iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

More Schools Consider Flavored Milk Bans

Flavored Milk Schools

By CHRISTINA HOAG   05/ 9/11 03:18 AM ET   AP

LOS ANGELES -- Chocolate milk has long been seen as the spoonful of sugar that makes the medicine go down, but the nation's childhood obesity epidemic has a growing number of people wondering whether that's wise.

With schools under increasing pressure to offer healthier food, the staple on children's cafeteria trays has come under attack over the very ingredient that made it so popular – sugar.

Some school districts have gone as far as prohibiting flavored milk, and Florida considered a statewide ban in schools. Other districts have sought a middle ground by replacing flavored milks containing high-fructose corn syrup with versions containing sugar, which some see as a more natural sweetener.

Los Angeles Unified, the nation's second-largest school district, is the latest district to tackle the issue. Superintendent John Deasy recently announced he would push this summer to remove chocolate and strawberry milk from school menus.

But nutritionists – and parents – are split over whether bans make sense, especially when about 70 percent of milk consumed in schools is flavored, mostly chocolate, according to the industry-backed Milk Processors Education Program.

Many, including the School Nutrition Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Dietetic Association, American Heart Association, and National Medical Association, argue that the nutritional value of flavored low-fat or skim milk outweighs the harm of added sugar. Milk contains nine essential nutrients including calcium, vitamin D and protein.

A joint statement from those groups points to studies that show kids who drink fat-free, flavored milk meet more of their nutrient needs and are not heavier than non-milk drinkers.

"Chocolate milk has been unfairly pegged as one of the causes of obesity," said Julie Buric, vice president of marketing for the Milk Processors Education Program.

Others note the nation's child obesity epidemic and say flavored milk simply needs to go.

Eight ounces of white milk served in Los Angeles public schools contains 14 grams of natural sugar or lactose; fat-free chocolate milk has an extra six grams of sugar for a total of 20 grams, while fat-free strawberry milk has a total of 27 grams – the same as eight ounces of Coca-Cola.

"Chocolate milk is soda in drag," said Ann Cooper, director of nutrition services for the Boulder Valley School District in Louisville, Colo., which has banned flavored milk. "It works as a treat in homes, but it doesn't belong in schools."

Flavored milk is also a target of British TV chef Jamie Oliver, who has made revamping school food a signature cause.

For a segment to be aired on his "Food Revolution" TV show, he recently filled a school bus with white sand to represent the amount of sugar Los Angeles Unified school children consume weekly in flavored milk.

"If you have flavored milk, that's candy," he told The Associated Press.

Oliver cheered Deasy's proposal to remove flavored milk from schools during a recent joint appearance on the "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" show.

If the school board adopts the ban, Los Angeles Unified would join districts including Washington and Berkeley, Calif.

But efforts by some other districts turned sour after children drank less milk. Milk consumption drops by 35 percent when flavored milks are removed, according to the Milk Processors Education Program.

Cabell County, W.Va., schools brought chocolate milk back at the recommendation of state officials, and Fairfax County, Va., did the same after its dairy provider came up with a version sweetened with beet sugar rather than high-fructose corn syrup.

The Florida Board of Education also backed away from its proposed ban on chocolate milk after the state agricultural commissioner urged the board to look at all sugary food and beverages served in schools.

The Los Angeles district has worked with its dairy supplier on flavored versions using the sweetener Truvia and chicory, district spokesman Robert Alaniz said.

Cooper and others argued children will drink plain milk if that's what's offered.

"We've taught them to drink chocolate milk, so we can unteach them that," Cooper said. "Our kids line up for milk."

Boulder Valley hasn't been barraged with complaints since removing chocolate milk two years ago, but it hasn't tracked whether milk consumption has dropped, she said.

Parents line up on both sides of the issue.

Deborah Bellholt, a South Los Angeles mother, said none of her six children ranging from pre-school to high school age will drink plain milk. "By allowing kids flavored milk, they still get the calcium they need," she said. "If not, they'd bypass it."

But Mimi Bonetti, a suburban Los Angeles mother with two elementary school-age children who drink plain milk, said she gets angry that chocolate milk is portrayed as nutritious. Children can get calcium and other nutrients from other foods, she said.

"If you offer them the choice of chocolate or plain, of course they're going to choose chocolate," Bonetti said. "When you're telling kids that drinking chocolate milk is a healthy choice, it's sending the wrong message."

Ask kids, and most vote for chocolate. Suburban Los Angeles seventh-grader Nacole Johnson said plain milk tastes yucky. If there were no chocolate milk, "I wouldn't drink it," she said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

LOS ANGELES -- Chocolate milk has long been seen as the spoonful of sugar that makes the medicine go down, but the nation's childhood obesity epidemic has a growing number of people wondering whether ...
LOS ANGELES -- Chocolate milk has long been seen as the spoonful of sugar that makes the medicine go down, but the nation's childhood obesity epidemic has a growing number of people wondering whether ...
Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 275
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Huber
10:40 AM on 05/19/2011
Chocolate & strawberry flavored milk were available in school cafeterias long before the so-called "obsesity epidemic".

