iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Leading Mortgage Firms May Be Forced To Reduce Loan Balances For Distressed Homeowners

Foreclosure Crisis

First Posted: 05/10/11 09:18 PM ET Updated: 07/10/11 06:12 AM ET

The nation's five largest mortgage firms may be forced to reduce loan balances for distressed homeowners as part of an agreement with state attorneys general and the Obama administration to settle claims of faulty mortgage practices, a top state official involved in the negotiations said Tuesday.

The proposal is part of a set of remedies banks would have to agree to in order to settle the state and federal probes launched last autumn, which found that the largest mortgage firms illegally seized the homes of at least dozens of borrowers and engaged in shoddy practices that short-changed troubled borrowers.

Mortgage principal reductions would comprise part of a larger fine levied on Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Wells Fargo and Ally Financial. Penalties could reach $30 billion, officials said.

The forced reduction of mortgage principal as a penalty against flawed past practices has proven contentious. Some Republican attorneys general have objected, as have some Republican members of Congress.

On Tuesday, however, a state official told The Huffington Post on condition of anonymity that the option "very much remains on the table."

While officials have not determined how much would be exacted from the banks -- and specific dollar amounts to settle the probes have not yet been discussed between the state and federal governments and the banks -- the proposal to compel financial firms to cut loan balances is part of one of two documents circulated Tuesday at a hotel in northern Virginia, where bankers, state officials and policy makers from the Obama administration began a three-day meeting.

The targeted banks have argued vociferously, both in private discussions and in public, that they opposed cutting distressed homeowners' principal balances.

During meetings two weeks ago, representatives from such banks conducted a presentation which they claimed illustrated that mandating principal reductions would not prevent a significant number of new foreclosures and would be harmful to the general economy.

The banks said "it would trigger a stampede of strategic defaults," an official familiar with one of the two discussions said at the time, referring to instances in which borrowers who can afford to make good on their obligations choose not to. Strategic defaults are much more common in the business world than among homeowners, according to experts who study the issue. Homeowners generally feel a moral obligation to continue making their payments, whereas corporations view the breaking of contracts as pure business decisions.

Government officials questioned the banks' assumptions and fought back against their claims.

The other document circulated Tuesday outlines standards that mortgage firms would have to adhere to for current and future borrowers, like forcing banks to ensure they have the right documentation when they move to repossess homes. The document was revised from an earlier draft first circulated in early March, The Huffington Post reported last week.

The standards are a response to investigations launched last fall after the nation's largest lenders voluntarily halted home seizures when faulty document practices -- like so-called "robo-signing" -- came to light, erupting into a nationwide scandal. Currently, no national standards govern how mortgage firms should treat borrowers who fall behind on their payments or default on their obligations. Congress has taken up the matter, and officials generally agree on how mortgage firms should treat borrowers.

Tuesday's bipartisan meeting included the Washington Attorney General Rob McKenna (R) and Colorado Attorney General John Suthers (R), who called in remotely. Top officials from Florida's and Texas' attorney general offices, both led by Republicans, attended, along with the Democratic attorneys general from Delaware, Iowa, Illinois, North Carolina and Connecticut.

Top officials from the Treasury Department, Department of Justice and the Department of Housing and Urban Development were also present.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The nation's five largest mortgage firms may be forced to reduce loan balances for distressed homeowners as part of an agreement with state attorneys general and the Obama administration to settle cla...
The nation's five largest mortgage firms may be forced to reduce loan balances for distressed homeowners as part of an agreement with state attorneys general and the Obama administration to settle cla...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,063
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (32 total)
01:50 PM on 06/10/2011
I WAS IN A SITUTATION AT THAT TIME WHERE I COULDN'T AFFORDED MY HOME BECAUSE OF AN INJURY THAT ALMOST COUSE MY LIFE. I AM SO GLAD THAT OBAMA GOT THE TREASURY TO TEMPORARILY PENALIZE MORTGAGE COMPANIES AND IS PUTTING PRESURE ON THE BANK..I BEEN TRYING TO KEEP MY HOME, AND THE BANK OF AMERICA BEEN GIVING ME A HARD TIME..I WANT THEM TO DO A MODIFICATION AND IT HAS BEEN 2 YEARS WITH NO RESPOND FROM THEM. WHY DO THEY KEEP TAKING SO LONG? GIVE TO THE PEOPLE WHO IS WILLING TO KEEP THEIR HOMES, AND GET THEM OUT OF YOUR WAY. YOU WOULDN'T BE IN THIS MESS IF YOU HELP THE PEOPLE THAT WANTS TO KEEP THEIR HOMES..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
04:04 PM on 05/19/2011
Helloooooooooooo

Any news on this one since the article came out?

