More

Renewable Energy Could Account For 80 Percent Of World's Needs By 2050: UN

Renewable Energy Un Ipcc

By MICHAEL CASEY   05/ 9/11 10:57 AM ET   AP

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates -- Renewable sources such as solar and wind could supply up to 80 percent of the world's energy needs by 2050 and play a significant role in fighting global warming, a top climate panel concluded Monday.

But the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said that to achieve that level, governments would have to spend significantly more money and introduce policies that integrate renewables into existing power grids and promote their benefits in terms of reducing air pollution and improving public health.

Authors said the report concluded that the use of renewables is on the rise, their prices are declining and that with the right policies, they will be an important tool both in tackling climate change and helping poor countries use the likes of solar or wind to develop their economies in a sustainable fashion.

"The report shows that it is not the availability of the resource but the public policies that will either expand or constrain renewable energy development over the coming decades," said Ramon Pichs, who co-chaired the group tasked with producing the report. "Developing countries have an important stake in this future – this is where 1.4 billion people without access to electricity live yet also where some of the best conditions exist for renewable energy deployment."

Governments endorsed the renewable report Monday after a four-day meeting. The nonbinding scientific policy document is to advise governments as they draw up policies and to help guide the private sector as it considers areas in which to invest.

Greenpeace and other environmentalists said Saudi Arabia and Qatar, two oil-rich states that don't have an interest in alternatives, successfully watered down the report's language on the cost benefits of renewables – a charge the Saudis denied, saying they only were arguing to stick with the science. Brazil, a major ethanol producer, opposed language on the negative effects of biofuels and hydro as well as the economic potential of other renewables.

The report reviewed bioenergy, solar energy, geothermal, hydropower, ocean energy and wind. It did not consider nuclear, so IPCC chairman Rajendar Pachauri said the recent nuclear accident in Japan was not discussed nor did it have any impact on the report's conclusions.

The IPCC has said swift, deep reductions in use of non-renewables are required to keep temperatures from rising more than 3.8 degrees Fahrenheit (2 Celsius) above preindustrial levels, which could trigger catastrophic climate impacts.

Stephan Singer, director for Global Energy Policy at WWF International, welcomed the report but said the IPCC should have gone further. He said its studies have found that the world could be fueled 100 percent by renewables by 2050.

"IPCC delivers a landmark report that shows the rapid growth, low-cost potential for renewable energy – but unfortunately does not endorse a 100 percent renewable energy pathway until 2050," Singer said in a statement. "We need to be fast if we want to tackle pressing issues as varied as energy security and efficiency and at the same time keep climate change well below the danger threshold of 2 degrees."

Greenpeace's Sven Teske agreed. "This is an invitation to governments to initiate a radical overhaul of their policies and place renewable energy center stage," he said. "On the run-up to the next major climate conference in South Africa in December, the onus is clearly on governments to step up to the mark."

Adnan Amin, the director general of the International Renewable Energy Agency which is based in Abu Dhabi, said the report "shows there is a growing global awareness about the potential for renewable energy" which he made clear has taken off in recent years.

From 2009 to 2010, Amin said investment in renewables has gone from $186 billion to $243 billion with China alone seeing a 30 percent increase. He said research and development in the sector has seen "record growth."

"These are remarkable figures for a sector still emerging," Amin said. "Where it points is some of the conclusions that the IPCC is coming to. We are seeing through research and development the technologic possibilities increasing and costs coming down and feasibility of investment in renewable energy increasing by the day. The opportunities are tremendous."

But the IPCC warned that further development of the sector will require significant investment in the next two decades – of as much as $1.5 trillion by 2020 and up to $7.2 trillion from 2020 to 2030.

