iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Despite Serious Risks, Teens Continue Indoor Tanning

Teen Tanning

The Huffington Post   Catherine Pearson First Posted: 05/10/11 09:44 AM ET Updated: 07/10/11 06:12 AM ET

Though most teenage tanners believe that tanning beds can cause cancer, many of them go anyway, new research shows. A survey conducted on behalf of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) found that 32 percent of white females between the age of 14 and 22 had used a tanning bed in the last year.

Dr. Ellen Marmur, Chief Dermatologic and Cosmetic Surgery at The Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York, and a member of the AAD, said that in her opinion, tanning beds can be even more harmful to your health than tanning outdoors. Because people take off most, or all, of their clothing, they expose parts of their body that might not otherwise be exposed to sunlight. And because a trip to the salon takes just a few minutes, it is feasible for indoor tanners to go several times a week -- more often than they might head to the beach. This, Marmur says, means increased exposure to harmful rays.

The type of exposure indoor tanners get reportedly makes a difference, too. Dr. Lawrence E. Gibson, a dermatologist with the Mayo Clinic has said: "Most tanning beds emit mainly UVA rays -- which may increase the risk of melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer."

Many states across the country have imposed restrictions requiring that minors have parental consent to use tanning beds, and some 20 have bills banning tanning for those under 18, the Associated Press reports. And last Monday, a California state senate panel approved one such bill.

The American Cancer Society has made anti-tanning bans for teenagers one of its top legislative priorities and is currently throwing its weight behind an effort to ban indoor tanning in anyone under 18 in New York. The state currently requires written consent from parents of anyone under 18 and has banned indoor tanning for children 14 and younger. The new bill would extend that ban to anyone under 18.

"We don't let children buy cigarettes, even if they were to come in with a note from mom," said Russ Sciandra, director of advocacy for The American Cancer Society's New York branch. "The government has an obligation to protect kids."

The bill was co-introduced by Assemblyman Harvey Weisenberg, a former lifeguard for whom the bill is important on a personal level. His wife was diagnosed with melanoma and he himself has had several cancerous moles removed -- one just a few weeks ago.

"These young women -- and it's mostly women -- are going [to the tanning beds] and they're being damaged," he said. "We have to educate and we have to make people aware of the risks, but we also have to deny access. "

For his part, John Overstreet, a spokesperson for the Indoor Tanning Association, disagrees. He believes the issue is beyond the purview of the government, and regards it as a first step from legislators who want to do away with the tanning industry altogether.

"Whether or not the kids get a suntan should be left to their parents, not the government," he said. "It's as simple as that." He adds that in spite of the stance of groups like the American Cancer Society and AAD, he believes there is no definitive evidence linking skin cancer risk with indoor tanning.

But proponents of the bill say it is a key way to help parents protect their kids, who can sometimes give into pressure from teenagers who are desperate to look tan before a big event, like graduation or prom. Indeed, approximately 35 percent of respondents in the ADA survey indicated they felt peer pressure to be tan, and a quarter of those who identified as indoor tanners said they went before a special occasion.

"When you're younger, you're immortal and how you relate to your peers and the people around you is more important than just about anything," Sciandra said. "It'd be a lot easier for parents to stop this kind of behavior if they could just say, 'No, it's against the law.'"

But legality aside, parents -- and particularly mothers -- can play a key role in teens' behavior. Notably, teenagers who tanned indoors were four times more likely to have a mother who shared the same behavior, with 42 percent indicating their moms tanned. (Only 5 percent of all respondents said they had a father who tanned indoors.) Overall, 94 percent of the young indoor tanners surveyed indicated that their parents knew they used tanning beds.

"This survey really shows the role that mothers have in enabling their daughters to use tanning beds," said Marmur. "I'm even hearing stories of mothers who bring their daughters to the tanning salon themselves. Women often dictate how their entire family will behave."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

Though most teenage tanners believe that tanning beds can cause cancer, many of them go anyway, new research shows. A survey conducted on behalf of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) found that...
Though most teenage tanners believe that tanning beds can cause cancer, many of them go anyway, new research shows. A survey conducted on behalf of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) found that...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:08 PM on 05/11/2011
Love those sexy white spots,,
10:05 PM on 05/11/2011
isnt it their own dam business, I'd rather that than a tattoo or piercing,
And by the way , It clears up acne without turning to dangerous pharmicuticals
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Kim0330
Purr, and the world purrs with you...
03:45 PM on 05/13/2011
Please get you facts straight. Tanning only seems to clear up acne, key word is "seems".

