iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ray LaHood 'Concerned' About Safety Of Urban Bikers, Unsure If He's A Hipster

Lahood

First Posted: 05/10/11 04:08 PM ET Updated: 07/10/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood signaled on Tuesday that his department would be looking into measures to encourage automobile drivers to observe better safety standards when it came to bicyclists cohabiting the roadways.

In an interview with The Huffington Post, the Illinois Republican praised various cities for restructuring transportation policy around cleaner forms of transit, singling out the construction of bike lanes to encourage biking as particularly effective. But with additional bikers on the road come additional risks. And as head of the Department of Transportation, LaHood noted his “concern” over the “way that bikers are treated when they are on streets.”

“I’m concerned that people that are driving cars have a level of respect for bikers, and that’s the reason that we have these bike lanes,” said LaHood. “Bikers have as much right to the streets as anybody driving a car and I am concerned about [their safety]."

Told that his heartfelt defense of bikers came off like the musings of a run-of-the-mill hipster, LaHood professed genuine confusion.

“I don’t even know what that term means,” he said.

LaHood’s encouragement of more urban biking has been echoed -- and in some cases, preceded by -- even more vocal championing from local lawmakers. In Chicago, incoming mayor and former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel has pledged to create a “world-class bike network” and has hired Gabe Klein, former head of Washington D.C.'s Department of Transportation, to fill that role in the Windy City. In New York, the Bloomberg administration has pushed back against public angst over the construction of bike lanes in the city’s busy streets by noting that the past four years have seen a 50% increase in people who commute to work via bikes.

“The New York of the future should accommodate all of these options,” Deputy Mayor Howard Wolfson wrote on The Huffington Post.

As for whether or not safety has decreased as biking has increased, the data is not entirely as alarming as LaHood suggested. According to a 2009 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) study, there were 630 "pedalcyclists" killed due to traffic accidents. That number was well below the 718 killed in 2008, and even further below the 786 killed in 2005. However, the study noted that: “The majority of pedalcyclist fatalities in 2009 occurred in urban areas (70%). In respect to vehicle crash location in relation to an intersection, most pedalcyclist fatalities in 2009 occurred at non-intersections. Compared to 2008 these numbers increased by 5 percent.”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,693
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
photo
elsquibbs
Socially liberal, fiscally prudent atheist.
04:52 PM on 05/12/2011
"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of behaviors and culture I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description of "hipsterism," and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and Ray LaHood is not that."
photo
oliviaah
we need more cowbell
12:55 PM on 05/12/2011
Let me understand this, bikes on sidewalks vs pedestrians is not allowed, yet bikes vs mororized vehicles is. Look at the disparity in regards to potential injury.
I used to work week-ends, and the route took me on a curvy narrow two lane road with no passing it's entire 4 mile length. Every Sunday morning, I'd encounter the same group of cyclists, riding in a group, and in no apparent hurry. They paid no heed to the fact that I was behind them and could not pass. About half way on this road there was an entrance to a country club with a large circle drive.....could they have done the drive and let traffic pass? Of course not. There are two sides to this debate, and while the cyclists I encountered were perhaps making a point, they were also jeoporadizing themselves and motorists as well.
Consideration on everyone's part should be expected.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RichieB
Science is true whether you believe it or not
10:22 PM on 05/11/2011
A little bit of progress in GA today on biking laws. Gov Deal signed a bill today requiring motorists to scoot over at least 3 feet when passing a cyclist. The state will publicize the new law and it will also be valid law in court cases concerning accidents to cyclists. A nice move from a republican governor. As an avid cyclist, I would love to see more dedicated bike paths and lanes. But that probably ain't gonna happen in this economy.
http://www.ajc.com/news/move-over-motorists-new-942645.html
05:46 PM on 05/11/2011
For the Transportation Secretary to speak about urban cycling without knowlege of "hipster" cyclists, is akin to him speaking about our nation's interstate highways without having knowledge of what semi-trucks are.
photo
syrius
Excuse me, EXCUSE ME!
06:25 PM on 05/11/2011
What are semi-trucks? El Caminos?!?
12:18 PM on 05/16/2011
What total nonsense. LaHood is looking at the transportation data and knows that bicycle infrastructure adds capacity at very little cost and with many benefits. He doesn't need to know anything about "hipsters" or any other bicycle-culture nonsense to know to support bicycle infrastructure.
04:12 PM on 05/11/2011
It's about time. Props to Mr. LaHood for stating the obvious!
03:09 PM on 05/11/2011
Both motor vehicle drivers and bicycle riders need to observe the laws in order to be safe. This isn't a Federal problem however; it is the responsibility of the states. The people who use the roads must be educated on the laws and the the laws must be enforced.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robrtl
02:13 PM on 05/11/2011
as a biker i realiz biking is inherently dangerous. during any year about10%of my large bicycling club members are injured . about 3% seriously.... the number of injuries that occr without a motor vehicle involved far exceeds the that involving cars...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A ScottMiller
01:56 PM on 05/11/2011
Good article, but it's not productive to criticize and ostracize drivers. This type of talk could backfire by angering them.

