iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gary Johnson: 'We Got Osama Bin Laden, Let's Get Out Of Afghanistan'

Gary Johnson Afghanistan

First Posted: 05/05/11 08:21 PM ET Updated: 07/05/11 06:12 AM ET

GREENVILLE, S.C. -- Former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson said ahead of the debate tonight that the U.S. should get out of Afghanistan now that Osama bin Laden is dead. He also went out of his way to challenge Tea Party views on immigration.

Speaking to a Tea Party rally here ahead of the 9 p.m. debate, Johnson spoke for 13 minutes on a range of subjects, drawing applause at some points and silence at others from a crowd that appeared to be comprised largely of Ron Paul supporters.

The crowd applauded warmly when Johnson said that the U.S. should have a strong defense but get out of the practice of “nation-building,” in part because it costs the Treasury too much money.

“We got Osama bin Laden. Let’s get out of Afghanistan,” Johnson said to more applause. He also said he was “opposed to what we did in Libya, A through Z.”

“Where was the military threat?” he said. “Where in the Constitution does it say that just because we don’t like a foreign leader we just go in and topple a foreign leader?”

Johnson’s call for the abolition of the Department of Education also met loud applause.

But his insistence that Medicaid and Medicare should be cut to balance the budget was met with silence.

A demand that the Federal Reserve be audited went over well. And while Johnson’s position that marijuana should be legalized got an enthusiastic response from some, others sat with arms crossed.

Johnson went out of his way to challenge attitudes widely held by conservatives on immigration -- including objecting to closing the U.S.-Mexico border.

“I think that immigration ultimately is a good thing,” he said, arguing that the U.S. should “make it as easy as possible for an individual that wants to come into this country to get a work visa ... so that applicable taxes would get paid.”

“For the [estimated] 11 million [undocumented immigrants] that are here, get them a work visa,” he said. “The notion of building a fence across 2000 miles of border, the notion of putting the National Guard arm in arm across 2,000 miles of border, in my opinion would be a whole lot of money spent with very little, if any, benefit whatsoever.”

Asked whether he was trying to make a point and confront conservatives on immigration, Johnson told The Huffington Post that the idea of building a fence or using the National Guard to close off the flow of immigrants from Mexico and Central and South America is “unrealistic.”

“I gotta tell you, it’s not going to work. It’s as simple as an 11-foot ladder to get across a 10-foot fence,” he said.

Asked about the crowd’s mixed reaction to his speech, Johnson indicated his appearance at the debate was intended to promote ideas as much as his potential presidential campaign.

“Oftentimes when there is no applause, when it’s a cussing go on, and discussion going along with that, often times that’s when you make the biggest headway,” he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
GREENVILLE, S.C. -- Former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson said ahead of the debate tonight that the U.S. should get out of Afghanistan now that Osama bin Laden is dead. He also went out of his way to ch...
GREENVILLE, S.C. -- Former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson said ahead of the debate tonight that the U.S. should get out of Afghanistan now that Osama bin Laden is dead. He also went out of his way to ch...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 592
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
07:03 PM on 05/15/2011
Gary Johnson is the only person I would vote for against President Obama.
photo
Barbara DeZan
Knowledge is Power
12:04 PM on 05/07/2011
Dear Gary, the doorknob:

"WE" didn't get bin Laden. YOU and the Repubs and the former administration had nothing to do with it.

Pres Obama and his team, the military, advisors and others took out bin Laden.

While you may have a certain amount of pride to express....don't ever think that any of us give you Repubs any credit at all. It was your little war and your party who supported it. It was your party who failed miserably and stopped chasing him. It was your party that decided to invade Iraq instead.

As for getting out of Afghanistan......apparently you aren't aware that drawdown begins in July....as Pres Obama decided last year.

I know it makes a good soundbite for the lunatic fringe, "getting out" is already underway...and it has nothing to do with you or your party.
06:23 PM on 05/08/2011
Withdrawing from a war is as scientifically important ethically as going into a war. The formula is very porecise and needed now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ronald Mc Donald
Attorney
10:50 PM on 05/06/2011
Screw the Tea Party!
JB1977
My micro bio is empty
02:20 PM on 05/06/2011
He's the best the right can offer. Which means he won't even win the primary.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
01:10 PM on 05/06/2011
Let's NOT get out of Afghanistan precipitously. 