If you don't want it or you don't want your children to drink it, then fine ... don't buy it and instruct your children not to buy it at school. Make your choice, and ALLOW the rest of us to make ours.
photo
oneyippie
Leaning far to your left
11:37 AM on 05/12/2011
Commercial milk is full of hormones, antibiotics, accumulated pesticides/herbicides, including DDT, PCBs, etc. It's hardly a healthy drink for young people who then have trouble when they are sick and discover that antibiotics no longer work for them.

There is no real need to drink milk other than to support the dairy industry which abuses animals, uses precious land and resources inefficiently and adds to pollution, not to mention those e-coli outbreaks...

And none of this has to do with the sugar issue...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anti-Panoptic
Conscious Grad Student
06:01 PM on 05/17/2011
Not to mention the human digestive system is made in such a way that it only accepts milk until age five, or until the mother stops producing milk. So there really is no point to consuming milk (thats intended for calfs anyway) after that age.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katmeyster
We don't have a spending problem.
10:57 PM on 05/11/2011
Milk without flavoring is full of sugar. It would be much better to have safe raw, whole, milk from grass-fed cows. Or water.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anti-Panoptic
Conscious Grad Student
06:03 PM on 05/17/2011
Or JUST water. I can't tell you how many adults I know that freak out at the idea of having to drink water for a day let alone the rest of thier lives. "Soda's just taste better so it must be better right?"
03:22 PM on 05/11/2011
Who are schools to tell kids what they will or will not drink? It's a big government conspiracy to control our lives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SuperMom101
What's on your plate?
02:45 PM on 05/11/2011
My husband thinks chocolate milk is sour milk that's about to turn bad. Wish they would just make casein buttons out of the sour milk like they did 80 years ago instead of adding "chocolate" flavoring, high fructose corn syrup and feeding it to our kids.

I used to be such a stooge for the dairy industry.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ozark Homesteader
http://ozarkhomesteader.wordpress.com
11:51 AM on 05/11/2011
As others have pointed out so well, kids today drink chocolate milk and claim that they'll drink nothing else because they're accustomed to the sugary sweetness. Chocolate milk and strawberry milk are dessert, and no average kid needs either of these for recovery after sports--sorry Loggietoad, but the overwhelming majority of kids at school don't need sugar-sweetened milk or even sports drinks.

Of course, kids also would do well to avoid the milk produced with industrial agriculture, which is high in hormones--even without treating cows with BGH--and lower in nutrients because of the ways cows are raised and milked continuously.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Huber
10:48 AM on 05/19/2011
What else is not "needed"? Technically, all the nutrition that you and your kids "need" can be provided to you in a bland, gray paste of matter, comprised of basic carbohydrates, amino acids, and trace minerals. Your entire dining experience can be reduced to sucking on your tube of paste and washing it down with room temperature water.

We don't "need" things to taste good, but we sort of like it nonetheless.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ozark Homesteader
http://ozarkhomesteader.wordpress.com
02:43 PM on 05/24/2011
I'm not the one who referred to need; it was a reference to the article. People are arguing that kids "need" chocolate milk to replenish after phys ed. That's ridiculous!

As for wanting chocolate, we need fewer calories than most Americans are eating. Supplying extra calories at school doesn't make sense, and kids can enjoy plain milk if they aren't oversugared.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tomteboda
01:39 AM on 06/07/2011
My father calls it "nutritious gruel". He likes to point out all the economic benefits to eliminating food as we know it and making everyone eat nutritious gruel.
photo
baxtron
tek phlarpt
11:44 AM on 05/11/2011
never had chocolate milk available in Dist 834 for elementary school in the 1980's. somehow I survived. The big problem is lack of supply for parents to buy the milk themselves and provide it at home. No grocery store or convenience store even sells the different flavored milks. you can only get them through school lunches. these parents face a real problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SuperMom101
What's on your plate?
06:37 AM on 05/11/2011
Soda = candy in a can

Chocolate cow's milk = candy in a carton

It's so strange. The USDA is building franken food pyramids; meanwhile, America (and her children) have never been fatter or sicker. I totally bought in to the food pyramid scheme until I had cancer at age 38 (over 11 years ago) and changed what's on my family's plates. See, I had no idea that what I was eating could possibly be making me (or our children) sick. Changed what's on my plate and been healthy ever since.

This is how crazy it is! Our daughter can not choose water as a beverage choice in her high school lunch line. Her choices are four types of cow's milk (including chocolate) or juice. The bottled water is extra because the USDA sees "no nutritional value in water." And, she plays sports! Next thing the dairy industry will be telling us that chocolate cow's milk is good for athletes and they'll be wearing chocolate milk mustaches.

How about a water cooler in the cafeteria in the lunch line like most offices in America have?

Common sense is not so common. - Voltaire

p.s. Great post Honeybear64!
09:49 PM on 05/10/2011
Banning sugary flavored milk in schools obviously isn't going to solve the problem of childhood obesity, but I think it's at least a sign that the problem is being taken quite seriously.