Rather, let's focus on the idea of adding more bike lanes, and at least in the Boston area, re-paving the roads. It's the potholes which present the biggest risk to cyclists' safety, since they force cyclists to choose between hitting a pothole and swerving into traffic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
too young but old enough
I already know how this is going to turn out...
03:37 PM on 05/11/2011
Totally agree on the pothole problem.

It'll be interesting to see what happens around the city once the bike-sharing program is firmly in place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pakaal
Pigs, in cages, on antibiotics
01:34 PM on 05/11/2011
Here in Hawaii we have cycling lanes, but lots of cyclists refuse to use them because growing numbers of drivers have a "bicyclist = nuisance" attitude. That can be frustrating for pedestrians, since the only alternative for cyclists is to use the sidewalk (emphasis on "walk") instead. No wonder we're seeing more protest rides on the streets, cyclists are getting tired of dealing with this attitude. We need more bicycles on the streets, not fewer.

And yeah, there are plenty of cyclists who ignore rules, they suck too. But this isn't a "might makes right" situation, everyone has to be more careful, and since the cars have the advantage of weight and size, and the disadvantages of being in a closed environment thus less cognizant of what's going on around them, IMO it's reasonable to ask drivers to err on the side of caution, rather than getting on the bicyclists' cases to do so.
04:13 PM on 05/11/2011
I live in downtown Honolulu, and I would never, ever ride a bicycle here. I walk and run every day and rarely drive. As it is, drivers fail to yield for pedestrians.
01:28 PM on 05/11/2011
Wow what bike hatred...Bicyclists do not deserve the same respect as other traffic on the road?...ridiculous! If all we do is base our judgments on anecdotal evidence, then discussion is pointless. If one looks with an open mind there are plenty of examples of wanton disregard for others by BOTH bicyclists and motorists. If you haven't seen both then your dogma is interfering with your intellect. Motorists..get over it..bikes are here to stay...bicyclists...get over it...you're not the only thing on the road. btw I've been an urban bicyclist in Chicago 40yrs.
01:23 PM on 05/11/2011
Don't you need a driver's license to be on the street with a car? Is it actually true that bikes have "the same rights?"

I ride a bike, but never in traffic lanes, and I'll admit that I don't stop at all stops, but, as I said, I don't ride in traffic lanes.

The day bikes follow all of the traffic laws and there is a means of keeping small children out of the left turn lane it might work. Until then, it's foolish.
01:22 PM on 05/11/2011
Getting those bikes tangled up in the under parts of my car is a pain !

Guess we could use more bike lanes/paths..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TOCB
Both major parties are married to money
01:15 PM on 05/11/2011
I did not bikers had as much right to the streets as drivers. There was a biker the other day riding in the middle of the street and I thought he should at least get to the side and let cars pass him. I had no idea he could lawfully be in the middle of the street riding a bicycle. This is very dangerous and asking for trouble. They should be in bike lanes. It is foolish to challenge motorized vehicles.
01:53 PM on 05/11/2011
Legally riding a bike down a road is a challenge to you? O_o
02:17 PM on 05/11/2011
The other day, as I was commuting to work on my bike from Brooklyn to Manhattan, a large grocery truck swerved swerved well into the bike lane that I happened to be riding in. I could have been killed. Here, in NYC, it's unlawful for cyclists to ride on the sidewalk and where there is a designated bike lane we must use it unless there is a good reason not to. Good reasons abound in the form of pot holes, double parked cars, dumpsters, open car doors, and large trucks crossing dangerously over the line, to mention a few. That doesn't always stop cops from handing out tickets for it.

Without protected bike lanes, where should we ride if not in the middle of the street?
01:14 PM on 05/11/2011
First, I ride a bike, but not in traffic lanes. It just isn't smart.

Just how can you "Share the road" with vehicles that travel at a slower speed and observe NONE of the traffic laws?

On the subject of bikes being in left turn lanes, I'm not sure they are buying themselves anything. If they were to the right and crossed the street twice instead of being in the left turn lane, they would be about even. So they are risking serious injury because they can.

One more point, and I saw this one. Is it ok to be in the left turn lane at age 21, with a good road bike? How about 12? Six?

I saw a kid with him mom in a left turn lane. The kid was probably 6, maybe 5. He was so small and hard to see there is no definition of anything that says that was a good idea.

I miss the old days where it was clear that slower vehicles should be to the right side. Even with the car doors it was safer.
foresure
Brash and Harsh
12:30 PM on 05/11/2011
Secretary LaHood has been a surprisingly good, and active leader.
01:26 PM on 05/11/2011
But he is just wrong that nikes have the same rights. You need a license, registration, and be a certain age to drive a motor vehicle.

You also have to have a helmet to ride a motorcycle or a scooter, but not so a bike. Not the same at all.
02:10 PM on 05/11/2011
There will never be a bike registration mandated by a city or state due to the volume of bikes. Hell I have 4 just on my own.

A cyclist can get a ticket for running stop signs,red lights, and even speeding. and it is the same fine as a motor vehicle. There are age restrictions on where you can ride (at least here in Chicago). Children under the age of thirteen are allowed to ride on the sidewalk.

As far as your motorcycle helmet statement they vary from state to state (IL it is your choice to wear a helmet or not).

Bikes that are on the road at night are required my law to have front and rear lights visible up to 500 ft.