Thanks for any updates.
07:14 PM on 05/16/2011
Financial Institutions are killing the Housing Market
If financial institutions were trying to retain the value of the distressed properties working out a solution with the current owner will be in the best interest of all parties.

No distress sale to reduce the market. No reduction of value of the neighborhood due to vacant unkept properties becoming eye sores. No theft of appliances or additional damage by squatters. No extra loss of value to the lender as the value of the property will be reset based on the new appraisal. No extra costs to the lender caused by foreclosing and selling costs (commissions) that the lender will have to incur. No Delinquent Property Taxes will have to be paid by the lender adding to the cost of foreclosure.

Foreclosures are already hurting home values and will cause another decline of the current values when the properties are auctioned off in the market. This spiral downturn on values is gaining momentum as foreclosed properties are sold at distressed prices "AS IS" vacant and without proper inspections to protect the home buyers from unforeseen defects i.e.: sprinklers, heating, air conditioners, roofs, plumbing, appliances, foundations, garage doors and water heaters.

By reducing the principal balance the lender is limiting their exposure to the additional costs that are incurred by foreclosure. This also retains the value of the asset at a current appraised level helping the neighborhood values to rebound and start to gain value (equity).

GARY
CRUISER4NEWS
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
05:05 PM on 05/16/2011
I don't like the word "may" in the headline.
"May" means its not a genuine attempt.
02:06 PM on 05/16/2011
My mortgage is with Wells Fargo and I feel they are deliberately trying make me loose my house. I tried twice for a loan modification before I actually had to file bankruptcy. They turned me down 3 time and I am still in jeapordy. I get paid twice a month and I don't bring home enough in one paycheck to make a house payment and still be able to buy gas or groceries. The other check has to go to everything else and it is barely enough to buy gas or groceries. I can't do anything else. My house needs repairs and they need to be done so that I can get more insurance. The insurance that is on the house is only on the mortgage and that is because Wells Fargo took it over. I had homeowners insurance but they took it over and started an escrow that I did not agree upon. I live in Alabama, do you know of anyone in Alabama that could help me? If I don't get help soon, I am probably going to have to sale and I really won't be any better off. I am a single 57 yr. old woman trying to make it on my own and I can't because of Wells Fargo. I need someone that would check out my title trail.
10:41 AM on 05/16/2011
HELP ME UNDERSTAND ….. Banks are opposed to reducing principal balances for distressed homeowners. Republican AG’s & members of Congress have also objected. Yet when it comes to saving their own homes from foreclosure, lawmakers are quick to accept offers from banks to get principles reduced on their own homes … and banks are eager to do it for them.

Read how bank lobbyists stopped lawmakers from introducing a bill to make it tougher to foreclose. Note the timing & how one lawmaker got the principle on his house reduced by 56% !

STATE SENATOR’S MORTGAGE REDUCTION QUESTIONED :
http://mandelman.ml-implode.com/2011/04/az-rep-seel-drops-amendment-requiring-pre-foreclosure-chain-of-title-2-days-after-servicer-grants-principal-reduction/

WATCH HIS RESPONSE:
http://www.kpho.com/local-video/index.html?grabnetworks_video_id=4688760

