More

Hispanic Lawmakers To Obama: Do More On Immigration Policy


First Posted: 05/06/11 05:41 PM ET Updated: 07/06/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Hispanic lawmakers are growing increasingly frustrated with President Barack Obama for not using his executive authority to change immigration policy, an issue with next to no prospects in Congress for at least another two years.

A Wednesday meeting between Obama and the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) “started off testy,” according to one lawmaker in attendance, as members vented that the president had not adequately used his power to advance an issue he routinely supports.

“We’ve run out of time. We’re not going to get any legislation out of the House or even the Senate. We need some administrative relief,” said this lawmaker, adding, "we go back home and get shit on all the time” for not getting anywhere on immigration policy.

CHC Members say there are several areas where Obama has the authority to take action in the absence of comprehensive immigration reform. These include expediting VISAs, focusing deportation efforts on criminal apprehension and changing rules that keep illegal immigrants out of the country for up to 10 years if they ever leave the U.S.

Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.), who chairs CHC’s Immigration Task Force, said he has the same message for Obama that he has been taking to the thousands of people who show up to the rallies he has been hosting nationwide on the need for reforming the immigration system.

“You have the authority,” Gutierrez said. “We want you to take the administrative action that you can take.”

The Illinois Democrat said many in the Hispanic community have been “expressing a real desire for Obama to be the kind of champion he articulated” that he would be when he ran for president in 2008.

Obama has had a rocky relationship with Latinos since taking office. The biggest blow was his failure to deliver on a campaign promise to pass comprehensive immigration reform during his first year in office. Latinos were also angry when Obama didn’t mention immigration reform once in his 2010 State of the Union address. But he won back some of their trust in December when he threw his weight behind trying to pass the DREAM ACT. The bill, which would provide a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants brought to the country as children if they attend college or join the military, narrowly failed passage, but Obama's public lobbying on the issue didn't go unnoticed.

The president has gone out of his way in recent weeks to tout his support for immigration reform: He held three high-profile meetings with business and faith leaders, law enforcement officials and Hispanic “influentials” including actresses Eva Longoria and Rosario Dawson. He hosted a Cinco de Mayo reception on Thursday, where he told a room full of prominent Hispanic politicians -- among them, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and CHC Chairman Charlie Gonzalez -- that immigration reform is a priority. And next Tuesday, he is giving a speech in El Paso, Texas, on immigration reform, followed by remarks Thursday at the National Hispanic Prayer Breakfast.

Obama also mentioned the issue when giving the Miami Dade College Commencement last week. “I strongly believe we should fix our broken immigration system,” he said to applause. “It will be difficult and it will take time. I know some here wish that I could just bypass Congress and change the law myself. But that’s not how democracy works.”

But some lawmakers dispute that Obama's hands are tied. Twenty-two Democratic senators sent him a letter last month urging him to use his executive authority to prevent the deportation of immigrants who would be eligible for the DREAM Act. The letter follows similar correspondence the CHC sent earlier this year.

“As you said in your State of the Union Address, ‘let’s stop expelling talented, responsible young people who could be staffing our research labs or starting a new business,’” reads the letter, which includes the signature of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). “Your administration could establish and publicize a process for DREAM Act students to apply for deferred action … Your administration could also require reporting and tracking of DREAM Act cases.”

A source that attended the White House-CHC meeting said Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) went after Obama on the issue of executive authority and urged him to treat immigration reform as a civil rights issue instead of a political matter. But the president responded that he didn’t think he had the authority to make the kinds of changes they wanted. A Menendez spokesperson was not available for comment.

“He didn’t think it would stand up in court,” said Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.). “His message was basically, if you’re going to overturn or change immigration policies substantially, it’s in Congress.”

Given the current political reality that Congress is unlikely to make any headway on immigration, Obama’s message to Hispanic lawmakers was “basically” to keep talking about the need for reform, even though nothing can pass, Cardoza said.

An administration official dismissed the idea that Wednesday’s meeting became heated or that members left on a sour note. "This was a positive meeting at which everybody was very engaged because they understand how important fixing the broken immigration system is to meet America's economic and security needs in the 21st century,” said the official.

Some CHC Members say they still give Obama credit for keeping immigration reform in the spotlight, even though they speculated his latest moves are more about politics than policy.

Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), who did not go to Wednesday’s meeting, chalked up the president’s renewed focus on immigration policy as posturing for his 2012 reelection campaign.