The problem isn't just the amount of sugar in an 8 oz serving of chocolate milk. The problem is that kids these days are used to added sweeteners and artificial taste modifiers in practically everything they eat and drink, so that unsweetened, or only naturally sweet, foods come to be seen as bland and flavorless. The problem isn't just one particular food item in a school lunch; the problem is that we're raising a whole generation of people to think that it's perfectly normal and natural to be on a 24-hour sugar high, and it certainly doesn't help that some parents see nothing wrong with allowing their kids to start off their day by jonesing on some Fruit Loops.

Let's face it: nature can't begin to compete with food scientists, who have mastered the art of manipulating our taste preferences. Why else would kids turn their noses up at an offering of fresh strawberries, but hanker after a McDonald's strawberry milkshake, which contains over 60 ingredients, not one which is an actual strawberry?

It'll take a lot more than banning flavored milk in schools to solve the problem of childhood obesity; it's going to require schools, and parents, turning the tide and helping kids re-train their taste buds to appreciate fresh, natural food.
03:24 PM on 05/11/2011
Resolving the issue of childhood obesity requires actual parenting, which unfortunately, the majority of Americans refuse to do. Good post though.
09:25 PM on 05/10/2011
Providing flavored milk at schools sends the message that this product is healthy. Clearly it is not healthy-it is dessert.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Kippel
02:53 PM on 05/10/2011
Can't we have a compromise? Flavor the milk but don't put so much sugar in it. It doesn't have to be so sweet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
02:55 PM on 05/10/2011
Ideally, we would do that.

That's one reason why I think this is political.

No common sense applied, no studies to back up impact of taking that staple off the menu, etc.
photo
baxtron
tek phlarpt
11:46 AM on 05/11/2011
Sugar is a staple? Your brain is very clean. Free from thought. Mammals do not need milk after about 9-18 months. but don't tell anyone that because there is a lot of money involved.
photo
Loggietoad
Libertarian Combat Veteran
11:55 AM on 05/10/2011
But here's the problem: Chocolate milk is good for kids! It is an excellent post exercise snack. See below:

-Chocolate milk enhances glycogen replenishment after endurance exercise in moderately trained males. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2010;42:S64.

-Chocolate milk as a post-exercise recovery aid. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism. 2006;16:78-91.

-Improved endurance capacity following chocolate milk consumption compared with 2 commercially available sport drinks. Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism. 2009;34:78-82.

-Effects of chocolate milk consumption on markers of muscle recovery during intensified soccer training. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2009; 41:S577.

It is a shame that misguided educators are wasting their time trying to make decisions about things that is not in their area of expertise. Talk to a sports nutrionist. They'll tell you what a waste of time this is.
01:54 PM on 05/10/2011
Your argument is predicated on the assumption that kids exercise-- PE/gym is being cut drastically in most schools, and at home, the majority of kids engage in sedentary activities like video games, web surfing, television. Maybe the solution is to offer chocolate milk as an incentive-- if you exercise for sixty minutes, you have the choice of having chocolate milk, otherwise, you get plain. Still, any way you slice it, chocolate milk is added sugar which most of the population (even those of us who exercise an hour a more every day) can do without.
photo
Loggietoad
Libertarian Combat Veteran
02:33 PM on 05/10/2011
I agree that exercise is important. But banning chocolate milk, which is easy, does not address the problem (lack of good physical education/exercise), which is hard. The first simply changes a food choice, the latter requires schools to have competent educators to teach kids healthy habits. It's treating the symptoms rather than the cause.

As far as the "sugar=bad" argument; the studies that I cited all concluded that the ratio protein, fat, and simple carbohydrates (i.e. sugar) was what made chocolate milk so beneficial for active kids/athletes. It is better than plain milk in that application.
photo
baxtron
tek phlarpt
11:47 AM on 05/11/2011
except for people who cannot digest those sugars. the athletes are drinking Gatorade, not milk.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
cinemaven
Follow me on Twitter :)
11:51 AM on 05/10/2011
What an easy out for the boards banning chocolate milk. It's a total distraction from the real issue which is what they're putting on the plates. As a former school board trustee, I have seen these distractions many times. If you get parents and especially the press concentrating on one small item, the bigger problems go unnoticed. In LA where Jamie Oliver is ranting, this would be a way to allow him to claim a victory and the board to look good in the press... they can always bring it back once he's gone.

Milk is a small item... kids could easily gain their calcium and nutrients with no milk at all if the food choices were fresh instead of prepackaged junk. Hopefully this distraction doesn't detract from the real issues.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trey X
11:36 AM on 05/10/2011
As an alternative, most parents/kids will do what I did as a student - bring your OWN beverage of choice from HOME!! This way, schools lose money, and the students are happy....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
02:48 PM on 05/10/2011
The schools in that district can ill afford to lose the money.
And the milk program in that district is quite successful.

This reeks of politics - distract from the real issues by creating one/sugar in everything is the target du jour for doing so.
10:50 AM on 05/10/2011
When I was in school we had half pints of milk, so the flavored milk was half the calories it is now. Can't they go back to that? or does it have to be a full 8oz for calcium intake?

Can't there be a compromise of adding less sugar to the milk? So much sugar in everything dulls kids taste, why would would they ever want to eat fruit when they have such sugary treats instead?