(Can you spell P-A-Y-O-L-A ?) (Can you spell B-R-I-B-E?)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builderman55
Featherless Biped
10:53 AM on 05/14/2011
We can't do that!! It will interfere with the free market!! Oh, wait...
10:35 AM on 05/14/2011
The government needs to step up its monitoring of the banks and hold them accountable.
Bank of America has been stringing me along on a home loan modification since FEB of 2009.
My home value in Riverside Ca. has dropped about 40% making it impossible to get a refi to obtain a more affordable interest rate,
WHERE is the help for distressed home owners and WHO is watching the banks?
I have contacted the bank, the OCC, the Treasury Dept, The Senate Banking Comm, the BBB. HUD, My Congressman, Senator and the CA Goverors office as well as all newspapers
So far NO HELP & NO Modification.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Deihl
12:56 PM on 05/13/2011
Banks will say,' ok,we'll do that ',but in Reality,they will do the opposite,They are nothing but,Goverment Legalized Banksters.They have been paying off people in High Places for years,and as they have the money to pay people off they will get away with for years to come.Our Country is in ruins,and they along with WALL STREET will benefit off our greif for trying to make a better living.Our Goverment puts Mobsters in Jail,not Banksters.It's all about the Pay-Offs,and who's getting it.
09:22 AM on 05/13/2011
The banks ran roughshod over the law and stole millions...Now the government's making'um put it back...You bigtime Law 'N Order types gotta problem with that ??!?...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles McNease
03:18 PM on 05/12/2011
Our country is sinking in quicksand and what is our government doing? Obama is worried about illegals being treated bad. Secretary Ray Lahood is worried about people riding bicycles, civil unions by gays is big news and Michell had a hootananny at the white house for a bunch of radicals. Democrats are screaming the debt ceiling must be raised or the world will come to an end. Big new is Obama's poll rating at 60%, based on the sampling of 50 democrats and 25 republicans. Pull the plug and let the boat sink. After all, that stuff floats, so why is the democrats afraid?
09:08 AM on 05/13/2011
Yup, and as the boat sinks and that water comes up to your lower lip we'll listen for you to scream " The government outta DO sumthin' "
photo
gywkwakwa
sick of LP bull
01:38 PM on 05/12/2011
Strong arm tactics again from our government as a means of controlling private industry. Obama, ACORN SEIU, AFL-CIO and the CRA forced banks into giving loans to people that could not pay them back with the promise that Fannie Mae and Freddie mac would cover it. Now they want to take-over banks (dictating how they operate) for doing what they forced them to do. ABO (anyone but Obama) in 2012. restore the constitution and freedom.
09:15 AM on 05/13/2011
Repeating lies don't make'um true gywk...Fannie ,Freddie,ACORN or CRA didn't have squat to do with the mortgage meltdown...Toxic subprime securities outta Wall Street accomplished that..and no, those were not regulated cause "the Great Free Market is always perfect"..Yup. a 'Perfect Storm'...........
10:38 AM on 05/14/2011
George Bush was in the White house when the banks were making bad loans out of GREED, not a push from the government,
Obama was not even in Washington then.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Milwaukeetj1
Keep your $$ in your neighborhood.
01:19 PM on 05/12/2011
I hope they fine them to high heck. I am barely holding on to my property, which five years ago was worth 125k and now 70k and yes I still have to pay for it. BS!
11:44 AM on 05/12/2011
We cannot fine and tax ourselves out of this problem. It will have to be done slowly. The only hope is for the economy to get better and for common sense to prevail. It really saddens me that so many people were hurt but this is not the answer. This is clearly a political act by the administration with the goal of reelection by saying that they are doing something but it will not change anything. Believe me, I will shed no tears for the banks if they have broken the law and must pay. My tears are for those shattered, crippled or destroyed by this housing tragedy. If "sticking" it to the banks who took taxpayer money and now do not give us loans, credit cards or mortgages would solve the problem, I would say fine, but it will not.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles McNease
11:36 AM on 05/12/2011
Banks are evil, Wall St. is evil, the rich are evil. This is the liberal democrats theme song. Guess what, according to current facts, 75% of all rich people are democrats???????? Explain this.
photo
unfoxworthy
We:ScottOlsens,the misfits,out to change the world
02:45 PM on 05/12/2011
Lemme guess...
you were eating the big color crayons when the rest of us were writing the alphabet
weren't you Charles?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles McNease
02:58 PM on 05/12/2011
No, unfoxworthy, I was running a business, raising my family when you were having lunch out of your diapers, thinking it was welfare cheese and you were getting a free lunch
11:10 AM on 05/13/2011
Democrats are better educated and smarter....therefore, they make more money. Hence, the phrase "liberal elite"