Tanning does cover up the redness and dries up the surface of your skin, making some blemishes fade away temporarily. But, you’re actually trading in one problem for a bunch of others. Tanning causes skin irritation, especially if you burn yourself. Tanning also breaks down collagen. Collagen is one of your prime defenses against wrinkles because it keeps your skin elastic. When skin loses collagen, not only are you more likely to see wrinkles but your pores may appear larger as well.

So no, in reality, it does not clear up acne.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Kim0330
Purr, and the world purrs with you...
04:09 PM on 05/13/2011
I meant to say your facts, not you facts. I clicked on post comment too quick.
01:11 AM on 05/14/2011
Sorry , I beg to differ, as a teen who was known as pizza face , one summer at the shore for a mere two weeks in the sun worked miracles and stayed that way well after the tan faded ,
No I see commercials on TV touting pills to do the same thing, but followed by a fast talking voice over of dangerous side effects of depression and thoughts of suicide,
I can tell you in high school you don't need any help to think of offing yourself.
and I can also tell you that you don't need to take a pill to kill sub dermal bacterial infections.
Sure you can scrub till you're raw in the face, but it wont clear up anything without dousing yourself with chemicals,
no thank you ,
02:47 PM on 05/14/2011
My acne cleared up in a tanning bed. And now, at 22, instead of acne anywhere on my body I have a back and legs covered in scars from cutting out sun-damaged skin and pre-cancerous moles. I'd rather have to use extra concealer than have people ask about my scars whenever I'm in a bathing suit.
05:29 PM on 05/11/2011
People like to pick on people in their teens and early 20s for having an inflated sense of immortality and making irrational choices. There's a lot of evidence in cognitive literature that adults aren't actually much better on either of these fronts. The difference may come primarily when doing "hot" reasoning (emotionally aroused) vs "cold" (calm state). In a cold state, adults and adolescents have more or less comparable abilities in these situations. Adolescents are a bit worse at regulating their emotions, but adults' performance also drops in hot situations.

Basically, everyone is fairly bad at reasoning in real-life situations. In formal operational tasks (I'm not endorsing hard Piagetian stage theory, so don't argue about that, just using it as shorthand to represent a constellation of cognitive abilities) adults and adolescents are about the same in a controlled environment (like if I asked you to perform a standard formal task overtly), but in real life, day-to-day reasoning, we tend not to use it and fall back on more basic decision making and reasoning. Maybe we don't tan, and maybe even if we do we know the risks, but we do other things constantly that defy logic and any good reasoning.

All I'm saying is don't pick on the kids, we're all stupid ;)
05:18 PM on 05/11/2011
From what I've read, the UV from a tanning bed isn't really any more harmful than the UV from the sun, so it's not really the bed that's causing the problem per se, it's how people use them. People who are wont to use tanning beds are probably going to spend more time absorbing UV radiation than people who just won't and would probably just lay out in the sun if the beds weren't available. It's not like tanning beds produce some kind of super-special UV, but people who use tanning beds aren't going to wear sunscreen (duh) or much in the way of clothing.

