Mexico (Pedro Nicolaci da Costa) - Inflation remains well under control, despite the spike in oil prices, but the Federal Reserve stands ready to raise interest rates if price pres...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 64
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
mrclark
I search for the America I believed in as a boy.
04:11 PM on 05/06/2011
Having read this column, I found Mr. Rosengren's statement that he did not feel that inflation was a problem as long as there was so many unemployed to drive down wages to be revealing. The FED doesn't care about unemployment or the working or middle classes; as they serve the interests of Wall Street and the big banks. Inflation is not a problem as long as it is hurting average American's, but if it threatens higher wages or corporate profits they will step forward to tame inflation at that point. We have a system of corruption that protects corporations and the wealthier class of people at the rest of our costs. It is truly sad when so many people who are smart people are too stupid to realize that class warfare has been ongoing for the last thirty due to an idiotic ideology that the wealthy have earned their money. Quite often they made their money with shenanigans like what happened at the FED over the last four years when they shifted the cost of Wall Street's failure onto the middle and working classes by devaluing our dollar while loaning it to save companies that should have failed.
photo
Kansiov
Just a Pragmatist
01:33 AM on 05/06/2011
Core inflation is still weak. There isn't a point to pull the plug when there is nothing much you can deal with through monetary policy.
photo
fireart
I got mine the hard way.
07:57 PM on 05/05/2011
A smart man who surrounds himself with idiots will fail.
photo
fireart
I got mine the hard way.
07:51 PM on 05/05/2011
Inflation is at 10%. It is hidden by schueing the index. Buy the time they figure this out and it becomes public it will be 15%. Carter years of Christmas past.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnjam101
09:26 PM on 05/05/2011
The debt ceiling-they raised it 7 times under Bush. They are responsible
for the debt and now don't want to pay the bill. Here's the breakdown on the debt and deficit and who it belongs to:

96% of current Deficit Spending Comes from BUSH PROGRAMS:

National Debt Increased by 75% under Bush:

2001 - $5.871 trillion
2008 - $10.640 trillion

National Debt Increased 25% Under Obama:

Jan 31st 2009 = $10.569-Tr­­illion
Jan 31st 2011 = $14.131-Tr­­illion

But of the $3.56-tril­­lion increase, 98% was carry over from Bush programs:

Bush: $910-billi­­on = Interest on Debt 2009/2011
Bush: $360-billi­­on = Iraq War Spending 2009/2011
Bush: $319-billi­­on = TARP/Bailo­­ut Balance from 2008 (as of May 2010)
Bush: $419-billi­­on = Bush Recession Caused Drop in taxes
Bush: $190-billi­­on = Bush Medicare Drug Program 2009/2011
Bush: $211-billi­­on = Bush Meicare Part-D 2009/2011
Bush: $771-billi­­on = Bush Tax Cuts 2009/2011

Bush's contributi­­ons:

2001 to 2008: $4.769-tri­­llion
2009 to 2010: $3.181-tri­­llion

Total: $7.950-tri­­llion

Increase Since 2001 = $14.131 - $5.871 = $8.26-Tril­­lion

Bush's contributi­­on: $7.950-tri­­llion / $8.26-Tril­­lion = 96%

Obama only contributi­­on: $580-billi­­on = Stimulus Spending (as of Dec 2010).

Increase caused By Bush's Programs: 96%
Increase caused by Obama's Programs: 4%
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neolow
was a democrat now a liberal
07:20 PM on 05/05/2011
The modified free-market economic policy that the Fed is following might be central to the US economic problems. Check out:
http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/
http://agonist.org/bolo/20100426/modern_monetary_theory_an_overview
Addressing the basis of our money management policies that controls income disparity, jobs, investments, and more is scary. And one thing I can say about our government, is that they like taking the easy way out. When the Repubs came in talking deficits, the Dems were relieved. Now they could fight over trivialities.
05:44 PM on 05/05/2011
Continuing the present course is like driving the country over a cliff. Inflation is already here. Basic necessities have all risen dramatically in the last two years. How can they make up numbers and expect us to believe them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnjam101
09:37 PM on 05/05/2011
try these numbers
By focusing only on the wealth of the top 1 percent of households versus 100 percent of us, the true picture is lost.

As reported by G. William Domhoff*, in 2007, U.S. net worth and financial distribution was:

Top 1 percent of households possessed: 35% of net worth (43% of financial wealth)

Top 5 percent of households possessed: 62% of net worth (72% of financial wealth)

Top 10 percent of households possessed: 73% of net worth (83% of financial wealth)

Top 20 percent of households possessed: 85% of net worth (93% of financial wealth)

It should be clear from the data above that the remaining 80% of households are left with just 15% of the total net worth (or just 7% of the total financial wealth) of this country.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:33 PM on 05/05/2011
There's still too much easy money flowing into the pocketbooks of the wealthy to stop now. We'll deal with the problems of the proletariat when and if it's absolutely necessary.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fineartgalaxy
Speaking from the heart, always.
01:34 PM on 05/05/2011
"Inflation is well under control". It just does not fell like it is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
02:54 PM on 05/05/2011
Correct, on both accounts.  Overall inflation is under control, but increases in the cost of gasoline, home heating oil, and certain foods are felt most severely by the "least wealthy" among us.  We know the causes of inflation in oil and foods are not a result of monetary policy, and therefore not the type of inflation the Fed can influence through monetary policy.  Speculation in oil markets has likely created an oil-price bubble that could burst if people just use less fuel to meet their needs.  Food prices are a completely different problem because extreme weather conditions globally have reduced food supply, and demand for food is "inelastic," (meaning the demand is not significantly affected by prices). 
 