"The deployment and development of renewables requires development of new infrastructure, otherwise we will not see further growth of renewables," said another of the report's co-chairs Ottmar Edenhofer.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates -- Renewable sources such as solar and wind could supply up to 80 percent of the world's energy needs by 2050 and play a significant role in fighting global warming, a ...
ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates -- Renewable sources such as solar and wind could supply up to 80 percent of the world's energy needs by 2050 and play a significant role in fighting global warming, a ...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 363
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roadrun
Question Authority
07:10 PM on 07/08/2011
Ooooh, that sounds expensive! So what are the costs of wars fought to obtain oil and the cost of military to protect shipping of it? I wonder how much it will cost to reduce the acidity of the oceans and bring them back to life like they used to be so we can eat that food once again? What is the total cost in the past year of the natural disasters from around the world? How much does it cost to make new glaciers that supply rivers which bring water to drink and grow crops? Are air filters which are big enough to clean the air of the things spewed into it every day very expensive? What cost to make the Gulf of Mexico clean again from the oil "spill"/gusher? And other spills around the world? Is it expensive to move those people in low places like Bangladesh to dry ground? How much to re-ice Antarctica, Greenland and the Arctic? What is the actual cost of the forest fires in Russia and North America this past year when we can't even calculate the impact of them yet? How much for the increased land area that malaria affects now as opposed to 40 years ago? What cost from beetles that kill trees due to warm winters?

Okay, $1.5 trillion in 9 years and $7.2 trillion in 19 or 29 years? Hmmm, maybe I'm not good at math because when I figure that comes out to a bargain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roadrun
Question Authority
06:23 PM on 07/08/2011
Whoever jumps on the manufacture and sale of this alternate energy bandwagon is going to reap huge rewards. The result of going to non-CO2 emission is a boost in quality of life for the population who goes that route, as Africa will find out quickly. As much as it seems expensive to swap technologies it will turn out to be greatly cheaper than the constant drain on any economy that tries so hard to keep the polluting oil, coal and gas economy going. We have become numb to the actual cost of keeping the CO2 emitting economy going, so much so that people think the actual cost of gas is really around $3.50 a gallon when it is actually about $25 a gallon.

One day people won't even remember all of the issues we deal with every day that are caused by oil, coal or gas. It will be in history books and kids will wonder what was wrong with us.
photo
OLJW00
right is right
10:26 AM on 06/16/2011
LOL - They went and did it again.

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/climate-change-panel-in-hot-water-again-over-biased-energy-report-2298055.html

It has now been revealed that the "science" behind this claim was written by a member of Greenpeace and uses the "sunniest" (pun intended) of 164 potential scenarios to make their FUZZY math work.

Liberals are funny..and reliable to boot!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Organic-Guy
Organic Gardener, Carpenter, Philosopher, Agitator
10:12 AM on 07/06/2011
So, you wouldn't believe anything about clean energy unless it was written by Exxon and Inhoff their bought and paid for corrupt political spearhead in Washington is that it?
Being a member of a group of positive thinkers instead of stinkin thinkers doesn't make you unreliable. If you read the information it states very clearly that the scenario counts on a lot of things like heavy investment by governments including the US which right now has it's head in a dark place because of mind sets like yours and many other things. It points out very clearly that the world will have to change it's mind about a lot of things and rearrange it's priorities for it to happen. It's just a hopeful projection probably designed to show just what good can happen if people would just do the right things starting now instead of continuing to invest in dirty, polluting, dangerous technologies that may very well kill us all. Showing people how good the future can be instead of discouraging them is probably unfamiliar territory for folks like you who seem to enjoy trouble, discontent and feelings of hopelessness.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Standley
opinionated jerk
09:34 PM on 07/06/2011
Tell ya what, get yer mind away from the silly-@55 hot-button climate change issue for a minute. Consider just a couple of the other benefits of getting away from coal and oil- fewer wars fought over oil, fewer mine deaths and torn-up real estate for coal. Can't you think of a few more good reasons to get away from the Flintstone technologies?
photo
Mike Gallagher
Solar Installer, All-Around Awesome Guy
02:20 PM on 06/13/2011
I work for an solar installation company in the San Francisco area, and we're seeing a big increase in residential installations of solar. It's been a great experience seeing how excited people get when they have a solar array installed on their home.

