More

New York Times 'Week In Review' Relaunch: Columnists Will Get More Space

New York Times

First Posted: 05/11/11 05:42 PM ET Updated: 07/11/11 06:12 AM ET

NEW YORK -- New York Times staffers in the editorial and news departments have been working for several months to reinvent the paper’s “Week in Review” section, a Sunday staple for more than 75 years. And so far, the Times has kept a tight lid on what readers should expect, including when the new section will launch and if its name will remain the same.

But The Huffington Post has now learned that the Times plans to launch its revamped weekly section next month and is even considering renaming it the “Sunday Review.”

Major weekly news magazines have increasingly tried to move away from the perception that they simply summarize the previous week’s news -- a model that looks out of step with today’s 24/7 news cycle. Similarly, the Times is striving to create a Sunday section that’s seen as looking forward, not backward.

Editorial page editor Andy Rosenthal declined to comment on upcoming changes but, in conversations with Times staffers, some details have emerged beyond the possible name change.

Star columnists like Nicholas Kristof and Maureen Dowd will soon have the opportunity to write long-form pieces jumping off the front page of the relaunched section. (Most weeks, the columnists will continue writing standard 800-word opinion pieces.)

That marks a significant departure from the long-running "Week in Review" model, whereby Times reporters and editors penned analytical, non-opinion pieces in the front of the section and Times columnists and outside op-ed writers filled up the back pages.

Presumably, columnist Tom Friedman and reporter John Burns could have pieces on the Middle East side-by-side on the front page of the redesigned section. While longtime Sunday subscribers may clearly know which is opinion and which is analysis, casual Times readers might not see the distinction.

The "Week in Review" has traditionally included work from both the news and editorial section of the paper. Such collaboration has continued over the past few months, with staffers from each side hashing out ideas at meetings. But with an uptick of opinion in the section, it's clear the editorial side will exert more control. Indeed, op-ed editor Trish Hall is heading up the project and reports to Rosenthal.

Times watchers see the new section as an opportunity for Rosenthal to assume a bigger role within the paper. Rosenthal, a favorite of Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr., is on the shortlist -- along with managing editor Jill Abramson and Washington bureau chief Dean Baquet -– to succeed executive editor Bill Keller when he hits mandatory retirement age in about three years.

(In related Times Kremlinology: Observers wonder how Rosenthal’s opinion section will stack up against Bloomberg View, the forthcoming Bloomberg News opinion page helmed by Rosenthal’s ex-deputy David Shipley and featuring two Times editorial alums.)

In a February memo to staff, Keller and Rosenthal noted that the revamped "Week in Review" project is being “done in parallel with, and in some sense as part of, a big expansion of online Opinion.”

Times staffers expect Virginia Heffernan and Mark Bittman -- two newish members of the opinion stable who primarily write online -- to contribute more to the Sunday section. Bringing in Heffernan and Bittman, who write about pop culture/Internet and food policy respectively, would shake up a section in which regular columnists focus more on politics, foreign affairs and economics.

But that’s not the only way opinion pages in the new Sunday section might look a bit different. In recent months, staffers have engaged in more philosophical discussions about opinion's role, pondering the idea of featuring point-of-view journalism from outside contributors. Should the redesign include New Republic-style pieces that often fuse traditional reporting with opinion?

That question, along with several others -- such whether or not to keep running syndicated cartoons in the section -- remain up in the air as editors continue tinkering before next month’s launch.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

NEW YORK -- New York Times staffers in the editorial and news departments have been working for several months to reinvent the paper’s “Week in Review” section, a Sunday staple for more than 75 ...
NEW YORK -- New York Times staffers in the editorial and news departments have been working for several months to reinvent the paper’s “Week in Review” section, a Sunday staple for more than 75 ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 49
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
yogajan
Well behaved women rarely make history
11:38 PM on 05/13/2011
I do hope they rework the Letters to the Editors . Way too many organizations defending themselves when called out by an article or editorial. I read each letter from the bottom up -- see who wrote it and what is their vested interest.

I really miss Frank Rich.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:35 PM on 05/13/2011
With Frank Rich gone it was already completely reworked. What? Again?
JohnnieBravo
MN Dem in Bachman district. Lives by "exact words"
09:58 AM on 05/12/2011
Frank Rich's shoes cannot be filled period. Not only was he a gufted wordsmith, but his analysis and historical accuracies he refernced were tops in his field.
He is one smart dude and probably one of the top 5 writers in teh country.

I bought subscription to The NYer because of his move.
09:17 AM on 05/12/2011
Little wonder Frank Rich quit the paper.
08:50 AM on 05/12/2011
Bring back Frank Rich and Bob Herbert!
08:34 AM on 05/12/2011
Nothing that's being proposed here would get me to start reading the Times with regularity again. It sounds as though they are moving still further away from objective news reporting and closer to the Fox News model -- a model which isn't serving the best interests of the public, I think.
08:20 AM on 05/12/2011
Hey, NYT, quit worrying about redesigning your paper -- it's not making it any easier or harder to read; these are wholly cosmetic and unnecessary changes. Get David Carr, Bob Herbert, and Clyde Haberman back on the payroll -- these columnists added far more value than your new fonts and layouts can ever will.
photo
Montcalms Revenge
Plaines d' Abraham
06:53 AM on 05/12/2011
The Times lost me a long time ago. I think it started with their pretentious, obnoxious commercials for the "Weekender" subscriptions.... As for the actual journalism: Yes, the Times was once the "gold standard". Now they always seem to be a step behind.... :-|
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
05:11 AM on 05/12/2011
Just keep these writer's pieces intact. Do what you will to entice new readers but keep the writer's work intact.
01:47 AM on 05/12/2011
Change is critical to paper oriented publications. Hopefully, the good ones will find a winning formula.
rdk70816
Yellowhammer
11:45 PM on 05/11/2011
Lost cause. It will fail.
11:31 PM on 05/11/2011
This is news? Who will do what with their could not care less propaganda?

Oh, they are officially moving opinion to the front instead of just slipping it into stories? Probably both now huh?

I am shocked they released the story before the elections.
11:29 PM on 05/11/2011
Desperation play from a dying dinosaur. How about a return to honest reporting? Perhaps that will help their bottom line.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tquin
10:57 PM on 05/11/2011
The Times is obviously started the long fall into history. Goodbye, goodbye, goodbye,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
middledge
go ask alice, i think she'll know
10:25 PM on 05/11/2011
Frank Rich was the soul of the NYT, his absence has had a profound effect on the paper....no one on staff is remotely capable of filling his space. Sadly, Maureen Dowd has tanked, she has run dry....Gail Collins is an honest fun to read voice, and I hope she finds more space, Freidman will never escape his disasterous push into Iraq and is now unimportant as well as disgraced.
I miss Frank.
photo
yogajan
Well behaved women rarely make history
11:42 PM on 05/11/2011
I agree. Reading Frank Rich's column on Sunday with a cup of coffee--now that is living.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:25 AM on 05/12/2011
After about three weeks of reading the Sunday Times with Frank Rich gone, I was flabbergasted with how ill-prepared the Times was to compensate for Rich's departure. I cancelled my subscription.