More

Paul Thomas Anderson's Scientology Movie Bought By Weinstein Company

Philip Seymour Hoffman

First Posted: 05/09/11 05:14 PM ET Updated: 07/09/11 06:12 AM ET

It's not uncommon for a film to hit out at organized religion, but a long-gestating Paul Thomas Anderson script is ready to do the uncomfortable: take on, in metaphor, the Hollywood-centric Church of Scientology.

Deadline reports that Anderson's proposed film, once under the working title, "The Master," but now without a name, has had its worldwide distribution rights bought by the Weinstein Company following a multi-studio bidding war. It guarantees a global audience for the film, which will star Philip Seymour Hoffman as a man who creates a religion in 1952, and Joaquin Phoenix as his second in command.

The film, which begins shooting in June, is a long time coming; the script was finished in 2009 and then shelved before the recent movement. According to Variety, the first iteration centered on the relationship between The Master (Hoffman's character) and Freddie (the lieutenant, to be played by Phoenix. "As the faith begins to gain a fervent following, Freddie finds himself questioning the belief system he has embraced, and his mentor," the industry daily reported.

Whether this was originally part of the story or not, the new script has Hoffman as a shaken war veteran who creates the religion in the 50's, which, according to Deadline, "catches on with other lost souls."

L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology, served in the Navy in World War II, and following his post-war release from the hospital, founded the belief system in 1952.

The group has a fervent following in Hollywood, including stars such as Tom Cruise and John Travolta. Clearly, they won't be a part of the film despite Anderson's talents; he's an Oscar-nominated writer/director, whose biggest hits include "Boogie Nights," "Punch-Drunk Love" and "There Will Be Blood."

For more, click over to Deadline.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ENTERTAINMENT

It's not uncommon for a film to hit out at organized religion, but a long-gestating Paul Thomas Anderson script is ready to do the uncomfortable: take on, in metaphor, the Hollywood-centric Church of ...
It's not uncommon for a film to hit out at organized religion, but a long-gestating Paul Thomas Anderson script is ready to do the uncomfortable: take on, in metaphor, the Hollywood-centric Church of ...
Filed by Jordan Zakarin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,123
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (35 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bholly72
11:40 AM on 05/12/2011
Hope they have big-time legal help on retainer. They'll need it. Bodyguards would probably be a good idea, too. When you consider what they did to Paulette Cooper, who wrote a very obscure book critical of them, you can be sure they'll do anything they can to stop this.
11:44 PM on 05/11/2011
Anderson's films are facinating. I would love to see what he does with this topic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FlangeSqueal
Hip urban unionista - fighting ignorance !
09:04 AM on 05/12/2011
I have to note that this blog has officially taken this article off the Entertainment page - I was wondering when the ex-A O L $ciento geeks at HuffPo would have enough of the excellent $ciento bashing that has been going on here for the past week !

The official $ciento response to this HAS ALREADY STARTED PEOPLE !
photo
Halsey
"There is a price to pay for speaking the truth. T
08:56 PM on 05/11/2011
This is interesting. Cruise was great in Magnolia, a Paul Thomas Anderson movie. I wonder if he saw something in Tom that prompted him to pen the film. (I'm just having fun with stream of consciousness).
Aside from Cruise, Travolta and Kirstie, for the life of me I can't think of another rabid (celeb) follower of scientology. It may be the glow is wearing off and the last trumpet has been sounded.
Still, Anderson is good, Hoffman is Great so I trust this will be a good film. Let's not forget, Paul (darn..he did Crash)..recently wrote a book about his break with the "church" (sic).
08:26 PM on 05/13/2011
In place of Scientology came a still rampant spinoff LGAT called 'est' (Erhard Seminars Training) from the 70's a/k/a/ and the modern revised version 'The Forum'.