Check out some of our installs on our Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/wattelectricinc

You can also check us out at www.wattelectricinc.com
02:04 AM on 05/30/2011
I will never understand liberal environmentalists. Who owns these renewable energy companies? Could it be those same multinationals that also sell us oil, and natural gas? Is it not GE that is one of the biggest makers of wind turbines(which they got from Enron), and natural gas and coal turbines? Is it not Bp producing solar panels now and building wind farms across the US(Two are under construction right now here in Texas)? And not only do you plan on forcing speculative price increases in their current fields with threatening, albeit toothless policy initiatives, but you are going to subsidize and pay for their business transition AND eliminate their lower cost competition (Liberals hate nuclear *generally*) ? And who is it that these higher energy costs are going to hit the hardest? I know the rich who don't care will still be able to afford to drive their Hummers, and the rich that do care will be able to afford to drive a Nissan Leaf or Volt, but what of the rest of us? Shouldn't we instead focus on a grassroots approach to renewable energy, rather than you liberals engaging in an ironic trickle-down approach (Tax breaks, tax credits, subsidies and grants to multinationals)? Liberals engaging in trickle-down economics, I'd laugh if it wasn't going to harm this country as much.
12:45 AM on 06/05/2011
I grew up in the mountains w/ clean air and ever-reaching views. In the city I can see only 20 miles and the horizon is brown. Is that so difficult to understand? Oil and coal are not clean. You mention the that you're against tax breaks/credits for renewables, yet you don't mention anything about the oil subsidies we give out. The very subsidies that were going to be chopped, and now are not going to be chopped. Furthermore, our dependence on oil only serves to transfer a bunch of our wealth to middle eastern countriles And you think renewables are harming our country? In the long run it won't matter because humans will extract all the easy to reach oil and pure economics will make renewables cheaper. In the short run we should be ramping up renewables for energy independence, cleaner air, and the eventual transition away from oil which we have to make anyways.
05:26 PM on 06/12/2011
You can question all you want but the fact is conservatives are in denial we even need renewables and are cutting any funding for research.

So your points are moot in the backward conservative world.
11:23 PM on 05/28/2011
Nuclear energy gave us Fukishima and Chernobyl -- poisoning the air, land and water.
Oil gave us BP and the poisoned Gulf.
Coal gave us the Massey mine disaster.

It is time to transition to safe clean alternative energy. Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from algae, cellulose and waste are the future. Let the transition to clean energy begin.
10:28 PM on 05/16/2011
I am wasting by not using electricity.. my battery bank is full at around noon (or earlier). From then on, all sun light "caught" on the PV-plates does not reach my batteries in the form of electricity, unless I use electricity (the system is off the grid). So, I make use of the electricity and turn this sunshine into music in my little solar music studio. (if interested: http://www.TurtugaBlanku.com )
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lori Rob
right wrong
04:40 PM on 05/12/2011
1.6 Billion People on planet Earth, 25% of which are in the dark..The Sahara Desert alone can capture enough solar energy to supply all the world’s electricity
needs and more..so what's the problem? Big Oil Monopolies with deep Pockets and thousands of Lobbyists...where are the Lobbyists for Sustainable Energies?
http://www.geni.org/globalenergy/library/energytrends/currentusage/renewable/solar/solar-systems-in-the-desert/Solar-Systems-in-the-Desert.pdf
photo
time1910
time is on my side
07:52 AM on 06/23/2011
F&F :) I found another project on clean power from deserts: http://www.desertec.org/en/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roadrun
Question Authority
06:32 PM on 07/08/2011
Not a criticism, just a correction. There are just short of 7 billion people, all of which would benefit greatly from sustainable energies.
07:14 AM on 05/12/2011
How about we stop the war on drugs, legalize hemp and marijuana, invest the money into hemp, solar and other green energy
04:19 AM on 05/12/2011
Do I understand that to save the planet, this coming decade the nations of the world together would have to spend almost half as much as the Iraq war cost the US? Dang. We'll never find that kind of money.
07:04 AM on 05/12/2011
sadly, you might be right..
12:49 AM on 06/05/2011
What do you mean we will never find that kind of money? That's actually not so expensive. I mean, we spent that much on a war, we can clearly spend half that on renewables. The science and technology for renewables is here, unfortunately, the politics are not.
07:29 PM on 05/11/2011
This is the same place that predicted 50 million "climate refugees" by 2010, so I would take this prediction with a bit of salt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean land-ocean temperature 1880 to present
10:24 PM on 05/11/2011
alteredstory
Commented 2 days ago in Green
Ok, so you picked kind of a wrong prediction to focus on. What they said was 50 million DISPLACED. 