There are also a lot of other risk factors... I've had 3 grandparents and a parent with some skin cancer (it was all caught early and treated!)... I'm going to steer clear, TYVM.
10:07 PM on 05/11/2011
Sorry kids , No Florida this winter,,
We're heading to the land of the Midnight Sun , hope you like the herring
04:49 PM on 05/11/2011
(Irrelevant: I enjoy reading comments in the Health section. Readers here appear more levelheaded than those found elsewhere on the site.) I digress. More states need to pass bills restricting tanning for those underage. Bills are intent; laws are change. Meanwhile, parents need to maintain some degree of responsibility. Unfortunately, it may be like preaching to the choir; an orange child is usually accessorized by an equally orange parent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sunshine saguaro
for you, a thousand times over
02:23 PM on 05/11/2011
Parents who let their children use tanning beds send a message that appearance & vanity are more important than safety & health-and that's just plain irresponsible. As far as adults, if they're hellbent on giving themselves cancer, I'd rather they tan than smoke because their tanning doesn't affect me, expect when they're so orange it hurts my eyes to look at them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelley Smith
Mother, Veteran, IT Geek
04:47 PM on 05/10/2011
Why is tanning important? Who would risk cancer to be darker? This is crazy.
05:20 PM on 05/11/2011
I'm Swedish, Welsh, Dutch, German, and some other white mixed together... I do like getting a little bit of a tan from being outside-- it keeps people from trying to write on me with dry-erase markers!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelley Smith
Mother, Veteran, IT Geek
06:24 PM on 05/11/2011
LOL-- Fanned and Faved
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
No brag, just fact.
04:29 PM on 05/10/2011
Teenagers have always had a false sense of invincibility, which is why, when left up to them, wrong choices will be made.
photo
cable1977
Against logic there is no armor like ignorance
04:21 PM on 05/10/2011
Newsflash - Teens do not accurately assess risk. What a shocker!
02:19 PM on 05/10/2011
Isn't that the whole thing with the age in the first place? It's dangerous, it's bad for you and we're all doing it tomorrow. Might call for a round of early 20 something speakers with a "you CAN get cancer because it happened to me." message.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jake Thomas
elastic
01:02 PM on 05/10/2011
You would think that with teenagers obessions with Twilight and all things Vampiric pale skin would be the vogue, apparently not. I am surprised.
Taylor Momsen is famous, this should not be happening. I think dermatologists are cooking the books.
10:43 AM on 05/10/2011
There is little evidence that tanning causes melanoma that being said safe sun exposure is probably safer than a tanning bed which emits less of the rays that cause vitamin d . But is it time we take a close look at the dermatologist advice?. Do sunscreens cause skin caner.? "NIH panel links Vitamin A in sunscreen to skin tumors " http://www.ewg.org/release/nih-panel-links-vitamin-sunscreen-skin-tumors but for years that has been the advice.
04:17 PM on 05/10/2011
Nice non sequitur. This report is preposterously irrelevant to sunscreen use as pure concentrations of retinyl palmitate were used in long term animal testing. This should in no way be extrapolated to normal human use, and it ignores that vitamin A is a fundamental antioxidant found in skin, and it has been denounced by nearly every major medical and scientific body globally for it's outright manipulative bent.
10:54 AM on 05/11/2011
Not exactly . From the release ...."A key independent science advisory panel has voted to confirm federal researchers' conclusion that retinyl palmitate, a form of vitamin A found in two-fifths of U.S. sunscreens, speeds the development of skin tumors and lesions when applied to the skin in the presence of sunlight.

The panel, meeting at a National Institutes of Health research center in North Carolina, today concurred with a pivotal draft assessment published last month by the National Toxicology Program, an interagency federal body that uses toxicology and molecular biology to evaluate chemicals for possible human health risks. ......

What major medical group objected the only group I know of that objected to the findings had close ties to the sunscreen industry
photo
Iatros78
Science is the consensus of expert opinion
10:42 AM on 05/10/2011
The world's leading cancer research organization, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, has recognized tanning beds as a "Group 1" carcinogen (known to be carcinogenic to humans) since 2009 (http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/iarcnews/2009/sunbeds_uvradiation.php). Other Group 1 carcinogens include asbestos, benzene, cadmium and tobacco smoke. There are only 110 Group 1 agents, mixtures, and exposure circumstances recognized by the IARC. In other words, the scientfic evidence for the carcinogenicity of tanning beds is overwhelming, despite the assertions of the spokesman for the tanning association.

The IARC's findings, published in Lancet Oncology are as follows: "Combined analysis of over 20 epidemiological studies shows that the risk of cutaneous melanoma is increased by 75% when the use of tanning devices starts before age 30. There is also sufficient evidence of an increased risk of ocular melanoma associated with the use of tanning devices."

The IARC meta-analysis makes it clear that early exposure to tanning beds dramatically increases the risk of melanoma. It is, therefore, sensible to restrict minors' access to these cancer-causing machines (tanning beds). We do the same for minors' access to other Group 1 substances such as tobacco. Should businesses be able to expose minors to cadmium or benzene or asbestos?

Children should be protected from businesses that would kill them to make a profit.

Rational, science-respecting persons follow the advice of the American Cancer Society and the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LateBoomer2
To love beauty is to see light. -Victor Hugo
04:05 PM on 05/11/2011
Thanks for the info, and I totally agree. F&F.