“I hate to be so blunt, but I think that’s all it is,” Cuellar said. “He’s saying, ‘Hey, I want to show the Hispanic community that I’m really trying to do immigration reform. The fact that it’s not passing isn’t because I didn’t try.’”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Hispanic lawmakers are growing increasingly frustrated with President Barack Obama for not using his executive authority to change immigration policy, an issue with next to no prospects ...
WASHINGTON -- Hispanic lawmakers are growing increasingly frustrated with President Barack Obama for not using his executive authority to change immigration policy, an issue with next to no prospects ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,149
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (36 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
hrpmap 08:54 PM on 05/06/2011
Yes do more on immigration, stop challenging the border states who are trying to fill the gap left by federal innaction, stop taking them to court wasting limited resources by doing so, stop opposing the people who want the border secured. Stop challenging the states who pass laws on licensing to prevent their employers within their border to ignoe laws like  E-verify, which,is  their right to do  Read More...
04:20 AM on 05/11/2011
This is very disturbing. Facts are facts and we need to confirm it in this case. I have always thought Obama was too fixated on passing laws to make "change" at the expense of administrative law with executive enforcement. If he can use executive athority and discretionary emphasis in enforcement areas....THE WHY THE HLL DOES HE NOT DO IT ?? I have heard that his administration has Increased deportations and separating families. I dont know if this is true. I agree that justice department discretionary enforcement emphasis is not a solution. In fact it will simply be reversed and re-emphasized under a republican president. However, if we are looking at this from a Political perspective only....the prez can provided relief which will garner to the benefit of democratic candidates at all levels. So why not do it ! ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Quitcherbichin
If you are posting here, thank a veteran.
11:07 AM on 05/10/2011
If B O was really serious about reforming immigration he would first secure the border, begin a concerted FEDERAL effort at identifying, and deporting illegals, and enforce e-verify. After that is done immigration requirements should be strengthened so that only people with educations, needed job skills, degrees, and no criminal records are admitted. This country cannot continue to accept any and all. We must only accept those who can contribute and assimilate.
10:31 AM on 05/09/2011
The reason why Obama wont support illegals getting a free pass on immigration is because the vast majority of american's are sick of illegals stealing jobs,, free medical, services and tons of other free services.
we do not need more poor, ignorant gang mentality types of people who refuse to learn English, stealing stuff from american's, we need scientists, engineers, doctors, inventors and investors and other intelligent people to help in creating and more promising future for americans
12:07 PM on 05/09/2011
well said
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brokerallen
The Middle Class Needs To Take Back America
01:01 AM on 05/10/2011
I think Obama knows he's out of a job if CIR passes. Now he's starting the push again when there is no chance of it passing the Republican controlled House. That is very sneaky of him after his promises to the Latino community. Most of the undocumented are wonderful people.
I'm white and live in a California farming community. Most I more than welcome. There are also far too many criminals and those who drive drunk or without a license or without insurance. They also bring lot of violence to our community. I welcome the responsible ones. They wouldn't be here if our businesses didn't hire them to take advantage. Then they build a life and have kids. I have to disagree with you. We have a responsibly to them.
We need to deport the criminals at the first sign of bad behavior. Everyone else we need to treat like the brothers and sisters they are.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Crabtree
10:36 PM on 05/08/2011
I have no doubt they will legalize all that are in this nation illegally..Some 20 to 30 million..my question remains what do we do with the next 20 to 30 million?,,pretty soon you have a copy of ole mecceo right here in the states.with the exact same problems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
red skull
I am legion
10:51 PM on 05/08/2011
Pres. Obama would anger too many citizens on both sides of the political spectrum. An action such as you describe, just might be the major tipping point in this country that is needed for a bipartisan, cross-cultural uprising to throw all of them out. Then we could start over and elect the representatives that will represent American citizens and not Mexico.