Droughts and floods in China "affected" over 250 million people. 15.2 million evacuated (http://en­­.­wikiped­i­a.­org/w­ik­i/2­010­_Ch­ina_­f­lood­s , http://en.­­­wikipedi­a­.­org/wi­ki­/2­010_­Chi­na_­dr­ough­t_an­­d_dus­t_st­o­rms)

In Pakistan, floods destroyed 1.8 million homes by mid September of 2010, and somewhere around 6-12 million "affected" not including disease and starvation (http://en­­.­wikiped­i­a.­org/w­ik­i/2­010­_Pa­kist­a­n_fl­oods)

That's around 260 million from only THREE weather events in 2010 ALONE.

That doesn't include South America, North America, Europe, or Australia, ALL of which had major weather disasters in 2010. Is that REALLY what you want to stake your argument on? REALLY?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Apollos Dad
The drapes don't match the rug
03:21 AM on 05/12/2011
Great post, TY
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Standley
opinionated jerk
05:49 PM on 06/10/2011
I wouldn't be at all surprised if you were able to find 50M people who have moved due to lack of water in the last few years.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
05:23 PM on 05/11/2011
Renewable Energy Could Account For 80 Percent Of World's Needs By 2050: UN ....

THAT'S GREAT NEWS BUT.............what are they doing about everything else that's in the process of collapse?
03:58 PM on 05/11/2011
Its kinda funny that you guys turn your head away from what really goes into green energy.. Perhaps if you were aware of the processes that it takes to make the elements that go into these 'green' devices, you would seriously reconsider what you champion... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_ch_Q6ZQvM
12:35 PM on 05/11/2011
Costco is offering DIY grid tied solar systems now.
07:30 PM on 05/11/2011
Big deal, we have been offering them for 32 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Standley
opinionated jerk
05:50 PM on 06/10/2011
It is a big deal and who are "we"?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
Women, their rights & nothing less ~ SusanBAnthony
11:53 AM on 05/11/2011
For years I've been hoping that the USA would jump into clean green energy the way we created the Space program in the 1960's, and won the race to the moon with Russia, because Presdident Kenedy made it a priority for our country.

Think we should do the same with clean green energy and China. See which of our countries can go greenest fastest.

Here's an article by Juan Cole making the same point ☮ 
http://www.juancole.com/2011/05/the-green-gap-with-china-us-falling-behind-as-congress-fiddles-cole-in-truthdig.html
03:59 PM on 05/11/2011
here a great video you have to watch! ;) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_ch_Q6ZQvM
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
Women, their rights & nothing less ~ SusanBAnthony
10:02 AM on 05/12/2011
Incredible and eye-opening video, bob. OMG. Thank you.

The human race has got to find a way to live in harmony with this Earth and her animals. Clearly "rare Earth" is not the way!!! ☮ F & F
12:50 AM on 06/05/2011
Can you re-post a different link? You-Tube banned it for copyright reasons.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Apollos Dad
The drapes don't match the rug
03:23 AM on 05/12/2011
HLL, Good to see you, I cant believe I had not fanned you- my apologies! Love the new Av
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
Women, their rights & nothing less ~ SusanBAnthony
10:04 AM on 05/12/2011
Thanks so much, ADad. Fanned back at ya.
Appreciate the thumbs up on my Av. Very kind ;-) ☮