1) The reason for being in Afghanistan was NOT to get bin Laden.
2) The reason for being in Afghanistan remains:  To establish a reasonable government that can act in its own interests to prevent a return of Islamic Supremacist Jihadis.
3) Bush was right:  The only long-term solution is to remove the breeding grounds (and training and supporting grounds) of the terrorists.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Ourstorian
Free your mind and your ass will follow!
03:07 PM on 05/06/2011
Keep drinking that Bush kool aid. No outside entity will ever establish a "reasonable government" in Afghanistan no matter how much money or how many troops are expended in the process.
06:31 PM on 05/06/2011
Hmmm I'm not so sure about this, if you asked any politician back in 2001 why we were in Afghanistan they would have said, "to get OBL". Its not until recently that our tactic of "nation building" has been implemented. I don't know if saying Bush was right is accurate, where was the right in invading Iraq?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:05 PM on 05/06/2011
where are the jobs --bring the troops home and end these three wars
12:36 PM on 05/06/2011
Can someone please direct me to where I can learn more about how abolishing the Department of Education is realistically helpful?

I'm serious, I want to like this guy and I don't get the scumbaggy vibe that the rest of the GOP candidates exude, why does he believe this would be helpful and how would attending to the problems of educating our nation's youth be achieved?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
01:12 PM on 05/06/2011
Simple answer:  Just graph the amount spent by the Dept of Education versus the educational level of the students since the Dept. of Educ. was founded.  Spending has risen while educational output has fallen.

It's counterproductive IF YOU ARE SERIOUS ABOUT PRODUCING EDUCATED STUDENTS.  If you have some other goal, you might wish to keep it around.
02:20 PM on 05/06/2011
I appreciate the info but I'm looking for something more robust than that. Something that includes what would be done to 1) do whatever the DoE is doing that is correct and 2)do what it was setup to do in the first place.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Ourstorian
Free your mind and your ass will follow!
03:09 PM on 05/06/2011
"Simple answer..."

More like ... simple-minded answer.

You have no real grasp of the problems and no idea how to solve them. Instead you offer simple-minded right wing talking points as if mere repetition of them will fix everything.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
01:13 PM on 05/06/2011
And re Dept of Energy, graph the price of gasoline and the availability of sensible energy supplies versus the years since the Dept of Energy was started.  It's counterproductive, too.

Would be good for the country to abolish both.
12:22 PM on 05/06/2011
Gov Johnson is no tea bagger. He is a true conservative. While my determination to see that the elderly and infirm are cared for puts us on opposite sides of many social issues, I have found the Gov to be even-handed and thoughtful, always ready to discuss any issue. He is loyal to his vision of the function of government and always ruled by logic. Other self professed conservatives preach and want to legislate their version of morality. Gov Johnson understands this is not the government's job. I have been with him in blue jeans and tees and he was as natural there as in a suit at a banquet. Gov Johnson is genuine in every way, and the GOP's only hope in the 2012 race.
06:33 PM on 05/06/2011
Well said! I really like Gary Johnson!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
11:26 AM on 05/07/2011
And he is not crazed! He is also a SANE voice for marijuana legalization.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Rockett
11:36 AM on 05/06/2011
There is no Afghanistan in terms that we are used to. It is a collection of tribes and various religions, and the people in general do not identify with the country. Our mission is to destroy the terrorists, no matter their allegience and to use this as a jumping off point into Pakistan to do the same. The short-sighted regressives think the prize was Osama, but there are many others still operating who must be castrated and neutered.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
american-dolt
Divide and Conquer
11:45 AM on 05/06/2011
Those "others" you mention, seem to grow as we Invade more Countries and side more with Israel and Big Oil.
11:35 AM on 05/06/2011
Is it indeed possible to give peace a chance? I would like to think so but we have fought continously for thousands of years.

www.3juno.net
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FACTISFACT
A war veteran. Finally retired
10:18 AM on 05/06/2011
The Presidential candidate said, “Where in the Constitution does it say that just because we don’t like a foreign leader we just go in and topple a foreign leader?” Public would like to know where was he when ex- President supported by Republicans went after ex- Iraqi President violating all cannon of Justice and later become crystal clear when he confessed he took the country to war on lies and killed so many innocents including an innocent President and ministers.