The illegals need to go home and protest unfairness there and at top speed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tobin C Rote
10:21 AM on 05/09/2011
Problem is that there have already been amnesty programs, They started in 1986. ever since then there have been amnesty bills. May not have heard about them but they are there. It is like we are admiting that we as a country either can not OR Will not do anything about the illegal immigration problem.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brokerallen
The Middle Class Needs To Take Back America
09:43 PM on 05/08/2011
With 72% of U.S. citizens opposed to immigration reform it is political suicide not put it on hold.
The upset victories by the Republicans was directly related to immigration. As a person who votes for Democrats I was outraged when Obama and the Democrats in Congress applauded the President of Mexico while he criticized the United States. Not a single Republican did so. That was the major topic around the water cooler for days. One person after another who voted for Obama were saying they would never vote for him again. Obama's duty is to represent the citizens of America not the citizen of Mexico. If he pushes the issue too hard now and the Republicans win more seats there will be mass deportations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tobin C Rote
10:26 AM on 05/09/2011
I was as outraged as you in regards to the president of Mexico! Actually I think it is more like 70% of Americans DO support immigration reform. At least that is the number of people that supported the AZ bill. The liberals don't want to do anything because they want the vote of the poor and needy. The conservatives are always vilified when they propose that something be done. So, nothing gets done. Soon there will probably be an amnesty bill and the cycle goes on and on and on ...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles McNease
08:05 PM on 05/08/2011
Has it ever occurred to any of you braindead liberals we don't need anymore people coming here? We have enough already and that is the reason responsible people don't continue having kids they can't afford. If you idiots had your way, America would become a crime and welfare country for the rest of the world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tcsosebee
07:39 PM on 05/08/2011
If they are not citizens then Obama and congress should not waste time on them. We have too many issues that are much more important that we need to deal with. We do, however, need stronger enforcement against illegal immigrants and the flow of drugs coming out of Mexico.
04:43 PM on 05/08/2011
I agree with ShowMeC6 on this one... If it is illegal for the mexicans to be in our country then why are they here complaining...
photo
ShowMeC6
Equal Justice, Not Social Justice....
02:38 PM on 05/08/2011
‘let’s stop expelling talented, responsible young people who could be staffing our research labs or starting a new business,’”

....These "talented" illegal aliens need to be back in THEIR country fixing THEIR countries problems so that it is a place that people would like to live....
photo
voyager48
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
02:52 PM on 05/08/2011
Why is it that suddenly illegals are talented (and responsible??) and citizens are not? Surely amongst 300 million people we have enough talent to do just fine without outside help? What about citizens who have been laid off and are starting new businesses. Surely they are the priority here not some person who feels like the country's laws somehow don't apply to them?

If we are so talent poor then why is it that countries like China and India are busting themselves to get technologies that have been developed in the US despite graduating far more engineers and scientists than us?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:44 PM on 05/08/2011
You and I, by asking questions such as this, are clearly not good enough to be Americans. We didn't see anything wrong with the racial makeup we had. WE don't feel guilty that we want to maintain our First World lives. We don't want to work harder for less pay. We don't want chronic high unemployment. We'd rather have more money for our needs rather than spend future trillions on newcomers who will compete with us for jobs.

See, we're wrong, we're bigots, we don't deserve to live in our own country!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:05 PM on 05/08/2011
Obama and the democrats turned their backs on the Hispanic community. After having control of both the House and the Senate after the 2008 elections, Obama turned to health care reform which squeezed out any fast track passing of immigration reform. This tells you that Obama was just trying to cater to the Hispanic vote during his campaign.

Immigration reform will never happen because the Republicans will not support any form of amnesty. Welcome to Washington grid lock.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaron Watkins
À Rebours
03:52 PM on 05/08/2011
Its not just the Republicans. A majority of Americans do not support it. It is a racist and broken idea to give an amnesty after the amnesty failed in 1986. Many moderate democrats also agree with that. The only way it will pass is if Obama uses an executive order.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tobin C Rote
10:39 AM on 05/09/2011
Why should anyone support amnesty? And, of course Obama pandered to the Hispanics! Unfortuntely, most of the illegals are Hispanic. So, anytime immigration reform that tries to keep illegals from coming from anywhere is proposed the legal Hispanic population screams racism. It is NOT racism! It is a country that spends a total of $113 Billion on beneifts for illegal aliens trying to stop the bleeding. Why is it that any American would approve of spending this much on anyone that is here illegally, no matter what country they entered the US from illegally. They currently are entitled to more benefits than our own homeless??? And the argument that illegals do the jobs that Americans don't want to do? If the illegals weren't there then ultimately the company that needs that job done will have to offer a higher wage so someone will be willing to do it. And that is a good thing for an American!
photo
RUKidding0
Freedom is Fundamental
12:50 PM on 05/08/2011
The entire immigration debate boils down to one simple point – illegal aliens already have full citizenship – in their own country, but this isn’t it.

They need to go home.

To facilitate their departure, we need to end the magnets that draw them here – from jobs to government services to the possibility of amnesty and citizenship.

To end the jobs magnet, we need to heavily fine or imprison those who provide those jobs.

To end the government services magnet, we need to deny these services, jail any who help provide them, and deport those who take advantage of them.

To end the amnesty magnet, we need to permanently end any possibility of amnesty.

It is just that simple.
01:20 PM on 05/08/2011
Amen
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
IllTakeTheRedEye
Do you know what a nonemployer business is?
03:23 PM on 05/08/2011
Agreed
 
Similar to Wall Street though, the employers that do as you indicate, need to have some form of  mandatory jail time for hiring illegal aliens. Many people think it is only a payroll thing like direct deposit payroll or cash under the table, but we must also stop companies that hire illegal alien individuals that are presenting themselves as if those individuals were their own "nonemployer business" or independent contractor (1099) being paid through Accounts Payable, and not through the Payroll department.. A 1099 independent contractor "nonemployer business" illegal alien gets paid like an outside vendor, and not like an employee, even though they are essentially breaking a gray area rule within the I.R.S. of the distinction between an employee versus as independent contractor.
 