Of course, with one in three Americans now obese, perhaps there is something they could do to influence the demand side of food prices.  If it's not obvious, I would only post such a remark because I am formerly obese.  :-)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anonymous67
01:14 PM on 05/05/2011
The problem is the Fed's stimulus is NOT making it into the general economy -- rather it's being hoarded by Wall Street. They are buying Treasuries and speculating in stocks, oil, food other commodities. And despite their excuses and protests -- they are NOT MAKING LOANS for small and medium sized business and individuals.

Look at ALL the facts and it is clear this IS EXACTLY what is happening. And why their is still no job growth and Main Street is again on the verge of collapses in the face of runaway commodity speculation. Even as the party on Wall Street rages on.

The Federal Reserve NEEDS to remove stimulus from the Wall Street to collapse the wide-ranging speculative bubbles. AND provide DIRECT stimulus that will reach the balance of the American economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OSCPJ
Want it? Work 4 it. No 1 has ever drown in sweat.
01:36 PM on 05/05/2011
Get over the politics.  Ben and everyone else knew that the money would not go to the economy.  It was never meant to.  It was a pure decision to make the banks healthy and empower the FED.  It has nothing to do with Greedy Wall Street.  Greedy Wall Street was given the money by the FED.  The FED kept the rates low. 
 
You do realize if they don't buy UST, we can't function as a country because we spend so much more than we make. 
 
You need to realize outside your narrow political ideas that the banks don't have to loan to anyone.  They are going to do what makes money.  That keeps them in business.  Politically agreeing or disagreeing with doesn't matter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AcademicFreedom
Often banned; always factual
03:09 PM on 05/05/2011
After Madoff and Fuld had no money someone has to support the UES temples; so, get the money to Wallstein Street and it will flow during shaboos.
12:57 PM on 05/05/2011
Wow this is a tough crowd.
12:56 PM on 05/05/2011
The Fed is addicted to quantitative easing. The precious metals and oil markets are anticipating the end of QEII so are selling off hard. Just a little taste of what one can expect for the equity markets should QE stop and the zero interest rate policy comes to a permanent end. While QEII will come to an end in June, QEIII will not be far behind. It is unclear how the Fed can exit QE without triggering a problem in the economy and markets. One thing they could do is quite paying interest on deposits at the Fed. Then there would be no reason for banks to hoard cash. Then they just might lend more.
http://www.TheAngryGrapes.Com
12:04 PM on 05/05/2011
Fed should be abolished or tightly regulated. The little secret they don't want you to know. Deflation is good for lower and middle class. Inflation is good for the rich.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fineartgalaxy
Speaking from the heart, always.
01:37 PM on 05/05/2011
The Fed has been a best friend to WS. It's time to do away with it. Forever. And please, please, we can do all the numbers and past performances analysis we want it is just not working any more. It is the past. Good bye, gone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OSCPJ
Want it? Work 4 it. No 1 has ever drown in sweat.
01:42 PM on 05/05/2011
I would agree.  I would state that when anyone talks about "Deflation" one has to ask is it good for new job seekers or things you need to buy.  Comparing it to Big Screen TVs or IPads doesn't make sense.
 
You will not see deflaiton in food, housing, energy and possibly vehicles.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
doneflyin
my micro-bio isn't
12:01 PM on 05/05/2011
I guess they're going to wait until we go to the store with our wallpaper money in wheel barrels.
I swear these Fed people don't eat, don't buy gas, and don't have any energy needs for their houses.
That or they are so well heeled they don't have a clue as to the costs of simple living for the average folk.
12:44 PM on 05/05/2011
Jobs are more important than inflation at the moment
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
doneflyin
my micro-bio isn't
01:22 PM on 05/05/2011
Low interest rates contribute to job loss. There are millions of savers like me who must limit their spending due to low interest rates. You have to preserve your seed capital so there is only so much you can spend a year or you start eating up that capital. Once you spend it, you don't get it back. And the stock market, even bonds are way to risky for older savers.

The main reason for these low interest rates has been to save the financial interests who, because of their reckless gambling, destroyed the capital markets.
Savers are now being penalized for this destructive and irresponsible behavior.

To add insult to injury, these big banks won't loan the money to businesses which would create jobs. They just go to the open Fed window, borrow money for free and buy government bonds to hoard in their accounts to make it appear the they are solvent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fineartgalaxy
Speaking from the heart, always.
01:38 PM on 05/05/2011
But inflation benefits the rich. The rich do not need jobs, they need inflated prices.
10:56 AM on 05/05/2011
More lies. Inflation is why gas,, gold,, milk and cereal cost so much. As you print more and more phony dollars each one is less valuable and it takes more to buy things that do have value. I keep just enough US dollars to pay my monthly bills. Obama is flooding the world with dollars to pay for wasteful welfare programs.
12:07 PM on 05/05/2011
They're essentially buying down their own debt while evaporating the citizens savings accounts.... When will people get a clue... Nice post!
12:46 PM on 05/05/2011
Actually they're increasing the money supply in order to keep the economy moving, cutting off the supply would only result in an economic decline
10:41 AM on 05/05/2011
Turn off the printers!
12:08 PM on 05/05/2011
Why? Obama just got OBL! He must know what he's doing! (LOL)
12:47 PM on 05/05/2011
We always print money, every year, that's the point of having your own currency

We are increasing the money supply to keep the economy going and interest rates low, a necessity if you want to see unemployment decline this century
01:32 PM on 05/05/2011
Where did you take the test for your GED? You clearly do not understand inflation and what causes it.
11:20 AM on 05/06/2011
Wow is there someone who is more clueless about economics than this commenter?

Wake up, both parties pursue inflationary policies and inflationary policies benefit the rich and wall street. This will not fix the economy.

The only politician who understands this is Ron Paul. It will be too late once those who cling to Obama actually recognize the realities here. Enjoy $10 gas.