The common theme is they are proselytizing fanatical 'nuts', and I would love to see that morsel written in to the script, if it isn't already. Of course, it could be a whole movie all by itself.
No kidding!
08:11 PM on 05/11/2011
Can't wait to see the movie, but those Scientologists don't mess around. Philip Seymour Hoffman had better hire a food taster.
photo
European1919
I am the Pigmâ’¶n
03:28 AM on 05/12/2011
Time to deploy team six to deal with the enemies within:banksters and scientologists, home grown terrorists and the Dove World Outreach Center.
photo
debrislide
I rob banks for a living, what do you do?
05:49 PM on 05/11/2011
He needs to take on a razor, a shower, and a comb. Looks like Nick Nolte.
04:08 PM on 05/11/2011
I see John Travolta playing this, not Seymour. Although if he does start this; Start by reading Dianetics The Mdern Science Of Mental Health and then read "How To Choose Your People" and then read "Have You LIved Before This Life?". Good luck.
photo
StrawHat
Eat veggies, don't vote for them
01:08 AM on 05/12/2011
I'd rather read a bottle of Drano. It would be more enlightening.
06:18 PM on 05/12/2011
Try reading 'Green Eggs and Ham' By Dr. Seuss first, - at least you won't have to wear plastic gloves when you read.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sydney Light
02:22 PM on 05/11/2011
This is why Hollywood remains great. Even for all of its profit motive, people like Weinstein (one of the most brilliant producers ever) take on tough topics and puts them out there to make people think... Movie making make be in one of its most fruitful and creative phases ever.
07:11 PM on 05/11/2011
Too bad Weinstein a fervent defender of Roman Polanski, though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FlangeSqueal
Hip urban unionista - fighting ignorance !
08:18 AM on 05/12/2011
Yeah - so ?
photo
multidoc
Re-animating the dead since 1922
09:33 AM on 05/12/2011
And Andrew Jackson was an enthusiastic slave owner. Your point?
11:15 AM on 05/11/2011
I wonder if the theaters will have electrodes hook up the seats.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Smurf Daddy
Don't just listen to those you agree with.
10:01 AM on 05/11/2011
I don't care what movie this guy is in, he's awesome.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daveh88
SLTFATF
09:43 AM on 05/11/2011
Go ahead, we've had movies mock Judaism and Christianity before so why not Scientology. I am Jewish and and I have not been offended at films that mocked the founding of my faith (there is one) and most of my christian friends loved "life of brian". All religions are fair game for films as long as it does not descend into bigotry
photo
StrawHat
Eat veggies, don't vote for them
01:09 AM on 05/12/2011
Scientology isn't a religion. It's a scam. How can one be bigoted against a scam?
06:21 PM on 05/12/2011
Exqueeze me, baking powder, - Scientology is a philosophy. They accept all religions and the head of the "Cult" studied it all ----including dark magic. That's when I said, I'll stay with Christian Science. A real religion. Although their philosophy works when you apply the ethics formula, and it really works. That is the science of the mind. Not a religion. You are right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daveh88
SLTFATF
09:53 AM on 05/13/2011
I am trying to be polite
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kvolovesart
09:38 AM on 05/11/2011
I just cannot believe rational people follow Scientology...it is completely bizarre and out there...I hope this film mirrors that "church" because I am interested to know the behind the scenes...
photo
multidoc
Re-animating the dead since 1922
08:55 AM on 05/11/2011
I'm getting a little tired of the commenters here who keep saying all religions are ultimately mythology (which I believe myself, BTW) and therefore all churches are the same. You are the same guys who say, "politicians are all the same" and don't vote. Some politicians, and some churches, are MUCH worse than others -- I doubt that, given the choice, any of you would be equally content to crawl bleeding into the Phelps church or your local catholic church -- and if out of laziness or resentment you pretend that there are no choices to be made, your decisions may affect many other people adversely besides yourselves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberaldawg
What are you looking at?
11:43 AM on 05/11/2011
At least with the Phelps church, you know going in what to expect.
photo
multidoc
Re-animating the dead since 1922
01:50 PM on 05/11/2011
You didn't vote in the 2010 elections, huh?
photo
StrawHat
Eat veggies, don't vote for them
01:14 AM on 05/12/2011
Fav'd. These same people (by their own lazy logic) would say that there's no difference between a lesbian, vegetarian, pacifist minister at a Unitarian church and Jim Jones of Jonestown massacre infamy.

It's a lazy, childish and irrational urge to take the complex and oversimplify it until words like "dangerous cult" lose all meaning.
photo
multidoc
Re-animating the dead since 1922
09:34 AM on 05/12/2011
I'd fan you, but apparently I already have.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:19 AM on 05/11/2011
Great to here PTA is back at it again. He is a great guy and a wonderful Director. We really enjoyed meeting and being around him during his filming of "There will be Blood."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jjgg5
04:40 AM on 05/11/2011
A virgin birth versus a spaceship landing on Earth from Mars (or, some such thing). Magical thinking is magical thinking. Next.
10:36 AM on 05/11/2011
That's completely missing the point. What possible relevance is your comparative opinion of their degree of craziness? The problem is Scientology is, in all likelihood -- at least judging by what escapees from the group say -- abusing and exploiting its members, including second-generation Scientologists who never even had any choice. They're doing appalling things. And they're tying up our court system and bankrupting critics with frivolous lawsuits, in order to make sure people can't find out what they're up to.

I mean, seriously, how is relevant that other religions believe bizarre and weird things? That doesn't mean they DO the same things. This is an intellectually lazy false equivalency, because it doesn't even begin to address what the actual problem with Scientology is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LandOfPinot
In vino veritas
02:21 PM on 05/11/2011
Let's see...
"The problem is Scientolog­y is, in all likelihood -- at least judging by what escapees from the group say -- abusing and exploiting its members..."
Of course the Catholic church never abused anybody, yet we heard a lot of reports about child abuse. Cue the double standard?
So yeah, a virgin birth and a spaceship landing wherever are two sides of the same coin: Myth.
photo
SuperRyan
Still as sexy as ever.
05:27 PM on 05/11/2011
The problem with the COS is not the mythology (which is one of the craziest), the problem is with how the COS does business.

And as for the mythology, the COS won't even share that information with members until after they have spent a fortune on auditing, and the "church" has enough information on the member to blackmail them from leaving.
11:19 PM on 05/12/2011
You got it in a nutshell. It's the perfect scam.

" We'll help you if you unload all your isuues with us but if you leave we'll hold that information against you" Takes a brave person to walk away from that. Especially when your family and friends that stay in are not allowed to comunicate with you. It's all so sad.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libnlandofthelost
Mrs. Curmudgeon
03:57 AM on 05/11/2011
I wish somebody would take on Opus Dei.