F & F
12:43 PM on 05/08/2011
The American public at large has not, as yet, completely connected the dots on the overall immigration situation in this country but are beginning to see how it is being used politically. The Obama administration has backed off, for now, because it was becoming more of a political liability then an asset, and they needed to let it cool off for awhile, but it will come back once they get their ducks in a row, so to speak, and they feel they are ready to use it to help them in the 2012 election campaign. It is potentially a high leverage issue, but the lack of border security, the huge internal costs to the American taxpayers, the stress being added to the infrastructure of the country, and all of this as the country itself cannot pay it's bills makes it a "hot potato" issue that could work against the current administration.
11:27 AM on 05/08/2011
Obama continues to defy the wishes of Congress by
stealth policy changes that give legal status to students
scheduled for deportation. On the surface, steps to retain those in higher education make sense. However, it also highlights the negatives of the loosely framed Dream Act. After getting a deportation reprieve the student's entire family, who had been living here illegally, also applied for legality. Therefore, the estimates of 800,000 eligible for the Dream Act would have to be multiplied by 3 to 4 for family and doubled again for those under 35 who could easily fake the education requirement. As the INS admits to being 2 years behind in processing legal applicants, where would they find the staff to police 2 million claiming enrollment in some form of higher education?? The premise is ridiculous. Secondly, why shouldn't the illegals at least have to go through the
strenuous application process required of legal applicants?
One would think anything less would offend the left's
mantra of "fairness". In previous periods of high immigration
there weren't massive social programs, free health care, the
EIC, or 51% of the country NOT paying any income tax. If
the illegals were bringing financial benefits to the communities
where they settle, there would be a mad dash to attract more.
Since that is not the case, claims of a financial drain are more
credible. The prospect of 20 million more into Obamacare
must be assessed intelligently during a period when existing
entitlements are in danger.
11:36 AM on 05/08/2011
agreed
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nasknit
Freedom isn't free.
01:54 AM on 05/09/2011
"Multiplied by 3 or 4"? I believe that is an understatement. Since we're talking Hispanics being upset about the lack of immigration reform, a more realistic multiplication would probably be at least 6 to 8. One person typically has 2 parents; then there are siblings, aunts, uncles, cousins, grandparents. NO WAY does a factor of 3 or 4 fit into reality.
11:16 AM on 05/08/2011
Those Americans of Hispanic heritage, particularly those that are in this country legally, are beginning to better understand the political manipulations surrounding the whole immigration issue, and how the "open borders" zealots and the progressive/ liberal /Democrats in this country are "using" Hispanics to further their political agenda, and they do not like it. Americans, in general, understand the historical "value added" of immigration to this country because almost all of us are decendants of immigrants to this country, but, we also understand the problems with the lack of control of immigrant crossings with our southern borders. We HAVE comprehensive immigration policies and laws already in place, but they are not being enforced by the federal government, and that is the root cause of our problems. The "open borders" advocates coupled with the liberal Hispanic lawmakers won't be satisfied until all immigration regulation is basically eliminated, and this is politically motivated to increase their voter base, because it doesn't make sense to do this.
11:23 AM on 05/08/2011
agreed
photo
RUKidding0
Freedom is Fundamental
11:28 AM on 05/08/2011
Agreed F & F
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FiredUpRTG
Don't start no stuff; won't be no stuff…
11:11 AM on 05/08/2011
People can be infantile unrealistic when it comes to knowing what a President can/cannot do on his/her own. There are 400+ congress people to convince, too…

Also, so many groups have projected onto Pres Obama what they think he said instead of listening to what he said. People thinking they've been disappointed stayed home or reactionarily voted Republican in 2010, and that's why WI, FL et.al. are in trouble this year.

The right thing to do: keep bringing your agendas in Pres Obama's attention, and vote for politicians who share your cause, so that there are enough elected into office who can change policy to the way you want.

The latter is what the t baggers are trying to do.
11:14 AM on 05/08/2011
i do vote my views......as i vote conservatively
11:30 AM on 05/08/2011
Can you tell us why the rest of the country who voted Dems, is in trouble this year?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FiredUpRTG
Don't start no stuff; won't be no stuff…
01:45 PM on 05/08/2011
Yup, its called 8 years of Bush and company. When a child (US) has guests (Repubs), they should hide away the good toys.