Because of the Instigation of a foreign country having dubious records that led to the death of the president of a sovereign country.

The difference is Bush went for war without any UN mandate. Here US President Obama as a team member was asked by the UN under proper resolution duly passed by the Security Council members passed a resolution asking member countries of the team to establish a No fly zone in LIBYA and take all measure to save the lives of the Libyan innocent public whom Gadhafi the President is killing.

Do I need to point out to the presidential aspirant the difference to go all out to kill person/ people without International i.e. UN mandate and or to go all out to save human lives in a catastrophe like that in Libya with the mandate of UN mandate?.

It is regrettable that an aspirant to become the US President could not differentiate the simple causes between the two events.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Puller58
Man of Mystery
10:15 AM on 05/06/2011
undefined
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
10:03 AM on 05/06/2011
Why do these baggers and their supporters want to do away with public education?
11:31 AM on 05/06/2011
Because Public Education has been a dismal failure. America ihas fallen behind most of the civilized world in education. It is time to give parents a choice of what schools they believe their children should attend. The public teachers unions have put their interests ahead of the students' for long enough.
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
12:25 PM on 05/06/2011
The biggest question I have about your post is concerning this statement, "It is time to give parents a choice of what schools they believe their children should attend." Like how? Should they be allowed to choose private schools their parents can't afford? I have heard M. Bachmann claim she would like all students to be home schooled, not of course explaining how an undereducated single mother or father could handle that. But really, I have no idea what you mean by that statement, can you explain further?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Ourstorian
Free your mind and your ass will follow!
03:04 PM on 05/06/2011
Public education has produced millions of well educated and successful people. Too bad you aren't one of them.
11:31 AM on 05/06/2011
Because they hate the children and want nothing more than an illiterate citizenry void of critical thinking skills and the ability to process, examine, and review complex material.

Or perhaps it's because the department of education is a bloated bureaucracy that views kids as identical widgets that respond to the same interventions and methodologies and want to have the same curriculum regardless of individual need. Or perhaps because the bigger and more money the federal Department of Education spends on education, the worse our schools have gotten. Or perhaps its because if local communities were free to innovate and reform their schools, like many charter schools who don't have to deal with the feds, actual working solitons to our myriad education problems would come to light.

But I'm sure the easy narrative "teabaggers hate ejucashun and don't want no learning" is easier spew and process for some. Because the State SHOULD be in charge of educating the population. That is always good for free thinking.
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
12:19 PM on 05/06/2011
I am sorry, I missed the part where education would be the responsibility of the state. If that ever happens, I pity the children who have to be educated in rightwing states like Texas. I can see it now, religion would be front and center, they would teach Christianity to Jews and tell them their founders killed Jesus, the children of atheists would be told they were going to hell.

When things are broken, this country has a bad habit of throwing it out rather than fixing it. We need to fix public education, not attack it. There is no reason a child's quality of education should be determined by their parent's wealth, or lack thereof.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
11:50 AM on 05/07/2011
Texas wants the rest of the nation to be as illiterate as the board of education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Shelby
Purveyor of tar and feathers
10:02 AM on 05/06/2011
I just don't get it..is really bad hair a requirement to be a GOP candidate?
11:21 AM on 05/06/2011
If that's the case, Trump might as well take over now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
11:47 AM on 05/07/2011
To have no conscience...is a requirement for the teaparty.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckpod1
09:55 AM on 05/06/2011
We're not leaving anywhere until we find those weapons of mass destruction!!!
I think they are in Libya now...they move around a lot!
11:22 AM on 05/06/2011
They're probably hidden in Trump's hair.